EnglishSuomeksi

The Laestadian Lutheran Church's own book against its practice

Christ Is the Same Yesterday, Today and Forever, a doctrinal anthology published in Finnish in 2018 by the SRK (Suomen Rauhanyhdistysten Keskusyhdistys, the Finnish central organization of Conservative Laestadianism and the LLC's sister body) and in English by the LLC in February 2022.
Cover of Christ Is the Same Yesterday, Today and Forever: Writings on the Basics of Faith and Doctrine

Five months after the LLC published the book in English, its annual meeting expelled the Minneapolis and Wolf Lake congregations from membership; in July 2026 it took up the membership of the Coastal California congregation. Each point below sets the book’s words beside what LLC ministers and leaders said and did, with the recording or document linked at each quotation.

The book is sold by the LLC: Christ Is the Same Yesterday, Today and Forever in the LLC store.

Questions this page asks

  1. Do the LLC’s board members, ministers and leaders believe what this book teaches?
  2. Were the Minneapolis and Wolf Lake congregations expelled from LLC membership, and their speakers removed, for professing the same faith this book professes?
  3. The SRK calls the LLC its sister organization in one faith. Can that be so, if the SRK believes as this book describes and LLC leaders are recorded teaching otherwise?

The points below set the book’s words beside the record, so readers can answer for themselves.

Terms used on this page
LLC, SRK
The Laestadian Lutheran Church (North America) and the Suomen Rauhanyhdistysten Keskusyhdistys (Finland), the two central organizations of Conservative Laestadianism; they call each other sister organizations.
Zion, God's kingdom, the congregation, the mother
The believers' names for their own fellowship.
The gospel, absolution, the keys
The forgiveness of sins proclaimed by one believer to another in the name and blood of Jesus; "the keys" is the authority to proclaim or withhold it (Matthew 16:19, John 20:23).
Church Law of Christ
Matthew 18:15-18, the steps for dealing with a brother who sins; its last step, "binding," is treating the person as outside the congregation.
Continual forgiveness; the robe of righteousness
The two phrases most often named in the dispute (points 3 and 12).
Greeting
The believers' greeting "God's peace," exchanged only between those recognized as believers.
The 1970s, the caretaking era
The period of "caretaking meetings" in Finland and North America that the SRK later acknowledged as error (point 2).
Pollari heresy
A division in North American Laestadianism in the 1930s and 1940s, named after its leader.
MLLC, WLLLC, CCLLC
The Minneapolis, Wolf Lake and Coastal California Laestadian Lutheran Churches. MBMAC is the Midwest-area boards meeting; Summer Services is the LLC's annual gathering, where the annual meeting is held.
Contents

The main contradictions

What the book teachesWhat the LLC did
1. The Bible over the church
“The church cannot rise above the Bible. The church must not be the master of the Bible, but rather as a hearer and believer of it” (p. 70). “The Bible is the highest authority of faith and life for an individual Christian and the congregation of God” (p. 55). “God's congregation itself is not the revelation but the servant of the revelation” (p. 55). “The Bible, the written Word of God, is the authority in the congregation” (p. 155). “All teachings and teachers are examined and evaluated on the basis of Scripture. The church cannot teach anything contrary to or beyond the Scriptures” (p. 177).

The LLC's own Constitution says the same. Adopted 1 July 2000:

“Said Corporation holds that the Holy Word of God is the highest authority and only measure according to which all doctrines and teachings in said Corporation are to be examined and judged.”
LLC Constitution, Section V
“The members of said Corporation believe that the Kingdom of God is one and indivisible. They also believe that there is only one saving faith, one baptism and one Holy Christian Church, or communion of saints, wherein God dwells through His Holy Spirit, and wherein He causes repentance and the forgiveness of sins to be preached for the salvation of souls.”
LLC Constitution, Section VI

The same principle is on the LLC's website: Position statements (“God's Word is Christian faith's highest authority”) and How we believe (“the Holy Bible is the highest authority in questions regarding faith and life”).

In 77 sermons by 38 ministers, and 37 statements at 18 recorded meetings (2018–2026), LLC ministers and leaders said the congregation is not below the Word, that the two are “one and inseparable,” that one must submit one’s understanding of Scripture to the congregation, or that reading or quoting the Bible marks the wrong spirit. All of them, with the recording at each →

At the 2022 annual meeting a Minneapolis delegate read the Constitution's own words to the delegates:

“And so the [LLC] Constitution says that member congregations confess [living] faith [which is founded on] the [Holy] Word of God, [in] which Jesus Christ is the chief cornerstone. And they also hold the Word of God as the highest authority, and all instructions and teachings of the said corporation … These are based upon the authority of the Holy Scriptures. So I would recommend here that we don't talk about dividing, because that's contrary to Scripture.”
Gary Lehtola, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ▶ 00:07:12 transcript
“All I want to do is get to heaven and believe with the [rest] of Zion. The document is there just as a guideline. If you don't have the Holy Spirit, you have to lean on these things.”
Andrew Skoog, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ▶ 01:47:31 transcript
“Even in the recent spiritual storms, there has been, there was even this kind of a question as to which is higher. ... That is, is God's word above the congregation or is God's congregation above God's word? ... And as the brothers have noted, that that is an absurd question. ... They are one and inseparable.”
Samuel Roiko, Elk River, sermon, 2024-08-19 ▶ 00:02:53
“As one older brother who has gone to his rest even pointed out, and he said that you can even take these Bibles that are written here. ... and burn every single one of them and destroy off of smartphones every single Bible app. ... I added that part.”
Samuel Roiko, Elk River, sermon, 2024-08-19 ▶ 00:03:23
“That is what happened in this last heresy. ... They placed the word of God above the congregation of God. ... The congregation of God ... and the undying word of our Heavenly Father are one, two in one.”
George Koivukangas, Cokato, sermon, 2024-07-29 ▶ 00:25:40

In private, the LLC's leaders conceded the rule they condemned in public. At the ministers' teleconference and the Midwest boards meeting in November 2021:

“It seems like one matter is the doctrine of the congregation. We will have a chance to hear the very good presentation that our brother Matti Taskila prepared. ... Of course, it is important. God's Word is our highest authority. God's Word is the light that shows the pathway to heaven. God's Word is our foundation.”
Jim Frantti, Ministers' teleconference, 2021-11-04 typed transcript (PDF)
“Then the doctrine of the congregation. The Holy Spirit is the third person in the Godhead. It governs the congregation. We have discussed it in recent years. Some feel like we are emphasizing the spirit without the word. There have been phrases like, spirit, spirit, spirit. It is like – that is all we speak about is the spirit. Of course, the spirit reveals what is in God's Word. It cannot be otherwise. We cannot separate and decide ourselves that this is the spirit, if it is not according to God's Word. God's Word is the highest authority.”
Keith Waaraniemi, Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 2021-11-20 ▶ 02:34:49 transcript

Keith Waaraniemi concedes the rule and reverses it in the same breath: the Spirit “governs the congregation” and “reveals what is in God's Word,” so that what the Word says is settled by the congregation's sense of the Spirit. The book has it the other way: the congregation is “the servant of the revelation” (p. 55). His was a long speech, about 26 minutes, gathered in advance: he said he had “tried to gather some thoughts together from things that have been said recently” (02:30:12), and he quoted the meeting synopsis point by point, Uljas, the Athanasian Creed and a 1937 article. In 2018 a speaker taking the LLC's side had held it against the Minneapolis brothers that they brought “research and prepared speeches” instead of hearts that said amen:

“Those brothers didn't bring their own wisdom there. They didn't bring their own research and prepared speeches and thorough Bible knowledge. They simply brought their hearts and they listened to that word and they confirmed with the spirit that was in them that it matched how they believed and how they had been raised and how they understood God's kingdom to work.”
Unidentified speaker (LLC side), meeting with the Minneapolis congregation, 31 May 2018 ▶ 02:25:13 transcript

An LLC board member to the Minneapolis congregation, November 2019:

“He speaks of those who claim they have departed from following men and have trusted in the word. And then he says, I say that if you correctly understand God's word, then the word binds you to the congregation. Neither is the pure word of God outside the congregation. … I have to say that I believe in that way as well. And it disturbs me or causes me concern when anyone seems to suggest or in some way want to separate God's Word from God's congregation.”
Jon Bloomquist (LLC), Minneapolis meeting with the LLC board, 24 Nov 2019 ▶ 03:12:21 transcript
More on this point
Bible as highest authority vs. charge of placing 'the word above the congregation' (2022 removal)
“The Church holds as its highest authority the principle that all doctrine in the Church shall be studied and evaluated according to the holy Word of God.”
Foreword (editorial committee), Foreword, front matter
“For this reason the Bible is the highest authority of faith and life for an individual Christian and the congregation of God.”
Mauno Soronen, Revelation: Source of Theology and Foundation of Doctrine, p. 55
“The church and the Bible belong together, but the church cannot rise above the Bible. The church must not be the master of the Bible, but rather as a hearer and believer of it.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 70

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02: “And we've heard speaking [their] speeches that seem to separate the word of God from the congregation and place the word above the congregation in some way. But our understanding is that the word and the congregation are inseparable.” ▶ 01:59:52 transcript
    Treats placing the Word above the congregation as an error; the book places the Bible above the church as its highest authority.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07: “It is disturbing to me that in this time, I hear voices that seem to want to separate them from each other -- the word from the congregation, for example.” ▶ 03:29:26 transcript
    Frames distinguishing Word from congregation as disturbing; the book says the congregation is the Word's servant and cannot rise above it.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Minneapolis – Jim Frantti, 2022-07-02: “There somehow seems to be a wrong understanding from some of these, of the doctrine of the congregation.” ▶ 01:59:22 transcript
    Book agrees: Bible is highest authority 'for ... the congregation of God'; 'the church cannot rise above the Bible' – the position Frantti called a wrong understanding.
“Word above the congregation” and “leaning on the written Word” charged as the heresy
“The congregation is a creation of the Word (creatio verbi).”
Mauno Soronen, Revelation: Source of Theology and Foundation of Doctrine, p. 56
“According to Luther, the Bible is the highest authority for faith and life.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 68
“Faith is attached to the Word, not to a person.”
Taskila, Christian Congregation and Kingdom of God, p. 155
“God's congregation is infallible in its doctrine of justification, because it adheres to the Word of God. In this way Gods living congregation will be preserved on earth until the end of time. The Bible, the written Word of God, is the authority in the congregation.”
Taskila, Christian Congregation and Kingdom of God, p. 155
“The laymen, meanwhile, considered it a serious error that confessional writings were placed above the Word of God.”
Palola, History of Conservative Laestadianism, p. 212
“the principle in the confessions of the Lutheran Church that the Bible is the highest authority of doctrine and faith”
Palola, History of Conservative Laestadianism, p. 213
“If you do not look for forgiveness through the Word, you will gape toward heaven in vain for grace, or (as they say), for a sense of inner forgiveness”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 139
“The keys are closely connected to God's Word, so they must be used only in accordance with God's Word.”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2024-08-19: “That is, is God's word above the congregation or is God's congregation above God's word? And as the brothers have noted, that that is an absurd question.” ▶ 00:02:53
    Calls the question absurd; the book answers it directly: the church cannot rise above the Bible.
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2024-08-19: “and burn every single one of them and destroy off of smartphones every single Bible app.” ▶ 00:03:32
    Illustrates God's word persisting in the congregation without the written Bible; book grounds the congregation in Scripture as norm.
  • Andrew Roiko, Elk River, 2024-07-15: “how those who were led astray by the enemy of souls tried to lean upon the written word of God as if that was all that was needed.” ▶ 00:15:36
    Leaning on the written Word is described as being led astray; book makes the written Word the highest authority.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford meeting, 2019-05-19: “Some people put the Word of God above the congregation of the Holy Spirit.” ▶ 01:54:09 transcript
    Treats Word-above-congregation as an error; contrary to book pp. 55, 70.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Minneapolis – George Koivukangas, 2024-07-29: “They placed the word of God above the congregation of God.” ▶ 00:25:49
    Book agrees: p.55/p.70: the Bible is the highest authority for the congregation; the church cannot rise above the Bible.
  • Against Wolf Lake – Andrew Roiko, 2024-07-15: “tried to lean upon the written word of God as if that was all that was needed.” ▶ 00:15:36
    Book agrees: p.68: Luther made the Bible the highest authority and rejected traditions against it; p.69: nothing contrary to the Word can be accepted.
What LLC speakers said or did
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2024-07-29: “That is what happened in this last heresy. … They placed the word of God above the congregation of God.” ▶ 00:25:40
    Names placing the Word above the congregation as what happened in the heresy; the book makes Scripture the measure of all teachers.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Minneapolis – Gary Lehtola (Minneapolis delegate), 2022-07-02: “And they also hold the Word of God as the highest authority, and all instructions and teachings of the said corporation” ▶ 00:07:12 transcript
    Book agrees: Palola p.213 records the 1960 decision that the Bible is the highest authority of doctrine and faith; Taskila p.155: the written Word is the authority in the congregation.
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Andrew Roiko, Elk River, 2024-07-15: “He as if is trying to distinguish the difference between what we even recently experienced, this heresy here in North America, how those who were led astray by the enemy of souls tried to lean upon the written word of God as if that was all that was needed.” ▶ 00:15:36
    Next segment [00:15:58]: 'the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.' The book ties faith and the keys to the Word.
  • Peter Lever, Spokane, 2024-08-11: “And we know that the Word is not above the Spirit. That's one point that seems to be spoken of with those who have left God's kingdom. [That] God's written word is above the Spirit.” ▶ 00:09:50
    Attributes to those who left the view that the written Word is above the Spirit, as an error.
2. “We believe exactly alike”: the claimed unity with the SRK, though Finland does not hold these lines
The book is the SRK’s own: the SRK wrote it, and the LLC published it in English in 2022. What it says about culture and doctrine is set out at point 14.

41 statements (2011–2026) on what the SRK and Finnish believers hold on these questions, and on the claimed unity of faith. All of them, with the recording at each →

The SRK board in 2020, the joint meeting of September 2022, and the SRK's delegate at the 2026 annual meeting:

“The SRK and its Board of Directors have full confidence in the operations of the LLC. We feel that we have mutual faith and the ensuing fellowship of the Holy Spirit.”
SRK Board of Directors, Finland (SRK), document, 2020-11-11 document (PDF)
“In various discussions with the LLC, a connection and common understanding that is created by the same faith and the Holy Spirit have been felt. There has been no doubt that we believe exactly the same way. In Finland and Sweden, the understanding has remained that the congregation of God is also present among believers in North America.”
Harri Vähäjylkkä, Oulu (SRK-LLC-SFC joint meeting), document, 2022-09-30 document (PDF)
“In the discussion it was brought out that the view of some is that in North America, in LLC congregations, the law is preached to the believers, while in Finland grace is preached. The meeting representatives did not agree with this observation.”
Harri Vähäjylkkä, Oulu (SRK-LLC-SFC joint meeting), document, 2022-09-30 document (PDF)
“Others explained unto us how they believed. and they asked do we understand in the same way? Do we believe in these basic questions in the same way? And always when we had a discussion, we noticed, yes, we believe the same way. … That between us there is the [love of the] children of God. And we believe in the same way.”
Tapani Kinnunen (SRK board; interpreted by Jouko Haapsaari), LLC Annual Meeting 2026, 2026-07-03 ▶ 01:46:30 transcript

The same LLC board member, in 2019, on the book itself:

“And I said, I've always thought we believed in the same way. And I don't expect anything new in this new doctrinal book. And he told me, he said, you know, you can rest assured, you believe the same way that we do. And he said, there is nothing new in this new book.”
Jon Bloomquist (LLC), Minneapolis meeting with the LLC board, 24 Nov 2019 ▶ 03:01:13 transcript

Yet Finland does not hold these lines: freedom there, rules here.

In 2011 the SRK board named “our attitude toward television and birth control” among the problems of the caretaking era and regretted “the diminishment of the conscience of the individual”:

“Problems arose which needed to be discussed together. Such problems were, for example, our attitude toward television and birth control. … In addition to these phenomena, the following began to appear: the diminishment of the conscience of the individual, injurious speech, and withholding forgiveness. Humiliation of another person is never right, neither is physical, mental, or spiritual violence. We regret the errors in doctrine and the abuses that occurred.”
SRK Board of Directors, Finland (SRK), document, 2011-10 document (PDF)

At Elk River in 2019 a speaker recalled the official ruling that believing teachers may not use television in the classroom, and said believers have called it an error:

“the decision that was made is that a believing teacher cannot and should not use television as a teaching tool in any form or fashion in the classroom. Hundreds of believing teachers were there and they left that meeting dumbfounded. … it said that we cannot make any fast and firm rule that the Holy Spirit will guide us. Case by case. So I have heard believers say that that decision, official decision that was made was an error.”
Unidentified speaker, Elk River, 2019-10-19 ▶ 00:31:45 transcript

LLC ministers themselves describe the difference, and Finnish members who moved here describe what it felt like:

“Here in this country, we're approaching the Super Bowl, and cultures being different. There in Finland, when I was there, there was the World Junior Championship hockey. I felt bad one night when they told me that there were only so few there because there's the hockey game on. We're not far from those temptations here either”
Richard Nevala, Rockford, sermon, 2016-01-24 ▶ 00:32:14
“years ago we had a congregation discussion meeting in Phoenix and our congregation was discussing celebrating Halloween. … And we were having this discussion, and there's some brothers that come from Finland, some speaker brothers, And we were describing to him what happens on this night in our country and how people celebrate it … They were shocked. And at that time we decided this is not the way we want to celebrate this evening.”
James Moll, Prescott Valley, sermon, 2023-11-01 ▶ 00:06:36
“So I moved here from Finland about eight years ago. And pretty soon after we moved here, I started noticing something around in sermons. … Speakers didn't quite say I was used to hear or how that game was supposed to go. And they were really humble and small changes, but often they were towards our own endeavor or our own words or … Or maybe sometimes law-minded or some kind of demand of our own that how we keep our faith.”
Tuula Mattila, LLC Annual Meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 ▶ 00:50:16 transcript
“I came here 13 years ago and I felt that I came to the jail. I live in Christian Freedom in Finland. It means that there was nobody watching … And for people, when they say here that, yeah, we live in freedom, maybe you don't know what the freedom is. And it's different. There's many things that have been different here.”
Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-31 ▶ 02:32:55 transcript

Both cannot be true. Either the LLC's rules on television, sports, Halloween, makeup and earrings are doctrine, in which case the two bodies do not believe alike, or they are culture, in which case the LLC has done what the book warns against on p. 180 and made them prerequisites for salvation. The SRK’s own statements and its book do not hold these lines. Every statement on this, with the recording at each →

When John Lehtola showed that he taught what the SRK teaches, he was rebuked for quoting the SRK.

Told that he was speaking a different doctrine, John Lehtola answered by showing that what he said was what the SRK itself says. If the two bodies believe “exactly the same way,” the SRK’s yearbooks, speakers’ meetings and Summer Services are the plainest evidence of what is believed. At Elk River in October 2019 he read from them: the 2017 SRK yearbook, O. H. Jussila (1942), and Hannu Kallunki at the 2018 speakers’ meeting.

“In the yearbook, SRK yearbook in 19, or 2017, it was about the Word of God and here it says, the Bible, the written Word of God is the only authority. The Bible is the only authority. It is above all and it is above everybody.”
John Lehtola (identified from context), Elk River, 2019-10-19 ▶ 00:44:40 transcript
“In the speaker's meeting back in 2018, so just over a year ago, … the presenter, Hannu Kallunki, several of you may know his name. He said, the teacher or a preacher is not an authority. Rather, the authority is the unchanging Word of God.”
John Lehtola (identified from context), Elk River, 2019-10-19 ▶ 00:46:05 transcript

The replies did not say any quotation was wrong, or that the SRK does not hold it. They faulted him for quoting:

“I think Brother John, when you're reading quotes from this mother [brother] or that brother, we want to be careful of that and not giving credit to them.”
Unidentified speaker, Elk River, 2019-10-19 ▶ 00:50:30 transcript
“We certainly can't take man's word and pass that on as understanding. Men, individual men, err. … These articles that are quoted, I don't know the full context, quoting such a small portion of an article, what is the full context?”
Unidentified speaker, Elk River, 2019-10-19 ▶ 01:07:02 transcript

Two years later a speaker from Dunblane answered him the same way. In 2018 he had already pointed out that what he read came from the SRK’s own Summer Services:

“What John Lehtola was saying, I guess I would call it cherry-picking a certain portion out of a sermon to find that which feeds what I would like to hear. … I don't think it's fair to take small and certain portions or even single sermons to justify one's actions or beliefs.”
Loren Ylioja, Dunblane, MBMAC, 2021-11-20 ▶ 03:54:03 transcript
“I read two statements on continual forgiveness. Well, the first one wasn't even, didn't even use the term continual forgiveness. It was continual grace. The second one was continual forgiveness from [SRK] Summer Services 20[17], and that's all I said.”
John Lehtola, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-09-30 ▶ 01:05:19 transcript

The unity is invoked when the SRK speaks for the LLC; when the SRK’s own words are read to show that a brother believes the same, they become “man’s word.” More on the charge against reading and quoting at point 15.

3. Continual forgiveness
“A child of God can every moment believe his or her sins forgiven. This does not pertain only to those situations in which one hears the proclamation of absolution” (p. 87). “Because the Christian owns Christ in faith, God sees in him or her only the righteousness of Christ and no sin” (pp. 98–99). “The Christian sins constantly in thought, word and deed, even though sin no longer governs him or her” (p. 104).

In 70 sermons by 35 ministers, and 43 statements at 16 recorded meetings (2017–2026), LLC ministers and leaders condemned the term “continual forgiveness,” called it confusing, or distanced themselves from it. In 51 of these statements the speaker did not quote the term at all, but attacked an “always forgiven” or “once forgiven, always forgiven” teaching, a freedom to sin that no Minneapolis or Wolf Lake statement in the record teaches. 32 of these speakers also preached daily or continual forgiveness themselves. All of them, with the recording at each →

Ministers preached against the term as a mark of the error, often while affirming what it means:

“This term and how it's being used and spoken of bothers me. And it is continual forgiveness that we live in continual forgiveness.”
Randall Haapala, Rockford, sermon, 2018-02-18 ▶ 00:18:23
Randall Haapala, Cokato, 17 Jan 2021 at [00:31:47]: “A God that will continually remind us, continually forgive us when the heart is penitent.” ▶ 00:31:47
Randall Haapala, Cokato, 23 Aug 2026 at [00:20:24]: “A God that wants to continually forgive us for our sins and our doubts.” ▶ 00:20:24
“I see this teaching of continual forgiveness fatal. Fatal. It’s killing the faith. It is not right.”
Jouko Haapsaari, LLC ministers camp, Stony Lake, document, 2018-04-14 typed transcript (PDF)
“The phrase of continual forgiveness has come up now and then. It seems to be a [burr under] some saddles. Maybe it would be good if we could just not think about that phrase.”
Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 ▶ 00:29:50 transcript
Jim Frantti, 7 Dec 2019 at [00:30:41]: “We need to be able to live everyday and every moment in forgiveness.” ▶ 00:30:41 transcript
“that we don't want to use words, that we as humans can so easily misunderstand, that we can so easily begin to become confused with this way that we believe,”
Loren Keplinger, Longview, sermon, 2022-07-24 ▶ 00:21:31
Loren Keplinger, Longview, 24 Jul 2022 at [00:23:09]: “if we remember this, that as believers, we are continually forgiven.” ▶ 00:23:09
“That once you're forgiven, you're always forgiven. That you have continual forgiveness. That's in the hidden heart of man where Satan dwells.”
George Koivukangas, Cokato, sermon, 2024-08-11 ▶ 00:27:32
George Koivukangas, Cokato, 6 Jan 2019 at [00:18:42]: “We are in continual need of the gospel of the forgiveness of sins every day.” ▶ 00:18:42
George Koivukangas, Cokato, 23 Aug 2020 at [00:32:22]: “And He has forgiven us our sins and continues to forgive us our sins daily, each day anew.” ▶ 00:32:22
“Some have tried to say that once you're in God's kingdom, you don't need forgiveness. We have a continual forgiveness. And I guess in some ways they're correct because we live of the grace of God.”
Richard Nevala, Menahga, sermon, 2026-01-13 ▶ 00:31:07
Richard Nevala, Menahga, 12 Jan 2025 at [00:18:26]: “When we believe, we live in forgiveness. We live of God's grace.” ▶ 00:18:26

The phrase “once forgiven, always forgiven” appears in the record only in the mouths of LLC ministers describing the error. No Minneapolis or Wolf Lake statement teaches it; the book itself says faith can be lost (p. 105), and so did the accused.

“But those heresies have been from years gone by, and sometimes when questions of forgiveness come up, we remember how it was that once forgiven, always forgiven.”
Howard Parks, Menahga, sermon, 2017-03-12 ▶ 00:18:48
Howard Parks, 12 Mar 2017 at [00:19:18]: “And we need that power of the gospel constantly in our endeavor of faith.” ▶ 00:19:18

The charge rested on how the term might be heard, not on what anyone taught. At the Minneapolis Congregation Meeting of 30 September 2018, a participant pressing the concern conceded as much:

“The question is the confusion around continual forgiveness. That has been discussed and when we try to drill down into what does this continual forgiveness mean, it comes to grace. But the message that people hear whether you believe it or not is freedom to sin.”
unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30 ▶ 01:02:06 transcript

Asked “Who's coming to that conclusion, freedom to sin?”, he answered that it was “the message that many people hear from your words.” The man he was questioning, apparently John Lehtola, replied: “I haven't heard one person who believes that way” (01:02:49).

More on this point
Continual forgiveness: 'every moment' and 'daily and richly' vs. 'once forgiven, always forgiven' attacks
“Grace is the grace earned by Christ and God's continuously present favor. A child of God can every moment believe his or her sins forgiven. This does not pertain only to those situations in which one hears the proclamation of absolution.”
Ari Pelkonen, God's Grace in Christ, p. 87
“in which Christian Church He daily and richly forgives me and all believers all our sins”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 109

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2024-08-11: “One of those terms that was often used was continual forgiveness.” ▶ 00:26:11
    Calls the term a 'covering for sin', then affirms 'God's grace is here every moment' – the book's own claim.
  • Eric Jurmu, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07: “To introduce subjects and topics such as continuous forgiveness, it brings to the weak ones and the tired ones worry and doubt.” ▶ 03:48:12 transcript
    Treats the topic itself as dangerous; the book teaches it for comfort.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against John Lehtola – (Lehtola's own words; charged later as 'continual forgiveness'), 2017-04-13: “And where Christ is and where he is present, there is continual forgiveness of sins.” ▶ 00:44:04
    Book agrees: p.87 'continuously present favor ... every moment'; p.99 'in faith itself Christ is present'. In context he directs troubled consciences to spoken absolution.
LLC leaders teaching continual grace in the book’s words

The book: as quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Jim Frantti, Ministers' camp, Stony Lake, 2018-04-14: “And quite honestly, I have to say I don't know what the term means. It's kind of a, for me anyway, it's a new term, and I'm not sure when it's mentioned exactly what it's meant by. Maybe it means what I think of as living under grace.” ▶ 00:16:20 transcript
    Concedes uncertainty about the term; his 'living under grace' matches the book.
  • Jim Frantti, Ministers' camp, Stony Lake, 2018-04-14: “We don't lose faith every time we fall into sin.” ▶ 00:17:13 transcript
    Consistent with book p.104 (sin no longer governs).
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2024-08-11: “We understand we live in continual grace of God. God's grace is here every moment of our life.” ▶ 00:26:23
    Same substance as book p.87, stated 12 seconds after condemning 'continual forgiveness'.
  • Richard Nevala, Menahga, 2026-01-13: “We have a continual forgiveness. And I guess in some ways they're correct because we live of the grace of God.” ▶ 00:31:11
    Concedes the attacked position is 'in some ways' correct.
“Once forgiven, always forgiven” charged as the heresy (no one had taught it)
“A believer knows that sin attaches. It takes the form of evil thoughts, words and deeds. Therefore the believer needs forgiveness.”
Osterberg, Repentance and Justification, p. 113
“A person’s faith is always weak and imperfect, but for the sake of Christ God counts it as perfect righteousness. A Christian is simultaneously righteous and sinful, holy and defiled, God’s enemy and a child of God.”
Osterberg, Repentance and Justification, p. 121
“in the “Christian Church He [the Holy Spirit] daily and richly forgives me and all believers all our sins”
Kopperoinen, Final Events, p. 167
“We are believers both before and after confession, but we wish to lay aside that which besets us so we would not tire on the journey (Heb. 12:1).”
Tervo, Life in Faith, p. 129
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2025-12-06: “There was controversy over this robe of righteousness in the most recent heresy. And it seemed that some of them did not understand that this robe of righteousness can be removed from us because of sin and disobedience.” ▶ 00:24:38–00:25:11
    Says sin removes the robe; book says the believer is simultaneously righteous and sinful (p.121) and a believer before confession (p.129).
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against the 2022 heresy (Minneapolis/Wolf Lake, unnamed) – Russell Roiko (Rockford), 2022-07-24: “Have you heard, dear brothers and sisters, something similar these past many years that we battled? Once a believer, always a believer. Once forgiven, always forgiven, so on. That kind of strange teaching that is so foreign, so contrary to the scriptures and to the teachings of the Spirit of God.” ▶ 00:16:44
    Book agrees: Book teaches the Holy Spirit 'daily and richly forgives' all believers (p.167) and that sin clinging does not end being a believer (pp.113, 121).
  • Against "this most recent heresy" (Minneapolis/Wolf Lake, unnamed) – Greg Jacobson (Flathead Valley), 2023-03-26: “we've heard things similar to that even in this most recent heresy that we've had How we don't need to care for our consciences on a daily basis. And how once our sins are forgiven, they're always forgiven. But this, dear brothers and sisters in faith, is an incorrect teaching.” ▶ 00:23:13–00:23:42
    Book agrees: Book's daily forgiveness (p.167) and 'believers both before and after confession' (p.129) are what the dissenters said; neither the book nor the dissenters taught 'once forgiven, always forgiven.'
LLC ministers preaching daily and continual forgiveness before 2022

The book: as quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Melvin Kallio, Outlook, 2019-03-17: “They would want to say, once forgiven, always forgiven. And it is true to a certain sense that God does daily forgive us all our sins. Those things that even we cannot see and acknowledge.” ▶ 00:19:05
    Matches book p.167 (daily forgiveness); he also stresses laying aside sins (Heb 12:1), as Tervo p.129 does.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2021-08-01: “Justification for me is simply this, that now, just as you are, you can continue to believe that all of your sins and doubts are forgiven in Jesus' name and precious blood.” ▶ 00:25:37
    Consistent with book; contrasts with the LLC's later heresy charge against similar substance.
4. Forgiveness to one who asks
“In discussing forgiveness, it was instructed that forgiveness be granted to one who asks. In connection with this it was stated, ‘In time it will become apparent what people have believed.’ It was reminded that the use of the key of binding belongs to the congregation in accordance with the Church Law of Christ” (pp. 208–209). “The effectiveness of the keys is not determined by the sinner's penitence. Human remorse is always imperfect. … ‘You should, indeed, repent. But to make repentance the basis of the forgiveness of your sins and of corroborating the work of the keys, is to abandon faith and deny Christ’” (p. 142, quoting Luther). The book describes restricting the gospel to the visibly penitent as the New Awakening error: it “emphasized that forgiveness is to be proclaimed only to ‘the awakened’ and those remorseful over their sins” (p. 206).

In 35 sermons by 25 ministers, and 66 statements at 14 recorded meetings (2017–2026), LLC ministers and leaders said the gospel can or must be withheld from one who asks, that asking is not repenting, or that something must come first. All of them, with the recording at each →

Jon Bloomquist of the LLC staff, explaining the LLC's position to the Wolf Lake board. The Wolf Lake side had cited the 1947 Finnish speakers' meeting, which is the same position the book gives on p. 208:

“There was a speaker's meeting in Finland in 1947. This was the question. Do we preach forgiveness to heretics or do they have to first clarify that they ask forgiveness for false doctrine and heresy? The matter was discussed. The conclusion was that "Forgiveness and repentance must be preached to the heretics as in general to those who are on the outside [of faith]".”
Esa Vilkama, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ▶ 00:49:56 transcript
“Most recently with regard to Esau, Keijo Nissila writes about that in his book [on Hebrews]. The understanding is that there are situations where we as believers cannot preach the gospel to somebody who asked. Some of the confusion is also from the fact some equate the word to 'ask' with 'repent'.”
Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ▶ 00:31:23 transcript
Jon Bloomquist, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 7 Dec 2019 at [04:45:36]: “this understanding that we are teaching the withholding of forgiveness. It is nowhere near the truth.” ▶ 04:45:36 transcript
“I think it is a mistake if you equate 'ask' with 'repent'. That seems to be, at least to me, the fundamental problem. [someone asks, what?] In your understanding, if you equate the word 'ask' with 'repent' -- they are not the same thing. I think, as Nick expressed, that ought to always be the case.”
Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ▶ 00:34:01 transcript
Jon Bloomquist, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 7 Dec 2019 at [04:45:36]: “this understanding that we are teaching the withholding of forgiveness. It is nowhere near the truth.” ▶ 04:45:36 transcript
“If you were walking down the road and you saw your neighbor's dog put its foot in a trap. You went over there and just petted and patted it. … That is in essence what we are doing, or something like that, if we preach the gospel to someone who has not recognized or acknowledged their sin. They remain in its grasp. That is how I understand it.”
Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ▶ 00:34:53 transcript

The dog in the trap is a member who has not “recognized or acknowledged their sin.” What the sin was, in Wolf Lake's case, he does not say; no one has (row 6).

“Esa, I do not agree with your understanding about Saul. God had rejected him as a king. That is not the same issue as not forgiving him, because he was not penitent. … Those are two different issues. I think about binding and withholding forgiveness. They are not even the same thing.”
Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ▶ 01:01:52 transcript

Two years earlier, to the Menahga and Wolf Lake boards:

“nothing would be easier and nothing would be more pleasing, the world would even applaud that, that we say always, whenever somebody asks, we preach the gospel. But unless we … remove from the scriptures these portions that show otherwise. And they're rare cases. Then I can't in good conscience accept that kind of a teaching.”
Jon Bloomquist (addressed as 'John'; attribution from context), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 ▶ 04:26:56 transcript

The same teaching from LLC pulpits:

“So God uses us as the mouthpiece. He opens our mouth to preach the gospel, and he closes our mouth when he knows the heart of that one is not seeking and searching in the correct way. And it's not a punishment, but it's for that reason that they would understand that they're still missing something.”
Rodney Nikula, Outlook, sermon, 2018-04-01 ▶ 00:30:17
“Are there times when God's Holy Spirit closes our mouth? This has happened when the person asking forgiveness is not sincere. We do not realize that, but God does. It is through their actions, through their conduct, you might say the way they bring things out, that it is very clear and God … does not give us the words to speak.”
Donald Lahti, LLC Summer Services, sermon, 2021-07-02 ▶ 00:33:16
“If somebody comes in asking for their sins forgiven, of course we want to preach the gospel to them. … But in this example that Jesus is giving us, it's too late. … They could not preach the gospel to them. It would give them false hope. We would never want to do that. We would not be helping such a one.”
Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, sermon, 2024-06-23 ▶ 00:25:43
Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 26 Mar 2017 at [00:34:07]: “the repercussions of withholding forgiveness to someone, to a penitent one, are great.” ▶ 00:34:07
“when we hear of someone that comes from that heresy or any heresy that when they ask for forgiveness that we would ask them if they want to have the sin of heresy forgiven too. And of course that grace is always offered to the penitent.”
Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, sermon, 2025-08-17 ▶ 00:33:10

And in practice. At the Southwest Area Meeting in March 2026, Phil Siljander asked for the gospel; the answer was a condition:

“I will say, like I said at the beginning, my faith hasn't changed. My strength comes through the gospel, and I do want to hear that gospel if I can believe. I promise to believe.”
Phil Siljander, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 01:56:13 transcript
“Again, I remind you, the humility that's required is to actually repent from unbelief. If you don't feel that you're in that state, then we can't. There's nothing that we can do to help you at this point. Only God himself can help you.”
Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 02:00:39 transcript
“And then it's a simple thing to ask for the gospel, but it's not so simple a thing to ask for the sin of unbelief to be forgiven, to accept that sort of humility. So those are the direct questions that have not been answered.”
Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 02:03:04 transcript

Earlier that afternoon the LLC board chairman had said that “God can close the mouths of his children.” Closing the same meeting, Jim Frantti gave the book's own position:

“God's kingdom is a place of forgiveness. It's not a place where the one who asks forgiveness is measured or judged or or put down, but it's a place where the gospel is freely preached. Whenever one wants to hear it.”
Jim Frantti, closing devotion, Minneapolis meeting with the LLC board, 24 Nov 2019 ▶ 03:50:54 transcript
More on this point
"Ask" is not "repent": withholding the gospel from one who asks
“For those who have fallen after Baptism, there is remission of sins whenever they are converted and...the Church ought to impart absolution to those thus returning to repentance”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 136

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26: “he wanted to preach the gospel one to another, that we can just preach the gospel to each other. The Spirit didn't answer. It wasn't in, we weren't able to preach the gospel.” ▶ 01:15:45 transcript
    Defends not preaching the gospel to one who asked; book says forgiveness be granted to one who asks (p.208).
  • Jon Bloomquist (LLC), 2021-03-26: “there are situations where as believers, we can't preach the gospel to somebody who asks. But I think that some of the confusion results from the fact that Some equate the word ask with repent. They're not the same thing.” ▶ 00:31:22–00:31:51 transcript
  • Jon Bloomquist (LLC), 2021-03-26: “That's in essence what we're doing or something like that. If we preach the gospel to somebody who has not recognized and acknowledged their sin but they remain in its grasp.” ▶ 00:35:15 transcript
  • Joe Wuollet (Wolf Lake) – the position being contested, not an attack, 2021-03-26: “when the forgiveness was discussed at the speaker's meeting, took a stand that when one asks for forgiveness, he or she has to be forgiven” ▶ 00:40:05 transcript
5. Repentance with no sin named
“The prerequisite for binding is that actual sins, sins contrary to God's Word, have been committed” (pp. 141–142). Binding must deal with “certain public sins, committed by persons who are known … such sins are supposed to have been punished first in a brotherly manner, and finally established as such by the whole congregation” (p. 141, quoting Luther). “A demand for confession cannot be made a condition for salvation” (p. 208). “True repentance occurs when God strips a person of his or her own possibilities and affects such that the person consents to accept the gospel that is offered to him or her” (p. 112).

In 13 sermons by 12 ministers, 54 statements at 8 recorded meetings, and 5 written statements (2018–2026), LLC ministers and leaders called for repentance without naming a sin or a doctrinal error, or declined to give the particulars. All of them, with the recording at each →

No sin was ever named. Seven weeks before the 2022 vote, the LLC chairman called both congregations to repent while saying a congregation has nothing to repent of:

“Sometimes, we have been asked this question, what must the Wolf Lake congregation repent of? And my answer has been nothing. A congregation doesn't repent. Faith is personal. … It feels like without repentance and caring for matters, this current division will become some kind of a formal separation.”
Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with Wolf Lake, 13 May 2022 (typed transcript) document (PDF)

At the annual meeting, delegates were told that those called to repent need not know what for:

“Those individuals may not understand, they might not feel or know exactly what the differences are, but know that there is a difference and all that's required is a humble heart and forgiveness of those sins. And if we have to, through what's been [referenced as the Church Law of] Christ [and] that final [step, take] action. Know that all it takes is simple repentance to be restored.”
Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022 ▶ 01:39:01 transcript
“believing is seeing. No amount of debate, no amount of writings or Discussions will reveal it if you don't want to. Ask for gospel, repent of your condition, and God will give the understanding or you won't even have the questions. … If your family, your spouse, your friend, your son, your daughter, your parent is confused, God will clarify matters for you if you humble yourself to repent, not requiring understanding, no conditions, just take care of your matter and belief.”
Paul Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022 ▶ 02:21:01 transcript
“I came here with a prayer in my prayer in remembrance of those in Minneapolis and Wolf Lake and those who are battling, is that you would repent, repent whatever your repentance needs to be, and God will show you. And if you don't need to understand, if you don't understand, the Bible says we see so dimly.”
Jared Juusola, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022 ▶ 02:50:35 transcript

In 2026 the demand was put to Phil Siljander with no sin named except unbelief itself, and the particulars were refused:

“Thank you, Phil. Phil, this is Keith [Kesti]. I think that the discussion we should have right now would center around how does each of us believe and not all the details. … And I don't know that these procedural matters are so important at this point. But rather, do we see, each of us, do we see ourselves in alignment with those who have left in heresy?”
Keith Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 00:42:19 transcript
“none of us want to go back and try to, rehash out the matters of the heresy uh the heresy happened unfortunately uh there was a wrong understanding and a wrong spirit and that was revealed in god's time and in god's time he cleansed his kingdom of that wrong understanding and so to go back and try to revisit about those matters it just it brings so much sorrow to us … that it's not something that we want to try to even discuss.”
Dave Edwards, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 01:12:56 transcript
“You Phil, I don't think I've ever had a conversation with you over the heresy and needing to know the nitty gritty details and you not being able to accept the heresy until you have those details is a concern of mine. And we see in the presentation when Jesus showed the wounds in his hands and wounds in his side to Thomas, and blessed are those who believe. … if we've been pretty removed from the heresy and we don't know the details and someone we trust and a brother that says, yes, this heresy happened and those individuals are no longer believing. All we can do is... If that's the case, then we can just say, amen, I believe you, brother, that you are believing. And if this is what you say is true, and so be it.”
Wyatt Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 01:25:33 transcript
“Those of us that are here are telling you that your faith has changed. It's no longer the faith that you shared with us from years ago as brothers have related. Your faith has changed. And the humility that's required is to repent from unbelief itself. If you don't believe that you're in unbelief and God doesn't choose to open your eyes, then there's No amount of discussion that's going to change anything.”
Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 01:59:09 transcript
Jared Huhta, 14 Mar 2026 at [02:03:04]: “it's a simple thing to ask for the gospel, but it's not so simple a thing to ask for the sin of unbelief to be forgiven, to accept that sort of humility.” ▶ 02:03:04 transcript

At the 2026 annual meeting, before the vote on Coastal California:

“please hear what's being said today you don't need to understand it just desire to hear what the kingdom of god is saying … With love for those in coastal California that they would see that the delegates who have been asked to come here with their own lack of understanding today, that we hear what the Southwest Area has said and we understand that they've been in these discussions for some time. We trust that God has led those discussions, and that the outcome that's been brought to us today is one that we support and trust is the right direction to take.”
Tyler Hendrickson (Longview), LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026 ▶ 02:04:09 transcript

In writing. The LLC's letters give no passage of Scripture and no named error. The 2022 ground was “a different spirit”; the 2026 ground was “the doctrine of the congregation,” a phrase the LLC has never defined in writing. The only content ever given for it is Jim Frantti's statement before the 2022 vote that the critics' speeches “place the word above the congregation” (row 1, “More on this point”), which is what the book and the Constitution teach.

“Many speeches by delegates expressed a loving call to repentance to restore unity. A different spirit was plainly evident in the speeches from Minneapolis and Wolf Lake delegates and guests. … After the long discussion period, where the loving call to repentance went unheeded, delegates overwhelmingly approved the motion to formally remove Wolf Lake and Minneapolis as member congregations in the Laestadian Lutheran Church.”
Jim Jurmu, Sam Roiko, Arvin Pirness (for the LLC Board), LLC letter to member congregations, 7 Jul 2022 ('AM Communication from LLC'), document document (PDF)
Jim Jurmu, Sam Roiko, Arvin Pirness (for the LLC Board), elsewhere: “we live in hope and prayer that they would yet find a place of repentance.”
“The LLC Constitution teaches that the Kingdom of God is one and indivisible and that there is one saving faith, one baptism, and one Holy Christian Church. The understanding of the doctrine of the congregation was not acceptable to those who were deceived in the 2022 schism. … the delegates affirmed that the Minneapolis Laestadian Lutheran Church and the Wolf Lake Laestadian Lutheran Church did not travel together in unity of spirit with the other LLC Member Congregations and approved a motion removing them as member congregations. … Return to mutual faith and fellowship is through individual repentance.”
Arvin Pirness (on behalf of the LLC Board of Directors), LLC Board response to the CCLLC delegate and chair, 26 Jun 2026, document document (PDF)
Arvin Pirness (on behalf of the LLC Board of Directors), elsewhere: “As a result, the decisions of the LLC regarding those matters are final and we will not be adding your proposed items to the agenda.”
“It is stated that the congregation no longer shares the unity of faith and spirit described in Section VI of the Constitution and has not complied with decisions made by the LLC as contemplated by Article II, Section 9 of the Bylaws, including, but not limited to the following: … has publicly rejected the decisions of the LLC Annual Meetings; … has sought to overturn prior decisions of the delegates regarding membership matters; … continues to conduct itself in a manner that the delegates believe is inconsistent with the unity of faith and spirit described in Section VI of the Constitution and Article II, Section 1 of the Bylaws”
Arvin Pirness (on behalf of the LLC Board of Directors and 2026 delegates), Letter of Notice to the CCLLC chairman, 22 Jul 2026, document document (PDF)
Arvin Pirness (on behalf of the LLC Board of Directors and 2026 delegates), elsewhere: “Above all, we continue to pray that God could awaken the lost and straying to a place of individual repentance.”

Removed as congregations, readmitted one at a time. The LLC removed Minneapolis and Wolf Lake by a vote on the congregations as bodies, yet says the way back is “individual repentance.” If repentance is individual, as the LLC's own chairman said in May 2022, the removal of whole congregations had no individual sin behind it, and no person has ever been told what to repent of.

More on this point
Repentance demanded without a named sin / as condition of fellowship
“No individual can bind a Christian who is in the fellowship of the congregation, because said individual may err. Use of the key of binding must proceed according to the Church Law of Christ.”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • LLC Board of Directors, The Voice of Zion / llchurch.org, 2023-01: “During a free and open discussion, meeting delegates and attendees shared a loving call to repentance to restore unity of faith. This call was neither recognized nor accepted as the call of the Holy Spirit.” ▶ source
    Removal followed refusal of a repentance call; the article names no specific sin. Book: binding requires actual sins (p.141).
  • Paul Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02: “God will clarify matters for you if you humble yourself to repent, not requiring understanding, no conditions, just take care of your matter and belief.” ▶ 02:23:26 transcript
    Repentance without understanding the sin; book: conscience requires confession, and a demand cannot be a condition (p.208).
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Wolf Lake – Nick Ylitalo (LLC), 2021-03-26: “I can say from my heart that you're in a dangerous place. God's kingdom is the same yesterday and today and forever ... So I think it is that, that it requires humbleness and repentance and to simply be in unity with God's kingdom.” ▶ 02:23:13–02:23:43 transcript
    Book agrees: Book: binding requires 'actual sins, sins contrary to Gods Word' (p.141); Wolf Lake replied 'repent, repent, repent. Of what?' (Bruce Johnson [02:39:47]).
  • Against Minneapolis – Jim Frantti (introduced by the moderator at [00:01:43]), 2022-05-14: “we bring a message to repent and turn again to travel with the Good Shepherd and his flock. Sometimes this question has been asked of us, what must the Minneapolis congregation repent of? And when it's been asked of me, I have said nothing.” ▶ 00:15:04–00:15:30 transcript
    Book agrees: 'A demand for confession cannot be made a condition for salvation' (p.208); binding presupposes actual sins (p.141).
  • Against Minneapolis and Wolf Lake – Bryce Ojalehto (Alaska), 2022-07-02: “But when God's children tell any of us that we need to repent, we know that even if we don't understand, it would be good that we be obedient to that.” ▶ 02:43:32 transcript
    Book agrees: 'the conscience requires confession of sins' (p.208), not obedience without understanding.
Southwest Area Meeting, March 2026: the particulars declined
“In dealing with one of its members who is under the ban it should be sure of the reason it thinks him to be deserving of excommunication as the words of Christ in our text direct. Otherwise the congregation might be deceived in imposing a ban which is false, thereby dealing with a neighbor unjustly”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141
“The duty of the child of God is to rebuke for sin, but it is to be done in the spirit of the gospel and love.”
Palola, History of Conservative Laestadianism, p. 208

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Keith Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14: “we should have right now would center around how does each of us believe and not all the details.” ▶ 00:42:49 transcript
    Declines the particulars Phil had just requested.
  • Keith Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14: “do not get wrapped up in all these little details, but rather ask yourself, am I in alignment with those congregations who have left?” ▶ 00:44:17 transcript
    Test offered is alignment with those who left, not a specified sin.
  • Wyatt Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14: “and you not being able to accept the heresy until you have those details is a concern of mine. And we see in the presentation when Jesus showed the wounds in his hands and wounds in his side to Thomas, and blessed are those who believe.” ▶ 01:26:03 transcript
    John 20:29 applied against asking for the details of the heresy.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Phil Siljander (Coastal California chair) – Phil Siljander, 2026-03-14: “Yeah, so I'm looking at the minutes from the 2025 meeting in Section 7, and I guess I would be curious to know who reached out and when and what the conversation would be, because I don't recall very many reach-outs” ▶ 00:40:56 transcript
    Book agrees: Kivioja p.141: the congregation must 'be sure of the reason'; otherwise it may impose 'a ban which is false, thereby dealing with a neighbor unjustly.'
The 2026 LLC Board letter: “doctrine of the congregation” as the only written ground
“God’s congregation itself is not the revelation but the servant of the revelation.”
Mauno Soronen, Revelation: Source of Theology and Foundation of Doctrine, p. 55
“The church and the Bible belong together, but the church cannot rise above the Bible.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 70
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Arvin Pirness for the LLC Board, Letter to CCLLC Board and delegate, 2026-06-26: “The understanding of the doctrine of the congregation was not acceptable to those who were deceived in the 2022 schism.” document (PDF)
    Names the congregation doctrine but not what MLLC/WLLLC held contrary to the Word.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Coastal California – Arvin Pirness for the LLC Board, 2026-06-26: “Return to mutual faith and fellowship is through individual repentance.” document (PDF)
    Book agrees: If the 'congregation doctrine' at issue is the Word above the church, the book (pp.55, 70) states that position.
The 2026 letters: “unity of spirit” as the stated ground

The book: as quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Arvin Pirness, on behalf of the LLC Board of Directors, Letter to the CCLLC Board and Delegate, 2026-06-26: “the delegates affirmed that the Minneapolis Laestadian Lutheran Church and the Wolf Lake Laestadian Lutheran Church did not travel together in unity of spirit with the other LLC Member Congregations and approved a motion removing them as member congregations.” document (PDF)
    Ground stated as unity of spirit, not sins contrary to God's Word.
  • Arvin Pirness, LLC Executive Director, Letter of Notice to the CCLLC Chair, 2026-07-22: “continues to conduct itself in a manner that the delegates believe is inconsistent with the unity of faith and spirit described in Section VI of the Constitution and Article II, Section 1 of the Bylaws” document (PDF)
    Other listed reasons: rejecting Annual Meeting decisions, seeking to overturn membership decisions; no Scripture or doctrine cited.
6. Quoting the Bible
Scripture is the test of teachers: “All teachings and teachers are examined and evaluated on the basis of Scripture” (p. 177). “First, this means that anything that is contrary to the Word of God cannot be accepted. Secondly, this means that faith and doctrine must not be based on something of which there is no revelation in God's Word” (p. 69). The 1950s dispute in Finland was decided on “Conservative Laestadians' traditional understanding that all belief and doctrine was to be examined in the light of Scripture” (p. 212).

In 27 sermons by 18 ministers, and 13 statements at 7 recorded meetings (2018–2026), LLC ministers and leaders treated reading, quoting or asking to be shown Scripture as a mark of the wrong spirit. All of them, with the recording at each →

At the 2022 annual meeting, a delegate explained how he decided between the two sides:

“I've heard the two sides here now. My spirit can tell a difference. One side is [hopeful. It] is begging for grace. The other side is quoting the Bible and wanting to be a part of a group.”
Timo Hotari (Toronto delegate), LLC annual meeting, 2 Jul 2022 ▶ 01:18:22 transcript
“The words that are spoken we cannot disagree with. They have quoted scripture, but so did the devil quote scripture.”
Don Lahti, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 ▶ 01:47:33 transcript
“That they would place the highest authority on the written word. But how can man even understand the written word if he doesn't have the keys of the kingdom of heaven? To open that word. And reference to demands of some in our time who say, show me in the Bible where I am wrong. That's not a heart of faith.”
Steven Kallinen, Monticello, sermon, 2020-11-23 ▶ 00:23:43
“I also had a coworker who could quote scriptures from any place in the Bible you asked him to. … But he's not believing, either. Quoting the scriptures – he quoted much of it to me, when we spoke of the Bible. But knowing scriptures and quoting scriptures didn't bring him to God's Kingdom. He hadn't been able to humble his heart.”
Lauri Nevala, Phoenix congregational meeting about minister Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 ▶ 03:46:00 transcript

In 2026, after conceding nothing was wrong with Phil Siljander's answers:

“I think many here have found that the responses that you've given are, there's nothing, we could say there's nothing wrong with your responses. … I think it was even in the presentation that even the devil quoted scriptures to Jesus to try to get him to do things that were contrary to God's will. And I think that's where we are left here at this point, where we wonder that … to the good words that you speak, where do they come from?”
Lauri Nevala (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, 14 Mar 2026 ▶ 01:42:09 transcript (he introduces himself at 1:40:05; the machine transcript hears the name as “Logan Neville”)
“we start to elevate ourselves, we start to latch onto and trust our own understanding above that of the congregation. ... So begins the fall away from grace and the dependence upon knowledge of scripture, carnal wisdom.”
Arvin Pirness, Menahga, sermon, 2025-05-04 ▶ 00:17:45
“And I've thought even recently it seems that some of those who have departed in this last heresy have been even like these Pharisees and have demanded to see, to show me ... Show me in Scripture. ... Give me evidence. ... And such is the heart of a Pharisee.”
Kevin Ruonavaara, Longview, sermon, 2026-06-07 ▶ 00:27:24

The argument runs backwards. The LLC says a member who states what the Bible says is relying on “his own understanding” as if he stood outside the congregation, while the congregation may say what it likes without referring to the Bible at all. The book puts it the other way: the congregation is “the servant of the revelation” (p. 55), and whoever asks to be shown an error from Scripture is asking for exactly the test the book requires.

Point 15 follows the same charge into the meetings of 2018–2022, where prepared statements, quotations and Scripture readings were faulted. Point 15 →

More on this point
John Lehtola’s Scripture quotations answered without any textual rebuttal
“This is not, however, a question of a new revelation, but rather of the Holy Spirit assisting one in possessing the revelation.”
Mauno Soronen, Revelation: Source of Theology and Foundation of Doctrine, p. 58–59
“In order to be able to interpret Bible texts responsibly and correctly, we must first attempt to determine what a given writer was originally trying to express.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 71
“When the Holy Spirit guides God's congregation, its understanding and teaching are preserved on the solid rock foundation of God’s Word.”
Mauno Soronen, Revelation: Source of Theology and Foundation of Doctrine, p. 59

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Unidentified member, Elk River congregation meeting, 2019-10-19: “It would be a constant quest to split [hairs] and a constant quest to looking at the original languages and the original intent and understanding the cultures behind God's Word.” ▶ 01:05:09 transcript
    Dismisses attention to original languages/intent; the book (p.71) makes determining the writer's original meaning the first step.
  • Unidentified member, Elk River congregation meeting, 2019-10-19: “But that Spirit can't teach differently than it teaches in God's congregation because it's the same Spirit.” ▶ 01:15:54 transcript
    Answers Lehtola's 'Word is the touchstone' quotes by appeal to the congregation's Spirit, not to Scripture.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30: “That the word is separated from the congregation to give permission to understand matters differently than the congregation of God.” ▶ 02:10:26 transcript
    Treats Lehtola's 'Word above the congregation' emphasis as a concern; book says the same.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against John Lehtola – Unidentified speaker, 2018-09-30: “Another thing that pertains to the doctrine of the congregation is the emphasis that John has put on the Word being above the congregation.” ▶ 02:09:54 transcript
    Book agrees: p.70: 'the church cannot rise above the Bible'; p.55: congregation is 'the servant of the revelation'.
  • Against John Lehtola – Lehtola quoting SRK sources (the position answered), 2019-10-19: “all understandings of faith and our stand of things within Christianity are subject to the written word of God, by which they are examined,” ▶ 00:45:36 transcript
    Book agrees: p.69 and Foreword: all doctrine is to be examined and evaluated by the Word of God – the same principle.
Asking to be shown one’s error from Scripture, treated as wrong
“The Church holds as its highest authority the principle that all doctrine in the Church shall be studied and evaluated according to the holy Word of God.”
Foreword (editorial committee), Foreword, front matter
“No doctrine or order which was not found in the Bible could not, according to Luther, bind the Christian conscience.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 68
“So, doctrine describes the contents of faith and meanwhile draws a boundary with wrong teachings.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 107
“The revelation no longer continues.”
Mauno Soronen, Revelation: Source of Theology and Foundation of Doctrine, p. 58
“In dealing with one of its members who is under the ban it should be sure of the reason it thinks him to be deserving of excommunication as the words of Christ in our text direct. Otherwise the congregation might be deceived in imposing a ban which is false, thereby dealing with a neighbor unjustly”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141
“Furthermore such sins are supposed to have been punished first in a brotherly manner, and finally established as such by the whole congregation”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141
“In proclamation and teaching, the Bible remains the highest authority.”
Sarkiniemi, Fundamentalism, p. 180
“The Bible is the only guide from which we can learn to know God's will. It is necessary for us to learn His will in the hearing of the Word in God's congregation.”
Helén, Ethics and Morals, p. 185–186

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Eric Mattila, Rockford, 2019-08-11: “don't have this sort of thought that prove to me first, show me my error and then I will repent. That is backwards in God's kingdom.” ▶ 00:56:15
    Calls asking to be shown one's error backwards; the book has doctrine evaluated by the Word.
  • Kevin Moll, Elk River, 2023-12-10: “Those who have gone away in this past heresy, how perhaps they have even this same thought that God would show, that God would open to them where they are wrong.” ▶ 00:32:33
    Wanting one's error shown is presented as a fault of the departed.
  • Ray Waaraniemi (meeting chairman), LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03: “Many scripture portions, many portions of Luther's writings, these were not the reason why” ▶ 02:10:53 transcript
    Scripture and Luther cited by the CCLLC delegate were set aside as not the reason; ground given is Spirit's revelation.
  • Ray Waaraniemi (meeting chairman), LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03: “have resulted in heresy. We believe that the Holy Spirit has revealed this to the living congregation of God.” ▶ 02:11:52 transcript
    Heresy finding rests on Spirit revelation to the congregation; book: no new revelation, Spirit bound to the Word (pp.58–59).
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03: “And when I sit here, I have to think to myself that this is not, the Holy Spirit is not a spirit of proof.” ▶ 01:37:43 transcript
    Rejects proof from Scripture as the Spirit's way; the book's norm is examination by the Word.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Coastal California – Ray Waaraniemi (meeting chairman), 2026-07-03: “We believe that the Holy Spirit has revealed this to the living congregation of God.” ▶ 02:11:52 transcript
    Book agrees: Doctrine is studied and evaluated by the Word (Foreword); nothing outside the Bible binds conscience (p.68).
  • Against Minneapolis – Kevin Moll, 2023-12-10: “Begin to demand of God that God would open to them.” ▶ 00:32:50
    Book agrees: p.107: doctrine 'draws a boundary with wrong teachings' – a boundary that can be stated.
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Eric Mattila, Rockford, 2019-08-11: “Even if you don't understand, even if you can't understand why so many people are talking to you, don't have this sort of thought that prove to me first, show me my error and then I will repent. That is backwards in God's kingdom.” ▶ 00:56:15
    Rejects asking to be shown the error before repenting; the book requires the congregation to be sure of the reason.
  • Bryce Ojalehto (Alaska; name from the human transcript only), LLC Annual Meeting, 2022-07-02: “But when God's children tell any of us that we need to repent, we know that even if we don't understand, it would be good that we be obedient to that.” ▶ 02:43:32 transcript
    Repentance asked without understanding the error.
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2024-08-11: “There was also this understanding that if it's not recorded in God's word, if it's not in this book that we call the Holy Bible, then it's man's word. This is a misunderstanding or a wrong understanding because we know that of course this is God's word.” ▶ 00:24:13
    Raised in a passage on fundamentalism; book's sola scriptura (p.177) says the church cannot teach beyond Scripture.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Wolf Lake – Nick Ylitalo (LLC), 2021-03-26: “He was defensive and he wanted to know, well, show me in black and white in the Bible, where am I wrong? But then he said, when the Holy Spirit pointed the finger at me and I was able to humble myself and simply repent ... So all my questions went away. These doctrinal questions, these things, they didn't matter anymore.” ▶ 02:22:43–02:23:13 transcript
    Book agrees: 'All teachings and teachers are examined and evaluated on the basis of Scripture' (p.177); asking for Scripture is the book's own method.
Quoting Scripture treated as a mark of the other spirit
“Faith is attached to the Word, not to a person.”
Taskila, Christian Congregation and Kingdom of God, p. 155

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Jim Moll (Prescott Valley), LLC Annual Meeting, 2022-07-02: “For example, you accurately quote God's word, but so does the enemy of souls. And the quotation of God's words, which are accurate, the understanding has been lost.” ▶ 00:40:45 transcript
    Accurate quotation discounted; no misreading identified.
  • Lauri Nevala (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14: “we could say there's nothing wrong with your responses. ... … I think it was even in the presentation that even the devil quoted scriptures to Jesus to try to get him to do things that were contrary to God's will.” ▶ 01:42:09 transcript
    Concedes nothing wrong in the answers, then discounts them by Matt 4:6.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Minneapolis – Ann Parks (Minneapolis), 2022-07-02: “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. We are commanded to test the spirits to see whether they are from God.” ▶ 03:05:28 transcript
    Book agrees: Sarkiniemi p.177: all teachings and teachers are examined 'on the basis of Scripture.'
Reading Scripture must agree with the congregation's understanding
“The Bible, the written Word of God, is the authority in the congregation.”
Taskila, Christian Congregation and Kingdom of God, p. 155

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Eric Mattila, Spokane, 2022-02-20: “But yet it is so that our understanding when we read God's word must agree with the understanding of the congregation. For not one of us has all gifts. Not one of us has a perfect understanding.” ▶ 00:28:27
    Makes the congregation's understanding the test of one's reading; Sarkiniemi makes Scripture the test of all teachers.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2023-03-05: “With sorrow we witnessed how many found their own knowledge, their own … studying of the Bible to be greater than the voice that speaks in God's congregation.” ▶ 00:27:38
    Faults Bible study held greater than 'the voice that speaks in God's congregation.'
Reading and studying the Bible

The LLC claim runs backwards: a member who states what the Bible says is treated as standing outside the congregation, while the congregation may say what it likes without referring to the Bible.

“He greatly valued the daily reading of God’s Word.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 72
“A Christian of today as well is strengthened in faith by reading the Word of God.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 72
“Luther recommended spending time with the Bible, to ruminate and ponder on it and even to repeat words and phrases out loud.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 69
“Faith, however, causes a desire to study the Word of God and learn more about it.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 95
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2023-03-05: “if we consider those discussions where it almost seemed like the reading of the Bible was a demand” ▶ 00:29:33
    Attributes a Bible-reading 'demand' to the departed.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix congregational meeting, 2022-01-08: “I asked him about the fact that there are members in Arizona who are holding their own Bible study at [a member's] house separate from the congregation here.” ▶ 00:48:50 transcript
    A Bible study is offered as a ground of concern about the minister.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Minneapolis – Neil Waaraniemi, 2023-03-05: “their own studying of the Bible to be greater than the voice that speaks in God's congregation.” ▶ 00:28:08
    Book agrees: p.72/p.95: reading the Word strengthens faith; faith causes a desire to study it.
  • Against Brett Rintamaki – Eric Mattila, 2022-01-08: “Also, they did not see anything wrong with that.” ▶ 00:49:14 transcript
    Book agrees: Book commends daily reading and pondering of Scripture (pp.69, 72).
7. “We couldn’t put a finger on it”: a different spirit, and new revelation, in place of a named error
“The revelation no longer continues. The New Testament congregation lives by the given revelation. No new revelation will be given” (p. 58). “God's congregation itself is not the revelation but the servant of the revelation” (p. 55). The Holy Spirit's work in the congregation “is not, however, a question of a new revelation, but rather of the Holy Spirit assisting one in possessing the revelation” (pp. 58–59). “The idea of a continuing revelation leads to relativism” (p. 59). The other way: the history chapter records that in 1932 the Finnish speakers' meeting held “a person who teaches correctly can be a heretic if he ‘belongs to the other group that opposes us’” (p. 210), and that in 1960 “a wrong spirit” was held to underlie differing doctrines (p. 213); in 1960 the doctrines were named (pp. 212–213).

In 34 sermons by 21 ministers, and 53 statements at 20 recorded meetings (2018–2026), LLC ministers and leaders gave “a different spirit,” something they could not put a finger on, or what “the Spirit revealed” as the ground, with no doctrinal error named. All of them, with the recording at each →

Closing the debate over the motion to expel Coastal California, after three motions to follow Scripture, the Constitution and the law received no second:

“We have wanted to allow you to speak your concerns, make your motions. I want to say this, that when your motions didn't receive a second, [it doesn't] mean that everything you said and quoted was not believed and understood. Many scripture portions, many portions of Luther's writings, these were not the reason why [there] weren't seconds to those motions but I think as has been alluded to here there's a long history of these discussions and differences and we feel that these things have resulted in heresy. We believe that the Holy Spirit has revealed this to the living congregation of God. When there's differences of spirit, and different interpretations as we've heard even of God's word and of where the Holy Spirit dwells. When those divide congregations, then what else can we do but have majorities delegates make these difficult decisions.”
Ray Waaraniemi, meeting chairman, LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026 ▶ 02:10:21 transcript

“We couldn't put a finger on it.” The admission that no doctrinal error could be named runs from the LLC board workshop of April 2019 through sermons preached after the removals:

“And God reveals through his children. Sometimes it's been said that, have you spoken individually with this minister? How do you know that something's wrong? The Spirit reveals. … And even sometimes when you can't put a finger on it, this is not unusual amongst God's children. You can't put a finger on it, but something doesn't feel right. … We couldn't explain from Scripture why, but it doesn't answer the Spirit. And later, sometimes God reveals it more clearly.”
Keith Waaraniemi, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (evening), 2019-04-13 ▶ 02:36:48 transcript
Keith Waaraniemi, 13 Apr 2019 at [02:37:53]: “there has been discussion that there's been no reasons given, for example, for why” ▶ 02:37:53 transcript
“We all agree that two spirits have been present in the recent discussions we have had. Through the hours of discussion, we haven't been able to pinpoint the specific issue or issues, so we're asking the congregation for help and guidance.”
Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 ▶ 00:23:39 transcript
“And dear friends there in Minneapolis, that I know how much we would wish to bless you, for you to repent, put that battle away, and put those sins away. We don't know what those sins are, … But one thing we can say is that it is unbelief when you have not believed what the Spirit has spoken in the congregation. If you have not believed that message, you need to put that unbelief away.”
Unidentified speaker, LLC board member workshop (part 2), 2022-04-30 ▶ 01:52:31 transcript
“The same Gospels preach there, my other parents' faith. The same Word of God is spoken from, from the pulpit. … Many things are the same, the same doctrine in many ways. But there's a different spirit. There's only one holy spirit. … God's spirit doesn't divide. But neither does it coexist with a spirit that's not of itself.”
Marvin Wittenberg, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 ▶ 02:16:18 transcript
Marvin Wittenberg, 14 May 2022 at [02:17:13]: “"Because we don't feel the same exact spirit, dear brothers and sisters, brothers and sisters, it's a sin if we don't go and serve." (the last clause is unclear in the recording)” ▶ 02:17:13 transcript
“You know, and oftentimes, we couldn't put a finger on what was different. … But it was the Spirit that was different. … Maybe it wasn't something that was so black and white. … Maybe it wasn't a point of doctrine that we could understand or put a finger on. … But it was a different spirit.”
David Anderson, Cokato (Spring Services), sermon, 2023-05-07 ▶ 00:28:23
“We're not able to even always discern what it was that made it difficult to hear. … We have even marveled over the last few years leading up to this time of the separation that there, when someone would speak with a different spirit, that sometimes the words could be correct … but they were coming from a different place.”
Allen Pirness, Rockford, sermon, 2023-08-08 ▶ 00:21:23
“And we hear about how when there's a foreign voice, our spirit's so quick to identify that. … We don't necessarily, we can't put our finger on it, we can't explain. There's no sort of ability, yeah, to explain what's different or that sort of thing, but the Spirit knows. And it's because the voice is different.”
Keith Kariniemi, Rockford, sermon, 2025-06-22 ▶ 00:11:36
“that they didn't feel that there was the same spirit, the same understanding, … the heresy happened unfortunately uh there was a wrong understanding and a wrong spirit and that was revealed in god's time and in god's time he cleansed his kingdom of that wrong understanding and so to go back and try to revisit about those matters it just it brings so much sorrow to us … do you feel that there was a heresy? And if not, um, why, uh, that's, that's what God's spirit has revealed.”
Dave Edwards, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 01:12:27 transcript
Dave Edwards, 14 Mar 2026 at [01:12:56]: “We're not looking for any long explanations” ▶ 01:12:56 transcript

Across every LLC meeting statement in the record, one speaker named a doctrinal item for the removed side: Jim Frantti's “place the word above the congregation” (row 1, “More on this point”). Every other ground given is a spirit, a feeling, or a revelation.

At the Minneapolis annual meeting of March 2020, the board's report gave the “different voice” without saying what it said:

“Sadly, we also heard a different voice, a dividing voice. Our congregation is clearly divided.”
MLLC board report, Minneapolis annual meeting, 8 Mar 2020 ▶ 01:06:06 transcript

Members asked what it was:

“But I think that when you say there's a different voice, it would be edifying to say what the voice is, what the doctrinal, what the wrong teaching is.”
A member, Minneapolis annual meeting, 8 Mar 2020 ▶ 01:13:16 transcript
“Not people, but what is the idea? What is the incorrect voice? We need to name that. We won't get beyond this if we cannot name it.”
A member, Minneapolis annual meeting, 8 Mar 2020 ▶ 04:23:34 transcript
More on this point
“A different spirit” given as the ground, with no doctrinal error named
“The prerequisite for binding is that actual sins, sins contrary to Gods Word, have been committed”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141-142
“The keys are closely connected to God's Word, so they must be used only in accordance with God's Word.”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141
“If you do not look for forgiveness through the Word, you will gape toward heaven in vain for grace, or (as they say), for a sense of inner forgiveness”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 139
“Secondly, this means that faith and doctrine must not be based on something of which there is no revelation in God's Word.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 69
“Therefore, it is important to preach according to the gospel and to attempt to describe the contents of faith correctly.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 106
“Meanwhile, it is nonetheless true that correct faith inevitably owns correct doctrine.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 107
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Dave Edwards, Glendale, 2019-03-17: “And even if we can't sit and pick out perhaps one doctrinal issue, or there's a wrong in this specific way, the Holy Spirit is able to … determine the thoughts of the heart and the intents of the heart. And the Holy Spirit recognizes that voice of one that is not of the same spirit.” ▶ 00:27:29
    Spirit recognition stands in for an identified doctrinal wrong.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14: “Many things are the same, the same doctrine in many ways. But there's a different spirit. There's only one holy spirit.” ▶ 02:16:46 transcript
    Said of another faith group (a parent's church): same doctrine, different spirit; offered at the Minneapolis meeting.
  • David Anderson, Cokato, 2023-05-07: “Maybe it wasn't a point of doctrine that we could understand or put a finger on. … But it was a different spirit.” ▶ 00:28:41
    Concedes no identifiable doctrinal point; ground is a different spirit.
  • Tapani Kinnunen (SRK board; interpreted by Jouko Haapsaari), LLC Annual Meeting 2026, 2026-07-03: “And always when we had a discussion, we noticed, yes, we believe the same way. And we left one another in God's peace. … Nevertheless, the matters went that way, as we have learned, and these two congregations separated themselves from this mutual congregation. And we understood in Finland that the question was not of legalities or laws, but the Spirit of God [separated].” ▶ 01:47:22 transcript
    Reports believing 'the same way' in discussions, yet separation on a spirit ground.
What LLC speakers said or did
  • LLC Board of Directors, The Voice of Zion / llchurch.org, 2023-01: “Delegates recognized a different voice and spirit in the speeches of delegates and guests from Minneapolis and Wolf Lake and that those congregations did not travel in unity of spirit with other LLC member congregations.” ▶ source
    Official ground is 'voice and spirit', not a stated doctrine shown contrary to Scripture.
  • Sheryl Simonson, Phoenix congregational meeting, 2022-01-08: “There was nothing wrong with what was spoken, but there just was no revelation and life. Most of it is just the reading of scripture.” ▶ 02:51:35 transcript
    Concedes no error in content; faults Scripture reading. Book p.55: the Word itself creates faith.
  • Lauri Nevala, Phoenix congregational meeting, 2022-01-08: “Perhaps even doctrinally, the words which are spoken are the same.” ▶ 02:14:30 transcript
    Analogy to unbelievers' sermons used against a minister whose doctrine is conceded.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Brett Rintamaki – Sheryl Simonson, 2022-01-08: “You cannot say that it is wrong, because every word in the Bible is true.” ▶ 02:51:35 transcript
    Book agrees: p.55: 'The Word not only tells of faith but creates faith by the power of the Holy Spirit.'
8. The Matthew 18 order: individuals, not congregations
“Instructions for the correct use of the keys is given in a Bible portion called the Church Law of Christ (Matt. 18:15–18). This Christ-given order must be followed” (p. 140). Luther on the ban: “I call it a devil's and not God's ban, contrary to Christ's command, when people are cursed with the ban sacrilegiously, before they have been convicted in the presence of the assembled congregation … In dealing with one of its members who is under the ban it should be sure of the reason it thinks him to be deserving of excommunication … Otherwise the congregation might be deceived in imposing a ban which is false, thereby dealing with a neighbor unjustly” (p. 141). “No individual can bind a Christian who is in the fellowship of the congregation, because said individual may err” (p. 141). The keys bind “a sinner” (p. 140); the book gives no procedure for binding a congregation.

In 6 sermons by 5 ministers, 30 statements at 6 recorded meetings, and 2 documents (2019–2026), LLC ministers and leaders described binding as personal and individual, or removed ministers and congregations without naming an error. All of them, with the recording at each →

The LLC's own ministers teach that binding is the congregation's act toward an individual, after the steps of Matthew 18:

“this individual claims to be a child of God, but yet lives otherwise, that we can't continue to hold such a one as a child of God. … we can easily, in our own impatience, in our own understanding, begin to take matters into our own hands and begin to, as if, bind as an individual. … It is the church that binds. It is the congregation. It is not any one of us as an individual. It's a very serious and sobering step that God's children would take in the light of the Holy Spirit. And we want to be very careful.”
Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford LLC, sermon on Matt. 18:15-18, 2021-08-31 ▶ 00:35:17
Keith Waaraniemi, 31 Aug 2021 at [00:37:15]: “to be quick to forgive but slow to bind” ▶ 00:37:15

What was done in 2022 was a vote on two congregations as bodies, on a motion that was not on the agenda, with no individual named and no charge in writing:

“We didn't, of course, on the annual meeting agenda put this topic or any kind of action item, but it's a meeting of the delegates, and the bylaws authorize the delegates to take whatever actions … And of course they have the freedom to make motions and vote on motions and could freely make a decision today even regarding these matters under discussion. I'm not encouraging or discouraging that, but simply saying that there is freedom for the delegates to address these matters.”
Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, new business, 2022-07-02 ▶ 02:03:57 transcript
“I guess I would at this time make the motion that we formally recognize … Wolf Lake and Minneapolis do not travel together with North American Zion. I'm not super familiar with the bylaws and what exactly that process would be, but that we formally remove the Wolf Lake and Minneapolis congregations. So that concludes my motion.”
Mitch Loukusa, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ▶ 02:28:25 transcript

A Wolf Lake delegate asked, just before the vote, that the congregations first be judged by Scripture:

“So to actually go through and do this all and approve it is seriously going to tear people apart, tear believers apart, and families. … Seriously, consider the effects of voting that through with really no reason. So I make a motion before excommunicating Wolf Lake and Minneapolis that they be judged with the Holy Word of God before committing that action.”
Mitchell Johnson (Wolf Lake), LLC annual meeting, 2 Jul 2022 ▶ 02:39:44 transcript

The chair answered, “I believe we can only have one motion on the floor at a time” [02:40:12]. The motion was never put, and the removal vote went ahead. The LLC's letter to the congregations five days later gave the ground:

“Many speeches by delegates expressed a loving call to repentance to restore unity. A different spirit was plainly evident in the speeches from Minneapolis and Wolf Lake delegates and guests. … After the long discussion period, where the loving call to repentance went unheeded, delegates overwhelmingly approved the motion to formally remove Wolf Lake and Minneapolis as member congregations in the Laestadian Lutheran Church.”
Jim Jurmu, Sam Roiko, Arvin Pirness (for the LLC Board), LLC letter to member congregations, 7 Jul 2022 ('AM Communication from LLC'), document document (PDF)
Jim Jurmu, Sam Roiko, Arvin Pirness (for the LLC Board), elsewhere: “we live in hope and prayer that they would yet find a place of repentance.”

Three years later a sermon applied the third step of the Church Law to the vote itself:

“It is just like when God's kingdom decided to officially remove … the Minneapolis and the Wolf Lake congregations from the association. … It did not remove anyone's faith. … The faith was gone already. … The spirit of God had left. … and a different spirit had entered in. … We cannot take away the faith of anyone, but we can acknowledge, for instance, after the third … step of the church law that that one is no longer believing”
Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga LLC, sermon on Matt. 18:15-22, 2025-08-10 ▶ 00:44:36
Neil Waaraniemi, 10 Aug 2025 at [00:51:10]: “The congregation binds, but one can be loosed when they hear the gospel from a brother or sister in faith.” ▶ 00:51:10

The litmus test. Binding in the book rests on “actual sins, sins contrary to God's Word.” In the record, the test applied to individuals was whether they agreed with the decision, or whether their hearts “said amen” to it:

“In these battles the congregation here in Phoenix has taken some action in regards to some of these events in Minneapolis and Wolf Lake. … We have sent a letter. We have decided that we will not send speakers [there]. Here is a question: are you in unity with the congregation on these matters? Or do you feel differently?”
Keith Hillukka, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 ▶ 02:19:57 transcript
“I asked him if he is with us or with those [people] in Minneapolis. He asked, what is going on up in Minneapolis? I didn't know what to say. I think that everyone here knows what is going on in Minneapolis. I was offended by him not being open about these matters.”
Mark Young, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 ▶ 01:37:10 transcript
“if we've been pretty removed from the heresy and we don't know the details and someone we trust and a brother that says, yes, this heresy happened and those individuals are no longer believing. All we can do is... If that's the case, then we can just say, amen, I believe you, brother, that you are believing.”
Wyatt Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 01:26:32 transcript
Wyatt Kesti, 14 Mar 2026 at [01:25:33]: “you not being able to accept the heresy until you have those details is a concern of mine” ▶ 01:25:33 transcript
“You heard them and you failed to second the motions that were brought forward because they didn't answer. … It's a really interesting thing how those who have found a different way are so offended by such a statement that it doesn't answer. They want to yet see a proof that isn't there.”
Arvin Pirness, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California) ▶ 00:40:18 transcript
Arvin Pirness, 3 Jul 2026 at [00:41:16]: “the way to God's kingdom and the return to prodigal ones is through individual repentance” ▶ 00:41:16 transcript
More on this point
2022 removal of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake: process vs. the Matt 18 order
“Furthermore such sins are supposed to have been punished first in a brotherly manner, and finally established as such by the whole congregation”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141
“The prerequisite for binding is that actual sins, sins contrary to Gods Word, have been committed”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141-142
“It was reminded that the use of the key of binding belongs to the congregation in accordance with the Church Law of Christ.”
Palola, History of Conservative Laestadianism, p. 208-209

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Mitch Loukusa (Rockford), mover, LLC Annual Meeting, 2022-07-02: “Wolf Lake and Minneapolis do not travel together with North American Zion. I'm not super familiar with the bylaws and what exactly that process would be, but that we formally remove the Wolf Lake and Minneapolis congregations.” ▶ 02:28:53 transcript
    Ground stated is not traveling together; no actual sin named in the motion.
  • Moderator (chair), LLC Annual Meeting, 2022-07-02: “Okay, let's show hands for those that are opposed. Okay, so the motion stands.” ▶ 03:23:12 transcript
    Decided by show of hands; no count spoken on the tape.
  • LLC Board of Directors, The Voice of Zion / llchurch.org, 'Spiritual Division in North American Zion Led to Heresy', 2023-01: “Delegates recognized a different voice and spirit in the speeches of delegates and guests from Minneapolis and Wolf Lake and that those congregations did not travel in unity of spirit with other LLC member congregations.” ▶ source
    States the ground as a recognized different voice and spirit, not specified sins.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Wolf Lake – Mitchell Johnson (Wolf Lake delegate), 2022-07-02: “So I make a motion before excommunicating Wolf Lake and Minneapolis that they be judged with the Holy Word of God before committing that action.” ▶ 02:40:12 transcript
    Book agrees: Kivioja p.141-142: binding presupposes 'actual sins, sins contrary to Gods Word'; keys used 'only in accordance with God's Word.' The motion was not put to a vote.
9. Removing ministers
Teachers are evaluated “on the basis of Scripture” (p. 177). “The preacher is chosen, called and sent by the congregation” (p. 143). “No individual can bind a Christian … because said individual may err” (p. 141). The book gives no ground for removing a preacher other than Scripture.

In 1 sermon by 1 minister, 31 statements at 8 recorded meetings, and 9 documents (2018–2022), LLC ministers and leaders described binding as personal and individual, or removed ministers and congregations without naming an error. All of them, with the recording at each →

At the 2018 Minnesota-wide meeting, a speaker urged congregation boards to act on ministers:

“I don't know either that the demand has been recently to talk about this, removing a servant and showing where there is care from the doctrine. I don't believe that there is evidence of clear wrong doctrine. For me it's enough to know that there is unrest around the service of one of the ministers.”
Minnesota-wide meeting, 14 Jun 2018, speaker not confirmed; “care from the doctrine” may be a mistranscription of “error from the doctrine” ▶ 02:25:27 transcript

The Rockford board chairman on Craig Kumpula, 2019:

“Last year it was concerned that Craig was serving at a confirmation camp. Parents were concerned. There was questions from sister congregations where he has been scheduled. … I can't sit here and say that it's only because we're discussing him. I would say that we're discussing him because of those concerns. I specifically, as I said, can't say that there is exact same … So this is maybe a long-winded way of saying that my concern with Craig, with [his wife], is, I can't specifically say it is doctrinal, but I can say that it troubles me how they will defend and join with those … That's my concern.”
Jeremy Glynn (Rockford LLC board chairman), Rockford congregation meeting on Craig Kumpula, 2019-05-19 ▶ 03:24:30 transcript
Jeremy Glynn (Rockford LLC board chairman), 19 May 2019 at [03:30:36]: “Brothers and sisters, this whole matter has weighed on me heavily. I feared being dried up in this matter. I feared being overly watchful.” ▶ 03:30:36 transcript

Darwin Lake. The LLC removed his July 2015 sermon from the archive within days. Its chairman later explained:

“I think what started a series of meetings was there was a sermon kept by our brother Darwin in Outlook. It raised some concern among believers. It seemed like it caused some divisions. Some spoke very favorably of it and some felt very troubled by it. … The LLC board and staff had discussed it and thought that if it is causing division, maybe it is best that we not keep it on the archives where it is aired for all of the public and the world to hear. … Not because we had any questions or doubts about how he believes or anything like that. Simply, we didn't feel that it was good for us to keep it there if it was causing concern.”
Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 ▶ 00:22:47 transcript

Phil Alajoki. In September 2018 the Detroit board moved to cancel his visit. Briar Siljander's letter to the congregation at the time, and the LLC chairman's denial four months later:

“No one on the board described any concern about how Phil believes or what he preaches. No one else on the board has called Phil. No one has spoken with him. No one knows the reasons that the Cokato board, through one of its members, told Phil he was not invited to speak there. Yet, now we are prepared to tell him that he is not welcome to come to Detroit to preach God's Word because we are told there is a "cloud" over him.”
Briar Siljander, Letter to the Detroit congregation, document, 2018-09-30 document (PDF)
Briar Siljander, elsewhere: “If it is a doctrinal difference between Phil and the Cokato board or certain members of that board, those doctrinal differences should be articulated and then discussed.”
“I received an email that had been sent not to me but to somebody else and then I received a copy of it that I had given advice to the Detroit congregation and board that they should not call our brother Phil Alajoki to serve there. I haven't met with the Detroit congregation or board in years and I've never given them that advice. … And I've never told any congregation board who to call or who not to call.”
Jim Frantti (self-introduced at [00:45:32]), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 ▶ 00:58:52 transcript
“I'll touch upon the question that came up about Brainerd not calling Darwin there. For many months, at least three or four months before he was scheduled to come, questions came up from the congregation … They have heard comments from other congregations where the spirit evidently did not answer. We struggled with it on the board. I'm not on the board, but I attend the board meetings. And each time, each meeting we said, we just don't have a good reason. … Not to call him.”
Don Lahti (Brainerd), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 ▶ 01:07:15 transcript

Brett Rintamaki. The Phoenix board took him off the schedule before any meeting. The stated issue was not his preaching but whether he agreed that there were “two spirits” and with the decision not to send speakers to Minneapolis and Wolf Lake:

“Over the past couple of years, congregation members have reached out to the board voicing concerns surrounding our preacher brother Brett. … The board has felt a change with Brett which is a lack of freedom with board members and [the lack of] attending board meetings. … At one of our board meetings in unity we decided that we would not schedule Brett to serve until we could meet as a congregation.”
Keith Hillukka, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 ▶ 00:21:30 transcript
“And our dear sister Cheryl [Simonson] and others who were not directly involved spoke. We said amen. I thought for sure that now Brett will see, he will step down and take care of his [matters], whatever they may be. But again, he resisted any attempts for help.”
Eric Mattila, Phoenix annual meeting (participant-prepared transcript; no audio), document, 2022-01 typed transcript (PDF)
“When Mark came to speak to me, he said he did not have concerns with my sermons. … He then asked if I was in the other group? And my answer was, I wasn't aware that there was a heresy. I'm aware that there are many misunderstandings going on right now. … I guess for me personally, there are two spirits, the Spirit of God and the Spirit of the devil. I think it is a serious matter. I'm not ignoring the fact that there are battles in God's kingdom. I have not been a part of the meetings or events that took place there in Minnesota. … I do not want to base my actions on secondhand information, hearsay and rumors.”
Brett Rintamaki, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 ▶ 04:31:04 transcript
Brett Rintamaki, 8 Jan 2022 at [04:35:13]: “My understanding was at the end of October, based off of this text message that there would be a congregational discussion on the Church Law of Christ. The message that I received in December that it was taken off the schedule came as a surprise to me.” ▶ 04:35:13 transcript
More on this point
Ministers disinvited/removed without a stated doctrinal error ('unrest', 'not in unity', 'two spirits')
“All teachings and teachers are examined and evaluated on the basis of Scripture. The church cannot teach anything contrary to or beyond the Scriptures.”
Seppo Sarkiniemi, Fundamentalism, p. 177
“Faith is attached to the Word, not to a person.”
Matti Taskila, The Christian Congregation and the Kingdom of God, p. 155

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide speakers' and boards' meeting, Monticello, 2018-06-14: “I don't believe that there is evidence of clear wrong doctrine. For me it's enough to know that there is unrest around the service of one of the ministers.” ▶ 02:25:58 transcript
    Removal ground stated as 'unrest', expressly without 'clear wrong doctrine'; the book says teachers are evaluated on the basis of Scripture.
  • unidentified board speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting on Craig Kumpula, 2019-05-19: “So this is maybe a long-winded way of saying that my concern with Craig, with [his wife], is, I can't specifically say it is doctrinal, but I can say that it troubles me how they will defend and join with those” ▶ 03:30:07 transcript
    Concern stated as association ('defend and join with those'), not a Scripture-based error.
  • unidentified speaker, Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27: “but if you say that unless you can identify something in somebody's sermon, that's not necessarily the case. Sometimes it may be evident and sometimes it may not.” ▶ 04:24:59 transcript
    Defends disinvitations without identifying anything in the minister's sermons.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Wolf Lake – Wolf Lake board, letter to the Cokato board (reporting the reasons Cokato gave), 2018-09-26: “In our first visit, you mentioned both the robe of righteousness and withholding of forgiveness as reasons, when I inquired why your decision was made. But no details as what, if any, differences that exist were given.” document (PDF)
    Book agrees: Wolf Lake asked to study the issues 'in the light of Scriptures' and to meet 'as the Church Law of Christ teaches (Matthew 18:15)'; the book makes Scripture the test of teachers (p.177) and requires Matthew 18 (p.140-141).
  • Against Brett Rintamaki – Eric Mattila (Phoenix annual meeting; participant-prepared transcript, no audio), 2022-01: “It was acknowledged that there were two spirits and two sides at that meeting. I don't believe that Brett [Rintamaki] was in agreement with it.” typed transcript (PDF)
    Book agrees: The book evaluates teachers by Scripture (p.177) and ties faith to the Word, not to a person (p.155); the stated grounds are disagreement and a 'two spirits' perception.
  • Against Brett Rintamaki – Mary Hillukka (Phoenix annual meeting; participant-prepared transcript, no audio), 2022-01: “Brett was not in unity with those decisions. So, that to me is very, very concerning that we have a speaker brother who is not in unity with the congregation on a very important matter like that.” typed transcript (PDF)
    Book agrees: The 'decisions' were about sending ministers to Minneapolis; the book's test for teachers is Scripture (p.177), not agreement with congregation decisions.
10. Judging hearts
“A human is unable to determine who truly is a member of the congregation, for only God can see into a person's heart. The borders of the congregation go ‘from faith to faith and from heart to heart.’ … For that reason the members of God's congregation can never be recorded in books or lists” (p. 156). “A minister does not always even know his listeners let alone see into their hearts” (p. 133). The congregation “will never become fully pure in this time” (p. 157).

In 10 sermons by 9 ministers, and 36 statements at 7 recorded meetings (2018–2026), LLC ministers and leaders declared a person or a congregation to be without faith, with no ground stated beyond their own sense of it. All of them, with the recording at each →

A sermon on Matthew 18, explaining the 2022 removals:

“Faith already left that heart before this action took place. It is just like when God's kingdom decided to officially remove the Minneapolis and the Wolf Lake congregations from the association. It did not remove anyone's faith. The faith was gone already. The spirit of God had left. and a different spirit had entered in.”
Neil Waaraniemi, sermon, Menahga, 10 Aug 2025 ▶ 00:44:26

“I don't know you, Phil.” At the Southwest Area Meeting in March 2026, speakers who said they had never spoken with Phil Siljander told him he was not believing. The only test stated was whether their hearts said amen:

“I don't know you, Phil, but when you said how you believe it, my heart didn't say amen, because many in this world believe that way, or proclaim to believe that way, that Christ is their Savior, and it's in the Bible.”
Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 00:55:57 transcript
Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), 14 Mar 2026 at [00:56:27]: “And I didn't get the feeling that you believe that because you didn't answer it. Maybe you do, and you can't speak to that. But it is a doubt that I had” ▶ 00:56:27 transcript
“I would say, Phil, I don't know you personally and haven't visited with you, but as I've sat here today, I've heard many, many loving calls for you to repent and return to God's kingdom through the spirit of this meeting and your responses. I don't feel that you've … On that, you've evaded the direct questions that have been asked. Like Shannon just said, through the Spirit, it reveals that I don't believe the same as you do.”
Jeremy Keranen (Colorado), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 01:52:17 transcript
“I can tell you that for myself, you and I do not believe the same. I feel that you are in unbelief. And that's all we can do is tell you directly that that's the case.”
Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 02:02:04 transcript
Jared Huhta, 14 Mar 2026 at [02:02:34]: “some of this discussion can seem a little pointless because it's clear that we don't believe the same” ▶ 02:02:34 transcript
“You said that, well, we've heard all these things from other people, but you haven't personally had these discussions. Well, that's because you haven't been around. We're having these discussions with you right now.”
Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 02:01:35 transcript

“A believer in what exactly?” At the 2026 annual meeting Briar Siljander was told the same, by speakers who had not met him, and asked what he was said not to believe. No one answered; the next speakers restated the verdict and said there was no need to prove it:

“He was invited to attend our last Southwest Area Board meeting, and he did attend remotely. And his testimony was not that of a believer. … He showed us clearly that he was not a believer. And I believe Briar has done us the same favor today. I would do him the favor, if he's still here, to let him know that he is not a believer. He is not traveling with us. I think his testimony, what he read, doesn't answer to any of our spirits, those of us that are believing.”
Jared Huhta, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California) ▶ 00:44:43 transcript
Jared Huhta, 3 Jul 2026 at [00:46:23]: “to let you know, Briar, that you are not a believer, that if you want to repent from unbelief, the opportunity is there” ▶ 00:46:23 transcript
“I think I also heard that I'm not a believer. And I guess I would like to understand a believer in what exactly? I have professed that I believe according to the constitution of this organization. And it's easy to fling around and say, well, my spirit didn't answer. Or maybe my tone was too hard. Or maybe too insistent.”
Briar Siljander, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California) ▶ 00:55:51 transcript
Briar Siljander, 3 Jul 2026 at [00:57:56]: “there's an open question here, repent of what? ... Do you agree that ... The vote of the delegates at that meeting was correct and the Holy Spirit. And if you don't, you are an unbeliever.” ▶ 00:57:56 transcript
“I don't know Briar. I don't know where he lives. I don't know if he represents … I know he's a lawyer, I've heard. Is he representing Minneapolis? Is he representing Wolf Lake? Is he even representing Coastal California? I don't know his membership status anywhere. … those members though had strayed they were that's just a formality whether they belong to the LLC but as Briar said the LLC [isn't] God's kingdom but they had left God's kingdom”
Paul Waaraniemi (Pelkie delegate), LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California) ▶ 01:02:06 transcript
“I don't think we should approach this from a spiritual matter. If he's aligned with the Minneapolis and Wolf Lake congregations, … And he perceives some sort of division remaining in God's kingdom. And I would say that's a good sign that you're not part of it. Because I'm not involved in any of these discussions. … it's very telling that Briar is not in the right place and we don't have to try to argue and go back and forth with him and try to prove that because I think that's what he wants.”
Aaron Huhta, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California) ▶ 01:09:19 transcript
More on this point
Individuals pronouncing a member 'not a believer'
“No individual can bind a Christian who is in the fellowship of the congregation, because said individual may err. Use of the key of binding must proceed according to the Church Law of Christ.”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 141
“This is a duty of service because Christ did not appoint powers, rulers or governments in the church, but rather duties of service.”
Kivioja, Work of the Holy Spirit, p. 138
What LLC speakers said or did
  • Jared Huhta (Prescott Valley), LLC Annual Meeting 2026, 2026-07-03: “He showed us clearly that he was not a believer. And I believe Briar has done us the same favor today. I would do him the favor, if he's still here, to let him know that he is not a believer. He is not traveling with us. I think his testimony, what he read, doesn't answer to any of our spirits, those of us that are believing.” ▶ 00:45:29 transcript
    An individual declares two members not believers; ground: testimony 'doesn't answer to any of our spirits.'
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Briar Siljander (Coastal California delegate) – Jared Huhta (Prescott Valley), 2026-07-03: “I would do him the favor, if he's still here, to let him know that he is not a believer.” ▶ 00:45:29 transcript
    Book agrees: Kivioja p.141: 'No individual can bind a Christian... because said individual may err'; binding must follow 'the Church Law of Christ.'
11. Christ and the written Word – “It is not enough”
“The contents of faith can be summarized in one word: Christ. … Throughout salvation history, a person's salvation has been based on faith, which contains only one thing: Christ” (p. 97). “Only faith can bring Christ to a person, and in Christ is found the complete salvation” (p. 99). “When a Christian's righteousness is Christ, it is clear that a person cannot augment this righteousness” (p. 100). Scripture “must be examined through Christ” (p. 57). The congregation “differs from all temporal organizations” (p. 154).
“It is not enough that we believe that Jesus once lived, died, even resurrected from death and rose into heaven. That's not enough. That's a fact. But even the devil does not deny that fact. The Bible says that he believes and trembles. What we believe, we have to believe that there is the kingdom of God lowered into this earth. And it is a group of people. Group of lacking, sinful people.”
Jouko Haapsaari, Monticello, sermon, 2023-03-11 ▶ 00:42:02

In 47 sermons by 33 ministers, and 24 statements at 9 recorded meetings (2017–2026), LLC ministers and leaders criticized a focus on Christ and the written Word, said believing in Christ is not enough, or placed the Holy Spirit only in this organization. All of them, with the recording at each →

Keith Waaraniemi, answering whether he had said one can speak too much about Christ, named his concern about Wolf Lake sermons:

“I've been asked a few times, have I said that you can speak too much about Christ? I do not remember my exact words. … some of the speeches of the Wolf Lake brother’s sermons have raised this question in my mind. There tends to be a focus on Christ and the written Word but an avoidance of speaking of the Holy Spirit, the congregation and the endeavor. The Holy Spirit is the teacher in the congregation. The Holy Spirit is the key to understanding Scripture. That has been a concern that I have had.”
Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with Wolf Lake, 7 Dec 2019 ▶ 03:28:08 transcript
“We can find lots of people in this community or in these surroundings communities that speak very warmly of Christ and of God's Word. But if you don't have the congregation, you don't have the Word. If you don't have the Word, you don't have the congregation.”
Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 ▶ 03:29:59 transcript
Keith Waaraniemi, 7 Dec 2019 at [03:30:23]: “So, the connection to the congregation is so important. And the Spirit of God works in the congregation of God.” ▶ 03:30:23 transcript

The same formula had been used at the LLC board workshop eight months earlier, and the Phoenix pastor answered it the same day:

“With regard to the sermons that have caused concern, not only with the Wolf Lake brothers, but with others, it seems that there's been a focus on Christ and the written … of the Holy Spirit, the congregation, and the endeavor. They're all important. Christ, salvation through Christ, the grace of Christ is most important. Justification by faith. We are saved by grace through faith. Those are the most important things. … we heard so preciously of the Holy Spirit and the work of the Holy Spirit. If that is missing, there is much missing.”
Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (evening), 2019-04-13 ▶ 02:40:14 transcript
“We can never preach too much about Christ. But also at the same time in living Christianity, sermons have included the address where we can find Christ, the body of Christ, God's holy congregation. We can never separate one from another. Personally, I feel about this congregation that around me some have lost the view of this beauty or value of the congregation.”
Harri Vähäjylkkä, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 ▶ 02:52:12 transcript
Harri Vähäjylkkä, 7 Dec 2019 at [02:51:52]: “Christ is the center of the sermons, of course.” ▶ 02:51:52 transcript

“Not enough.” From LLC pulpits, believing that Christ died for our sins is not enough; one must also believe that this group is the kingdom, where the Holy Spirit alone is found:

“And the world also says that I believe and therefore I will be saved. I'm saved. But isn't it important that we know what we believe? It's not enough to believe that God created all things. It's not enough to believe that Jesus was born into this world. He suffered and died and rose again. One must have the Holy Spirit. One must be a member of that body of Christ. Because there is only one body, one spirit, one God, one faith, one baptism, one holy mutual congregation here upon this earth. There is not many.”
Nathan Muhonen, Williston, sermon, 2024-03-31 ▶ 00:22:01
Nathan Muhonen, 31 Mar 2024 at [00:21:30]: “It's only by faith. Be not faithless, but believing. That's all that's required, dear brothers and sisters, is that we believe.” ▶ 00:21:30
“How is that spirit born in us? By and through believing our sins forgiven. But many in this world believe that Jesus died for their sins. And they are zealous and they will post whatever they want on these social medias how righteous they are.”
Randall Haapala, Monticello, sermon, 2020-01-19 ▶ 00:27:51
“There are those that may even speak the same message in those non-living churches of this world, but the power is not in those words that they speak, for the Holy Spirit is only within one kingdom here on this earth. It doesn't only mean of just Phoenix congregation, but of whole God's kingdom, which spans the continents of this world”
Swen Sorvala, Phoenix, sermon, 2021-05-16 ▶ 00:17:40
“So we know, understand, and believe that God's Holy Spirit is only found in one place, and that's here in God's kingdom.”
Keith Kariniemi, Cokato, sermon, 2026-10-07 ▶ 00:04:52
Keith Kariniemi, 7 Oct 2026 at [00:15:53]: “And the Holy Spirit is only found here.” ▶ 00:15:53

Applied to a person. At the Southwest Area Meeting, Phil Siljander confessed his faith in Christ. The answers:

“So are you asking how I believe? My faith has not changed. I believe the same way. through faith in Jesus Christ that I have that hope of heaven. And that has not changed.”
Phil Siljander, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 00:33:19 transcript
Phil Siljander, 14 Mar 2026 at [01:45:04]: “But, you know, my faith is in Jesus Christ and that through him I could reach, I could reach heaven.” ▶ 01:45:04 transcript
“[I heard your] question of your faith by this way that you said that you believe like you have believed before that you have that hope of heaven. Hope of heaven is a thing that I would say that most people on this earth have. They hope that they can [get] to heaven it doesn't really confess your faith”
Mikko Pasanen, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 00:50:27 transcript
Mikko Pasanen, 14 Mar 2026 at [00:55:00]: “All of us will rejoice if you can be, come back, if you can come back to this kingdom.” ▶ 00:55:00 transcript
“I don't know you, Phil, but when you said how you believe it, my heart didn't say amen, because many in this world believe that way, or proclaim to believe that way, that Christ is their Savior, and it's in the Bible. But There was a question asked, is that do you believe that this is God's kingdom here, the one saving grace, the one kingdom? And I didn't get the feeling that you believe that because you didn't answer it.”
Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 00:55:57 transcript
“There is one single kingdom on this earth, and it is small, and it's hard for humans to accept that, but you must believe that to be saved, just the way I believe.”
Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ▶ 00:57:56 transcript
Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), 14 Mar 2026 at [00:58:55]: “God's kingdom isn't a brick and mortar. It's not a geographic. It's a believer, wherever they are, believing.” ▶ 00:58:55 transcript

Compare the book: “The righteousness that a Christian owns by faith is entirely Christ's righteousness” (p. 99), and faith “contains only one thing: Christ” (p. 97). The LLC speakers made belonging to the group the content of faith. You can never speak too much about Christ.

More on this point
Faith alone: the content of faith is Christ (Southwest Area Meeting, March 2026)
“by faith alone, by grace alone, by the merits of Christ alone.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 94
“I believe that God is my Savior, my refuge, my hope and my salvation.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 94
“The expression by faith alone gets its meaning from the fact that only faith can bring Christ to a person, and in Christ is found the complete salvation.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 99

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Mikko Pasanen, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14: “Hope of heaven is a thing that I would say that most people on this earth have.” ▶ 00:50:27 transcript
    Discounts a confession of hope through faith in Christ; the book describes faith as exactly that trust and hope.
  • Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14: “it almost took my faith that there was references in the Bible to what you have to do to be saved, and it was believe in Christ, that he's your savior.” ▶ 00:56:57 transcript
    Treats 'believe in Christ' as a near-loss of faith; book: faith whose content is Christ saves.
  • Lauri Nevala, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14: “we could say there's nothing wrong with your responses.” ▶ 01:42:09 transcript
    Concedes the confession is sound, then discounts it ('even the devil quoted scriptures').
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Phil Siljander (Coastal California) – Mikko Pasanen, 2026-03-14: “question of your faith by this way that you said that you believe like you have believed before that you have that hope of heaven.” ▶ 00:50:27 transcript
    Book agrees: Phil's confession – 'through faith in Jesus Christ that I have that hope of heaven' [00:33:49] – tracks the book's definition of saving faith (pp.94, 97, 99).
  • Against Phil Siljander (Coastal California) – Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), 2026-03-14: “when you said how you believe it, my heart didn't say amen, because many in this world believe that way,” ▶ 00:55:57 transcript
    Book agrees: p.97: 'The contents of faith can be summarized in one word: Christ.'
Wolf Lake sermons criticized for 'a focus on Christ and the written Word'
“That is why the holy Scriptures must be examined through Christ.”
Mauno Soronen, Revelation: Source of Theology and Foundation of Doctrine, p. 57
“The principle of “what makes Christ” (quid Christum agit) became the core of Luther's Bible interpretation.”
Pauli Niemelä, The Bible – Highest Authority of Faith and Life, p. 68

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07: “There tends to be a focus on Christ and the written Word but an avoidance of speaking of the Holy Spirit, the congregation and the endeavor.” ▶ 03:28:55 transcript
    Lists Christ-and-written-Word focus as a concern; the book makes Christ the key and center of Scripture.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Wolf Lake – Keith Waaraniemi, 2019-12-07: “And I would even be direct enough to say that some of the speeches of the Wolf Lake brother’s sermons have raised this question in my mind.” ▶ 03:28:08 transcript
    Book agrees: Scripture 'must be examined through Christ'; faith's content is 'one word: Christ'.
12. The robe of righteousness
“Because the Christian owns Christ in faith, God sees in him or her only the righteousness of Christ and no sin” (pp. 98–99). “A Christian remains completely sinful, but simultaneously he or she is completely righteous in Christ. … The righteousness that a Christian owns by faith is entirely Christ's righteousness. It is never governed by the Christian” (p. 99). “A Christian is simultaneously righteous and sinful, holy and defiled, God's enemy and a child of God” (p. 121). Jesus' followers “dress the penitent sinner in the pure robe of righteousness” (p. 115). Faith can be lost (p. 105) through “a neglected conscience and living a sinful life” (p. 129). Nowhere does the book say the robe is stained, soiled or removed by the believer's sin. The damage of sin is in the conscience, which absolution restores.

In 65 sermons by 40 ministers, and 13 statements at 6 recorded meetings (2015–2026), ministers spoke of the robe of righteousness as stained, removed, or unstainable. All of them, with the recording at each →

What Wolf Lake taught, and was told was wrong doctrine:

“Because God only sees a perfect white robe on his believers, the children that believe. There aren't spots and speckles of sin or stains on the robe when we believe. The blood of Jesus has washed it away.”
Darwin Lake, Phoenix, sermon, 2016-03-27 ▶ 00:53:08
“We believe that the Robe of Righteousness is the righteousness of Christ, perfect without blemish, gifted to us by faith when we believe. It is not stained by our sins and failures, but covers them. By faith, being owners of this garment of salvation, we are righteous before God without sin. ... Some have said we as believers stain this robe of righteousness, others suggest that we also wear another robe that we stain and clean. We believe neither is correct.”
Wolf Lake congregation (board and speakers), Wolf Lake, document, 2018-11-20 document (PDF)

What LLC ministers preached. Before the dispute the LLC's own wording was that the robe “becomes stained”; from 2018 the stronger form was that it is removed:

“We have that white robe of the Lord Jesus Christ's righteousness. That perfect robe of righteousness. But when we wear that robe, because of our sinfulness, not because of Christ, but because of us, that robe that we wear becomes stained. Sometimes there has been this kind of understanding that once a person has put on that white robe, they no longer have to worry about anything. That that white robe can't become stained. But we know... that because of our sinfulness, the white robe becomes stained.”
Keith Waaraniemi, Monticello, sermon, 2015-02-06 ▶ 00:33:13
“But there is a warning in God's Word that we can lose this precious faith. When we lose this precious faith, we lose the robe of righteousness. Let us not err to think that once I have this robe, it will always be there for me. Because sin separates man from God. God will not continue to robe one with the robe of righteousness if he or she lives in sin.”
Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, sermon, 2018-05-06 ▶ 00:48:36
Neil Waaraniemi, Rockford, 20 Sep 2020 at [00:41:59]: “There has never been a question that the robe that Jesus has given would be defiled.” ▶ 00:41:59
“For we know that stains do come upon our robe. We know that we sin each and every day. We are imperfect human beings. We fall into sin. And if we do not continually put away those sins, eventually that robe which we own will become so stained it will no longer be an acceptable wedding garment.”
David Anderson, Alaska, sermon, 2019-08-04 ▶ 00:26:29

Treated as the heresy:

“Over a hundred years ago now, there was this understanding that when you heard that Gospel once, that you did not need to hear it again. That all you needed to do was believe. That once you were given that robe of righteousness, it was so pure and so holy that it could never become stained or defiled. Those people that had this understanding are no longer in God's kingdom. But they all departed in heresy.”
Eric Mattila, Alaska, sermon, 2019-06-30 ▶ 00:43:47
Eric Mattila, Menahga, 2 Nov 2024 at [00:07:40]: “they cannot take that robe of righteousness with them, that it will be lost” ▶ 00:07:40
“But then Don Lahti brought up that there is a group of people that believe that the robe of righteousness cannot be stained. They are in a wrong doctrine. You could have corrected him. He was wrong.”
Bruce Johnson, Wolf Lake, 2019-12-07 ▶ 05:04:48 transcript
“In the Finnish Bible, it says, blessed are they that wash their robes. That wash their robes. There were those who said that these robes ... These garments can never be defiled. And Jesus here very clearly says, Blessed are they that wash their robes”
George Koivukangas, Cokato, sermon, 2026-08-09 ▶ 00:24:23
George Koivukangas, Cokato, 30 Jun 2019 at [00:25:53]: “The righteousness of Christ is so perfect, we can't do anything. We can't add, we can't take.” ▶ 00:25:53

The walk-back, and back again. From the April 2018 ministers' camp the LLC's stated line became that Christ's robe cannot be blemished and that sin stains the conscience, which is the book's position and Wolf Lake's. Neil Waaraniemi moved from “removed” (2018, 2020) to “never been a question that the robe … would be defiled” (September 2020), then back to “can be removed from us because of sin” in 2025:

“First of all, I believe that Christ's righteousness is perfect. It cannot ever be blemished or diminished by our sins. His work was perfect and he finished it all for us. ... But sin stains my conscience. And the scriptures give examples of caring for sin. One is the washing of robes, one is the washing of feet ... did that mean their sins tarnished the righteousness of Christ and all that? No, of course it doesn't mean that.”
Jim Frantti, LLC ministers' camp, 2018-04-14 ▶ 00:23:27 transcript
“There's been a lot of discussion concerning garments the robe of righteousness, and so on. But here we see the words of Jesus that there were a few that have not defiled their garments, which would tell us that some, because of sin and unbelief, became defiled. You know, the important thing is not the terminology ... There has never been a question that the robe that Jesus has given would be defiled. But because of sin and unbelief, we can become defiled and lose this most precious gift of living faith.”
Neil Waaraniemi, Rockford, sermon, 2020-09-20 ▶ 00:40:26
Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 5 Aug 2020 at [00:23:27]: “That robe of righteousness will be removed from one who does not live according to God's Word” ▶ 00:23:27
“That robe of righteousness is the robe that Jesus has prepared for us. There was controversy over this robe of righteousness in the most recent heresy. And it seemed that some of them did not understand that this robe of righteousness can be removed from us because of sin and disobedience.”
Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, sermon, 2025-12-06 ▶ 00:24:38
Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 5 Mar 2023 at [00:36:17]: “the robe of righteousness. And it cannot be defiled.” ▶ 00:36:17
More on this point
Robe of righteousness: 'God sees no sin'; simul iustus vs. 'robe can be removed because of sin'
“On the one hand, in Christ he or she is completely free from sin and completely righteous, such that he or she cannot become more righteous even in heaven.”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 99–100
“The Christian sins constantly in thought, word and deed, even though sin no longer governs him or her”
Hanna Ottman, By Faith Alone, p. 104
“A believing person is simultaneously righteous and sinful (simul iustus et peccator).”
Jari Kupsala, Creation and Humankind, p. 39

And the book passages quoted above.

What LLC speakers said or did
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2025-12-06: “There was controversy over this robe of righteousness in the most recent heresy. And it seemed that some of them did not understand that this robe of righteousness can be removed from us because of sin and disobedience.” ▶ 00:24:38
    Says sin removes the robe; book: Christian sins constantly yet God sees only Christ's righteousness.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2022-11-01: “they had told the believer that you can go on washing your robe. I am simply going to believe my sins forgiven.” ▶ 00:20:05
    Presents 'simply believe my sins forgiven' as the heretic's line; book p.87 allows believing sins forgiven every moment.
  • James Jurmu, Monticello, 2026-04-05: “He sees no sin in you or me when we are clothed in that robe of righteousness because of the works of His only begotten Son,” ▶ 00:16:33
    Matches the book; mainstream LLC usage.
  • Carey Simonson, Outlook, 2020-04-10: “No blemish can be found thereon, nor anything defiled, no matter how corrupt I am, in it I'm glorified.” ▶ 00:29:09
    Hymn text preached by a later LLC Board member; matches book pp.99–100.
Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Minneapolis – Neil Waaraniemi, 2025-12-06: “did not understand that this robe of righteousness can be removed from us because of sin and disobedience.” ▶ 00:25:11
    Book agrees: Book: the Christian 'sins constantly' yet is 'completely righteous' in Christ; God sees 'no sin'.
13. What the congregation is
“Luther taught that the church is not primarily an institution or organization, but it should be the living community of Christ, which the Holy Spirit has gathered through the Word and sacraments. Within the visible church is an invisible congregation” (p. 160). “In different parts of the world, however, there are members of the congregation of Christ that belong to some other church or are not members of any church. Nevertheless they have unity of the Holy Spirit with the congregation of Christ” (p. 161). The congregation “differs from all temporal organizations” (p. 154); its members “can never be recorded in books or lists” (p. 156).

The book's “the congregation cannot err.” The book quotes Luther: “It is impossible that the congregation can err in even the smallest point of doctrine” (p. 156, citing Bondage of the Will), and adds on its own authority that “a Christian cannot believe differently than what the holy, mutual congregation teaches” (p. 159). The book grounds the first statement in the Word: the congregation is infallible “because it adheres to the Word of God. … The Bible, the written Word of God, is the authority in the congregation” (p. 155). The sentence is Luther's (Bondage of the Will, 1525, LW 33:85: “it is impossible for the Church to err, even in the smallest article”), but the book stops one sentence short. Luther continues: “But here is the task, here is the toil, to determine whether those whom you call the Church are the Church,” and concludes (LW 33:89), “The Church is hidden, the saints are unknown.” The Church that cannot err is, in Luther, the hidden remnant preserved under erring kings, councils and popes, never the body that bears the name.

Luther himself, in The Papacy at Rome (1520), a work the book lists in its bibliography:

“The essence, life and nature of the Church is not a bodily assembly, but an assembly of hearts in one faith … And this unity is of itself sufficient to make a Church, and without it no unity, be it of place, of time, of person, of work, or of whatever else, makes a Church.”
Martin Luther, The Papacy at Rome (1520), Works of Martin Luther, Philadelphia (Holman) ed., vol. 1, p. 349; LW 39:65
“The external marks, whereby one can perceive where this Church is on earth, are baptism, the Sacrament, and the Gospel; and not Rome, or this place, or that.”
Martin Luther, The Papacy at Rome (1520), Holman ed., vol. 1, p. 361; LW 39:75
“Just as being in the Roman unity does not make one a Christian, so being outside of that unity does not make one a heretic or unchristian. … to be in this place or that, does not make a heretic: but to be without true faith makes a man a heretic.”
Martin Luther, The Papacy at Rome (1520), Holman ed., vol. 1, p. 351; LW 39:67
“The external Roman Church we all see, therefore it cannot be the true Church, which is believed, and which is a community or assembly of the saints in faith, for no one can see who is a saint or a believer.”
Martin Luther, The Papacy at Rome (1520), Holman ed., vol. 1, p. 361; LW 39:75

In 37 sermons by 31 ministers, 21 statements at 10 recorded meetings (2017–2026), LLC ministers and leaders identified God’s kingdom with this organization, or said there is no faith outside it. All of them, with the recording at each →

The kingdom is this organization:

“And that if at any times you have questions about the work of the LLC, the LLC is us. We are God's kingdom … here on earth and here in our organization in North America”
Carey Simonson, Outlook, sermon, 2017-09-24 ▶ 00:28:30
“In North American Zion, the address for this living faith is under the [Laestadian] Lutheran Church. And we believe that the administration of God's house in our land is under this organization.”
Ray Waaraniemi, LLC Summer Services, sermon, 2020-07-04 ▶ 00:24:12
“I think what we're being asked to choose is to trust that we are in God's kingdom. That the [Laestadian] Lutheran Churches in North America and sister organizations throughout the world are God's kingdom. … And as God's kingdom, they're guided by His Holy Spirit.”
Unidentified speaker, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 ▶ 01:20:11 transcript
“The correct way to believe is that which is revealed through the Holy Spirit in God's living congregation and nowhere else. … when you believe simply that this is God's congregation, when you believe simply that there is no other place where I or anyone else can find salvation, … but in this small and precious flock”
Tomm Stewart, Seattle, sermon, 2023-08-20 ▶ 00:52:25

At the 2022 vote, the question put to the delegates by the chairman and the LLC staff:

“Is God's kingdom here today? Is God's kingdom present here in this gathering? Is the Holy Spirit here? … But if you answer the question that God's kingdom, is it here today? Is the Holy Spirit speaking? And if your answer is no, then to me it's clear that we are not part of the same fellowship.”
Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ▶ 02:05:11 transcript
Jim Frantti, 2 Jul 2022 at [02:09:55]: “So I say to those of you who have been battling against God's congregation, is God's kingdom here?” ▶ 02:09:55 transcript
“Do you believe that God's kingdom is here, that God's spirit is here, that the body of Christ is here? He has spoken.”
Jon Bloomquist, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ▶ 02:16:00 transcript

Ceased by vote. After the vote, sermons taught that the removal by the delegates was the Spirit's own act separating the two congregations from God's kingdom:

“Or we even question that decision that was made last summer there at that annual meeting when God even revealed to those delegates there to even make that decision that separated those two congregations from the rest of God's living kingdom.”
Stanley Ylioja, Outlook, sermon, 2023-04-23 ▶ 00:16:51
“In the same way there at that annual meeting, the Spirit instructed, … that we must sever ourselves from this false spirit, that this spirit must be removed from the congregation. And at that time, these congregations, as we recall, Wolf Lake and Minneapolis, were removed from the LLC. This then was an open heresy in our midst. … I think we can safely say that this was the work of the Spirit. This was the work of God.”
Carey Simonson, Saskatoon, sermon, 2024-10-06 ▶ 00:25:27

The book and Luther hold that the unerring congregation is the hidden assembly of believers, known only to God and marked by the gospel and sacraments. The LLC applied “the congregation cannot err” to a delegate vote of a legal corporation, and treated the vote as removing two congregations from God's kingdom.

14. Culture treated as doctrine
“Fundamentalist influences have also been visible in the difficulty of distinguishing between culture and doctrine. Cultural issues may then give rise to doctrines that slowly begin to be demanded as prerequisites for salvation” (p. 180). “Demanding certain works or the avoidance of certain works can lead to an outwardly pious life, but it does not bring faith and salvation” (p. 103). “Drawing the line between good and unsuitable hobbies is sometimes difficult. Even believers may have conflicting opinions about what is suitable” (p. 201). “The Bible is the only guide from which we can learn to know God's will” (p. 185).
“If you are very gifted at sports and if you are in high school, your fellow students and the coaches would love that you would be on the sports teams of the school. And through the Holy Spirit, God's kingdom has always taught that we would avoid those places of competition that would draw our hearts away from God.”
James Jurmu, Rockford, sermon, 2025-01-19 ▶ 00:31:34

In 72 sermons by 43 ministers, and 6 statements at 4 recorded meetings (2015–2026), LLC ministers and leaders treated sports, Halloween, television, makeup, earrings and the like as sins, or as matters “the kingdom has revealed.” All of them, with the recording at each →

The pattern: concede that the Bible is silent, then ground the rule in a decision credited to the Holy Spirit, and make obedience to it the test of faith:

“You believers, you don't go there to the movies. You believers, you avoid partaking of alcohol. You believers, you avoid having a television in your home. It's not a work that we do or from this list of rules. But isn't it this way that we endeavor to keep faith and a clean conscience? And these things the Spirit reveals to be sin. The Bible doesn't tell us. We've used this example many times, but it's so clear. The Bible doesn't tell us about television. But God, through His Spirit, through the Holy Spirit in Zion, has revealed this.”
Marvin Wittenberg, Outlook, sermon, 2015-04-05 ▶ 00:20:15
“But we must differentiate between that which the Spirit has taught. We know things like television and worldly music. or celebrating of Halloween, little things like this, that those are not merely traditions of man, but the Spirit has taught the congregation of God that these things are not good and are not right.”
David Anderson, Alaska, sermon, 2018-09-23 ▶ 00:20:34
David Anderson, 23 Sep 2018 at [00:20:05]: “So we don't follow these things that are necessarily traditional. We don't have to uphold them.” ▶ 00:20:05
“You will not find television or trick-or-treating in the cover of this Bible. But yet God still guides and he still teaches and he still instructs his children. I have recently heard this sort of a saying, that these instructions and teaching are man-made sins. ... that I cannot watch television or have a social drink or go trick-or-treating. That is nothing but decisions of men. Dear brothers and sisters, do not confuse the Holy Spirit with decisions of men. Do not begin to speak evil against the Holy Spirit.”
Eric Mattila, Phoenix, sermon, 2021-02-21 ▶ 00:30:28
Eric Mattila, 21 Feb 2021 at [00:31:53]: “It is a very sobering matter when we speak about that sin of blaspheming.” ▶ 00:31:53
“Just because movies and television and these types of things weren't there then. It's been revealed through the Holy Spirit in the congregation that those are sin. That they're wrong. So it doesn't speak specifically to that in the Bible. So it doesn't change.”
Peter Lever, Spokane, sermon, 2021-10-10 ▶ 00:16:09
“When we have made a decision as a congregation, or there's been instruction in the congregation, and I think of things like the instruction that we wouldn't have televisions in our home. We want to be obedient to that instruction and not question that. Is that truly true? the instruction that God has for us? Or is that just something that man has brought forward? And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die”
Stephen Warwaruk, Outlook, sermon, 2022-03-07 ▶ 00:07:26
“And I've heard over the course of some years that of course television is not in the Bible and so forth, but if we start to put in God's kingdom where us as board members or speakers begin to question these decisions that were guided by the Holy Spirit, And if we have these discussions, and another one I think of is Halloween. ... If we begin to question and say that, well, I can... I can do this and it's not going to harm my faith life. There's other believers that know that this happens, but this is, I would say, very simply grieving the Holy Spirit.”
Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 2018-06-14 ▶ 02:34:49 transcript

Made the mark of faith:

“This mutual acquaintance, they were confessing faith, yet the wife wore earrings. When I went into that house, I knew they were confessing faith. I greeted the husband. And the words wouldn't come out to greet the wife.”
Richard Nevala, Rockford, sermon, 2016-06-26 ▶ 00:14:44
“That she has never understood how wearing earrings would steal her faith. But she would not want to wear earrings because she wants to keep her faith. ... Do not pierce your ears and wear those things. Why? Will we get to heaven by not wearing earrings? No, but we'll be able to keep faith, childlike faith, by listening to how God's Spirit teaches us to avoid the ways of this world.”
James Jurmu, Monticello, sermon, 2019-11-17 ▶ 00:32:54
“In the last heresy, the heresy of 1973, There were a number of fruits of a false spirit that were prevalent at that time. It was leniency, greeting heretics, watching and owning televisions, Marriage with unbelievers. Obsession with sports.”
Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, sermon, 2021-07-25 ▶ 00:28:43

Raised against Wolf Lake at the Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting of 26 March 2021, late in the evening, as something heard:

“One, I understand that there are several who are participating in Halloween from Wolf Lake. Is that true? Do any of you guys know, is it true or not? … Like the Halloween deal. I have heard that it is fairly widely participated in by members from Wolf Lake.”
Mark Skoog, Menahga board chairman ▶ 03:14:42 transcript

What it came to, from the Wolf Lake chairman:

“I will say this. If my kids did go to Dan and Nicole's for Halloween to get some candy. If that is a problem – I don't even know if they did. If they did, I hope that is not really a problem.”
Pat Lake, Wolf Lake board chairman ▶ 03:17:56 transcript

No one at the meeting gave a reason for the rule from Scripture or from the book. Dave Keranen, who had raised it at a meeting in January, said he could not give one either:

“It is difficult for me to explain to my children why we don't go trick or treating. I simply trust that God's Kingdom through the Holy Spirit has said that it is not a place for a child of God.”

Content, not the device. At the Minneapolis Congregation Meeting of 6 May 2018, John Lehtola recalled the principle he had stated in the 1990s about videos:

“The content is the deciding factor. … The guiding principle, according to the Holy Spirit, is content decides. And that did not seem to fare well with some people.”
John Lehtola, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 6 May 2018 ▶ 01:14:48 transcript

Later in the same meeting Walt Lampi, of the LLC office, raised it against him, and in the same breath said the decision was about content:

“The topic of television came up. He made a statement that television decision made back in the day was obsolete. … I personally don't think it's obsolete. I always think it, I've always thought it was about content. But I worry why we would go there to kind of undercut that congregational decision because it's brought much good to the believers.”
Walt Lampi, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 6 May 2018 ▶ 02:04:20 transcript

John answered:

“So I am not or have never undone the so-called television decision. I'm just illustrating a point that now today with our cell phones and our computers we have the television right at our fingertips and it's even much more and much worse than television ever was. … we need to be watchful and careful because television, and more than television, is in our homes and in our hands.”
John Lehtola, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 6 May 2018 ▶ 02:09:24 transcript

Five months later he was answering the same charge, read from the list of concerns about him:

“it seems like John's views have raised concern. Comments like the television decision is obsolete. I agree that the devices and the device that I'm holding in my hand … These devices, we can get television on them.”
John Lehtola, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 30 Sep 2018 ▶ 02:11:33 transcript
More on this point
Culture vs. doctrine: Halloween, TV, sports as revealed 'by the Kingdom'
“Sometimes, however, a person may put his or her own perceptions above others’ views and judge their actions based on one's own perceptions. This is called moralism.”
Helén, Ethics and Morals, p. 184

And the book passages quoted above.

Answered for holding the book’s position
  • Against Wolf Lake – Dave Keranen, 2021-03-26: “I know I brought up the Halloween and trick-or-treating, you know, concern at the meeting in January. And I believe it's pretty widespread, you know, through Wolf Lake.” ▶ 03:38:44 transcript
    Book agrees: Book: believers 'may have conflicting opinions about what is suitable' (p.201); warns cultural issues can become doctrines (p.180).
  • Against Wolf Lake – Dave Keranen, 2021-03-26: “I just simply trust that God's kingdom through the Holy Spirit has said, you know what, that's not a place for a child of God and it's not an activity we want to participate in.” ▶ 03:39:14 transcript
    Book agrees: p.180: cultural issues belong to the secular regiment, where 'the Christian makes choices guided by living faith'.
15. Reading Scripture and quotations treated as a fault
The Christian reads the Bible: “Christian doctrine instructs us to diligently read and hear God's Word, partake of the communion, pray and maintain fellowship with believing friends (Christian Doctrine, item 77)” (p. 128). “It is necessary to read and know the Bible, for there we find weapons against the enemy of souls, the world and our own temptations. Jesus also deflected the devil's temptations with God's Word (Matt. 4:1-11)” (p. 129). The book quotes Christian Doctrine (1948): “We should read the Scripture thus, that praying we seek from them the living God and are obedient to His voice when He speaks to us in His Word” (pp. 61–62). And on selective quotation, the complaint some LLC speakers made: “The Bible must be read and interpreted in its entirety. Faith must not be built on the basis of one Bible portion or one book in the Bible” (p. 65).

In 21 statements at 12 recorded meetings (2018–2022), speakers on the LLC side faulted those who questioned the LLC for reading prepared statements, quotations or Scripture, or granted that what they read was accurate and set it aside for want of the Spirit. Two of the statements are reports of earlier criticism, by John Lehtola and Janelle Lehtola. All of them, with the recording at each →

The request to be shown an error from Scripture was itself put forward as the fault:

“And John has said that he feels that what he's quoting is how he believes. And I believe that. And so, the stuff that is continuously quoted, I have to believe that that's where John's concerns lie. … John has answered, well, feelings don't mean anything to me. Show me a scripture where I'm wrong. But, brothers and sisters, the Spirit of God works in God's children. … And we can't dismiss it just because someone says that if you can't prove it with Scripture, then I won't listen to it.”
Keith Waaraniemi, MLLC / RLLC meeting at the LLC office, 24 Apr 2018 ▶ 04:03:52 transcript
“When I heard Al Lake speak, I have to agree with what Tommi and others have mentioned. I was confused. It seems like the spirit did not come clear. I'm not disagreeing with a lot of the quotations that you read from scripture. They are factual. But my question arises from the fact that why doesn't something answer to the spirit?”
Don Lahti (Brainerd), Menahga joint boards meeting, 12 Jan 2019 ▶ 01:06:15 transcript

Prepared statements and “defenses” set against the Spirit:

“We have God's written word. But without the Spirit speaking and opening it, it's a dead word. … The whole world has the written scriptures, and they can form their defenses to how they believe from the scriptures, which is why there's probably hundreds of denominations. And so it seems when some of you come to teach God's kingdom, you have your defenses prepared ahead of time, oftentimes. And we hear them, but we don't hear the comforter there.”
Nick Ylitalo (Menahga), Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 20 Nov 2021 ▶ 02:15:00 transcript
“I also just want to encourage you to speak from the heart. I know at times we read a lot of prepared statements and whatnot, and I think we're going to have a lot of … this evening, so it'd be good if we could just keep it to what's on our heart and mind. As it says in Matthew 10, 19, and 20. But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak, for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.”
Keith Hillukka (Phoenix board chairman), Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 8 Jan 2022 ▶ 00:23:33 transcript
“If you have some prepared statements, maybe you can email them in. But for the interest of time, I just want to limit this to the delegates, if there's any more comments from the delegates.”
the moderator, LLC annual meeting, 2 Jul 2022 ▶ 03:04:07 transcript
“But regarding the two spirits, Jesus was tempted by the devil in the wilderness … If we don't use the word to defend our faith, what do we use? If it is truly the highest authority as our bylaws construct our Constitution even state, why wouldn't we use it to defend what we believe is true?”
Ann Parks (Minneapolis), LLC annual meeting, 2 Jul 2022 ▶ 03:04:27 transcript

The LLC side read prepared texts itself. At the 2016 ministers’ camp the LLC’s account of the Wolf Lake meetings was read from a written text, and the meetings at which others were faulted for reading heard read introductions, synopses and reports:

“I'm just going to ask our brother Keith to read from a summary he prepared for last Friday's meeting. … this part of this introduction tonight with a few additional comments that I didn't mention at April 8th.”
Jim Frantti (presiding; inferred from the recording), asking LLC board member Keith Waaraniemi to read, LLC ministers' camp, Stony Lake (Friday session), 15 Apr 2016 ▶ 00:35:06 transcript
“I was going to read in a book here because I don't know how to remember things and speak them into mic, but like confession is not needed since absolution proclaimed and the original conversion is sufficient for a lifetime.”
Keith Waaraniemi (LLC board), Menahga joint boards meeting, 12 Jan 2019 ▶ 00:29:49 transcript
“Nine of the 11 board members were in agreement with it. So I'll read it. It's kind of long, but I'll try to move right along.”
the Minneapolis board's report, read by “Mike” (first name only on the tape), Minneapolis annual meeting, 8 Mar 2020 ▶ 01:04:38 transcript
“And so I've tried to gather some thoughts together from things that have been said recently and discussions, and I'll try not to spend too much time on that, but I will try. The continent-wide meeting synopsis has these kinds of statements in it … There is a concern that a different understanding on the doctrine of the congregation exists in our midst.”
Keith Waaraniemi, Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 20 Nov 2021 ▶ 02:30:12 transcript

Interpretation. The book tells the Christian to read the Bible and notes that Jesus answered the devil with God’s Word (p. 129). On the tapes the fault found was not in what was read, which was often conceded to be accurate, but in who read it. When the LLC side read prepared texts, no one faulted it; when the other side read Scripture, Luther or SRK sources, it was called prepared defenses without the Spirit. Point 6 follows the same charge in sermons.

Every statement behind the counts

Each theme lists every verified statement, newest last, with the recording or document at each. Quotes are exact; machine transcripts can mis-hear a word, so listen before quoting. Words in square brackets are the compiler’s corrections of machine mis-hearings or supplied context. Sermon dates follow the LLC archive index, which can be the day after the service. Speakers from the SRK (Finland) are marked as such; where a speaker is not named on the recording the entry says so.

The Word and the congregation 130 statements: 83 sermons by 40 ministers, 39 statements at 19 meetings, 0 documents (2018–2026) ↑ top
  • Todd Anderson, Rockford, 2018-03-25 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:42:32
    “One who submits ourselves to the congregation mother. The congregation mother is, we know, never errs.”
    March 2018.
  • Todd Anderson, Outlook, 2018-03-30 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:44:52
    “God's congregation as we know and believe is a never-erring congregation. If the congregation of God is instructing and you find yourself even more ... if I'd say bucking against God's congregation, I would hope that you would reflect on your position or your thoughts even.”
    Good Friday 2018.
  • unidentified speaker (presentation titled 'Frantti presentation'), LLC ministers' camp (Stony Lake), 2018-04-14 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:07:21 transcript
    “Let's not try to probe so deeply. Let's not try to understand every detail and split hairs and become expert theologians on these topics. Let's just ask God, give us that portion of understanding that he feels we need and that will keep us united.”
    Opening caution before discussing whether the gospel can ever not be preached.
  • unidentified speaker (presentation titled 'Frantti presentation'), LLC ministers' camp (Stony Lake), 2018-04-14 both-sides ▶ 00:48:15 transcript
    “You know, we often speak about the Word of God, that it's our highest authority, according to which all teachings have to be examined, and it is that. But you know, God's Word isn't separated from His Kingdom.”
    File title names Frantti; the transcript has no speaker labels, so attribution is not confirmed at this timestamp.
  • unidentified speaker, MLLC / RLLC meeting at the LLC office, 2018-04-24 congregation-over-word ▶ 04:09:29 transcript
    “We've heard a lot tonight about the Word of God being the highest authority, which it is. But if we separate the Word from the congregation, we are lost.”
  • unidentified speaker, MLLC / RLLC meeting at the LLC office, 2018-04-24 congregation-over-word ▶ 04:10:24 transcript
    “And that focus on the Word, as important as the Word is, concerns me. I have to say, it concerns me. If we separate the Word from the congregation, I think the danger is that we give ourselves license to understand matters differently than the Spirit of God teaches in the congregation of God.”
    Same speaker as [04:09:29] (continuous turn).
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2018-05-06 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:44:38
    “You and I desire to hear and believe what the Spirit says to the churches and not to interpret Scripture according to our own mind. It is so that we want our understanding of Scripture ... to be the same as the children of God in God's kingdom.”
    May 2018, as the Minneapolis dispute began.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2018-05-20 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:17:18
    “We know as individuals we can err. As individual servants can err. Even individual congregations can err. But the congregation as a whole cannot err.”
    May 2018; qualified form.
  • unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 2018-06-14 both-sides ▶ 00:25:14 transcript
    “I've sometimes heard in the recent times that, and it's true, God's Word is the highest authority in God's people. So is God's Word higher or more important than the Holy Spirit? I would say no.”
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Alaska, 2018-06-30 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:14:42
    “that His kingdom is an unerring kingdom. We as individuals can err and even a local congregation can err and boards can err. But the mutual congregation here on earth does not err. ... And dear brother, dear sister, it should be the desire of each of our hearts that our understanding of matters of faith would be the same as the understanding of our brothers and sisters who dwell in this kingdom.”
    June 2018; standard qualified form (individuals, local congregations, boards can err).
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30 congregation-over-word ▶ 02:09:54 transcript
    “Another thing that pertains to the doctrine of the congregation is the emphasis that John has put on the Word being above the congregation.”
    Listed as a concern about Minneapolis minister John Lehtola.
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30 congregation-over-word ▶ 02:10:26 transcript
    “So yes, the word is the head of the congregation. But we can't separate the word from the congregation, and that's what I'm concerned is happening. That the word is separated from the congregation to give permission to understand matters differently than the congregation of God.”
    Same turn as [02:09:54].
  • George Koivukangas (Cokato), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 both-sides ▶ 02:57:06 transcript
    “Enlightened by our own understanding and our own reading and our own deep study, and that's a danger. Wisdom of Solomon reminds us that too much study becomes a weariness. But I've been accused of saying that you can't read the Bible. And it's like, I have always encouraged to read and study the Holy Scriptures”
    Speaker answers an accusation that he discouraged Bible reading. 'Wisdom of Solomon' = Ecclesiastes 12:12 (misattribution in speech or in the machine transcript).
  • Eric Mattila, Menahga, 2019-03-20 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:32:19
    “That first prove to me where I have erred. Prove to me where I am wrong. Show me which chapter and verse I have been wrong. And then I will repent. Vision will never come back this way.”
    2019; asking for 'chapter and verse' presented as the attitude that keeps a person blind.
  • unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 both-sides ▶ 00:13:56 transcript
    “The Bible, as we all know, is the highest authority by which all matters are discussed, decided, and judged. But as we heard in the presentation, you have to have the key to the Bible, and that is the Holy Spirit.”
    Same speaker calls a dissenting document 'a document of garbage' [00:13:04].
  • Don Lahti, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 01:47:33 transcript
    “The words that are spoken we cannot disagree with. They have quoted scripture, but so did the devil quote scripture.”
    About speeches made that day (and a circulated 'Confession of Faith' document); continues 'there is a false spirit'.
  • unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 discourages-own-reading ▶ 02:02:06 transcript
    “So, reading the Bible alone, without the Holy Spirit revealing it, opening that word, really, doesn't understand how much is going on.”
    Prefaced by 'it's important to read the Bible'; preceding segment ends 'even satan'.
  • unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 both-sides ▶ 02:35:45 transcript
    “And of course, the Word of God is the highest authority in the congregation, the written Word of God, and there's no conflict with that when the Spirit is right in the congregation of God. So I've been disturbed by this thought of, ... almost separating the congregation from the Word and separating the congregation from the Spirit.”
    Defends boards' role; 'The Spirit reveals' how one knows a minister is wrong.
  • unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 congregation-over-word ▶ 03:49:02 transcript
    “Maybe the enlightenment is only through my reading and not through the understanding that is given through the Holy Spirit in God's congregation. ... My understanding of Scripture is that of the congregation of God and not that I would be off on my own and understanding contrary to God's congregation.”
    Preceded by 'it's always been an encouragement that we would read God's word as it is the highest authority'.
  • unidentified speaker, Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 01:46:11 transcript
    “Further, it is believed and taught that the Bible is the only guide or authority according to which all doctrine is to be examined and judged. Nothing can be placed alongside or rise above”
    Reads a statement rejecting the claim that Conservative Laestadians raise the congregation above the Bible; adds 'You can't separate the congregation and God's Word' [01:47:39].
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-05-19 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:19:14
    “through our own study and our own knowledge of reading of the Holy Scriptures, that we would become so knowledgeable that we would begin to question the understanding in God's kingdom through the living Holy Spirit, which is the correct way.”
    2019; Satan's aim described as Scripture study leading one to question the kingdom's understanding.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford meeting, 2019-05-19 congregation-over-word ▶ 01:54:09 transcript
    “Some people put the Word of God above the congregation of the Holy Spirit.”
    Item in a list of 'some say' complaints; continues 'We can't put one above the other' [01:54:42].
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford meeting, 2019-05-19 both-sides ▶ 04:24:45 transcript
    “Brothers and sisters, even though we've spoken much about the importance of the Word, the Word being the highest authority, and I also agree with that”
    Speaker then says there is 'also an' (cut off) other side to stress.
  • Eric Mattila, Alaska, 2019-06-22 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:21:17
    “And we know because Jesus Christ is the head and the Holy Spirit dwells in this body that it cannot err. It is an unerring body. ... And instead of trying to prove the way we think or to justify the way we believe, it is better to ask that what do the believers say?”
    2019; pairs 'unerring body' with 'ask ... what do the believers say' instead of proving one's view.
  • Eric Mattila, Rockford, 2019-08-11 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:56:15
    “Even if you don't understand, even if you can't understand why so many people are talking to you, don't have this sort of thought that prove to me first, show me my error and then I will repent. That is backwards in God's kingdom.”
    2019; addressed to those being admonished; repent first, understanding follows.
  • Jim Moll, Cokato, 2019-10-06 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:16:11
    “It lives in the congregation. It's not above the congregation. We studied that last night, how the Holy Spirit is one with the congregation and the Word of God and God Himself.”
    2019; 'It' is the living Word (preceding segment).
  • unidentified speaker, Elk River congregation discussion on the Holy Spirit, 2019-10-19 congregation-over-word ▶ 01:15:54 transcript
    “But that Spirit can't teach differently than it teaches in God's congregation because it's the same Spirit.”
    Addressed to John (Lehtola) after his Scripture quotations.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-10-31 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:12:07
    “Paul wrote to Timothy and said that the congregation is the pillar and the ground of truth. And it cannot err. And so even if we do not understand these types of matters, it would be good that we would be obedient.”
    Oct 2019; context is Halloween customs, i.e. congregation instruction without a Bible text.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-11-10 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:49:45
    “One never receives living faith through the private interpretation of the Scriptures, through one's own study, through one's own knowledge.”
    2019; standard 'faith comes by hearing' point.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 congregation-over-word ▶ 03:28:55 transcript
    “There tends to be a focus on Christ and the written Word but an avoidance of speaking of the Holy Spirit, the congregation and the endeavor.”
    His stated concern about Wolf Lake ministers' sermons.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 congregation-over-word ▶ 03:29:26 transcript
    “It is disturbing to me that in this time, I hear voices that seem to want to separate them from each other -- the word from the congregation, for example.”
    Same turn; continues 'if you don't have the congregation, you don't have the Word'.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Glendale, 2019-12-29 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:23:31
    “If we find in our lives that I have been believing and teaching contrary to God's Word and the understanding of Scripture by God's Kingdom, then matters are not well.”
    Dec 2019; 'the understanding of Scripture by God's Kingdom' set beside God's Word as the norm.
  • unidentified speaker, Glendale congregation meeting, 2020-10-17 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:50:13 transcript
    “When we got married, we were given the Bible. We were told not to let the dust gather on its cover to read the Bible. But when you read the Bible, the Holy Spirit will not be found in the Bible. ... All the answers are in there, but there's almost this thought that the Bible is somehow above everything. And it's not.”
    Speaker's side and office unknown.
  • unidentified speaker, Glendale congregation meeting, 2020-10-17 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 02:50:29 transcript
    “That's what God's Word teaches, and the board is not in any way above the Word of God and its teachings, and it's there for us as individuals, it's there for the board, it's there for the speakers, it's there for all of God's children”
    On board vs congregation; preceding segment: 'The congregation directs the board.'
  • Kevin Moll, Elk River, 2020-11-23 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:06:17
    “but also there was ... a group of reformers who had taken and placed God's word above the congregation and how we understand that God's word is there perhaps between and we treasure God's word but we also treasure this spoken word of God”
    Nov 2020, reporting a meeting discussion; contrasts Rome (tradition above the Word) with reformers who put the Word above the congregation.
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2020-11-23 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:23:43
    “That they would place the highest authority on the written word. But how can man even understand the written word if he doesn't have the keys of the kingdom of heaven? To open that word. And reference to demands of some in our time who say, show me in the Bible where I am wrong. That's not a heart of faith.”
    Nov 2020, reporting a meeting; Luther vs. those who put 'the highest authority on the written word'.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2020-11-23 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:39:09
    “I know if I was the minister of that congregation, I would be shaking in my boots. I wouldn't be telling someone to prove me wrong, show me in the Bible where I've gone wrong. I would be saying, help me.”
    Nov 2020; Rev 3 Sardis letter applied to a minister.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2021-02-21 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:32:20
    “Let us have that mind of a child, that I am not wiser than all the others, that I do not want to grow. I don't want to demand that somebody needs to prove to me that this or that is spoken of.”
    2021; warns against speaking against 'God's congregation' and demanding proof.
  • Samuel Roiko, LLC (2021 Phoenix Winter Services), 2021-03-20 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:24:51
    “Sometimes a statement is made that we need to turn to the word. While on its face it is good to ask always what God's word says, it seems that the statement can contain an accusation that we have turned away from God's word. ... However, God's word and the congregation are inseparable.”
    Before the 2022 removals; treats 'turn to the word' as an implied accusation, quoting Raattamaa that those 'trusting in the word' drift from the flock.
  • Dave Keranen, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 both-sides ▶ 03:34:40 transcript
    “I understand how God's word is the highest authority. But I feel that we need to allow the Holy Spirit to work also.”
    Answering Wolf Lake's appeal to Scripture; continues that the Bible does not say 'You can't have a TV'.
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 both-sides ▶ 03:41:20 transcript
    “When we speak that God's word is the highest authority. Through faith we are speaking of the Living Word of God. How is the word living?”
    Continues: made alive only through the Spirit, which 'dwells among the flock of believers'.
  • Eric Mattila, Longview, 2021-04-02 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:34:17
    “And let us trust that this mother here on earth will never lead us astray. This beautiful mother congregation knows how to lead and guide her children. This mother will never teach us in a wrong way.”
    Good Friday 2021; follows 'If there are matters that we don't understand, let us humble ourself.'
  • Eric Mattila, Longview, 2021-04-02 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:35:09
    “that we never begin to think that we are more knowledgeable, or that we have more wisdom, or that we understand the Bible better than the rest. This is a very dangerous place to be.”
    Same sermon; understanding the Bible 'better than the rest' called very dangerous.
  • Brian Johnson, Elk River, 2021-04-19 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:20:10
    “We can't say, show me where I've erred. Point it out in the Bible. And then I'll repent. We can't go there.”
    Peter's repentance; asking to be shown one's error from the Bible described as the wrong heart.
  • Daniel Rintamaki, Ishpeming, 2021-05-09 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:08:29
    “A mother who cannot err. A mother who teaches us in all truth”
    Mother's Day 2021.
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC (2021 Summer Services), 2021-07-03 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 00:18:08
    “The Church is not above the Word, but subject to it and one with it. As Paul says, a great mystery, it too is an article of faith.”
    Summer Services 2021 presentation-style sermon on the oral and written Word; also says 'This oral word is inseparably linked to God's congregation' [00:15:53].
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2021-07-11 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:27:29
    “The right side calls into self-righteousness. The right side would say that, prove to me why I am not acceptable child of God. Prove to me by the Bible why I am not just fine like I am.”
    2021; 'prove to me by the Bible' assigned to the self-righteous 'right side'.
  • Scott Landa, Alaska, 2021-10-24 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:20:05
    “That one true kingdom, the mother congregation cannot err.”
    Oct 2021; preceded by 'one individual may err, and even a church may err'.
  • Aaron Anderson, Williston, 2021-11-21 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:11:51
    “In other words, to the voice of all of the believers here on earth, that voice is unerring. This mother congregation does not err”
    Nov 2021.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2021-11-21 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:33:46
    “Sometimes we hear in our time, well, prove to me where I've gone wrong. Show me in the scripture where I've gone wrong. ... when we begin to defend ourselves in that way we find also that we aren't listening we aren't hearing the voice of the Spirit”
    Nov 2021.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2021-12-06 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:42:26
    “But if we begin to have an understanding that is different from the congregation of God, that is different from the voice of the Holy Spirit, we must submit our understanding. We must put our trust in the congregation, Mother, ... we must simply say that perhaps I don't truly understand what this portion means. For this mother is the one who takes care of us. This mother is so dear and precious. She will never lead us astray.”
    Rev 22 sermon; immediately preceded by encouragement to read Scripture and refute strange doctrines with it.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix congregational meeting on Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:48:50 transcript
    “I asked him about the fact that there are members in Arizona who are holding their own Bible study at [a member's] house separate from the congregation here.”
    Listed among concerns about Brett Rintamaki ('they did not see anything wrong with that').
  • Sheryl Simonson, Phoenix congregational meeting on Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 02:51:35 transcript
    “There was nothing wrong with what was spoken, but there just was no revelation and life. Most of it is just the reading of scripture. You cannot say that it is wrong, because every word in the Bible is true.”
    Criticism of a minister's sermons in the meeting that led to his removal. Member, not a leader.
  • Eric Mattila, Spokane, 2022-02-20 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:13:18
    “Living faith does not come to a person by reading the Word of God. Neither does it come by prayer.”
    Same sermon; Scripture has power but does not give life without the Spirit. (The book, pp. 72-73, says the same.)
  • Samuel Roiko, Monticello, 2022-02-20 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:23:18
    “And I think that is a serious misunderstanding in discussions when there has been this rebuke that we need to turn to the Word of God. Well, we... ... Luther says that the congregation of God and the Word of God are one. They are inseparable, and it's almost a question, when have we turned away?”
    Answers the dissenters' call to 'turn to the Word' as a misunderstanding; the congregation and Word are one.
  • Eric Mattila, Spokane, 2022-02-20 both-sides ▶ 00:28:27
    “But yet it is so that our understanding when we read God's word must agree with the understanding of the congregation. For not one of us has all gifts.”
    Says it has 'never been spoken or taught ... that it is somehow wrong to read the Holy Bible', then requires reading to agree with the congregation.
  • Eric Mattila, Spokane, 2022-02-20 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:29:13
    “And there we always want to take a back seat to the congregation of God. We always want to take a back seat to what the Spirit teaches. We do not want to begin to defend if we have had a wrong understanding.”
    Same sermon; the reader whose understanding differs defers to the congregation.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2022-02-21 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 00:49:15
    “And God's word is clear. And we cannot veer from God's word one iota. In matters of salvation, in matters of life, in matters of doctrine, God's word is the highest authority.”
    Feb 2022; aimed at those who find the Word 'old-fashioned', not at dissenters.
  • unidentified speaker (LLC side), LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 both-sides ▶ 00:09:07 transcript
    “And it has guided on the base of God's holy word which we know is for us the highest authority.”
    LLC-side statement that the Spirit has guided the meetings with Minneapolis.
  • Jim Moll, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:40:45 transcript
    “For example, you accurately quote God's word, but so does the enemy of souls. And the quotation of God's words, which are accurate, the understanding has been lost.”
    Addressed to a Minneapolis speaker before the removal vote.
  • Jim Moll, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:42:13 transcript
    “The ability to hold God's word and know God's word is fine for a temporal life, but without the spirit there's not understanding. ... But find yourself in that place you are and listen to the mother speaking and the voice of the spirit speaking.”
    Same turn; the remedy offered is to listen to 'the mother'.
  • Timo Hotari, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 01:17:53 transcript
    “Listening to his [speaking turns], quoted Bible portions. I've had many friends in the world that were of different denominations that have quoted the Bible much better than I have.”
    Lead-in to the [01:18:52] remark;
  • Timo Hotari, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 01:18:52 transcript
    “One side is [hopeful. It] is begging for grace. The other side is quoting the Bible and wanting to be a part of a group.”
    Delegate's comment before the removal vote; preceded by 'I've had many friends in the world ... that have quoted the Bible much better than I have' [01:17:53].
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-over-word ▶ 01:59:52 transcript
    “And we've heard speaking [their] speeches that seem to separate the word of God from the congregation and place the word above the congregation in some way. But our understanding is that the word and the congregation are inseparable.”
    Given as a particular of the 'wrong understanding ... of the doctrine of the congregation' before the removal vote.
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-over-word ▶ 02:14:50 transcript
    “When his body is here, present, it has spoken here today. It has spoken now for years. Christ and his Church are one flesh. They cannot be separated from one another.”
    Answering Minneapolis/Wolf Lake speakers: the body (the meeting) 'has spoken'.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2022-07-03 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:24:49
    “the Holy Spirit, which leads and guides God's congregation, the mother Zion will never err. God does not ask that we understand. ... He simply asks that we believe.”
    Sermon the day after the 2 July 2022 removal vote, addressed to anyone 'in opposition'.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2022-07-14 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:32:15
    “claims or accusations that has been made against us is that we have lifted God's congregation above God's word. I do not believe that and I guess that you don't believe that either. ... I think that what is really in question here is that they are not willing to accept but have rejected the understanding of God's word which is held by God's congregation. They have their own ... understanding of it that is what is in question”
    12 days after the 2022 removals; denies ranking the congregation above the Word, then makes the congregation's understanding the test.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2022-07-14 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:34:08
    “We understand and believe that the Holy Scriptures teach that God's Word and God's congregations cannot be separated from one another. ... We recognize that there are many, many people, Christian denominations, that read from and speak from and no doubt love and cherish the same Bible that we do. But they do not understand it and believe it.”
    Same sermon [32:15-34:59]; ends with 'the Holy Spirit speaks in God's congregation'.
  • Phillip Huhta, Glendale (radio devotion), 2022-07-19 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 00:09:41
    “We Christians must, however, remember that God and his word are still above the congregation. Then he continues, the congregation remains the body of Christ and the holder of the truth only on the condition ... that adheres to the word, that is believes in it and lives by it. The written word of God is our only authority, according to which all doctrines and teachers are to be evaluated and judged.”
    17 days after the 2022 removals, quoting a 1948 Finnish summer-services writer while still an LLC minister.
  • Brian Johnson, Spokane, 2022-07-31 both-sides ▶ 00:33:06
    “And they've said to us, don't follow man. ... Return to the word. But here in the congregation, through the mouth of each one of you, through the believers, is that good speaking voice of the shepherd. ... This is not above the word and the word is not above it, but the word dwells within the congregation.”
    Four weeks after the 2022 removals; rejects ranking either way, places the Word 'within the congregation'.
  • Russell Roiko, Rockford, 2022-08-23 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:27:57
    “Some of these who used to be our dear brothers and sisters in faith became so wise in themselves, so knowledgeable, so learned, memorized so much of the scriptures and the confessional writings that they thought they had the right to examine ... others' faith, and the foundation of others' faith.”
    Aug 2022, weeks after the removals; 'these past spiritual storms'.
  • Russell Roiko, Rockford, 2022-08-29 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:19:51
    “So I think of it as I already described in that aspect that somebody thinking they can build their house on the word of God simply by reading and memorizing it and reading the confessional writings and memorizing them and quoting them and so on. Of course, it doesn't build faith that God requires. It causes a person to have a carnal faith, a rational faith,”
    Aug 2022; house on the sand applied to reading, memorizing and quoting Scripture and confessions.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC delegate report discussion, 2022-10-23 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 01:09:58 transcript
    “We can go round and round and round and read scripture and talk about how we forgive, who we should forgive. We're tired.”
    After the 2022 removals; addressed to two members.
  • Brian Johnson, Elk River, 2022-12-25 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:07:59
    “It has been said for years by others that we must recognize ... Return to the Word. ... Brethren and sisters, the Word has always been here. ... The Word and the congregation belong together.”
    Christmas sermon; answers 'Return to the Word' from 'others'.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2023-02-20 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:20:24
    “It is unerring in its message of salvation and doctrine. This congregation here on earth is the body of Christ. It cannot err for that reason that Jesus Christ himself is the head.”
    2023; 'this congregation here on earth' unerring in doctrine.
  • Mikko Pasanen, Phoenix, 2023-02-27 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:35:10
    “We recall even that they. They wanted to read more Bible. And speak about the word of God. And how gracious and loving our heavenly father is. Which he is. We don't deny that. But. ... they did not remember the third part of the Triune God, the Holy Spirit.”
    Feb 2023; 'the last heresy' compared to those who resisted the Holy Ghost in Acts 7.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2023-03-05 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:27:38
    “With sorrow we witnessed how many found their own knowledge, their own ... studying of the Bible to be greater than the voice that speaks in God's congregation.”
    March 2023; about those who left. Same sermon adds 'Reading the Bible is important' but 'not made a demand' [00:30:35].
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2023-03-05 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:29:33
    “Brother and sister, if we consider those discussions where it almost seemed like the reading of the Bible was a demand”
    Same sermon; continues 'Reading the Bible is important ... But we know that in God's kingdom it is not made a demand.'
  • Stephen Warwaruk, Saskatoon, 2023-03-13 both-sides ▶ 00:35:52
    “And I had personally heard that one brother had said that God's congregation here on earth is above what's recorded in the Bible. ... So God's congregation isn't above what's recorded in Scripture. ... But what we understand and preach in God's kingdom is in unity with what is recorded in the Bible.”
    March 2023; reports the SRK chairman's January 2023 opening statement answering 'accusations that we were putting the congregation above the Bible'; says a brother had said exactly that.
  • Loren Keplinger, Spokane, 2023-03-19 both-sides ▶ 00:23:27
    “We hear from this most recently departed group so often that God's word ... His written word is the highest authority. And we also believe this. But this written word is not alive unless it is brought to life by God's spirit itself. And his spirit is only found here in his kingdom.”
    March 2023; concedes the departed group's highest-authority claim, then locates the Spirit only in 'his kingdom'.
  • Kimmo Puolitaival, LLC, 2023-04-03 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 00:29:25
    “And that the word of God is the highest authority. Through which all the doctrines and teachers should be verified. And that through that word should be everything written, investigated or verified.”
    Easter 2023 at the LLC; matches book p.177.
  • Adrian Pirness, Elk River, 2023-05-22 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:15:46
    “The Holy Spirit doesn't teach one individually different than it teaches collectively in God's kingdom. ... Here, God's kingdom is the mother, the unerring mother.”
    May 2023.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2023-07-23 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 00:12:08
    “we know that scripture is the highest authority and we know that God has given to his children the Holy Spirit of God which teaches us which interprets the Holy Scriptures”
    July 2023; affirms Scripture as highest authority, with the Spirit as interpreter.
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga, 2023-07-30 both-sides ▶ 00:29:12
    “We can say that our reason is in this way, that it is not above God's Word, but rather it is before we ought to examine even this, our own reason and understanding in the light of God's Word and in the light of His congregations.”
    July 2023; reason subordinated to both the Word and the congregation.
  • Andrew Roiko, Elk River, 2023-08-07 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:19:42
    “Dear brother from Finland said at the speakers and elders meeting just recently at Silver Springs this summer that here in this kingdom it is unerring. ... This kingdom cannot err. ... It cannot err even in the smallest point of doctrine.”
    2023; echoes the Luther quotation the book itself prints (p.156).
  • Jim Frantti, Ishpeming, 2023-08-27 both-sides ▶ 00:34:29
    “And that didn't mean that God's kingdom is somehow set above God's word. God's word is our highest authority. But the living word is only there where God's spirit is. It can't be found elsewhere in this world. ... People can't find God's kingdom even by their own careful reading and study of the written word of God”
    Aug 2023; a year after his 2022 annual-meeting remark, explicitly denies setting the kingdom above the Word.
  • Keith Moll, Menahga, 2023-10-29 both-sides ▶ 00:11:25
    “And also, the Word of God is joined perfectly together with this Holy Spirit. It cannot be separated. One is not above the other, but they join perfectly.”
    Oct 2023; Word vs Spirit (not congregation).
  • Kevin Moll, Elk River, 2023-12-10 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:32:33
    “Those who have gone away in this past heresy, how perhaps they have even this same thought that God would show, that God would open to them where they are wrong. ... Begin to demand of God that God would open to them.”
    2023; Job parallel.
  • Brian Johnson, Cokato, 2024-01-21 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:27:16
    “God's word and the congregation are inseparable. ... They cannot be parted. ... The Word of God is within the congregations here this morning.”
    Psalm 122 sermon; inseparability formula.
  • Ronald Honga, Prescott Valley, 2024-01-28 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:31:51
    “Become those who understand. Those who are able to understand and read scripture like the last heresy. They emphasize so much, we must read, we must know. ... And the Holy Spirit, the gift of the Holy Spirit and the faith which is given by and through the Holy Spirit was lost to them.”
    Jan 2024 on 1 Pet 4.
  • Andrew Roiko, Elk River, 2024-02-18 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:36:24
    “And if one refuses to be obedient, refuses to listen to what the mouth of the Lord, the congregation has spoken, they will be devoured with the sword.”
    2024 on Isaiah 1:16-20; 'the mouth of the Lord' (Isa 1:20) applied to 'the congregation'.
  • Jim Moll, Prescott Valley, 2024-04-14 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:07:02
    “And it seems like in the past, recent past, there were those who elevated the word above the congregation. But stop to think there, brother. The word of God is Jesus.”
    Reporting a recent meeting's topic 'the relationship between the Word of God and the congregation of God'.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2024-06-23 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:24:14
    “Or they are so strong that they are above rebuke. They cannot be rebuked. Prove to me how I have gone astray. Rather than to listen to the voice of the mother, Mother Sarah, the mother congregation, the Holy Spirit who speaks of nothing but love.”
    June 2024; ten virgins.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2024-06-30 word-above-congregation (fairness) ▶ 00:43:55
    “That's why to us it's the highest authority and guide and teacher. The light in which all other teaching and preaching needs to be examined and tested.”
    2024 sermon on 2 Tim 3:14-17; matches the book p.177 wording.
  • Daniel Kumpula, Rockford, 2024-07-14 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:30:49
    “through our own study of God's word, where by simply studying the Bible and coming to our own revelations and understanding that we become heaven acceptable. No, that's not the way it is.”
    July 2024; about salvation, not authority.
  • Andrew Roiko, Elk River, 2024-07-15 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:15:36
    “this heresy here in North America, how those who were led astray by the enemy of souls tried to lean upon the written word of God as if that was all that was needed. ... But as Paul wrote in the sixth verse, the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.”
    Transfiguration Sunday 2024 on 2 Cor 3.
  • Keith Moll, Rockford, 2024-07-21 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:14:59
    “recently departed into heresy have begun to build their own understanding close to God's kingdom. ... but it is when they are outside of this kingdom there is not this Holy Spirit to lead and to guide that even God's word”
    July 2024; sentence trails off in the transcript.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2024-07-29 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:25:40
    “That is what happened in this last heresy. ... They placed the word of God above the congregation of God. ... The congregation of God ... and the undying word of our Heavenly Father are one, two in one.”
    Sermon on 2 Chr 1:7-12 framed as 'spiritual fornication'; names Word-above-congregation as what happened in the heresy.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2024-08-11 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:24:13
    “There was also this understanding that if it's not recorded in God's word, if it's not in this book that we call the Holy Bible, then it's man's word. This is a misunderstanding or a wrong understanding because we know that of course this is God's word.”
    Aug 2024, discussing 'fundamentalism'; the claim that what is not in the Bible is man's word called a wrong understanding, because there is also 'the spoken word of God'.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2024-08-11 both-sides ▶ 00:25:56
    “And there has been those that, as we experienced in the last heresy, the most recent heresy, that there were those that had a wrong interpretation of scripture.”
    Same sermon: 'the Spirit is what interprets the Word of God'; check one's reading against how others believe.
  • Peter Lever, Spokane, 2024-08-12 both-sides ▶ 00:09:50
    “And we know that the Word is not above the Spirit. That's one point that seems to be spoken of with those who have left God's kingdom. [That] God's written word is above the Spirit. When we were told in one of the epistles, I'm not sure if it's John or James, that the Word, the Father, and the Spirit are one. They're one. One is not above the other. And we've heard that many times in the last number of years. We know God's Word is our highest authority on earth.”
    Aug 2024; attributes 'written word above the Spirit' to those who left, then affirms highest authority.
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2024-08-19 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:02:53
    “Even in the recent spiritual storms, there has been, there was even this kind of a question as to which is higher. ... That is, is God's word above the congregation or is God's congregation above God's word? ... And as the brothers have noted, that that is an absurd question. ... They are one and inseparable.”
    Opening of sermon on Rev 10:9-11; calls the Word-vs-congregation question 'absurd', citing 'the brothers'.
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2024-08-19 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:03:23
    “As one older brother who has gone to his rest even pointed out, and he said that you can even take these Bibles that are written here. ... and burn every single one of them and destroy off of smartphones every single Bible app. ... I added that part.”
    Illustrates that 'God's congregation is never without God's holy word' even if every Bible were destroyed; attributes the Bible-burning image to a deceased older brother and says he added the Bible-app part himself.
  • Kevin Moll, Monticello, 2024-09-01 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:39:59
    “And I think even in this recent heresy that we experienced, some that went astray, perhaps even stopped there, that they wish to prove their point or their thought according to God's Word. ... But when we open God's Word and we read and we try to decide, is this according to God's Word, my thought, how even we can become led astray so quickly.”
    2024; next step recommended is asking 'what do God's children then say about this matter?'
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2025-01-05 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:32:00
    “This shows us that that true light of the understanding of God's word is here in the congregation of God. ... It has been tempting for man throughout time and is tempting even today to elevate one's own understanding above that which the congregation of God teaches.”
    Zechariah's golden candlestick applied to the congregation as holder of the right understanding of Scripture.
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2025-01-05 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:33:14
    “And even in recent times and the last storms of the heresy, those who considered and held their own understanding to be greater than the understanding that was taught and spoken of and preached of in God's congregation, ... lost the way and fell away from this precious unity that we have.”
    Same sermon; applies the point to those who left in 'the heresy'.
  • Brian Johnson, Elk River, 2025-01-06 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:15:21
    “How often we heard, just turn to Christ. ... Or turn to the word. ... Or the words above the congregation. ... They cannot be separated. ... They are one and inseparable.”
    Lists 'turn to the word' / 'the word above the congregation' among 'the errors' of 'that last heresy', citing the last ministers' camp.
  • Ronald Honga, Prescott Valley, 2025-01-26 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:23:08
    “Some have left. And their pride has carried them away. This understanding of the human mind and being able to be knowledgeable about the doctrine and understanding of God's word. ... has led them astray.”
    Jan 2025.
  • Brian Johnson, Seattle, 2025-04-18 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:18:22
    “Demanding spirit, show me. This is not the spirit of God. Help me. ... Show me where I'm wrong. This is a dangerous condition to be in.”
    Good Friday; the impenitent thief's 'demanding spirit'. Not explicitly about Scripture.
  • Arvin Pirness, Menahga, 2025-05-04 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:17:45
    “we start to elevate ourselves, we start to latch onto and trust our own understanding above that of the congregation. ... So begins the fall away from grace and the dependence upon knowledge of scripture, carnal wisdom.”
    May 2025 on Ezek 34. Arvin Pirness signed the 2026 LLC board letter.
  • Chad Simonson, Flathead Valley, 2025-08-17 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:20:28
    “We even remember those in this last heresy, how they turned to their own understanding for matters of faith, and the devil led them astray.”
    Aug 2025 on Prov 3.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2025-08-17 discourages-own-reading ▶ 00:21:08
    “There was some that had grown within themselves. They began to be teachers of men. They suddenly had great understanding of the scripture and questioned the doctrine that we have always known in God's kingdom, or the teachings of the Holy Spirit.”
    Aug 2025; 'During the last heresy, what did we hear and experience?'
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2025-10-12 both-sides ▶ 00:36:32
    “It felt like they were trying to beat the Word of God onto our... The Word of God is the highest authority. And it is. But it's also connected with God's Kingdom. It's opened by the Spirit. ... It's not intended for private interpretation.”
    Oct 2025; those with 'a misunderstanding of Scripture' felt to be 'pounding ... with the Bible'; affirms highest authority in the same breath.
  • Michael Kuopus, Ishpeming, 2026-01-04 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:24:25
    “How sad it is that even when maybe some of you have heard that, how the believers, we have been told that, oh, you're elevating yourself. ... You're elevating yourself above the Word of God when you try to rebuke me or tell me how to believe.”
    Jan 2026; reports and rejects the charge that the believers' rebuke elevates them above the Word.
  • Troy Wuollet, Phoenix, 2026-01-11 both-sides ▶ 00:28:38
    “it was written in this way that god's word is the guide is the yardstick and our highest authority regardless of the words or understandings of those”
    Jan 2026; same sermon says the congregation 'cannot be separated from God's word' [00:23:44].
  • Swen Sorvala (Phoenix; presenter), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:08:26 transcript
    “it's so important not to listen to false teachers even when their message is so close and what would it mean when it's so close and it's often based on scripture and we can't argue with ... scripture in and of itself, that it is God's word. So therein lies, it's the interpretation thereof. And God's word is opened by the Holy Spirit. And so you and I are not necessarily theologians”
    Opening youth-evening presentation replayed at the meeting; speaker not identified in the file.
  • Steve Wuollet, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 discourages-own-reading ▶ 01:03:02 transcript
    “[My heart is yearning for you, Phil], to humble your understanding, lean not onto our own understanding, but humble ourselves and hear the Spirit.”
    Said to Phil Siljander.
  • Lauri Nevala (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 01:42:39 transcript
    “I think it was even in the presentation that even the devil quoted scriptures to Jesus to try to get him to do things that were contrary to God's will.”
    Said to Phil Siljander after 'there's nothing wrong with your responses'.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Rockford, 2026-03-21 both-sides ▶ 00:26:40
    “And we have been accused of ... placing the congregation above God's word. But I personally have not observed that. I don't believe that to be the case at all. But believe as God's word itself shows, and as our forefathers in faith have said, ... God's word and God's congregation cannot be separated one from another.”
    2026; repeats the 2022 denial and the inseparability formula.
  • Ramin Shulda, Longview, 2026-03-22 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:25:40
    “But this former believer asked, well, where does it say this in God's Word? ... And we can say you could read this Bible as many times as you wanted to, and you wouldn't find where it says that. ... As children of God, dear brothers and sisters, aren't we so fortunate that we wish to be obedient to the mother in the congregation?”
    March 2026; on 'home teachings of the congregation' about makeup and nail polish that are not in the Bible.
  • Bryce Pirness, Outlook, 2026-04-12 congregation-over-word ▶ 00:32:56
    “So many times those writings and those confessional writings of Luther became a topic and a questioning point among those who had left in the heresy of God's kingdom. ... where those individuals took their own understanding of what was being recorded and tried to put their understanding above those and of that understanding of the Holy Spirit.”
    April 2026, after a weekend on the confessional writings.
  • Ross Fredrickson, Menahga, 2026-05-10 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:17:16
    “That the mother congregation never errs.”
    May 2026; from a hymn verse 'the Spirit never teaches errors'.
  • Jim Frantti, Cokato, 2026-05-31 congregation-cannot-err ▶ 00:37:21
    “And that's why we say of God's kingdom that it is an unerring kingdom. ... It's an unerring mother. ... And if we remain in her care, we will be cared for properly.”
    May 2026; LLC president at the time of the 2022 removals.
  • Kevin Ruonavaara, Longview, 2026-06-07 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:27:24
    “And I've thought even recently it seems that some of those who have departed in this last heresy have been even like these Pharisees and have demanded to see, to show me ... Show me in Scripture. ... Give me evidence. ... And such is the heart of a Pharisee.”
    June 2026 on Luke 12.
  • James Jurmu, Monticello, 2026-06-07 both-sides ▶ 00:27:40
    “You and I have experienced those visits with those who have great wealth of knowledge of God's Word, who have not owned the Holy Spirit in their heart, and they have felt through their own knowledge and wisdom that they were better than others. ... And yet God wants you and me to read and to study.”
    June 2026; also says believing children 'have more power than you do through your knowledge of Scriptures'.
  • unidentified speaker, LLC annual meeting, 2026-07-03 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 01:37:43 transcript
    “And when I sit here, I have to think to myself that this is not, the Holy Spirit is not a spirit of proof.”
    Response to a dissenter's presentation of Scripture/Luther citations.
  • Tyler Hendrickson (Longview), LLC annual meeting, 2026-07-03 congregation-over-word ▶ 02:04:09 transcript
    “please hear what's being said today you don't need to understand it just desire to hear what the kingdom of god is saying”
    Addressed to the Coastal California representatives before the expulsion vote.
  • Ray Waaraniemi (meeting chairman), LLC annual meeting, 2026-07-03 congregation-over-word ▶ 02:10:53 transcript
    “mean that everything you said and quoted was not believed and understood. Many scripture portions, many portions of Luther's writings, these were not the reason why ... have resulted in heresy. We believe that the Holy Spirit has revealed this to the living congregation of God.”
    Response to motions (citing Scripture and Luther) that received no second.
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga, 2026-07-26 bible-quoting-suspect ▶ 00:17:49
    “As I have heard in our time also in social media, there are many that they do these posts that quote scripture and outwardly even appears to be the correct message. And a child of God can even become tempted in these things”
    July 2026, false prophets sermon; Scripture-quoting posts as temptation. Context does not name the dissenters.
  • Adrian Pirness, Elk River, 2026-08-02 both-sides ▶ 00:22:04
    “And they have the ability to quote many portions of scripture. And it can feel sometimes in those discussions that they have much understanding and knowledge of God's word.”
    Aug 2026; about someone 'outside of God's kingdom'; same sermon encourages humble 'personal study'.
Continual forgiveness 124 statements: 70 sermons by 35 ministers, 43 statements at 16 meetings, 8 documents (2017–2026) ↑ top
  • Howard Parks, Menahga, 2017-03-12 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:18:48
    “But those heresies have been from years gone by, and sometimes when questions of forgiveness come up, we remember how it was that once forgiven, always forgiven.”
    Cites 'once forgiven, always forgiven' as an old heresy when 'questions of forgiveness come up'; next segment says believers 'need that power of the gospel constantly'.
  • Peter Lever, Longview, 2017-04-16 both-sides ▶ 00:34:51
    “Even if you had so much faith that you could believe past, present, and future sins forgiven? You need the gospel every day, don't you?”
    Argues the daily gospel is still needed, while himself affirming that Christ died for 'past, present, and future sins' (00:34:29, 00:35:20).
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Southern Minnesota speakers meeting, 2017-05-02 condemns ‘always forgiven’ typed transcript (PDF)
    “I can’t think that all [of] my sins are forgiven all the time. Because, unforgiven sin leads into the world. If all sins are always forgiven, no one can one fall away from faith. It is impossible. I think it is even logically impossible. That is Pollarian doctrine.”
    Responding to Craig Kumpula on sins forgiven before hearing the gospel; calls "all sins always forgiven" Pollarian doctrine. Source is a typed excerpt transcribed from the meeting audio.
  • Walt Lampi, Ministers teleconference, LLC office, 2017-11-02 distances ‘always forgiven’ typed transcript (PDF)
    “Some maintain that since we have a righteousness of Christ, we are always forgiven. [There are] discussions of the robe of righteousness, and do not need to continually hear the gospel.”
    Lists "always forgiven" among positions said to cause unrest in North American Zion; he says the list reports positions heard, not his own statements.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC (RLLC) congregation discussion, 2018-01-21 distances ▶ 00:14:26 transcript
    “And when I hear this continual forgiveness, it almost, for that term, to me it almost goes against that teaching in the sense we don't need to put”
    Says the term sounds like grace but seems to go against the teaching of putting sin away; earlier [00:13:29] asks whether 'continual forgiveness' is being confused with grace.
  • Walt Lampi, RLLC (Rockford) discussion afternoon, 2018-01-21 distances ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:36:01 transcript
    “Some maintain that since we have the righteousness of Christ, we are always forgiven. We do not need to continually hear the gospel.”
    Same report repeated at Rockford as a "peculiar phenomenon". Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC (RLLC) congregation discussion, 2018-01-21 calls-confusing ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 01:30:23 transcript
    “Why is there such an emphasis on just we're always forgiven instead of try to keep a tender conscience and put sin away? That's a confusing message.”
    Participant calls the 'always forgiven' emphasis a confusing message that could lead to 'it's forgiven anyway'.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC (RLLC) congregation discussion, 2018-01-21 both-sides ▶ 01:54:56 transcript
    “What does continual forgiveness mean? There was no rebuke over sin. There wasn't an explanation of what could be done.”
    Reports people confused after sermons; in the next breath concedes the term is theologically correct. A later speaker [02:19:03] says 'as Rick said, I understand what it means', so this may be a 'Rick' (not confirmed; not attributed).
  • Jouko Haapsaari, RLLC (Rockford) discussion afternoon, 2018-01-21 distances ▶ 02:03:06 transcript
    “I do not have much understanding to speak about continual forgiveness. But what I hear is that the spirit is troubled. That is clear. It is obvious. There are warnings of emphasis, like emphasizing continual forgiveness too much.”
    Says the spirit is troubled by emphasis on continual forgiveness. Excerpt compilation. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Randall Haapala, Rockford, 2018-02-18 condemns ▶ 00:18:23
    “This term and how it's being used and spoken of bothers me. And it is continual forgiveness that we live in continual forgiveness.”
    Says he has 'heard lately' the term and it bothers him; next segment (00:18:51) concedes 'yes, we live in God's grace every waking moment of the day'.
  • LLC Board of Directors, LLC board meeting, Phoenix Winter Services, 2018-02-23 distances document (PDF)
    “It was acknowledged that there have been some questions and differing understandings on these topics that have caused concern.”
    Synopsis lists "Continual Forgiveness" with robe of righteousness etc. as topics of differing understanding that "have caused concern".
  • Steven Kallinen, Menahga, 2018-04-01 distances ▶ 00:11:53
    “When we think even of this very precious matter, your child of God, there has been such comments sometimes raised in the near time of continual forgiveness.”
    Reports that 'continual forgiveness' comments have been raised and asks 'What does it really mean?' (00:12:21). 'in the near time' is likely a mis-transcription (e.g. 'in recent time').
  • Carey Simonson, Outlook, 2018-04-08 both-sides ▶ 00:08:49
    “that our sins are continually forgiven. And this then may put in the thought that do we need so often this gospel of the forgiveness of sins to personally own and believe.”
    Says 'this thought' has come 'that our sins are continually forgiven' and warns it may make the gospel seem unneeded; in the next segment he says Jesus paid for 'the sins that are yet to be committed'.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC ministers camp, April 2018, 2018-04-14 distances ▶ 00:18:02 transcript
    “But sometimes it has felt to me that this term, continual forgiveness, means that our sins of the past and present and future are all forgiven, and therefore I don't even need to hear the gospel.”
    Says the term is new to him and he doesn't know what it means: 'Maybe it means what I think of as living under grace' [00:16:20]. Named only by the file title; later meetings refer to 'Jim Frantti's presentation'.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC ministers camp, April 2018, 2018-04-14 distances ▶ 00:19:23 transcript
    “The term continual forgiveness almost implies to me like there's no such thing as unforgiven sin.”
    Continues: 'So that's why that term feels odd to me... I'm not saying this to judge anybody who has used this term' [00:19:47]; prefers 'living under God's grace'. Speaker named only from the file title ('Frantti presentation').
  • Jouko Haapsaari, LLC ministers camp, Stony Lake, 2018-04-14 condemns typed transcript (PDF)
    “I see this teaching of continual forgiveness fatal. Fatal. It’s killing the faith. It is not right.”
    Calls the teaching "fatal... killing the faith".
  • unidentified speaker, LLC ministers camp, April 2018 (Tom Huhta session), 2018-04-15 both-sides ▶ 00:24:56 transcript
    “And then, secondly, I just want to say this, that the speech, the concerns that have arisen about continual forgiveness, those of us that have been concerned about that, we're not concerned about what Juhani Ulias wrote on page 79 of his treasure hidden.”
    Responds after Tom Huhta read Juhani Uljas ('Faith is being in the righteousness of Christ and living in forgiveness every moment' [00:05:27]) and concedes the Uljas wording is fine. 'Ulias/Yuhani Willius' = Juhani Uljas; 'treasure hidden' = Treasure Hidden in the Field.
  • unidentified brother (concern reported by another speaker), MLLC / RLLC meeting at LLC, 2018-04-24 distances ▶ 01:42:24 transcript
    “He had related to me some concerns that he had regarding this term, continual forgiveness. And the concern, he said, was that it was blurring the lines between grace and absolution.”
    A second-hand report of an unnamed brother's concern. The speaker reporting it defends the term himself [01:42:47].
  • unidentified speaker, MLLC / RLLC meeting at LLC, 2018-04-24 calls-confusing ▶ 03:07:48 transcript
    “I've had other conversations, for instance, about this, that if we talk about continual forgiveness and we always think about it as grace, why do we need to call it continual forgiveness? We've always talked about it as grace.”
    Same speaker [03:01:30] concedes the term 'has been used in publications in Zion' and that he reads it as grace, but says at [03:02:24] 'If you say that continual forgiveness is bad, I agree. Wholeheartedly.'
  • unidentified minister at the April 2018 ministers camp (as reported), Minneapolis Congregation Meeting (report of the April 2018 ministers camp), 2018-05-06 distances ▶ 01:00:40 transcript
    “One asked, why change the words? Until this day, grace has been sufficient for us. Why add the words of continual forgiveness?”
    Reported ministers camp remark. The same report at [01:05:01]: 'Continual forgiveness troubled me also.'
  • unidentified minister at the April 2018 ministers camp (as reported), Minneapolis Congregation Meeting (report of the April 2018 ministers camp), 2018-05-06 condemns ▶ 01:10:29 transcript
    “Another brother said continual forgiveness kills faith. I first heard it 10 years ago and now it came up again by our dear brother John in the Rockford family discussion. It is a wrong doctrine.”
    Speaker reads a summary of statements made at the ministers camp; 'John' = John Lehtola (MLLC).
  • unidentified minister at the April 2018 ministers camp (as reported), Minneapolis Congregation Meeting (report of the April 2018 ministers camp), 2018-05-06 condemns ▶ 01:11:44 transcript
    “But he said, what am I to repent of? The response from [Finland] was that continual forgiveness is poor doctrine.”
    Reported exchange: John Lehtola asks what he must repent of and is told that continual forgiveness is poor doctrine. Lehtola then [01:12:15]: 'If the term continual forgiveness causes confusion, I will avoid it.'
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-06 distances ▶ 02:25:16 transcript
    “We've mentioned maybe not using that term again.”
    Says the Rockford presentation seemed to cause confusion and that he asked John Lehtola about not using the term; was alarmed that John said he 'would take that to his grave'.
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-31 distances ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:15:52 transcript
    “First started or came up at a MBMAC meeting, mission meeting, Midwest Mission meeting a couple years ago where a brother said that he believes that his sins, past, present, and future are already forgiven. And he claimed that all I have to do is believe that.”
    Given under the heading 'Living under grace versus continual forgiveness' [00:15:24]. Continues at [00:16:18]: 'it seemed like such an attack against the use of the gospel. Sins are atoned for, but I need forgiveness.'
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Minneapolis (MLLC) meeting, 2018-05-31 calls-confusing ▶ 01:28:25 transcript
    “if continual forgiveness is the same as grace, why do we need new terminology for that? I don’t worry about [it] if it's the same. Like Russ said in his presentation. We also heard the statement that the past, present and future sins are forgiven. That sounded odd.”
    Questions the need for the term; troubled by "past, present and future sins are forgiven". Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-31 calls-confusing ▶ 01:54:00 transcript
    “And so that's why that continual forgiveness confused me so much is because I didn't in my own life have that experience.”
    Earlier [01:53:06]: 'I, for one, have been one that's been so troubled by this thought, this idea, these words.' The opening words 'Patrick Bryan's right here' [01:52:38] look garbled.
  • unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 2018-06-14 distances ▶ 01:37:23 transcript
    “So this person who tried to explain to me how they believe about continuing forgiveness, explained that the gospel is not the gospel that saves, it's faith that saves, and the gospel is only meant for taking care of things in this time.”
    Calls continual forgiveness 'a familiar topic here in Southern Minnesota' [01:36:28] and describes steering a conversation with someone who held it toward sin.
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30 both-sides ▶ 00:58:25 transcript
    “Even though there is such a thing as, like Luther talks about in the [Large Catechism], and he uses the word continual forgiveness, but then there's attached to this is daily repentance.”
    Concedes that Luther uses 'continual forgiveness' but ties it to daily repentance.
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30 condemns ▶ 01:02:06 transcript
    “The question is the confusion around continual forgiveness. That has been discussed and when we try to drill down into what does this continual forgiveness mean, it comes to grace. But the message that people hear whether you believe it or not is freedom to sin.”
    Concedes that, examined closely, the term 'comes to grace' but says the message heard is 'freedom to sin'. At [01:02:49] the person he is questioning (apparently John Lehtola) answers: 'I haven't heard one person who believes that way.' The same passage is in part3 [00:51:29].
  • unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30 distances ▶ 01:30:25 transcript
    “And at that meeting, I became concerned about John, what he was speaking about this continual forgiveness, and he went on and on and on about it.”
    Recounts the January 2018 Rockford discussion and later being 'alarmed at his boldness' [01:21:13].
  • Eric Mattila, Alaska, 2018-10-21 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:22:17
    “And if somebody speaks to you or somebody tells you that we no longer need to put sin away, that your sin that you have not yet committed, even tomorrow, is already forgiven, or that you no longer need to wash your robe, in the blood of the Lamb that run the other way. Do not listen to this sort of teaching.”
    Tells listeners to 'run the other way' from anyone saying sins not yet committed are already forgiven. Earlier in the sermon (00:08:58) he praises a congregation that did not adopt 'new theories and new concept and new wording'.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, LLC ministers teleconference, 2018-11-01 condemns typed transcript (PDF)
    “The new concepts seem odd. I am fearful of them. There is a wrong teaching. Twelve years ago I arrived in America. In the first month, I received an email. In conclusion, there was an odd list of questions. It was in regards to the moderate use of alcohol, worldly music and continual forgiveness. I was worried. I don’t believe in this way.”
    Recounts an email listing continual forgiveness with moderate alcohol use and worldly music; from a typed summary of the meeting, not word-for-word.
  • Randall Haapala, Cokato, 2018-11-04 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:19:00
    “If you think about this, that all our future sins that we haven't even committed are already forgiven, I ask you honestly, What kind of life does this breed? I would say it breeds permissiveness of sin.”
    Calls the idea 'the devil doing his work'. Just before (00:18:29) he says sins 'are forgiven when that audible message of the Gospel is preached', which runs against book p. 87.
  • Curtis Simonson, Cokato, 2018-12-31 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:32:52
    “That we just think that they're always forgiven. There's no need to care for those matters. That it's not according to God's Word.”
    Warns against thinking sins are 'always forgiven' when one is not bothered by them; does not name a group.
  • Tommi Kinnunen, Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 distances ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:36:06 transcript
    “my spirit does not answer that my sins are always forgiven. There’s something there that doesn’t answer my spirit.”
    Typed meeting notes (PDF). Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Jim Frantti (Pelkie), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:46:27 transcript
    “To say that when Christ died on the cross, he paid for all of my sins, my whole lifetime's sins. They have all been paid. But that's different than saying that my sins, even of the future, are already forgiven ahead of time.”
    Preceded at [00:46:00] by 'the gospel is not a reassurance that my sins have been forgiven ahead of time'.
  • Evan Siltala, Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 02:41:53 transcript
    “if the gospel was only reassurance and I thought my sins were always forgiven, I tell you, it wouldn’t take long and I’d never have to hear the gospel again.”
    Reports Wolf Lake-aligned individuals saying past, current and future sins are forgiven, and objects. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Evan Siltala (Cokato), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 02:42:53 transcript
    “From the sermons in Wolf Lake, what is the rest of the congregation, why are they receiving or how are they receiving this message that their sins are always forgiven and that the gospel is just reassurance?”
    Aimed at Wolf Lake sermons; based on talks with three people who 'align themselves with Wolf Lake'.
  • Evan Siltala (Cokato), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 02:46:49 transcript
    “But yeah, the topic of forgiveness is very concerning when there are those that expressly say, all my sins are already forgiven. Where is that going to lead you?”
    Warns about where 'all my sins are already forgiven' leads children and later generations.
  • Randall Haapala, Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 03:30:33 transcript
    “if we believe that our sins are all always forgiven, past, the future, whatever, where does this lead us? I know where it leads me,’ cause I have found great comfort in that gospel. But with this kind of belief it would lead me to permissiveness of sin and leniency.”
    Identified in the typed transcript as "Randy Haapala-Cokato" (Cokato minister Randall Haapala). Different statement from the 2018 Rockford sermon already on the page. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Andrew Raisanen, Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 calls-confusing ▶ 04:26:54 transcript
    “I've never heard Robes of righteousness or continual forgiveness until recently. I'm sure I've read about it in the Bible or heard it in conversation but never in such great depth. I'll be honest it's extremely confusing”
    Says he never heard "robes of righteousness" or "continual forgiveness" until recently. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-01-27 condemns ▶ 00:53:34
    “And begins to think that my future, my past, my present, and my future sins are forgiven. And when we believe this, we go from that deep ditch on the right side and we wake up one morning in the filth”
    Describes believing past, present and future sins forgiven as the 'right-side ditch' that leads to the 'filth' of the left.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2019-02-10 condemns ▶ 00:33:29
    “And I guess for myself, I would consider some of these new ideas that we have heard going around. And I would even say one, this doctrine of continuous forgiveness.”
    Lists 'this doctrine of continuous forgiveness' among 'new ideas' that are not durable building material; glosses it (00:33:59) as 'That my sins of tomorrow are already forgiven.'
  • Eric Mattila, Glendale, 2019-02-17 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:47:12
    “That if your sins are already forgiven, so don't worry about putting sin away. This kind of message will lead you out of God's kingdom.”
    Warns that a message that sins are 'already forgiven' will lead out of God's kingdom.
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2019-03-03 both-sides ▶ 00:15:29
    “Thus, I need that power of the gospel also every day. There is no such a thing in my life as continual forgiveness that would have forgiven things that are going to happen into the future.”
    Rejects 'continual forgiveness' defined as forgiveness of future sins, in the same breath as affirming he needs the gospel 'every day'.
  • Melvin Kallio, Outlook, 2019-03-17 both-sides ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:19:05
    “There are some in our day even who would want to preach a different gospel. They would want to say, once forgiven, always forgiven. And it is true to a certain sense that God does daily forgive us all our sins.”
    Calls 'once forgiven, always forgiven' 'a different gospel' preached 'in our day', then concedes God 'does daily forgive us all our sins'.
  • Eric Mattila, Cokato, 2019-03-17 distances ▶ 00:25:57
    “That we would begin to think that we are strong in our faith. That we would already believe for tomorrow that our sins are forgiven.”
    Warns against believing 'for tomorrow' that sins are forgiven; stresses believing today.
  • Tommi Kinnunen, Cokato, 2019-03-25 distances ▶ 00:31:15
    “this thought or concept of us being continually forgiven. He said, that is something that I heard in the world. That's what it's like in the world. And he instructed them that were listening to run from it, to run from that thought.”
    Approvingly relays a young man's comment at a gathering where 'a discussion about continual forgiveness came up' (00:30:44), telling listeners to run from it.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-03-31 condemns ▶ 00:45:51
    “Was this belief that you can buy the forgiveness of your sins, not only those sins that you had already committed, but you can buy forgiveness for future sins that you have not yet committed? Five hundred years ago, they were preaching this. Continual forgiveness.”
    Equates 'continual forgiveness' with indulgences for future sins and says 'Satan is in our midst' (00:46:20). In the same sermon (00:40:12) he says 'We live in continual grace'.
  • Eric Mattila, Alaska, 2019-04-07 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:23:50
    “When you hear that message that sin is not so dangerous, that don't fear sin, it is already forgiven, Do not believe this sort of teaching.”
    Warns against a message that sin is 'already forgiven'; links it to neglecting absolution (00:24:48).
  • David Niemi, Toronto, 2019-04-07 condemns ▶ 00:28:06
    “It is that same gospel which many today wish to even take away from God's kingdom. They wish to say that we even live in continual forgiveness.”
    Presents 'live in continual forgiveness' as taking away the gospel.
  • Donald Lahti, LLC Board Member Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 both-sides ▶ 00:10:16 transcript
    “This new phrase that they have coined ‘continual forgiveness’ is nothing more than a birth of that Pollari heresy. We know – and I won’t go into depths on it – God’s grace is every day with us. We can believe each and every day.”
    Calls the term the birth of the Pollari heresy, then affirms that grace is with us and we can believe "each and every day". Bruce Johnson re-read the Pollari line at the 2019-12-07 Wolf Lake meeting. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Andrew Loukusa, LLC Board Member Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 both-sides ▶ 02:32:41 transcript
    “Then as far as the issue of continual forgiveness or the robe of righteousness. I had a discussion with some individuals not too long ago. It really troubled me with some of their viewpoints. Not necessarily what they were saying was wrong,”
    Troubled by some individuals' views on continual forgiveness, while conceding that what they said was not necessarily wrong. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • George Koivukangas, Roaring Fork Valley, 2019-04-19 condemns ▶ 00:39:47
    “And with it, then he brings new understandings and new enlightened wisdom and knowledge that we begin to justify our sins, that we have continual forgiveness in this way, that once we have heard the gospel,”
    Attributes 'continual forgiveness' ('even those which we have not done yet', 00:40:17) to Satan's 'new understandings'.
  • unidentified speaker, Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 distances ▶ 03:34:16 transcript
    “But I don't think that there's that much looseness in that term that that's all we need to do is believe that Christ died on the cross for our sins and we're continually forgiven and we're heaven acceptable.”
    Earlier [03:33:14]: 'I've never heard of continual forgiveness before, and it was kind of almost like it was shocking.'
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-04-28 both-sides ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:17:15
    “That my future sins are already forgiven. I live in forgiveness of Christ daily. And that was one of the aspects of that heresy.”
    Says a brother recently asked him about 'I live in Christ's forgiveness daily' (00:16:29) and answers 'And we do, don't we' (00:16:46), then says an old heresy twisted that saying into 'future sins are already forgiven'.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 01:53:43 transcript
    “Some say our sins are always forgiven no matter what sins one might have fallen into. Always forgiven. Always. Why do we talk about sin? Sin is always forgiven.”
    Continues [01:54:09]: 'Unforgiven sin is what separates man from God.'
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 01:58:25 transcript
    “Some say that our sins are already forgiven before we commit them. It's kind of those kinds of comments that cause”
    Speaker says he heard it 'with my own ears'; the next line [01:58:55] reads 'That wrenching anxiety'.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 distances ▶ 02:17:10 transcript
    “If you find a different understanding of forgiveness, I guess the term that keeps being sent to me by text and email is continual forgiveness. I don't even know what that means in Christ's description, because it's not there in those words.”
    Continues: 'And those words, continual forgiveness, are big. We're supplanting something that creates these discussions' [02:17:40].
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 calls-confusing ▶ 02:19:39 transcript
    “The core problem is this continuous forgiveness of sin, and I'm confused on that myself.”
    Short remark calling the issue the 'core problem'.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 condemns ▶ 02:25:05 transcript
    “It goes back to that term, continual forgiveness. It doesn't fit with that continual forgiveness, that term. If we live in continual forgiveness, how can sin attach to our conscience?”
    Says he has had discussions with people who say 'sin does not attach to conscience. The gospel is just a reassurance.'
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 condemns ▶ 03:50:53 transcript
    “So I don't disagree that it's not there. In fact, I believe it came from there. But I think it's a dangerous thing when we start to talk about what continual forgiveness really is. You supplant the word or the term in place of grace.”
    Concedes the term comes from SRK/Finnish usage: [03:50:26] 'I agree that this is only out of Finland. In fact, I honestly believe that this term came from Finland.' ('only out of Finland' may be mis-heard.)
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 distances ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 04:30:47 transcript
    “I have to say I struggle here and I guess that's where we say we need more discussion. We certainly need that. Because this raises right away for me many questions about all my sins are already forgiven before God.”
    Reacts to a written communication sent to congregation members, which said [04:30:28] 'although a child of God believes that all of his sins are already forgiven before God, he still desires to hear the gospel'.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-06-30 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:46:32
    “And how can you have unforgiven sin if you believe that your future sins are already forgiven? As many have believed that, as I mentioned in that heresy in 1920, many believed that.”
    Framed around the 1920s (Pollari) heresy; no explicit present-day reference.
  • David Niemi, Toronto, 2019-08-11 condemns ▶ 00:21:44
    “Then there are those who even say this, that don't worry about putting that sin away, that you live in continual forgiveness. But what does Jesus teach us?”
    Presents 'you live in continual forgiveness' as teaching not to put sin away.
  • Eric Mattila, Rockford, 2019-08-11 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:30:45
    “and if they had instructed me in this way, that that sin is already forgiven. That those sins of the future have already been forgiven. That you do not need to bother me with your sin.”
    Imagines his parents telling him sins of the future are already forgiven, then calls it 'a destructive message' and 'twisted message from the enemy' (00:31:09-00:31:35).
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-09-01 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:31:29
    “They have no need of the Gospel because their sins are already forgiven unto them. That is a terrible, terrible place to be.”
    Speaks of 'many former children of God' in 'false teachings' (00:31:04) who think their sins are already forgiven.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-10-13 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:35:06
    “Or if we begin to think that these words are just reassurance that your sins are already forgiven. Don't worry. This is what Satan has done throughout time. He has brought these wrong understandings and wrong teachings and wrong doctrines into God's kingdom.”
    Rejects treating absolution as 'just reassurance' of sins already forgiven; calls it Satan's wrong doctrine.
  • Rodrick Sorvala, Elk River, 2019-10-20 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:27:55
    “I know that there's been some mistrust of the Holy Spirit here in God's kingdom. And I've heard myself that sins are already forgiven, but we know that that's not according to God's word.”
    Reports hearing 'sins are already forgiven' within God's kingdom and rejects it.
  • Randall Haapala, Phoenix, 2019-10-27 condemns ▶ 00:28:09
    “I personally have had those discussions that there are those that think and believe that even the sins that they haven't even committed are forgiven already it's not according to what the Bible teaches”
    Introduced with 'The enemy is is attacking inside the walls of God's kingdom' (00:27:40); next segment concedes 'yes dear brother and sister they have been atoned for'.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, LLC ministers teleconference, 2019-11-01 condemns typed transcript (PDF)
    “The [last item of] continual forgiveness is a totally new concept, and it is very worrisome to me.”
    Agrees with Rick Nevala that "there is wrong teaching"; recounts the email again.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-11-10 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:28:53
    “as those did in that heresy of the polarism, where the righteousness of faith is so perfect that even my future sins are already forgiven today. And yet, that is very deceitful. It is from Satan.”
    Framed as the 1920s 'polarism' heresy, which he says 'affected even in Cocado', and asks 'is there anything new under the sun?' (00:23:40).
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-11-17 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:28:53
    “No matter how Satan may have convinced us or tries to convince us that the gospel is just reassurance unto you that indeed your sins are already forgiven. That is a sermon of unbelief.”
    Calls the view of absolution as 'just reassurance' of already-forgiven sins 'a sermon of unbelief'; just before (00:28:21) he says 'I need to hear the gospel every day.'
  • Jouko Haapsaari, MBMAC meeting, 2019-11-23 distances typed transcript (PDF)
    “I would have to say that I feel slightly uncomfortable about this phrase or term of ‘continual forgiveness’. I'm not hung up with words. Please don’t say that ... But the words have meaning. The concepts and words mean something.”
    Prefers the biblical term "grace" (Rom 5:2).
  • Arthur Harju, Roaring Fork Valley, 2019-12-01 calls-confusing ▶ 00:34:05
    “It seems as though Satan is even attempting to bring confusion around these matters of forgiveness, which is the central message of God's kingdom.”
    Generic remark on 'confusion around these matters of forgiveness' (December 2019); no term named.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 both-sides ▶ 00:29:50 transcript
    “The phrase of continual forgiveness has come up now and then. It seems to be a [burr under] some saddles. Maybe it would be good if we could just not think about that phrase.”
    Asks that the phrase be set aside, then in the same turn affirms living 'every moment in forgiveness'.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 distances ▶ 02:36:32 transcript
    “If sins are forgiven all of the time, what happens when we preach the gospel? I also heard this term ’continual forgiveness’ for the first time in Finland in my life in some discussions.”
    Finnish SRK visitor, not an LLC speaker. At [02:39:53] says some believers felt the term carried 'some new teaching'.
  • Eric Jurmu, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 condemns ▶ 03:48:12 transcript
    “It is a dangerous thing. Our forefathers who went before us lived and traveled by grace, under the same grace care of that we travel. To introduce subjects and topics such as continuous forgiveness, it brings to the weak ones and the tired ones worry and doubt.”
    Part of a longer turn criticizing 'wrong understandings and wrong emphasis and the wrong terminology' [03:47:20].
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 distances ▶ 04:46:40 transcript
    “I finally brushed the terms away. I think we are believing in the same way.”
    After visiting Anne and Esa Vilkama 'about continuous forgiveness' [04:46:08], says he set the terms aside and thinks they believe the same way; earlier [04:42:59] asks when the term entered 'the public discussion and bec[a]me a debate'.
  • Loren Hillukka, Cokato, 2020-01-19 calls-confusing ▶ 00:47:30
    “Here, I had also thought when reading this portion of God's Word of some of the confusion of today even around this matter of forgiveness.”
    Generic reference to 'the confusion of today' about forgiveness (January 2020).
  • Daniel Huhta, Longview, 2020-02-16 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:17:06
    “gospel message again, or maybe we can say once forgiven, always forgiven. That is not according to God's word. That is contrary to how we believe as God's children.”
    Rejects the claim that, having received the gospel once, one doesn't need it again; this is framed as heard 'even in our time in Christianity' (00:16:36).
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2020-04-19 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:15:37
    “some who have gone into heresy have had this understanding that once you have heard the gospel and have had your sins forgiven you are always forgiven and nothing matters anymore what you do”
    Attributes 'always forgiven' to 'some who have gone into heresy'.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2020-08-10 both-sides ▶ 00:16:08
    “The reason why my heart jumped with joy is because during the last few years we have heard this new concept of continual forgiveness. And there is something which is very right and true and proper and there is something that troubles.”
    Calls continual forgiveness a 'new concept' and says it 'replaced grace with continual forgiveness' (00:16:38), but concedes part of it is 'very right and true and proper'.
  • Michael Kuopus, Ishpeming, 2020-10-18 distances ▶ 00:18:20
    “I have often thought about this matter of when Jesus died on the cross that our sins are automatically forgiven forever.”
    Raises the idea that sins are 'automatically forgiven forever', then answers 'That's not what the Bible teaches, does it?' (00:18:50).
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2020-11-05 condemns ▶ 00:22:39
    “There is a part to this topic which over the last few years has been talked about, which is forgiveness and how it relates to sin. Some have said that we have continual forgiveness. And in that sense, it seems like the topic of sin is diminished. We are always forgiven.”
    Ties 'continual forgiveness' to the discussions 'over the last few years' and to 'forgiveness for today, tomorrow, and into the future' (00:23:07).
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2020-11-05 condemns ▶ 00:27:30
    “And when I think of the topics of our time, for instance, continual forgiveness, it seems to have this type of, that doctrine has this type of thought to it, that there's not reason to put sin away.”
    Calls continual forgiveness a 'doctrine' implying no reason to put sin away. In the same sermon (00:37:04) he asks 'Is there continual forgiveness?'
  • David Niemi, Outlook, 2020-11-08 condemns ▶ 00:19:07
    “We know that there are those who would wish to even say that we live in continual forgiveness or that once a believer, always a believer. That is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.”
    Puts 'continual forgiveness' alongside 'once a believer, always a believer' and calls both not the Holy Spirit's teaching.
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2020-11-23 distances ▶ 00:21:18
    “There is this desire by some in today's time frame to separate absolution from the proclamation of the gospel. Such reference was made to the terminology of continual forgiveness.”
    Links 'the terminology of continual forgiveness' to separating absolution from the gospel. Earlier (00:11:04) he refers to a November ministers' teleconference. The header date is 2020-11-23; the audio file is named 20201122.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2021-01-01 distances ▶ 00:20:38
    “thinking about the discussions of our days, they live in continual forgiveness when they live in the covenant of baptism. Luther, though, would argue against that.”
    Applies 'continual forgiveness' 'for lack of better terms' (00:20:10) to churches that rely on baptism alone, with reference to 'the discussions of our days'.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Phoenix, 2021-01-31 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:29:04
    “sometimes when someone emphasizes this, that our sins are always forgiven, have they become rich in themselves, that they do not need the Gospels,”
    Suggests that emphasizing 'always forgiven' reflects being 'rich in themselves' (Laodicea).
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2021-02-20 condemns ▶ 00:15:43
    “Jesus did not come with this kind of message that do not have any worries about that your sins are continually forgiven. No, he did not say this,”
    Says Jesus did not tell the Ephesus 'preacher' that his sins are 'continually forgiven'.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Phoenix, 2021-02-20 both-sides ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:36:41
    “Let us not depend on this, that my sins are already forgiven. It is true that when God looks at us, through the merit of His Son, we are without sin.”
    Warns against relying on sins being 'already forgiven' while conceding that before God, through Christ, 'we are without sin'.
  • Terry Ruonavaara, Roaring Fork Valley, 2021-03-01 both-sides ▶ 00:25:53
    “And I've often wondered in this way that where does this thought come from that one would desire to just have continual forgiveness and live a life with this thought that no matter what sins we fall into, they're always forgiven.”
    Calls it a topic 'spoken much of in recent years in God's kingdom' (00:25:22), then a minute later uses the term himself: 'We are always in need of continual forgiveness.'
  • Mikko Pasanen, Phoenix, 2021-03-07 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:18:55
    “You become telling things that we don't need to put away sins. That it is already forgiven.”
    Ties the Laodicean 'I am rich' to teaching that sin 'is already forgiven'. In 2018 he said forgiven sins are 'always forgiven'. Non-native English phrasing.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2021-04-19 both-sides ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:33:49
    “And that's why it is so dangerous to speak that we're always forgiven no matter what. Of course we are forgiven. God forgives us because of His grace. But it's not some kind of automatic process.”
    Warns against 'always forgiven no matter what' while affirming 'Of course we are forgiven'; says 'I cannot explain it so clearly'.
  • Arthur Harju, Roaring Fork Valley, 2021-05-30 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:35:15
    “it seems as though they wanted to live by grace but not by truth that if our sins are forgiven they are always forgiven”
    Refers to 'those who wanted to make the way maybe a little bit broader' (00:34:42); concedes 'we live by grace'.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2021-06-06 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:11:22
    “maybe we could say debating whether one would need to ask for the gospel or if their sins were always forgiven. And I asked him, are you ashamed to beg?”
    Recounts debating a man over whether one needs to ask for the gospel or is 'always forgiven'.
  • Donald Lahti, LLC, 2021-07-02 distances ▶ 00:22:58
    “But when we think of grace, it is not what some people in the world would say, a continual forgiveness. It is continual grace”
    Preached at the LLC summer services. The segment just before (00:22:29) says 'God, through His grace, forgives us for what we do not even know.'
  • Jeremy Glynn, MBMAC meeting, 2021-11-20 condemns ▶ 03:14:11 transcript
    “going back to the topic of would there be a time when we wouldn’t forgive, continual forgiveness, the robes of righteousness. I remember that the discussions were always – at least from my perspective – it felt like those (people) trying to change how we understand those matters. The concern was that it was a position that was dangerous to widen the path of the believer and make more room for the enemy.”
    Says the concern was that these positions widen the path of the believer. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • George Koivukangas, Monticello, 2022-01-16 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:41:26
    “And the two main teachings where they were wrong, one of them was this, once forgiven, always forgiven. Confession. Confession isn't needed.”
    Framed as the Pollari heresy at Cokato/French Lake.
  • Eric Mattila, Spokane, 2022-02-19 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 01:26:06
    “As I have even heard some in our day say, that they have such strong faith that they believe all their sins tomorrow and all their sins of the rest of their life already forgiven.”
    The archive file holds two sermons; this passage is in the second, which begins at 00:33:57, and the archive names Mattila as its speaker.
  • Martin Wuollet, Spokane, 2022-05-29 both-sides ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:23:55
    “but rather we can endeavor simply in the stronghold of understanding that our sins are always forgiven and I would say That that is indeed true. That the gospel is not weak.”
    Criticizes 'making sin trivial' through 'always forgiven' but immediately says 'that is indeed true'.
  • Russell Roiko, Rockford, 2022-07-24 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:16:44
    “Once a believer, always a believer. Once forgiven, always forgiven, so on. That kind of strange teaching that is so foreign, so contrary to the scriptures and to the teachings of the Spirit of God.”
    Asks whether listeners have heard this 'these past many years that we battled' (preached 2022-07-24, the day of the expulsion-era services). Also on a YouTube clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPn2IhXSCc0
  • Loren Keplinger, Longview, 2022-07-24 both-sides ▶ 00:20:35
    “that these words of continual forgiveness were brought to our attention, that this matter, that one who is a believer, as we know, is heaven acceptable, that God indeed forgives our sins.”
    Reports the 2022 summer-services instruction (00:19:03-00:20:06) on the 'subtle message' of continual forgiveness, while affirming God 'indeed forgives our sins'. Also on a YouTube clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGQWt-iwVlA
  • Loren Keplinger, Longview, 2022-07-24 calls-confusing ▶ 00:21:31
    “that we don't want to use words, that we as humans can so easily misunderstand, that we can so easily begin to become confused with this way that we believe,”
    Says the words could be 'converted to that false understanding... once forgiven, always forgiven' (00:21:06), so they should not be used. 2 min later (00:23:09): 'as believers, we are continually forgiven.'
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2022-11-01 distances ▶ 00:20:05
    “And the one that had went into that heresy, they had told the believer that you can go on washing your robe. I am simply going to believe my sins forgiven.”
    Tells a Pollari-era story after saying 'there has been much discussion and debate around this matter. And I don't pretend even now to know or understand' (00:19:38).
  • Steven Laiho, Williston, 2022-12-11 distances ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:31:58
    “are already forgiven. I find that a strange, a strange way to express that.”
    Calls 'sins... we haven't fallen into yet are already forgiven' a 'strange way to express that' and asks 'how is it that we feel this sin if it is already forgiven?' (00:32:21).
  • LLC Board of Directors, The Voice of Zion, January 2023, 2023-01-01 distances ▶ source
    “This was accompanied by another disturbing trait, namely, the dismissal of the importance of preaching absolution in sermons and in general.”
    Does not use the term; charges those who departed with minimizing sanctification and confession and dismissing preached absolution (the "separate absolution" theme). Date is the issue month.
  • Greg Jacobson, Flathead Valley, 2023-03-26 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:23:42
    “How we don't need to care for our consciences on a daily basis. And how once our sins are forgiven, they're always forgiven. But this, dear brothers and sisters in faith, is an incorrect teaching.”
    Attributes this to 'this most recent heresy that we've had' (00:23:13) and compares it to a 'blank check to commit sin'. Also on a YouTube clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAGY3mSwmEY
  • Randall Haapala, Cokato, 2023-04-17 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:19:21
    “And oh, how the flesh would love that kind of belief. That our sins are always forgiven. Even the ones we haven't even committed. That's not the way it is.”
    Next segment concedes 'our sins have been atoned for' (00:19:42).
  • Michael Ylioja, Outlook, 2023-08-13 both-sides ▶ 00:19:59
    “This is not a correct teaching. We need to battle sin and temptation daily.”
    Responds to a teaching 'that once we have this name of a child of God, we always will' (00:19:32). Later in the same sermon: 'A penitent sinner is always forgiven.' Next sentence 'We can't hear...' may be a mis-transcription of 'We can hear...'.
  • Loren Hillukka, Elk River, 2023-08-14 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:30:25
    “That maybe it's okay for them to believe that their sins are always forgiven. And then they have no further need of asking for the gospel.”
    Describes those who 'wanted to broaden the way to heaven' (00:30:14).
  • Daniel Parks, Menahga, 2024-01-28 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:32:42
    “but they used to have this saying that once forgiven, always forgiven. So their faith was very shallow”
    Refers to 'one of those heresies that have left God's kingdom many, many years ago' (00:32:14); no present-day reference.
  • Russell Roiko, LLC, 2024-03-17 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:10:07
    “Why would it even come up as it did during these past battles? You don't need to preach the gospel all the time. Those sins are already forgiven.”
    Refers to 'these past battles'. He then cites Romans 3's 'forgiveness of sins that are past' (00:11:01) and adds 'We don't have to worry about tomorrow' (00:11:28).
  • Loren Keplinger, Spokane, 2024-07-29 calls-confusing ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:28:31
    “That once one believes, isn't one always forgiven? And even to ponder this matter can even cause confusion, for we know the gospel is the source of strength in our life.”
    Attributes the question to 'this great heresy, this recent heresy' (00:28:02). Also on a YouTube clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjRP8-fIkN8
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2024-08-11 both-sides ▶ 00:26:11
    “One of those terms that was often used was continual forgiveness. But that wasn't new, that they used that in a wrong way. We understand we live in continual grace of God.”
    Just before (00:25:46) he says 'They take terms that we have used and has been used in the living kingdom for generations.' Also on a YouTube clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LNSPuX3Vus
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2024-08-11 condemns ▶ 00:27:32
    “That once you're forgiven, you're always forgiven. That you have continual forgiveness. That's in the hidden heart of man where Satan dwells.”
    Follows a reference to a lawsuit 'thrown out of court' (00:27:24).
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2024-09-22 condemns ▶ 00:26:56
    “Or once I've had my sins forgiven, I'm always going to have my sins forgiven. It's completely contrary to what God's Word teaches us”
    Framed as 'what the world feels'; no explicit reference to the dispute.
  • Pekka Sipila, Williston, 2024-10-24 distances ▶ 00:38:38
    “So they could not believe future sins forgiven.”
    Manna analogy (00:38:13 'Manna could not be gathered for longer than one day'); interpreted Finnish sermon.
  • Ward Plough, Longview, 2025-08-31 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:39:56
    “if we begin to listen to that message of the enemy, that the gospel is unnecessary, that putting sin away really is not a big deal, that your sins are already forgiven, don't sweat, don't worry”
    Calls 'your sins are already forgiven' a 'message of the enemy'.
  • Gary Hoikka, Cokato, 2025-11-02 distances ▶ 00:29:46
    “We cannot store up this Gospel message. We cannot store up this forgiveness from yesterday into future days.”
    Manna analogy; no group named.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2025-11-10 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:32:19
    “That once forgiven, we are always forgiven. And that is a lie from Satan himself.”
    Preceded by 'they have begun to believe that even our sins that we have not committed are already forgiven unto us. And that is a sermon of unbelief' (00:32:02-00:32:11).
  • Richard Nevala, Menahga, 2026-01-13 both-sides ▶ 00:31:07
    “Some have tried to say that once you're in God's kingdom, you don't need forgiveness. We have a continual forgiveness. And I guess in some ways they're correct because we live of the grace of God.”
    Restates the opposing view, then concedes 'in some ways they're correct'.
  • Randall Haapala, Cokato, 2026-06-21 condemns ‘always forgiven’ ▶ 00:22:19
    “And I was telling them that this was one of those matters in this last heresy. That there were those that thought and believed that our sins are always forgiven. Even the ones we haven't even committed.”
    Says this came up in Ecuador with translators discussing 'can God forgive sins directly from heaven' (00:21:50). He then concedes 'they've been paid for' but says 'this kind of thinking is not correct' (00:22:50). Two months later (2026-08-23) he preaches 'A God that wants to continually forgive us'.
Withholding forgiveness from one who asks 103 statements: 35 sermons by 25 ministers, 66 statements at 14 meetings, 0 documents (2017–2026) ↑ top
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2017-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:33:36
    “Nothing more I would want to do to anybody on the outside of God's kingdom is to preach the gospel to them. That's what Jesus sent us to do. We don't even have to ponder this matter and debate this matter. … So let us not debate these kind of matters even. Because the repercussions of withholding forgiveness to someone, [to a penitent one,] are great.”
    Second part at [00:34:07].
  • Rodney Nikula, Outlook, 2018-04-01 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:30:17
    “So God uses us as the mouthpiece. He opens our mouth to preach the gospel, and he closes our mouth when he knows the heart of that one is not seeking and searching in the correct way. And it's not a punishment, but it's for that reason that they would understand that they're still missing something.”
    Easter Sunday, John 20:19-29.
  • Jim Frantti (attributed by file name and content match; no speaker labels), LLC ministers' camp, Stony Lake, 2018-04-14 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:07:44 transcript
    “would there ever be a situation in which God's children cannot preach the gospel? My thoughts on it might be a little too simple, I don't know, but the way I've thought about it is, how can we say never? How can we say to God, you can never close the mouth of your children? He has done it.”
    Presentation to ministers; later [00:10:24]: binding is used because 'it does not help someone to give them a false security'.
  • Unidentified speaker ('Dennis'), LLC office meeting with Minneapolis and Rockford boards, 2018-04-24 condition-before-gospel ▶ 01:07:21 transcript
    “Jeremy, three years ago preached that a heretic needs to repent of heresy. And I just think that there's unbelievers and there's Christians, and I don't know if he still believes that”
    Hearsay report of a sermon; the named minister replies at [01:09:23].
  • Unidentified speaker (the minister whose sermon 'Dennis' cited; 'Jeremy' is an inference), LLC office meeting with Minneapolis and Rockford boards, 2018-04-24 withhold-from-asker ▶ 01:10:32 transcript
    “If I preach the gospel to somebody and they don't receive the blessing, they're bound in their own sin. Now, if God closes my mouth, … I have sorrow that that happened to me. And who am I to say that God would never close my mouth? I agree that that could happen. That would never be my wish.”
    Mixed statement; second part at [01:10:52]. An earlier line [01:09:50] 'I don't believe that' is unclear in the recording.
  • Russ Roiko (reporting the April 2018 ministers' camp), Minneapolis congregation meeting, 2018-05-06 preach-to-asker ▶ 01:12:37 transcript
    “John asked for the gospel and it was preached, but he did not agree with the larger concerns that were lovingly expressed to him by brothers at the camp.”
    Chair: 'Thank you, Russ, for those greetings from ministers camp' [01:13:17]. Gospel preached to John Lehtola at camp.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis congregation meeting, 2018-05-31 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:28:40 transcript
    “those cases at those caretaking meetings in the 1980s were wrong. Forgiveness shouldn't have been withheld. And that's our position statement, 2011. … Could God cause and allow such a situation where forgiveness wouldn't be preached? It's impossible for us to know that. We'll leave that in God's hands.”
    Second part at [00:29:39]. The speaker's account of what he said in 2011.
  • Lauri Nevala, Monticello, 2018-08-12 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:33:14
    “God himself knows who is penitent, who is not. And even sometimes we have in these past few years we have heard these discussions of is there ever a time when … forgiveness can't be preached or won't be preached. The Bible speaks of a time when the doors of the kingdom will be closed and the gospel is no longer preached. … even if such a one longs for it.”
    Parts at [00:33:43] and [00:34:15]; he leaves it 'in God's hands'.
  • Brian Johnson, Elk River, 2018-08-19 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:32:41
    “Don't withhold the gospel. The gospel cannot be proclaimed too much. Believe your sins forgiven in Jesus' name and precious blood.”
  • Don Lahti, Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 withhold-from-asker ▶ 01:05:44 transcript
    “Whosoever sins you remit, they are remitted unto them. And whosoever sins you retain, they are retained. And these are Jesus' own words. Why did he put them there? Because there are circumstances that forgiveness cannot be preached.”
    Speaker per the human transcript (Don Lahti-Brainerd).
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 withhold-from-asker ▶ 01:44:36 transcript
    “The question was not of withholding forgiveness. The question was, could there ever be a time? Could there ever be a time? That was the question. … brothers answered that question, used the examples from scripture that you cited, Saul and Samuel, for example, and answered, yes, there could be, but no one was looking for this thought of being able to withhold forgiveness for this reason or that reason.”
    His account of the 2011 MBMAC discussion; second part at [01:45:05].
  • Roger Alajoki, Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 preach-to-asker ▶ 03:56:30 transcript
    “I think the danger is that we can end up in a position that has happened before in history of the kingdom of God that people have begun to examine the hearts of those that ask. And Bible gives us no permission for such. … there were many instances where someone may have asked for the gospel and it was not preached.”
    Speaker per the human transcript (Roger Alajoki-Wolf Lake); second part at [03:57:53].
  • Sam Roiko, Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 withhold-from-asker ▶ 04:33:51 transcript
    “We all agreed that there may be a time. And then to hear some say that I cannot go along with that or I cannot agree with that raises that concern that are you putting yourself above the Holy Spirit in the congregation?”
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2019-01-20 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:20:44
    “He didn't have a penitent heart … And he revealed to Samuel that it was the case with Saul that he was not penitent. And Samuel was directed to not worship with Saul. … God still reveals matters through His kingdom.”
    Eight days after the Menahga joint boards meeting; parts at [00:21:15] and [00:21:47].
  • Dave Edwards, Glendale, 2019-03-17 refused-in-practice ▶ 00:47:23
    “It's not that we are withholding forgiveness from someone. It is that they are denying the forgiveness. … there are times when one would not be able to forgive. This has happened in my life.”
    Introduces his own account; second part at [00:47:45].
  • Dave Edwards, Glendale, 2019-03-17 refused-in-practice ▶ 00:50:56
    “But he said, I don't believe that that's correct. But because I like the sounds of those words, can you preach those words to me? And I'll never forget it. I felt as if I couldn't say a word. Not a single word. … he said, are you going to preach those words to me? And again, I could not say a word. … And so that was withheld from him in that way.”
    First-hand: a lapsed member asked twice at a gas station; parts at [00:51:27] and [00:53:11]. He adds that preaching 'would have been fine' [00:52:22].
  • Jon Bloomquist (addressed as 'John'; attribution from context), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 ask-not-repent ▶ 03:04:15 transcript
    “We want to help those who have fallen. And the words, you know, words mean something. To ask is not the same thing as to repent, for example. They're two different words, two different concepts. Esau asked with tears. … As the scriptures say, but he found no place of repentance. He wanted the blessing, but he wasn't penitent. And that reflects the understanding that you find in Luther, in Johannes Ulius' introduction on confession and the keys, and many, many other places. That's what we've taught.”
    Answering Wolf Lake's confession-of-faith document; 'Ulius' is Uljas. Second part at [03:04:45].
  • Roger Alajoki (attribution from context), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 preach-to-asker ▶ 04:19:44 transcript
    “the Bible tells us, and it has long been understood in Christianity, that we don't begin to examine the penitence of one that is asking for forgiveness. If we're going to make such a case that there's even this possibility that we'll reject to speak to somebody, how is that done without the examination of somebody's penitence? It's not possible. … I would rather err on the side of caution and preach.”
    Second part at [04:20:12].
  • Jon Bloomquist (addressed as 'John'; attribution from context), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 withhold-from-asker ▶ 04:21:02 transcript
    “I have said that there may be cases, I think, that I can't say that it was wrong. I don't know. There's many places I wasn't present.”
    Answer when Roger Alajoki asks whether some of the 1980s withholding was correct.
  • Jon Bloomquist (addressed as 'John'; attribution from context), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 withhold-from-asker ▶ 04:26:56 transcript
    “nothing would be easier and nothing would be more pleasing, the world would even applaud that, that we say always, whenever somebody asks, we preach the gospel. But unless we … remove from the scriptures these portions that show otherwise. And they're rare cases. Then I can't in good conscience accept that kind of a teaching.”
    Second part at [04:27:21].
  • Jon Bloomquist (addressed as 'John'; attribution from context), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 ask-not-repent ▶ 04:27:48 transcript
    “And we don't have to start digging in somebody's heart. But if by their words and actions they plainly indicate that they don't intend to repent, that is to turn away from the sin, reject the sin that the congregation sees that they're in, then that's not repentance. … Repentance and ask are not the same thing. Esau asked, he didn't repent. Saul asked, he didn't repent. And they're very rare, and they're these kinds of soul care situations.”
    Second part at [04:28:18].
  • Unidentified speaker (Menahga), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 withhold-from-asker ▶ 04:49:02 transcript
    “it's my understanding that the [Menahga] board and speakers are of one mind that there are times when the gospel would be withheld. And I said, yes, that's correct. We had that discussion and there it's scripturally clear and correct … there are times when the gospel of the forgiveness of sins will not be preached.”
    Recounts a phone call from a sister; Last clause at [04:50:30].
  • Unidentified speaker (Menahga), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 withhold-from-asker ▶ 04:51:28 transcript
    “But I will always forgive. To me, I was really left with the feeling that this person no longer trusts in the power of the Holy Spirit to open the mouth and to close the mouth. … But this individual now has placed her own understanding and her own mind above the teaching of the Holy Spirit.”
    A sister's 'I will always forgive' is treated as placing her mind above the Spirit. Second part at [04:51:58].
  • Timothy Niskanen, Toronto, 2019-11-02 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:25:46
    “Is there ever a time you wouldn't forgive someone? It is not very common. … But it happens. This is yet the love of the Heavenly Father to help His children here on this earth.”
    Second part at [00:26:15].
  • Eric Jurmu, Elk River, 2019-11-17 refused-in-practice ▶ 00:43:51
    “He wanted to hear those words of the gospel. But my father-in-law, he could not preach that gospel to him. He says his mouth was closed. … it never came that he was able to preach the gospel to his father when he asked in this way.”
    Secondhand family account; the father later believed. Second part at [00:44:12].
  • Jim Frantti (attribution from context), Minneapolis meeting with the LLC board, 2019-11-24 withhold-from-asker ▶ 01:03:31 transcript
    “when I've been asked this question about is there ever a time when the gospel can't be preached, I've had to just stick to this simple understanding and answer that why don't we leave it in God's hands. … It's not man's duty to search the heart of any person. It's always our wish to preach the gospel. But God can close the mouths of his children. So how can we dare to say to God, you can never do this?”
    Second part at [01:03:48].
  • Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:31:26 transcript
    “Dear brother, you do not have to carry the burden of sin. This is a kingdom of forgiveness and grace. And anytime that you want to hear the gospel, you can ask, and it is freely preached.”
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 preach-to-asker ▶ 03:20:25 transcript
    “The forgiveness stands. I don't hold anything against Darwin specifically about that sermon. The fact that he asked for the gospel, we preached the gospel and I think we all joined in that.”
    On Darwin Lake's 2015 sermon.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 withhold-from-asker ▶ 03:23:27 transcript
    “could there EVER be a time when the gospel could not be preached? Brothers gave Scriptural examples of such times. That was pretty much where the discussion ended. … We are not to evaluate someone's penitence or someone's heart. But if we go to those lengths to say that there could not ever be a time, I don't think that matches up with Scripture.”
    Second part at [03:23:57]. Also [03:24:27]: no one 'in our country or continent' has a desire to withhold.
  • Warren Raisanen, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 refused-in-practice ▶ 03:54:28 transcript
    “The 1980s was the work of Satan. It absolutely was. I watched people regularly pleading for forgiveness and it being withheld. … You are not penitent enough, so we cannot forgive you. Some of those people managed to stay in faith and some of them never came back.”
    First-hand on the 1980s; second part at [03:55:17].
  • Warren Raisanen, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 withhold-from-asker ▶ 03:57:43 transcript
    “In 2016, three of the Phoenix ministers -- they were young ministers -- they came back [from ministers camp at Stony Lake] and they were talking about that we needed to figure out when not to forgive. That was very, very scary.”
    Report of what three Phoenix ministers brought home from the 2016 camp; the congregation 'almost unanimously' rejected it [03:58:04].
  • Eric Skoog, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 preach-to-asker ▶ 04:01:26 transcript
    “There are times as believers when we withhold forgiveness. In our board meeting they shared this. They spent over an hour talking about examples of when we could do this. … Our board agreed that is not correct. … As believers, when someone asks for the gospel, we preach the gospel. And we let God do the work.”
    First sentence reports the ministers' claim; the rest is the Phoenix board's rejection. Last part at [04:01:47].
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 withhold-from-asker ▶ 04:25:43 transcript
    “I am not going to say that every situation what's wrong. I am not God. I cannot say that. But I emphasize that grave errors were made in that regard.”
    Answer to 'when is it okay?' about the 1980s; machine transcript has 'was wrong' for 'what's wrong'.
  • Al Lake, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 preach-to-asker ▶ 05:43:21 transcript
    “Forgiveness is given no matter what. If they do ask, of course, we are going to forgive. I find absolutely no point where we would withhold the gospel.”
  • Will Randall, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 withhold-from-asker ▶ 05:57:05 transcript
    “He came to the conclusion, well, actually there are times that we would withhold [forgiveness]. … There are times that it would be acceptable, permissible and even necessary to withhold [forgiveness]. … There's been another recent sermon that preached an example of withholding and permission for it.”
    Reports what a Gillette member brought back from visiting Minnesota speakers; last part at [05:59:10].
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2020-06-21 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:29:46
    “But we do not want to throw pearls to the swine. That good food from heaven, we don't want to give that to the pigs. … We want to give it to those who are penitent, repentant, and want to believe. And that doesn't make us judges. The Holy Spirit reveals all things. … Esau, with tears, asked for the blessing, but it was not given to him. You cannot fool the Holy Spirit.”
    Matthew 18:15-18; parts at [00:30:15] and [00:30:45].
  • Daniel Huhta, Longview, 2020-08-16 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:47:55
    “We see how King Saul attempted to confess his sin … But when the heart and conscience is full of sin and is not penitent, God, as we mentioned earlier, sees into the hearts of his children and saw into the heart of King Saul. And he did not forgive him. … there is times, although rare, that the forgiveness of God will not extend to one because one has rejected God. We trust and believe through the power of the Holy Spirit that God will reveal those times … when forgiveness won't be preached.”
    1 Samuel 15; parts at [00:48:22], [00:48:48], [00:49:19].
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2020-11-08 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:33:30
    “There is forgiveness, and then there is withholding forgiveness. They both exist very real. And the history of living Christianity has shown them both happen. … Withholding is so rare, so extremely rare”
    Unmerciful servant; second part at [00:33:58].
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2020-11-08 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:36:49
    “If a person knows that they have done wrong, forgive them. But if the person does not believe it, then it's a different story. God's grace is not a cloak for sin.”
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Phoenix, 2021-02-20 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:47:16
    “Jesus teaches us that we don't have authority to say enough is enough but when one is penitent we wish to preach the gospel … But dear brother, dear sister, if one is not penitent over sin, … It does not benefit him”
    Church Law of Christ; parts at [00:47:49] and [00:48:20].
  • Bruce Johnson, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:19:54 transcript
    “Where in the Bible has it instructed a believer to withhold forgiveness? I believe that the original question was not even this. Was the withholding of forgiveness from the children of God during the 1980s wrong or right?”
    Restates what he says the original 2011 question was.
  • Nick Ylitalo, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:22:55 transcript
    “The gospel at times, when the spirits so moves, can be withheld. … If it would happen, it would be done in love to reveal the condition of that individual. Maybe they are repenting on their own conditions, or who knows [what].”
    Recalls objecting at Darwin Lake's 2011 Bible class. Second sentence at [00:23:22].
  • Nick Ylitalo, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:24:16 transcript
    “The keys -- in this forgiveness discussion. It is such that God through his spirit has given us this power that we can free another person from their sin. And also, when in love it is needed, [we can] refrain from preaching the gospel.”
    Reads John 20:23 as permission to refrain.
  • Bruce Johnson, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 refused-in-practice ▶ 00:25:47 transcript
    “I lived in the 1980s. I marched to the front of the church. I have seen where [the gospel] has been withheld. I don't believe that it was right. … Forgiveness has been withheld even in recent years.”
    First-hand on the 1980s; 'recent years' claim at [00:42:47], not specified.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:31:23 transcript
    “Most recently with regard to Esau, Keijo Nissila writes about that in his book [on Hebrews]. The understanding is that there are situations where we as believers cannot preach the gospel to somebody who asked. Some of the confusion is also from the fact some equate the word to 'ask' with 'repent'.”
    Opening the forgiveness point of Menahga's letter to Wolf Lake; cites Luther, Nissila, Esau and Saul.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:31:54 transcript
    “They are not the same thing. It is certainly the case that we as human beings cannot see into another person's heart. Neither is right or proper to try and measure the depth of another person's penitence. It is openly acknowledged, as it was at that meeting in 2011, that there were errors made in those [caretaking] meetings in the 1980s, where that happened.”
    Continues directly from the previous block; concedes 1980s errors while keeping the distinction.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:32:34 transcript
    “But we do not have to see into somebody's heart if their words already reveal, for example, that they are not penitent. This was the case with Saul. That is a different question. That is why we have the understanding that we do. Sounds like some of you still deny that.”
    Addressed to the Wolf Lake board.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:33:08 transcript
    “You feel that there is never a case when you cannot preach the gospel. There is never a case when you would not preach the gospel when someone is penitent. If it is a little bit murky we would certainly want to err on the side of preaching the gospel.”
    Frames the Wolf Lake position and his own qualification.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:33:38 transcript
    “But if there is clear evidence in someone's words or actions that they are not repenting or turning away from the issue in question, that is not to try to dig into somebody's heart. It is what they are confessing themselves to. That wasn't the case with Saul, for example, and Esau.”
    The typed transcript reads 'wasn't the case'; the recording sounds like 'was the case with Saul'.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:34:01 transcript
    “I think it is a mistake if you equate 'ask' with 'repent'. That seems to be, at least to me, the fundamental problem. [someone asks, what?] In your understanding, if you equate the word 'ask' with 'repent' -- they are not the same thing. I think, as Nick expressed, that ought to always be the case.”
    His summary of 'the fundamental problem' with Wolf Lake's position.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:34:53 transcript
    “If you were walking down the road and you saw your neighbor's dog put its foot in a trap. You went over there and just petted and patted it. … That is in essence what we are doing, or something like that, if we preach the gospel to someone who has not recognized or acknowledged their sin. They remain in its grasp. That is how I understand it.”
    The trapped-dog analogy; the second sentence is at [00:35:25].
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:35:50 transcript
    “Roger, who is not here, in one of his speeches he used an example of when one would not preach the gospel. … I asked Roger if I heard him correctly. He had never previously acknowledged that. At our meeting at Brainerd, he insisted that [unless] someone hit him with a box of rocks, he would always preach the gospel. That is why it is a question for us.”
    Roger Alajoki's 'always preach' position is presented as the problem. Second sentence at [00:36:30].
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:38:02 transcript
    “You can't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If something has been wrongly used, it does not mean it cannot be used. That is why it is a question for us.”
    On the 1980s withholding: wrongly used does not mean it cannot be used.
  • Joe Wuollet, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:39:25 transcript
    “I believe the danger with what Jon just said is putting yourself in the judgment seat of God. That is God's place to judge whether someone is penitent or not. It is God's place to know the heart as to know whether or not the gospel is actually believed.”
    Direct reply to Bloomquist.
  • Joe Wuollet, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:40:05 transcript
    “After the new Awakening heresy in Finland, there was a discussion. I do not remember what year it was. When the forgiveness [issue] was discussed at the speaker's meeting, they took a stand: when a person asks for forgiveness, the person has to be forgiven. … It will be revealed in its time if people have believed [minister's meeting in 1947]. It was also reminded about the use of the keys of binding. They belonged to the congregation and not to the individual.”
    Cites the Finnish speakers' meeting (1947 per the transcriber's bracket); matches the book, p. 208. Second part at [00:40:26].
  • Randy Hillukka, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:44:40 transcript
    “I believe as Jon and Nick [Ylitalo] discussed forgiveness. As Jon explained, the Bible teaches where there was a situation with Saul and Esau. … Forgiveness was not given. So it is. Bruce, I don't worry about that place where I could be put in some day [to] judge. I trust that God will show me through the Holy Spirit, if that is to happen.”
    Second part at [00:45:33].
  • Esa Vilkama, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:49:56 transcript
    “There was a speaker's meeting in Finland in 1947. This was the question. Do we preach forgiveness to heretics or do they have to first clarify that they ask forgiveness for false doctrine and heresy? The matter was discussed. The conclusion was that "Forgiveness and repentance must be preached to the heretics as in general to those who are on the outside [of faith]".”
    Reads from SRK history books; the 1947 speakers' meeting.
  • Esa Vilkama, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:50:31 transcript
    “No, we do not need to clarify. We just preach forgiveness and time will tell if people have believed. … Jesus commanded to preach the gospel in all of the world. One cannot set any condition on the gospel. Sins must be preached forgiven without any kind of questioning.”
    Continues the 1947 citation; second part at [00:51:12].
  • Esa Vilkama, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:51:40 transcript
    “There are two keys. Only the congregation can bind. An individual cannot withhold forgiveness. It applies to a situation where the Church Law of Christ has been followed. In The last resort the congregation binds. I would keep these two issues separate.”
    Transcript: 'this is not like individual person withholding forgiveness' (a distinction, not a prohibition).
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 01:01:31 transcript
    “Some of us recall the 2011 meeting. We cannot say, never. It is because of the rare examples that are [existing] in God's word. We can trust that the Holy Spirit leads and guides. Your board actively rejected it in the discussions over the next several years.”
    Timestamp marked approximate in the aligned transcript.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 ask-not-repent ▶ 01:01:52 transcript
    “Esa, I do not agree with your understanding about Saul. God had rejected him as a king. That is not the same issue as not forgiving him, because he was not penitent. … Those are two different issues. I think about binding and withholding forgiveness. They are not even the same thing.”
    Reply to Esa Vilkama's 1947 citation; separates withholding from the key of binding. Second part at [01:02:43].
  • Bruce Johnson, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 refused-in-practice ▶ 01:06:40 transcript
    “In the Minneapolis meeting when Roger said that he would always forgive, he was accused of having unforgiven sins. Someone across the table [Jim Moll] could see into Roger's [Alajoki] heart.”
    Recalls the April 2016 Minneapolis meeting; bracketed name is the transcriber's.
  • Unidentified speaker [Milo Lake?], Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 01:10:15 transcript
    “Would the Holy Spirit contradict the words of Christ? If the Holy Spirit is God the Father, the spirit of Jesus Christ, would it contradict the words that he instructed for us to do? As far as the retaining of sins goes -- I think the remitting is pretty clear.”
    Transcriber's label carries a question mark.
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 01:14:21 transcript
    “If we believe the same on these matters -- on this matter of forgiveness -- we can confess our faith and say, yes, I believe that there are times through the spirit -- the spirit of God that is in each believer, God being all-powerful can withhold from preaching the gospel and forgiveness.”
    Makes agreement on withholding the test of 'whether or not we believe the same'.
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 refused-in-practice ▶ 01:15:01 transcript
    “There was one person who was traveling in heresy. He had an ecumenical understanding. … In this way he wanted to preach the gospel one to another. We can just preach the gospel to each other. The spirit did not answer. We are not able to preach the gospel. … There are times when God has through the power of the Holy Spirit withheld forgiveness.”
    Secondhand account of a now-deceased believer; last sentence at [01:16:38].
  • Steve Haataja, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 withhold-from-asker ▶ 01:18:17 transcript
    “The word 'never' is a pretty strong word. I do not have the desire that I would ever withhold. But I do not believe that God does not have the power ever to use the word never -- that it would never happen.”
    Was present at the 1980s meetings; 'I sure cannot say never'.
  • Leland Lake, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 preach-to-asker ▶ 01:21:04 transcript
    “Sometimes the discussion has felt to me like it is I who am choosing who is forgiven and when are they forgiven? That does not seem like it would be right to me, because I am not capable of choosing.”
  • Donald Lahti, LLC Summer Services, 2021-07-02 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:33:16
    “Are there times when God's Holy Spirit closes our mouth? This has happened when the person asking forgiveness is not sincere. We do not realize that, but God does. It is through their actions, through their conduct, you might say the way they bring things out, that it is very clear and God … does not give us the words to speak.”
    Summer Services sermon; followed by a family example (omitted here). Last clause at [00:33:48].
  • Jouko Haapsaari (attribution from context), MBMAC meeting, 2021-11-20 ask-not-repent ▶ 04:43:34 transcript
    “But if somebody says, I repent but continue, is that repentance? … But if you do not repent, it's lip service. Repentance is a change of heart. It's not only words.”
    Addressed to 'Antti'; second part at [04:44:33].
  • Stefan Forstie, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 preach-to-asker ▶ 02:05:59 transcript
    “With Brett's repentance – I would say that when he asked for the gospel – for offenses that he caused the congregation. … After that it is like it is open season. A few people talked to him after [the 'repentance'] about their concerns.”
    Gospel was preached when asked; concerns continued afterward. Second part at [02:06:26].
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2022-01-24 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:30:47
    “When has God withheld the gospel when we have cried from a heart that has felt the pain and weight of sin?”
  • Jim Frantti (attribution from context), LLC board meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:24:36 transcript
    “God doesn't make great demands of us. He asks us to humble to repentance, to care for our own matters.”
    Opening statement.
  • Jim Frantti (attribution from context), LLC board meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 condition-before-gospel ▶ 02:47:42 transcript
    “Why did it take so long? Why was that so hard? Forgiveness is so simple. Why is it so hard? Well, all I can say is that we don't preach forgiveness to a congregation, but it's preached to penitent sinners.”
    Closing of a long turn; same turn [02:41:20]: 'Forgiveness is freely preached. It has been preached already here tonight.'
  • Lyndon Simonson, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:39:25 transcript
    “Anyway, [I would] encourage you to humble yourself before the congregation.”
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 condition-before-gospel ▶ 02:06:02 transcript
    “But when we are fighting against his kingdom, if we have fallen from faith or into a wrong spirit, what God asks of us is a simple repentance. He doesn't ask some great things.”
  • Paul Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 condition-before-gospel ▶ 02:21:27 transcript
    “Ask for gospel, repent of your condition, and God will give the understanding or you won't even have the questions.”
    To delegates 'of a different mind' before the removal vote.
  • Robert Haapala, Saskatoon, 2022-11-13 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:33:49
    “The doors of grace were closed. They were no longer able to share the gospel. God had closed the mouths of his own. And this is how it will be at the end of time.”
    Ten virgins who asked for oil.
  • Mikko Pasanen, Longview, 2023-01-07 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:30:05
    “But they were not able to preach the gospel for those that were without oil. They felt that they would have preached the gospel for those foolish ones. They would have mixed up with their wrong understanding. And they could not do that.”
    Ten virgins, Epiphany.
  • Loren Hillukka, Elk River, 2023-07-02 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:30:26
    “Now therefore I pray thee, pardon my sin and turn again with me that I may worship the Lord. … But here we see a very sobering matter, that in this case, because Saul was not penitent, even when he realized the error of his ways, God had closed that window of grace for him.”
    Second part at [00:30:33].
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2023-07-16 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:51:45
    “Some have argued when we have spoken about this issue of forgiveness and whether or not it can ever be that God's children would not proclaim … the gospel to someone who asks that, well, Samuel had a direct revelation. But the text does not in any place indicate that. … It does not say that he would not have forgiven … Saul, if Saul was penitent. … King Saul found no place of repentance, just as Esau did not find it.”
    1 Samuel 15:22-26; parts at [00:52:16], [00:52:47], [00:53:12].
  • Loren Hillukka, Elk River, 2023-11-05 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:28:10
    “He meant that the grace of God is so abundant that if one is penitent and asks for the gospel, there is sufficient grace to preach it unto them.”
    Seventy times seven.
  • Adrian Pirness, Elk River, 2024-03-24 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:31:31
    “to preach this gospel to anyone who would ask, to that one who is penitent and remorseful over their sin.”
    'Anyone who would ask' is at once narrowed to the penitent.
  • Carey Simonson, Saskatoon, 2024-05-12 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:34:27
    “But we cannot bless someone in a false hope, in a false spirit. But only when the Holy Spirit has awakened the heart of one, then the blessings will come from God's kingdom. And here Esau cried and asked for the blessing.”
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2024-06-23 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:25:43
    “If somebody comes in asking for their sins forgiven, of course we want to preach the gospel to them. … But in this example that Jesus is giving us, it's too late. … They could not preach the gospel to them. It would give them false hope. We would never want to do that. We would not be helping such a one.”
    Ten virgins; parts at [00:26:14] and [00:26:39].
  • Jukka Kolmonen, LLC Summer Services, 2024-07-04 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:48:22
    “Then comes this place where you retain those sins. They are not preached, forgiven unto them. Grace always belongs to a penitent one. … But who is not penitent of their sins, that preaching of forgiveness does not help them.”
    Visiting SRK minister, interpreted; second part at [00:48:52].
  • Blaine Maki, LLC Summer Services, 2024-07-06 refused-in-practice ▶ 00:25:32
    “that we can freely offer that gospel whenever it is asked for you know there is ever a time and we have experienced this even recently that our heavenly father would even there close the mouth of his children that it is not us but it is”
    Says the 'would there ever be a time' question came 'as a trick or a fraud' [00:25:03] and that closing of mouths was 'experienced ... even recently'.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2024-10-27 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:17:17
    “We don't have the right to withhold forgiveness. We cannot do that. It will not bear good fruit”
    Matthew 6:14-15.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2024-10-27 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:35:29
    “We do not have permission to withhold forgiveness. We are not in the place of God as Joseph told his brothers”
    Matthew 6:14-15.
  • Greg Jacobson, Alaska, 2025-01-12 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:12:33
    “he has also given us those keys to the kingdom of heaven where we forgive, but we also can, by and through the power of the Holy Spirit, at times when one is not penitent, we withhold that forgiveness.”
    John 20:23 read as a withholding key.
  • Carey Simonson, Saskatoon, 2025-04-27 withhold-from-asker ▶ 00:24:29
    “That we would also be willing always to preach the forgiveness of sins to anyone who wishes to believe. That it is not in our limits, but in God's limits. That we would preach to the penitent. … But there is also a time when someone would wish to use the gospel for a cloak for sin or demands or is not penitent. Then also at those times the Holy Spirit will guide and interpret.”
    Second part at [00:24:51], then 'whosoever sins ye retain'.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2025-08-17 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:33:10
    “when we hear of someone that comes from that heresy or any heresy that when they ask for forgiveness that we would ask them if they want to have the sin of heresy forgiven too. And of course that grace is always offered to the penitent.”
    A question is to be put to the asker before preaching.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2025-09-30 condition-before-gospel ▶ 00:12:28
    “To the penitent the gospel is preached. God does not withhold forgiveness from the penitent. We do not withhold forgiveness from the penitent. Those who seek God's mercy and God's grace, we gladly preach the gospel of forgiveness to them.”
  • James Moll, Prescott Valley, 2025-11-23 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:29:06
    “Though he sought it with tears, he was not penitent in his heart. And that is what would prevent one, and will always prevent one, from finding God's kingdom. One has to be humbled and to receive recognition of their sinfulness.”
    Esau and Cain.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 condition-before-gospel ▶ 01:21:08 transcript
    “You are suffering from this blindness of one that's on the outside of God's kingdom. So if you can humble your heart to believe that sin of unbelief forgiven and gather back with us as believers, you can believe that mother of all sin, unbelief forgiven in Jesus' name and blood.”
    Gospel offered on condition of confessing unbelief.
  • Phil Siljander, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 refused-in-practice ▶ 01:56:13 transcript
    “I will say, like I said at the beginning, my faith hasn't changed. My strength comes through the gospel, and I do want to hear that gospel if I can believe. I promise to believe.”
    The request that the following speaker answers.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 refused-in-practice ▶ 01:57:38 transcript
    “we were in communion and our one of our attendees there for communion wasn't believing and asked for the gospel and the gospel was preached. But afterwards the discussion was had with her about … faith and it was revealed that she was not believing even though she wanted to hear that gospel this discussion has gone similarly that the gospel is preached when one asks the question is is it believed”
    First-hand account from Colorado; second part at [01:58:07]. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting; the speaker's 'for seven years I wasn't believing' matches Jared Huhta's self-introduced turn at 01:20:38.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 condition-before-gospel ▶ 01:58:38 transcript
    “Then you ask to hear the gospel, but … Those of us that are here are telling you that your faith has changed. It's no longer the faith that you shared with us from years ago as brothers have related. Your faith has changed. And the humility that's required is to repent from unbelief itself. If you don't believe that you're in unbelief and God doesn't choose to open your eyes, then there's … No amount of discussion that's going to change anything.”
    Answer to Phil's request; parts at [01:59:09] and [01:59:37]. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting; the speaker's 'for seven years I wasn't believing' matches Jared Huhta's self-introduced turn at 01:20:38.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 condition-before-gospel ▶ 02:00:39 transcript
    “Again, I remind you, the humility that's required is to actually repent from unbelief. If you don't feel that you're in that state, then we can't. There's nothing that we can do to help you at this point. Only God himself can help you.”
    Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting; the speaker's 'for seven years I wasn't believing' matches Jared Huhta's self-introduced turn at 01:20:38.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 ask-not-repent ▶ 02:03:04 transcript
    “And then it's a simple thing to ask for the gospel, but it's not so simple a thing to ask for the sin of unbelief to be forgiven, to accept that sort of humility. So those are the direct questions that have not been answered.”
    Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting; the speaker's 'for seven years I wasn't believing' matches Jared Huhta's self-introduced turn at 01:20:38.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Rockford, 2026-03-21 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:30:31
    “Saul asked but did not receive forgiveness. And that was because while he … we could say, performed the act of repentance. There was no change in his heart. He took no responsibility for his wrongdoing.”
    Second part at [00:31:01].
  • Aaron Anderson, Williston, 2026-06-28 preach-to-asker ▶ 00:43:23
    “every time when someone has ever asked a believer that can they yet believe i have never seen where … It has been spoken that no, that you need to do this and that, that you are not penitent enough. But this message of forgiveness is spoken freely.”
    Second part at [00:43:44].
  • Loren Hillukka, Elk River, 2026-07-12 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:27:57
    “there is always forgiveness for a penitent heart. … Here, in this case, God did not allow Saul to be forgiven because he was not penitent.”
    Second part at [00:28:08].
  • Kevin Ruonavaara, Flathead Valley, 2026-08-16 ask-not-repent ▶ 00:19:42
    “Saul acknowledged his error. He wanted to be forgiven. But his heart was not right. He was not penitent. Now Saul wanted it both ways.”
Repentance with no sin named 72 statements: 13 sermons by 12 ministers, 54 statements at 8 meetings, 5 documents (2018–2026) ↑ top
  • Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 14 Jun 2018, 2018-06-14 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 00:37:53 transcript
    “As we all know, our time has been troubling. I have not known specifically how to give an answer to some things, some topics, some questions, some writings. But it has troubled me. Even though I don't understand why, there are no specific reasons of why. So what does the Holy Spirit do when there are wrong teachings in understanding? Romans chapter 16 verse 17”
    Early instance: 'wrong teachings' are to be marked and avoided although the speaker has 'no specific reasons'. No speaker labels in file.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 7 Dec 2019, 2019-12-07 particulars-declined ▶ 00:32:27 transcript
    “We have discussed robe of righteousness, the time of the 1970s and 80s. We have a discussion about the Church Law of Christ. We have had a discussion about justification. On some of those, I personally do not I do not understand what is the difference? In fact, someone asked me, what you think about what is going on. My answer was, I am confused.”
    Lists topics but says he does not understand what the difference is.
  • Lori Alajoki, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 7 Dec 2019, 2019-12-07 particulars-declined ▶ 01:08:02 transcript
    “In the Church Law of Christ it tells us to go to our brothers and sisters to tell them their fault. We tell them what is wrong with them. We don't tell them that there is something wrong with you, but I don't know what it is. … There have been fellow travelers in this congregation that have been told to repent. When they have asked what are they to repent of. They have been told, I don't know, just repent. I believe that is contrary to the word of God.”
    Wolf Lake member's testimony of the practice; included as the complaint, not as an LLC statement.
  • Jim Jurmu, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 7 Dec 2019, 2019-12-07 particulars-declined ▶ 01:51:15 transcript
    “What is causing a division between us? It doesn't seem to be so much that there is some doctrine that is being spoken or taught that is different. Yet sometimes I do not understand what the questions are asking.”
    The later board chairman says the division is not a different doctrine being taught.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 7 Dec 2019, 2019-12-07 particulars-declined ▶ 03:17:46 transcript
    “So, for the last four and a half years we have had these discussions. I think that we have to say that we have differed on understanding. There is something that has prevented the unity that we have once enjoyed and shared. What exactly it is, God only knows.”
    Asked what concerns the LLC brothers have about Wolf Lake; the difference is said to be known only to God.
  • Nick Ylitalo, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 26 Mar 2021, 2021-03-26 repent-no-sin ▶ 02:22:55 transcript
    “He said that when the Holy Spirit pointed a finger at me and I was able to humble myself and simply repent of my disobedience and battling against God's Kingdom. When I was able to put that away, then all of my questions went away. These doctrinal questions did not matter anymore.”
    Model of repentance 'of my disobedience and battling', after which doctrinal questions cease to matter.
  • Nick Ylitalo, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 26 Mar 2021, 2021-03-26 particulars-declined ▶ 02:49:46 transcript
    “There have been sermons when the spirit has not answered. It is not so that we need to have a specific reason. … I think that is where we have to trust in the Holy Spirit. If God's children are troubled by the message, it would be better that they would not speak. It might not be that we can come up with a black and white thing – he said something wrong.”
    Answering Wolf Lake's repeated question why its speakers were disinvited: no specific reason is needed.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 13 May 2022 (typed transcript), 2022-05-13 particulars-declined document (PDF)
    “Sometimes, we have been asked this question, what must the Wolf Lake congregation repent of? And my answer has been nothing. A congregation doesn't repent. Faith is personal. We can only take care of our own matters. Repentance doesn't happen as a group. But it happens personally, as we all, I think, know and have experienced in our lives. … It feels like without repentance and caring for matters, this current division will become some kind of a formal separation, which I think none of us want.”
    Asked directly what the congregation must repent of, the answer is 'nothing'; seven weeks later the congregation as a body was removed. Typed transcript; the speech ends at the [42:57] marker.
  • Carey Simonson, LLC meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 13 May 2022 (typed transcript), 2022-05-13 repent-no-sin document (PDF)
    “And so, we can try to answer some of these questions. But I think the call comes again that today if you hear [his voice], harden not your heart; humble yourself to seek for repentance. And then when you repent, God will give you understanding, as he wishes.”
    Response to members' questions: understanding follows repentance. Typed transcript, marker [1:35:23].
  • Unidentified speaker (Wolf Lake member), LLC meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 13 May 2022 (typed transcript), 2022-05-13 particulars-declined document (PDF)
    “But it's difficult when somebody says to repent and you don't know what you're supposed to repent of. You said repentance is a turning away of, of a turning away and a change of heart. But if you don't know what the what the air is, or whatever,”
    The member's question put back to the delegation ('air' = error). Included to show the particulars were asked for.
  • Unidentified speaker (LLC delegation leader; the 'December 26, 1976' testimony matches Jim Frantti's at Wolf Lake and at the 2022 annual meeting), LLC meeting with the Minneapolis congregation, 14 May 2022, 2022-05-14 particulars-declined ▶ 00:15:04 transcript
    “Sometimes this question has been asked of us, what must the Minneapolis congregation repent of? And when it's been asked of me, I have said nothing. A congregation doesn't repent. Faith is personal. And we must each take care of our own matters. Repentance is an individual matter.”
    Same answer given to Minneapolis the next evening. File has no speaker labels.
  • Unidentified speaker (same LLC delegation leader as [00:15:04]), LLC meeting with the Minneapolis congregation, 14 May 2022, 2022-05-14 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:24:36 transcript
    “God doesn't make great demands of us. He asks us to humble to repentance, to care for our own matters. And even if you don't understand, as I didn't understand everything, that doesn't matter. It's not what's most important. When we can hear the calling voice of the Good Shepherd and repent, then God will give understanding as he sees important.”
    Understanding is explicitly not required before repenting.
  • Unidentified speaker (Minneapolis member; chair calls 'Sana'), LLC meeting with the Minneapolis congregation, 14 May 2022, 2022-05-14 particulars-declined ▶ 02:02:16 transcript
    “I know you asked us to repent individually, but I'm not clear as to what, you know, how can we show that we want to believe? … I or we hear things that we need to repent without clarity on what exactly we need to repent.”
    The member's question to the delegation; no answer naming a matter follows in the transcript. Included to show the particulars were asked for.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:21:38 transcript
    “the love that Mitchell spoke about from Jesus Christ is being shown to you brothers and sisters in Wolf Lake, Minneapolis right now in the form of rebuke and a call to repentance. And that has been the case for the last several years. … So if you find yourself in that position where you feel condemned or pushed out or excommunicated or separated, that instruction is still there, that call to repentance is still there. Find it in yourself, humble yourself and repent.”
    First speech after Wolf Lake's delegate; the call is to 'find it in yourself'.
  • Lyndon Simonson, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:39:25 transcript
    “Anyway, [I would] encourage you to humble yourself before the congregation.”
    Short exhortation; no matter named.
  • Jim Moll, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:42:13 transcript
    “[The instruction] of God's kingdom, [brother, is] to [repent and] find yourself in that place [where] you [are] and listen to the mother speaking and the voice of the spirit speaking. That's all that's asked. … all that's left to do is individually Seek and find your condition to repent and love will be restored and there won't be this bitterness and there won't be these disputes. There won't be these questions, these kinds of questions that keep circulating and keep changing. When one set of questions are answered, there's a new set of questions.”
    'Construction' is a likely mistranscription of 'instruction'. Return is individual; questions are treated as the problem.
  • Daniel Kumpula, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 unbelief-named-only ▶ 01:04:04 transcript
    “And as was alluded to in speaking terms earlier, we are not, no individual is being pushed from God's kingdom. But the spirit is, there is this foreign spirit that's being pushed out of God's kingdom. And if you feel that push, Out of God's kingdom. You're hanging on to that spirit that is being pushed from God's kingdom.”
    The thing being removed is 'a foreign spirit'; no doctrine identified. 'Speaking terms' = speaking turns.
  • Hannu Janhunen, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 01:27:33 transcript
    “Pointed to me that I have fallen into the wrong spirit. That God was able to give that humbleness and obedience to the voice of the Holy Spirit. That I was able to put that sin away. I did not understand at the moment, but through the grace of God gave me that humbleness too. … The Kingdom of God is humbleness and obedience to the instructions of the Holy Spirit. And we personally want to listen to the voice of the Holy Spirit and the instructions that we receive. And that we would humble ourselves to put the sins away when we are so instructed.”
    Model offered: put away 'that sin' (a wrong spirit) without understanding, because instructed.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 01:39:01 transcript
    “Those individuals may not understand, they might not feel or know exactly what the differences are, but know that there is a difference and all that's required is a humble heart and forgiveness of those sins. And if we have to, through what's been [referenced as the Church Law of] Christ [and] that final [step, take] action. Know that all it takes is simple repentance to be restored.”
    Explicit: the people called to repent may not know what the differences are. Spoken while urging the delegates toward action.
  • Tim Niskanen, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 01:53:08 transcript
    “we have to acknowledge that there has been, in Christianity, two spirits. And both cannot be right. One is true and one is false. And the only way that one can come onto Living faith is to repent from this false spirit.”
    Repentance 'from this false spirit'; nothing more specific.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 02:06:02 transcript
    “But when we are fighting against his kingdom, if we have fallen from faith or into a wrong spirit, what God asks of us is a simple repentance. He doesn't ask some great things. We don't have to defend … And the thought that came to me then was, if I leave this place this evening and I don't repent, maybe God never calls to me again. And I had to put aside all my questions and all my defenses, and I had to repent. … Is the Holy Spirit here speaking today? And if it is, hear the voice of the Spirit humbly yourselves. Repent of those matters into which you have fallen.”
    The 1976 kitchen-table story: questions are to be put aside and forgotten. Earlier in the same speech [01:55:42] he lists the topics critics raised (justification, forgiveness, confession, sacraments) as accusations against the LLC, not as errors of theirs.
  • Paul Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 02:21:01 transcript
    “believing is seeing. No amount of debate, no amount of writings or Discussions will reveal it if you don't want to. Ask for gospel, repent of your condition, and God will give the understanding or you won't even have the questions. … If your family, your spouse, your friend, your son, your daughter, your parent is confused, God will clarify matters for you if you humble yourself to repent, not requiring understanding, no conditions, just take care of your matter and belief.”
    'Not requiring understanding, no conditions'. He is one of the book's three translators.
  • Mitch Loukusa, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 02:25:23 transcript
    “it seems as though the Holy Spirit is so clearly saying that now is the time, but yet it feels like it would be taking too much upon myself to make … I guess I would at this time make the motion that we formally recognize Wolf Lake and Minneapolis do not travel together with North American Zion. I'm not super familiar with the bylaws and what exactly that process would be, but that we formally remove the Wolf Lake and Minneapolis congregations. So that concludes my motion.”
    The motion removes two congregations as bodies; its stated ground is that the Spirit says now is the time.
  • Mitchell Johnson, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 particulars-declined ▶ 02:40:12 transcript
    “Seriously, consider the effects of voting that through with really no reason. So I make a motion before excommunicating Wolf Lake and Minneapolis that they be judged with the Holy Word of God before committing that action.”
    The removed side's request that the ground be shown from God's Word before the vote; no speaker answered it with a text. Included as the request that went unanswered, not as an LLC statement.
  • Bryce Ojalehto, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 02:42:00 transcript
    “And I don't know what the difference is between each individual, but it seems that the divide is evident and clear. And the call to repent and flee both Wolf Lake and Minneapolis congregations has been repeated many, many times. … But when God's children tell any of us that we need to repent, we know that even if we don't understand, it would be good that we be obedient to that.”
    Obedience to a call to repent is urged even without understanding what for.
  • Jared Juusola, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 02:50:35 transcript
    “I came here with a prayer in my prayer in remembrance of those in Minneapolis and Wolf Lake and those who are battling, is that you would repent, repent whatever your repentance needs to be, and God will show you. And if you don't need to understand, if you don't understand, the Bible says we see so dimly.”
    'Repent whatever your repentance needs to be' – the content is left to God to show afterward.
  • Jordan Muhonen, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 03:07:12 transcript
    “I would just want to say that there is hope. That same call to repentance, which has already been extended, still applies. Even if this formal separation of The two churches is carried out. The call to repentance remains.”
    Return after a congregational removal is framed as the standing call to individual repentance. He also claims the differences 'have been listed even in the synopsis of these meetings' [03:09:34].
  • Ward Plough, LLC annual meeting, Monticello (LLC Summer Services), 2 Jul 2022, 2022-07-02 repent-no-sin ▶ 03:21:33 transcript
    “I agree with Jordan, that regardless of what the decision is today, that there is always hope for repentance while one yet lives.”
    Last speech before the vote; the way back is individual repentance.
  • Timothy Niskanen, LLC Summer Services (Monticello), 2022-07-03 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:12:23
    “Yesterday at that annual meeting, one of the brothers related that he had gone into that heresy for nearly three and a half years. And he had many, many questions. And he said he was hoping that he would find the answer to these questions. … But they said they would try and answer, but they said the most important thing is I'm a child of God and my sins are forgiven. He said this stopped him in his tracks, this simple message.”
    Retells Frantti's story from the pulpit the next day: questions set aside.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2022-07-03 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 00:23:30
    “And all what we hear in each one of those discussions and meetings is this calling voice of the Holy Spirit. to humble yourself unto repentance, to hear what the Spirit says unto the churches. … the Holy Spirit, which leads and guides God's congregation, the mother Zion will never err. God does not ask that we understand. He simply asks that we believe. That is what is required of us, is faith.”
    The morning after the vote.
  • Jim Jurmu, Sam Roiko, Arvin Pirness (for the LLC Board), LLC letter to member congregations, 7 Jul 2022 ('AM Communication from LLC'), 2022-07-08 repent-no-sin document (PDF)
    “Many speeches by delegates expressed a loving call to repentance to restore unity. A different spirit was plainly evident in the speeches from Minneapolis and Wolf Lake delegates and guests. … After the long discussion period, where the loving call to repentance went unheeded, delegates overwhelmingly approved the motion to formally remove Wolf Lake and Minneapolis as member congregations in the Laestadian Lutheran Church.”
    Official account: a call to repentance, 'a different spirit', removal of congregations; no sin or doctrine named.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2022-07-17 unbelief-named-only ▶ 00:36:33
    “there was a decision made there to acknowledge that congregations of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake are not traveling the same path as the children of God. The mind of man would say that they were thrown out of God's kingdom. Brothers and sisters, what separates from God. It is sin. God does not reject anyone. Man rejects God.”
    The separation is attributed to 'sin' in general.
  • Benjamin Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2022-07-31 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 00:25:14
    “I'm sure like many of you, you have wondered and pondered at the events that took place there at our annual meeting during summer services and the decision there that there are now those that we no longer hold in unity and fellowship. And I'm sure like me, many of you can have difficulty understanding or grasping such a decision. We are presented in our lives those times when we must believe without comprehending, without understanding”
    Four weeks after the vote, at the LLC's home congregation.
  • LLC (website update, unsigned), llchurch.org, 'August 2022 Update', 2022-08-01 repent-no-sin ▶ source
    “Many speeches by delegates expressed a loving call to repentance to restore unity. The loving call to repentance went unheeded, moving delegates to approve the motion to formally remove Wolf Lake and Minneapolis as member congregations in the Laestadian Lutheran Church.”
    Repeats the July letter.
  • Peter Lever, Roaring Fork Valley, 2022-10-08 particulars-declined ▶ 00:26:56
    “The annual meeting made it, I guess you could say, official on paper. A heresy has taken place. There's no other word for it or name for it. of those who have strayed down a wrong path a different path they have different understandings and different faith different doctrine and i couldn't begin to explain it all to you”
    'Different doctrine' asserted; the preacher says he could not explain it.
  • LLC Board of Directors (signed by all 15 members), Voice of Zion, Jan 2023: 'Spiritual Division in North American Zion Led to Heresy', 2023-01-01 particulars-declined ▶ source
    “During a free and open discussion, meeting delegates and attendees shared a loving call to repentance to restore unity of faith. This call was neither recognized nor accepted as the call of the Holy Spirit. Delegates recognized a different voice and spirit in the speeches of delegates and guests from Minneapolis and Wolf Lake and that those congregations did not travel in unity of spirit with other LLC member congregations. … We pray that they might still find grace to walk footsteps of repentance and return to the Father's house, to His living congregation.”
    Six months after the vote. The nearest the LLC comes to particulars is in this article: 'a rebuffing, at times even a belittling, of sanctification' and 'the dismissal of the importance of preaching absolution', described as 'disturbing traits' in 'some who have departed', not as a sin shown from God's Word.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2023-02-13 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 00:15:39
    “We have seen even how in recent times that even the decision of the annual meeting has been said that that's not a decision of the Holy Spirit. It was a decision of man. … Perhaps we cannot understand that decision, or it is difficult to understand. But yet, God speaks through his congregation and makes his will known yet today.”
    Replies to the objection that the vote was a human decision.
  • Stanley Ylioja, Outlook, 2023-04-23 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 00:16:51
    “Or we even question that decision that was made last summer there at that annual meeting when God even revealed to those delegates there to even make that decision that separated those two congregations from the rest of God's living kingdom.”
    Questioning the decision is listed among the enemy's temptations.
  • Gary Hoikka, Cokato, 2023-10-08 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:25:02
    “It would be our prayer that these that have been deceived, that they could once again hear that gospel and repent of their condition.”
    'Repent of their condition'.
  • Samuel Roiko, Ishpeming, 2023-12-10 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:47:19
    “And if there would be one who finds that the borders of God's kingdom have become dim, and has given ear to the enemy that here and there would be those who are saved. The call from God's kingdom yet sounds forth to humble yourself to be a little child and take care of matters. Travel with the unity of God's children and make repentance.”
    'Take care of matters' with the matter left unnamed, apart from doubting that salvation is only here.
  • Ross Hillukka, Monticello, 2024-03-31 unbelief-named-only ▶ 00:44:48
    “If there is one here listening or present who does not journey and travel together in unity of spirit and the fellowship of God's kingdom, God is yet calling if you are seeking, dear one. There is room. … Humble yourself in the sin of unbelief. Come unto repentance. Leave all sins forgiven, even the sin of unbelief.”
    Not traveling 'in unity of spirit' is addressed as the sin of unbelief.
  • James Moll, Prescott Valley, 2024-11-24 unbelief-named-only ▶ 00:29:34
    “we have a person in such a condition can have their sins forgiven. They can repent of unbelief. They can repent of heresy. They can repent of whatever and all sins and have them forgiven while those doors are open.”
    Heresy and unbelief as the objects of repentance; 'whatever'.
  • Carey Simonson, Saskatoon, 2025-01-13 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:11:57
    “The last times that I visited with other brothers from the LLC to the congregations of the churches in Wolf Lake and Minneapolis, and there we spoke the message of the believers that now is a time to repent, that there is a grave danger of falling away if those who are called do not repent.”
    His own summary of the May 2022 visits: the message was 'now is a time to repent'.
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga, 2026-02-15 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:43:35
    “Even one who finds himself on the outside of God's kingdom. The message is to humble yourself and to repent.”
    Menahga delegate in 2022; same formula four years on.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:32:22 transcript
    “So I guess one of the questions that I had was for Phil is, do you believe along with us, and do you believe that this faith that the brothers here share is the one true saving faith. And I guess if not, if you find yourself outside of this kingdom or that you don't believe the same, then I would be the first to welcome you back or to offer that repentance to you that you can believe along with us.”
    Opens the questioning of Phil Siljander; the only test stated is assent to 'the one true saving faith'. Self-identified 'Jared Hutta' at [00:29:27] (transcription of Huhta).
  • Shannon Simonson (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:38:06 transcript
    “but all of a sudden that same elephant that was in the room back when we had our last heresy times is back in our meeting. With that prayer that you can repent of where you're at and be a part of God's kingdom”
    Chair calls Phil to repent 'of where you're at' before any question of doctrine has been put to him.
  • Keith Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 particulars-declined ▶ 00:42:19 transcript
    “Thank you, Phil. Phil, this is Keith [Kesti]. I think that the discussion we should have right now would center around how does each of us believe and not all the details. … And I don't know that these procedural matters are so important at this point. But rather, do we see, each of us, do we see ourselves in alignment with those who have left in heresy?”
    Direct reply to Phil's request for who/when/what on the 'non-communication' and 'spiritual heresy' findings in the 2025 minutes. Surname per the 2026 annual meeting ('Keith Kesti has a lot of the communications', [00:43:56]); not Keith Waaraniemi.
  • Keith Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 particulars-declined ▶ 00:44:17 transcript
    “And that would be my encouragement to you, dear brother, is that do not get wrapped up in all these little details, but rather ask yourself, am I in alignment with those congregations who have left? Is what your mother-in-law confesses that she believes the same way with you?”
    Same speech; the transcript breaks the turn at [00:43:46] but the sentence runs on from Keith's 'foundational questions'. Alignment, not any named sin, is the test.
  • Swen Sorvala (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 00:49:29 transcript
    “I was at that, maybe some of your brothers have been there as well, at that annual meeting in Minnesota when that spirit revealed that Minneapolis and Wolf Lake were not of the same union of faith as the rest of Zion. I felt that was a clear message to me to hear and observe that. It was a comforting message in that way that the unity of spirit was there. But it was a great sorrow that so many had given up their faith. It was clear that their faith is already gone, that we couldn't join them in faith.”
    The 2022 removal is recounted as a revelation of 'that spirit', with no ground stated. Content shows this is not Phil speaking.
  • Mikko Pasanen (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 particulars-declined ▶ 00:52:56 transcript
    “I know all the details, and I don't know that they really mattered that much. … [To one of them it was said that] if you don't repent, [I will] spew [you] out of my mouth because [of] your doings and deeds”
    Declines to go into the communication record, then applies Rev. 3:16 to Phil. The 'spew out of my mouth' clause reads as a transcription gap (likely 'I will spew you out').
  • Keith Moll (Prescott Valley), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-for-disagreeing ▶ 01:08:50 transcript
    “in that area they've also gone with that heresy and not trusted and believe that the holy spirit is leading and guiding and needs to be more time or more discussion where these things from god's kingdom seem to be spoken clearly from the holy spirit that there is something different. There's been a resistance or a rebellious spirit to go against God's kingdom. … Is that kind of a rebellious or spirit that would go against God's kingdom and that could be cared for and forgiven”
    Wanting 'more time or more discussion' is itself framed as the rebellious spirit to be repented of.
  • Dave Edwards, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 particulars-declined ▶ 01:12:56 transcript
    “none of us want to go back and try to, rehash out the matters of the heresy uh the heresy happened unfortunately uh there was a wrong understanding and a wrong spirit and that was revealed in god's time and in god's time he cleansed his kingdom of that wrong understanding and so to go back and try to revisit about those matters it just it brings so much sorrow to us … that it's not something that we want to try to even discuss.”
    Refuses Phil's request to discuss what the heresy consisted of; 'a wrong understanding' is never specified. Listed as LLC board (Southwest) in the Jan 2023 Voice of Zion article.
  • Dave Edwards, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-for-disagreeing ▶ 01:15:39 transcript
    “I guess to be very straightforward, do you feel that there was a heresy? And if not, um, why, uh, that's, that's what God's spirit has revealed. And, and, and if you do feel that, then how, how do you believe, do you, do you feel that there has been, uh, questions or perhaps even offenses that have arisen from this, um, that, that matters need to be cared for.”
    The test put to Phil is whether he affirms 'there was a heresy', i.e., the 2022 finding.
  • Jared Huhta (turn labeled '(board speaker)'; continues his self-identified turn at [01:19:10]), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-for-disagreeing ▶ 01:20:10 transcript
    “All of us that are gathered, both online and those of us here, all believe that there was a heresy and that those people have left us. They're no longer believing. This has been going on for many years. I can't believe that you would be in the dark as you're insinuating. We know that there was a heresy. The question is, are you with us on this side of the heresy, or did you go with the heresy?”
    Agreement with the heresy finding is the dividing line; Phil's statement that he does not know what happened in Minneapolis is disbelieved.
  • Jared Huhta (turn labeled '(board speaker)'; continues his self-identified turn at [01:19:10]), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 unbelief-named-only ▶ 01:21:08 transcript
    “You are suffering from this blindness of one that's on the outside of God's kingdom. So if you can humble your heart to believe that sin of unbelief forgiven and gather back with us as believers, you can believe that mother of all sin, unbelief forgiven in Jesus' name and blood.”
    The only sin named is 'unbelief'.
  • Wyatt Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 particulars-declined ▶ 01:25:33 transcript
    “You Phil, I don't think I've ever had a conversation with you over the heresy and needing to know the nitty gritty details and you not being able to accept the heresy until you have those details is a concern of mine. And we see in the presentation when Jesus showed the wounds in his hands and wounds in his side to Thomas, and blessed are those who believe. … if we've been pretty removed from the heresy and we don't know the details and someone we trust and a brother that says, yes, this heresy happened and those individuals are no longer believing. All we can do is... If that's the case, then we can just say, amen, I believe you, brother, that you are believing. And if this is what you say is true, and so be it.”
    Wanting the details is treated as Thomas's unbelief; the expected response is to say amen to a trusted brother's report.
  • Paul Savela (Prescott Valley minister), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 01:34:31 transcript
    “When we are believing in God's kingdom as children, we want to believe that the Holy Spirit is the one who is led and guided in this decision. And that happened in God's time. … But even on the other side of this heresy, I think it's a dangerous spot to find yourself where we want to know all those details similar to these people that came up in question after that time that plague was sent forth.”
    Korah analogy: asking for the details is likened to the Israelites who grumbled after Korah and died of the plague. Surname likely mistranscribed.
  • Shannon Simonson (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-no-sin ▶ 01:46:29 transcript
    “I know we don't judge. We don't take somebody out of faith. The only way somebody loses [faith or] goes another [way], or finds another way, is [through] unforgiving sin. I feel right now, I feel your speeches are the same as the last heresy. And you're standing outside the temple doors.”
    Phil is declared outside the kingdom on the basis that his speeches 'are the same as the last heresy'; no sin identified.
  • Jeremy Keranen (Colorado), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-no-sin ▶ 01:52:17 transcript
    “as I've sat here today, I've heard many, many loving calls for you to repent and return to God's kingdom through the spirit of this meeting and your responses. I don't feel that you've On that, you've evaded the direct questions that have been asked. Like Shannon just said, through the Spirit, it reveals that I don't believe the same as you do.”
    Summarizes the meeting as calls to repent; the 'direct questions' were about agreeing that there was a heresy.
  • Mikko Pasanen (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 repent-no-sin ▶ 01:54:40 transcript
    “Then Jesus continues, Phil, listen, I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire so you can become rich and white clothes to wear so you can cover your shameful nakedness and [salve] to put on your eyes so you can see. Then he says, Those who I love I rebuke and discipline. So be earnest and repent. … Dear [Phil], this call is out. Do you want to believe?”
    Laodicea text applied to Phil personally as the call to repent.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 unbelief-named-only ▶ 01:59:09 transcript
    “Those of us that are here are telling you that your faith has changed. It's no longer the faith that you shared with us from years ago as brothers have related. Your faith has changed. And the humility that's required is to repent from unbelief itself. If you don't believe that you're in unbelief and God doesn't choose to open your eyes, then there's No amount of discussion that's going to change anything.”
    Repentance 'from unbelief itself' is demanded after Phil has asked for and received the gospel; the asking is said not to count. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting; the speaker's 'for seven years I wasn't believing' matches Jared Huhta's self-introduced turn at 01:20:38.
  • Arvin Pirness (on behalf of the LLC Board of Directors), LLC Board response to the CCLLC delegate and chair, 26 Jun 2026, 2026-06-26 particulars-declined document (PDF)
    “The LLC Constitution teaches that the Kingdom of God is one and indivisible and that there is one saving faith, one baptism, and one Holy Christian Church. The understanding of the doctrine of the congregation was not acceptable to those who were deceived in the 2022 schism. … the delegates affirmed that the Minneapolis Laestadian Lutheran Church and the Wolf Lake Laestadian Lutheran Church did not travel together in unity of spirit with the other LLC Member Congregations and approved a motion removing them as member congregations. … Return to mutual faith and fellowship is through individual repentance.”
    The written ground for 2022: 'doctrine of the congregation' and 'unity of spirit'. No passage of Scripture and no specific error is cited. Removal was of congregations; return is individual.
  • Arvin Pirness (LLC executive director), LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 00:40:48 transcript
    “It's a really interesting thing how those who have found a different way are so offended by such a statement that it doesn't answer. They want to yet see a proof that isn't there. But yet, as God's children, we remember all those who have become troubled in these matters that the way to God's kingdom and the return to prodigal ones is through individual repentance.”
    Said right after no delegate seconded CCLLC's motion that no doctrinal error had been shown from God's Word; a 'proof' is said not to exist, and return is individual.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 unbelief-named-only ▶ 00:45:29 transcript
    “He showed us clearly that he was not a believer. And I believe Briar has done us the same favor today. I would do him the favor, if he's still here, to let him know that he is not a believer. … You're back in March to let you know, Briar, that you are not a believer, that if you want to repent from unbelief, the opportunity is there to believe even that sin forgiven, that sin of unbelief. So there's a lot of detail that has gone into this.”
    Reports the March meeting with Phil and extends the same verdict to Briar; the sin named is unbelief.
  • Wyatt Kesti, LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 repent-no-sin ▶ 00:49:18 transcript
    “during our spring board meeting, fortunately, the call for repentance was extended to Phil, but he did not adhere to that message. He did not accept that call back into God's kingdom”
    Describes the March meeting as a call to repentance that Phil declined; nothing he was to repent of is stated.
  • Paul Waaraniemi (Pelkie delegate), LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 01:02:57 transcript
    “Because we all know when we're that divided, it is a matter of conscience, it's a matter of offense, it's a matter of differences, a matter of different spirits. And as Arvin said, Those things are corrected by the individual repentance. … But that decision, when I came to that meeting, I didn't know we were dealing with that. And I wondered, oh, are we really there to come to that point? We didn't live in Minneapolis or Wolf Lake and hadn't through most of those meetings. And by the time I heard the delegates from those congregations and many other places say their [psalms] of what they'd been through for a few years, I realized that, yes, This is God's time.”
    A 2022 delegate describes voting without prior notice or knowledge of the matter, persuaded by the speeches. Return is again individual.
  • Aaron Huhta (Alaska), LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 repent-for-disagreeing ▶ 01:09:19 transcript
    “If he's aligned with the Minneapolis and Wolf Lake congregations, And he perceives some sort of division remaining in God's kingdom. And I would say that's a good sign that you're not part of it. … but if he truly does want to somehow you know come back to god's kingdom or that's the desire then i'd say repent and believe the gospel”
    Perceiving that the 2022 division is still an open question is itself taken as evidence of unbelief.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 particulars-declined ▶ 01:25:27 transcript
    “He seems to want to convince us of, some specific error that we participate in. But at the end of the day, I don't feel that I'm going to gain anything by getting into an argument with Briar over this issue. We feel that he's wrong. He feels that we're wrong. I say, let's move forward.”
    Declines to engage the Scripture and Luther passages Briar read; this is the speaker amending 'my motion' at [01:23:06].
  • Justin Anderson (Rockford), LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 01:58:26 transcript
    “i didn't understand where both sides were exactly on a lot of things but as the years have moved along and my friends and families who have gone [to heresy] it has become more and more clear by their fruits Who has the Holy Spirit? Who doesn't?”
    Says he did not understand the issues in 2022; the decision is confirmed afterward by 'fruits'.
  • Tyler Hendrickson (Longview), LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 02:04:09 transcript
    “please hear what's being said today you don't need to understand it just desire to hear what the kingdom of god is saying … With love for those in coastal California that they would see that the delegates who have been asked to come here with their own lack of understanding today, that we hear what the Southwest Area has said and we understand that they've been in these discussions for some time. We trust that God has led those discussions, and that the outcome that's been brought to us today is one that we support and trust is the right direction to take.”
    Delegates vote on the Southwest Area's report while acknowledging their own 'lack of understanding'; Briar is told he need not understand.
  • Ray Waaraniemi (meeting chairman), LLC annual meeting, 3 Jul 2026, 2026-07-03 decision-right-without-reason ▶ 02:10:53 transcript
    “Many scripture portions, many portions of Luther's writings, these were not the reason why weren't seconds to those motions but I think as has been alluded to here there's a long history of these discussions and differences and we feel that these things have resulted in heresy. We believe that the Holy Spirit has revealed this to the living congregation of God. … Well, the Spirit has revealed these matters to us. So may God grant you even grace to return”
    Closing statement before the vote: the ground is the Spirit's revelation, not any passage; the quoted Scripture and Luther are not disputed.
  • Arvin Pirness (on behalf of the LLC Board of Directors and 2026 delegates), Letter of Notice to the CCLLC chairman, 22 Jul 2026, 2026-07-22 particulars-declined document (PDF)
    “It is stated that the congregation no longer shares the unity of faith and spirit described in Section VI of the Constitution and has not complied with decisions made by the LLC as contemplated by Article II, Section 9 of the Bylaws, including, but not limited to the following: … has publicly rejected the decisions of the LLC Annual Meetings; … has sought to overturn prior decisions of the delegates regarding membership matters; … continues to conduct itself in a manner that the delegates believe is inconsistent with the unity of faith and spirit described in Section VI of the Constitution and Article II, Section 1 of the Bylaws”
    The written grounds against CCLLC are rejecting and seeking to overturn the 2022 decisions, plus 'unity of faith and spirit'. No doctrinal error and no passage of God's Word is named. Vote 61 to 1.
A different spirit, and what the Spirit revealed 91 statements: 34 sermons by 21 ministers, 55 statements at 20 meetings, 0 documents (2018–2026) ↑ top
  • Eric Mattila, Alaska, 2018-04-22 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:27:05
    “With their mouth they confessed the same faith as the believers. They didn't necessarily speak anything that was different, but yet they had different spirits. … Or there was a different feel that we can't quite put a finger on what you are saying is different. But yet when we hear it, it troubles us. And it makes us restless. And it's sort of confusing.”
    Recounts a Finnish heresy where the confession was the same and the difference could not be named; no doctrinal error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, MLLC / RLLC meeting at LLC, 2018-04-24 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:52:02 transcript
    “I spoke there and adopted that, I think it's more than this, I think there's two different spirits. … The reason I say that is because these issues, they don't go away, but they come up in another way.”
    Infers 'two different spirits' from recurring issues rather than any named doctrine.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2018-04-29 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:16:42
    “It's hard to even put a finger on exactly what's wrong. But the lambs are... They're troubled. Something hurts their ear. But it's so close, it's hard to put a finger on at times.”
    Error so close to the narrow way that what is wrong cannot be named; the 'lambs' are troubled.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-31 no-error-named ▶ 00:57:29 transcript
    “One doctrinal error of that period was, for example, the so-called spirit doctrine, which demanded that individuals repent of spirits of different names, like the dry spirit, lenient spirit, Kosciuszko spirit.”
    SRK's own description of the 1970s 'spirit doctrine' as a doctrinal error, read into the record;
  • Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 2018-06-14 different-spirit-ground ▶ 02:13:10 transcript
    “I think it's dangerous for us to continue to have speaker brothers speaking in American Zion who are not in the same spirit as what we understand as the [correct] spirit.”
    Ministers should be stopped for not being 'in the same spirit'. No error named.
  • Eric Mattila, Alaska, 2018-07-01 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:04:54
    “Maybe one could say a clashing of spirits. Sometimes it is hard to explain. We don't know exactly what the difference is.”
    Describes the dispute as a clash of spirits whose difference is unknown; no doctrinal error named.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2018-07-22 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:35:16
    “And even if we can't put a finger on what's wrong, we don't want to go there. We don't want to go there. We want to follow the voice of the Good Shepherd which speaks here in God's kingdom through the Holy Spirit. Man errs. The Holy Spirit has never erred.”
    A 'strange' voice is to be avoided even when the wrong cannot be identified; no doctrinal error named.
  • Steven Laiho, Ishpeming, 2018-10-07 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:15:05
    “I've heard that terminology even spoken often, even as of late, that you just can't quite put my finger on it or understand what the issue or the matter is.”
    Notes in October 2018 that the phrase is being 'spoken often, even as of late'.
  • Randall Haapala, Cokato, 2018-11-04 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:15:38
    “We know when we hear something, when the Spirit is troubled, don't we? It just doesn't feel right. You can't actually just put your finger on what it is, but it doesn't feel right.”
    Feeling of the Spirit replaces identification of the error; no doctrinal error named.
  • Wayne Kallio, Outlook, 2018-12-02 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:21:24
    “immediately, immediately, one can sense that there is something off track here. The train is derailing. Something is not quite right, and it may be hard to put a finger on it, but the Holy Spirit tells one immediately that … There's a different understanding here.”
    Deviation is sensed 'immediately' by the Spirit though hard to name; no doctrinal error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:48:30 transcript
    “I don't know what the issues are and I can't relate to or I can't put my finger on or my thoughts onto what bothers me the most.”
    Cannot say whether forgiveness is the issue or a 'byproduct of something else'.
  • Unidentified speaker, Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 cannot-name-it ▶ 05:03:48 transcript
    “And again, that's very elusive. It's hard to kind of put your finger on. But I can say that with regard to Phil and Darwin”
    Just before [05:03:18]: 'It's not that I can say there was something that's wrong, but something about this doesn't sound familiar and right anymore.'
  • Unidentified speaker, Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 cannot-name-it ▶ 05:04:46 transcript
    “And Darwin was here this weekend, and I wish Darwin was here, but it caused a lot of unrest in our congregation. And we don't know what we should do. It's not like you could put a finger on anything.”
    Relays another congregation's complaint about Darwin Lake's visit: unrest, with nothing to point to.
  • Dave Edwards, Glendale, 2019-03-17 no-error-named ▶ 00:26:56
    “We are living in that time today where there are those that are rising up against the teaching of God's kingdom and what the Holy Spirit has revealed onto the congregation. … And even if we can't sit and pick out perhaps one doctrinal issue, or there's a wrong in this specific way, the Holy Spirit is able to … determine the thoughts of the heart and the intents of the heart. And the Holy Spirit recognizes that voice of one that is not of the same spirit.”
    Says outright that no single doctrinal issue need be identified; the Spirit judges the heart. No doctrinal error named.
  • Dave Edwards, Glendale, 2019-03-17 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:32:46
    “And even if we can't put our finger on something, the Spirit is groaning within.”
    The Spirit's unease stands in for a named error.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (afternoon), 2019-04-13 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:52:22 transcript
    “i tremble when i say these words but this is the content of my heart this is how i believe i believe there is this kind of different spirit working among us … It doesn't edify. It doesn't call. It doesn't gather. Those folks who are there are not happy. They're angry. They're defensive.”
    A 'different spirit' is identified by attitude (anger, defensiveness); no doctrinal error named.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (evening), 2019-04-13 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:36:48 transcript
    “And God reveals through his children. Sometimes it's been said that, have you spoken individually with this minister? How do you know that something's wrong? The Spirit reveals. … And even sometimes when you can't put a finger on it, this is not unusual amongst God's children. You can't put a finger on it, but something doesn't feel right. … We couldn't explain from Scripture why, but it doesn't answer the Spirit. And later, sometimes God reveals it more clearly.”
    Answers 'how do you know something's wrong' with 'The Spirit reveals'; admits it cannot be explained from Scripture. No error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (afternoon), 2019-04-13 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 03:51:25 transcript
    “If it is so that the gospel is not preached, but it's because the Holy Spirit has revealed it, then it is according to God's will.”
    Withholding the gospel is justified by what 'the Holy Spirit has revealed'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 counter-voice ▶ 01:39:33 transcript
    “And so to say that someone should step down because of confusion or because of a weird feeling that you can't put a finger on, I think that those matters need to be discussed more.”
    Objects to removing a minister over 'a weird feeling that you can't put a finger on'; asks for the Word as the basis.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 spirit-says ▶ 02:54:45 transcript
    “I tremble when I hear that the Spirit reveals it without being measured with the Word. We know that the Bible is the highest authority.”
    Objection: 'the Spirit reveals it' was being used without measuring by the Word (matches the book, p. 55, 58).
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-08-25 no-error-named ▶ 00:18:11
    “Maybe they can name some certain point of doctrine they disagreed with. Or maybe they can name some certain thing that they wanted to do that God's kingdom seizes sin. But I don't think anyone could pinpoint the exact moment when they fell from faith.”
    Falling from faith is treated as gradual and not tied to a nameable doctrine; 'seizes sin' is likely 'sees as sin'. No error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:23:39 transcript
    “We all agree that two spirits have been present in the recent discussions we have had. Through the hours of discussion, we haven't been able to pinpoint the specific issue or issues, so we're asking the congregation for help and guidance.”
    Board states both 'two spirits' and inability to pinpoint any issue in the same breath. No error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 no-error-named ▶ 00:30:18 transcript
    “that there has been no specific difference stated up until this point, other than, as he said, the feeling that there's a different spirit.”
    Confirms no specific difference had been stated, only a feeling of a different spirit.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:40:46 transcript
    “Nobody's been able to really, at a board level, put a finger on what the difference is. There's not something to say, here, this is where this brother thinks differently than I do, or this brother thinks differently than other members of the congregation. … Myself, I've had, I haven't been able to put a finger on it myself, but I've struggled a little bit with putting the Bible class lessons together.”
    Board member admits no one can say where the minister 'thinks differently'; no error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:41:15 transcript
    “Myself, I've had, I haven't been able to put a finger on it myself, but I've struggled a little bit with putting the Bible class lessons together. Out of fear, I don't know where it's coming from”
    Follows [00:40:46]: 'Nobody's been able to really, at a board level, put a finger on what the difference is.'
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:51:38 transcript
    “I don't necessarily pinpoint one wrong teaching or wrong doctrine, but there's definitely been an unsettled feeling.”
    No wrong teaching named; an 'unsettled feeling'.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 cannot-name-it ▶ 01:31:32 transcript
    “I'm not sure if I can get one out and around, but I can't put a finger on it. To me it seems That in our discussions and your comments, they are doctrinally correct. They are according to Scripture.”
    Cannot name the problem and in the same breath says the brother's words are 'doctrinally correct' and 'according to Scripture'.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado (Roaring Fork Valley) congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:54:30 transcript
    “I know we've heard how we haven't been able to pinpoint the difference, but some have commented on that letter”
    Sums up the evening: the difference could not be pinpointed.
  • Esa Vilkama, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:58:42 transcript
    “I have not heard them speak wrong doctrine. … Often I hear these terms like confusion, cloud, can't put a finger on it. … These kinds of expressions don't really mean much. They are like empty expressions. They can easily be misused against others without really needing to explain anything.”
    Records the LLC-side vocabulary ('confusion, cloud, can't put a finger on it') and that no wrong doctrine had been shown.
  • Unidentified speaker, Glendale congregation meeting, 2020-10-17 cannot-name-it ▶ 01:14:25 transcript
    “There's a sense of unease or non-unity. We're actually working with an employer right now that we're trying to figure out ways to work that. And there's a sense of non-unity. And it's not necessarily one thing you can put a finger on, but you can tell that there's a difference of”
    A 'sense of non-unity' with nothing to put a finger on.
  • Unidentified speaker, Glendale congregation meeting, 2020-10-17 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 02:24:40 transcript
    “And in both cases, the spirit revealed that it would be appropriate to consider it. So, we do speak about individuals, but it's in those cases, and it's always with fear and trepidations. So hard to explain, it's like, how do I even have the right to even open my mouth?”
    Board's authority to take up a minister's case rests on what 'the spirit revealed'; no error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Glendale congregation meeting, 2020-10-17 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:59:36 transcript
    “And what makes it difficult, I think, is that the things that were talked about in that letter are such that it's kind of difficult to put your finger on it, like what it is, yet there is something that's different.”
    The objection to the minister is 'something that's different' that cannot be identified; no error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Glendale congregation meeting, 2020-10-17 counter-voice ▶ 04:05:55 transcript
    “But it's when we can go round and round, well, there's something there, I don't know what it is, I can't put my finger on it, but we need to keep reading about it, and reading about it, and reading about it, and reading about it, and there's something there, but I can't put my finger on it.”
    Objects to the pattern: under the Church Law of Christ there should be a clear, named difference, as with Luther.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2021-03-07 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:39:51
    “We recognize that those who have left God's kingdom have a different spirit than we do. … There's only two spirits. There's the spirit, the Holy Spirit, which dwells in the hearts of a child of God. And there is the spirit of this world.”
    Those who 'have left' are identified by a different spirit; reads 2 John 10 but names no doctrine they fail to bring.
  • Unidentified speaker, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:33:59 transcript
    “Some of the reasons are very vague, such as that there is something wrong with them, but I can't put a finger on it. … There are concerns and confusion around them. But again, it cannot be explained.”
    Reports the reasons given for rejecting Wolf Lake ministers: 'something wrong ... can't put a finger on it'.
  • Randy Hillukka, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 cannot-name-it ▶ 03:21:25 transcript
    “There is something there. We have heard from other congregations with which we are one hundred percent unified. … Can I put my finger on it? I can't, personally. We have heard that.”
    Explains why Wolf Lake ministers are not invited: 'something there' he personally cannot identify. No error named.
  • Dave Keranen, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 03:37:48 transcript
    “I believe that [God's] Kingdom through the Holy Spirit has revealed it. Just seeing my brothers who were raised in God's Kingdom. They have become lost and in unbelief without the Holy Spirit.”
    Judgment of unbelief rests on revelation to the kingdom; the only particular he raises is Halloween trick-or-treating (03:38:32).
  • Martin Pylvainen, Ishpeming, 2021-05-22 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:26:33
    “that there can be those within the kingdom of God traveling amongst the believers who perhaps have a different spirit within them. And they would be like these … wolves who are in the sheep's clothing, they would speak the same words. They would speak the same doctrine. They would preach the same gospel. But if the Holy Spirit is not in one's heart,”
    Explicitly: same words, same doctrine, same gospel, yet a different spirit makes one a wolf. No doctrinal error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC annual meeting 2021, 2021-07-03 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:01:55 transcript
    “The hope was that there would be a call for help, a awakening to the heart of those who have become confused and speak with a different voice or with a different spirit. Therefore, this is the real concern”
    Wolf Lake and Minneapolis are described as speaking 'with a different spirit'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC annual meeting 2021, 2021-07-03 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:15:48 transcript
    “And everyone there agreed there was two spirits. God's kingdom is one faith, one hope. There isn't two spirits. It doesn't work. And when we look at these sermons, which are being archived, … there is teaching in it, which I don't think follows along that same teaching that has been in God's kingdom for as long as I have been alive.”
    'Two spirits' as the agreed ground; does point to one archived sermon on Revelation 7 ('robe of the endeavor', 01:16:50) as differing teaching.
  • Peter Lever, Spokane, 2021-07-12 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:42:21
    “It doesn't sound right. And maybe you can't pinpoint it or even identify it. But it didn't sound right. That comes from the Spirit.”
    Out-of-tune piano: the hearer cannot identify the error, but the Spirit knows.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2021-11-21 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:32:20
    “That we can't give a list and say that this is what you listen for. But when God's Spirit affects in our hearts, the Spirit discerns that which is right and wrong. Yes, it's based on the Holy Word of God. … the congregation of God is guided by the Holy Spirit. And it's a mystery also that we can't explain.”
    No list of what is wrong can be given; discernment is a mystery of the Spirit. No doctrinal error named.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2021-11-26 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 00:03:29
    “it doesn't teach one thing to one believer and another to another believer, but has the same message. And it is so that we find that we all have the same doctrine and beliefs because the Holy Spirit has revealed it to us.”
    Shared doctrine is grounded on revelation to believers rather than on Scripture; general teaching, no error named.
  • Steve Kariniemi, Phoenix congregational meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:23:28 transcript
    “We hear talk about two different spirits. If there are two different spirits, I don't look around this room and see a bunch of unbelievers and consider myself as a believer. And if anyone does, they have put themselves in the place of judgment. I do believe that there are some very serious doctrinal differences and understandings that need to be addressed and talked about.”
    Objection: 'two spirits' talk is judgment; asks that doctrinal differences be addressed instead.
  • Sheryl Simonson, Phoenix congregational meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:52:01 transcript
    “So, if somebody just keeps reading scripture and reading scripture, you can't say that the sermon was faulty. But there just was no life. … To this day, I cannot tell you how Brett believes and what his understanding is. It is important in God's kingdom that those who are feeding the flock would have the same spirit. I also have to say, as in the last couple of meetings, I have heard two voices here tonight.”
    Concedes the sermon cannot be called faulty and that she cannot say what he believes; objection is spirit. No error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC board member workshop (part 2), 2022-04-30 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:09:21 transcript
    “the loving call for repentance for those who have become shipwrecked from faith because of a different spirit, because they do not hear this loving voice of the Good Shepherd even today.”
    Shipwreck of faith is attributed to 'a different spirit'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC board member workshop (part 2), 2022-04-30 spirit-says ▶ 01:52:31 transcript
    “And dear friends there in Minneapolis, that I know how much we would wish to bless you, for you to repent, put that battle away, and put those sins away. We don't know what those sins are, … But one thing we can say is that it is unbelief when you have not believed what the Spirit has spoken in the congregation. If you have not believed that message, you need to put that unbelief away.”
    States 'we don't know what those sins are' and defines the sin as not believing 'what the Spirit has spoken in the congregation'. No error named.
  • Randy Herrala, LLC board member workshop (part 2), 2022-04-30 different-spirit-ground ▶ 02:01:35 transcript
    “But if the battle has continued as it has, well, then we must believe differently about those topics and the description of how we believe. … So we have to say that as we've reached this point, we do believe differently. There's a different spirit.”
    Different belief is inferred from the persistence of 'battle', then restated as 'a different spirit'; no doctrine named.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 different-spirit-ground ▶ 02:16:18 transcript
    “The same Gospels preach there, my other parents' faith. The same Word of God is spoken from, from the pulpit. … Many things are the same, the same doctrine in many ways. But there's a different spirit. There's only one holy spirit. … God's spirit doesn't divide. But neither does it coexist with a spirit that's not of itself.”
    Offers his parent's other church as the model: same doctrine, different spirit; applied to Minneapolis ('we don't feel the same exact spirit', 02:17:13). No error named.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 spirit-says ▶ 02:19:20 transcript
    “But it doesn't coexist with the spirit that doesn't answer. And that's what we wrestle with. None of us are able, of our own wisdom or strength, to be able to serve or to tell. It either answers or it doesn't.”
    The test is whether the spirit 'answers'; admits no one can 'tell' by any other means. No error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 cannot-name-it ▶ 02:24:35 transcript
    “For years now, I've heard there's division, but we can't put our finger on it. I'm not sure today anyone could actually say they could put their finger on it.”
    Records that 'we can't put our finger on it' had been the LLC side's position for years.
  • Carey [surname not on tape], LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 cannot-name-it ▶ 03:01:29 transcript
    “They've been caused by some deeper root that I don't understand, we don't understand, but God knows. And we pray that that could be revealed … So then when it doesn't unite, where does that put it? It does not unite those of a different spirit.”
    The cause is 'some deeper root' no one understands; disunity itself proves a different spirit. No error named.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 different-spirit-ground ▶ 04:42:36 transcript
    “And then when they heard that there's been talk about wrong spirits, they said that, have they in America discussed the 1970s and 1980s like we haven't been thoroughly discussed them? And they have refuted the doctrine of spirits. We don't talk about such things as wrong spirits. … That's been refuted, debunked.”
    Reports SRK brothers' reaction that the 'doctrine of spirits' was refuted (cf. book p. 213 history).
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2022-05-22 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:24:36
    “If there is a different spirit in the heart, that heart has been separated from God's kingdom into unbelief. It doesn't matter what it's called. If it's a heresy, it's unbelief, it's lost from the treasure of faith.”
    A different spirit alone equals unbelief 'no matter what it's called'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Mitch Loukusa, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 spirit-says ▶ 00:15:41 transcript
    “How timely the instruction has been, has come through the Holy Spirit that God has given to His servants. And the voice of the Spirit has spoken throughout these years.”
    The mover of the removal motion grounds matters on 'the voice of the Spirit'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Trent Simonson, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:34:40 transcript
    “The separation, I think, has already happened. There's two spirits. God's kingdom consists of one spirit.”
    Separation is grounded on 'two spirits'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Daniel Kumpula, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:02:27 transcript
    “I have heard two spirits, even here today. I tremble with that thought. … I used the words, who is that? But also came to my mind, what is that? That was a foreign voice I was hearing. It was not recognizable to my spirit. And I tremble. … If we continue to battle with these two spirits, acknowledging how can we continue forward with two spirits, it's impossible.”
    A 'foreign voice' not recognizable to his spirit is the ground; no doctrinal error named.
  • Hannu Janhunen, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 01:29:08 transcript
    “It is such a decision here, through the understanding and guidance of the Holy Spirit, that we formalize this. It does not change anything. That separation has already happened. … and I also acknowledge that we have heard two spirits here. One that answers to the Holy Spirit and the other that does not. … And when someone or a group or even a congregation is revealed to the Kingdom of God as a whole,”
    Formalizing the removal rests on Spirit guidance and on a congregation being 'revealed to the Kingdom'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Tim Niskanen, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:53:08 transcript
    “we have to acknowledge that there has been, in Christianity, two spirits. And both cannot be right. One is true and one is false.”
    'Two spirits' as the frame for the decision; no doctrinal error named.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:55:42 transcript
    “Many times we've been asked what are the differences if there are two groups or two spirits, what are the differences? … There somehow seems to be a wrong understanding from some of these, of the doctrine of the congregation. … And we've heard speaking our speeches that seem to separate the word of God from the congregation and place the word above the congregation in some way. But our understanding is that the word and the congregation are inseparable. … It feels like we do hear, even here this afternoon, two different kinds of speeches. … if we have fallen from faith or into a wrong spirit, what God asks of us is a simple repentance.”
    The chairman's answer to 'what are the differences': one doctrinal item (placing the Word above the congregation), the rest conduct and 'two kinds of speeches', ending in 'a wrong spirit'.
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 different-spirit-ground ▶ 02:19:30 transcript
    “But I think it is very clear, as many have known, there are two voices and two spirits here, as there have been for some time.”
    'Two voices and two spirits' given as self-evident; no doctrinal error named.
  • Jared Juusola, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 different-spirit-ground ▶ 02:49:03 transcript
    “and we've heard about two spirits here. Two. Two spirits. Do you know what? There are two spirits. But there's only two spirits. John Lehtola taught me this. There's the spirit, the Holy Spirit, and there's unbelief.”
    Equates the 'other' spirit with unbelief; no doctrinal error named.
  • Jordan Muhonen, LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 no-error-named ▶ 03:09:34 transcript
    “The question has been asked so many times, what are the differences? And I would have to say for my own part that I have heard the differences. They have been listed even in the synopsis of these meetings. … I have sat on the same church bench as you have. We have heard the same speeches. And we have walked out of the building with a different understanding.”
    Asserts differences exist and were 'listed' in synopses, but states none on the floor before the vote.
  • Moderator (chair; 'Ben Grangroth' per the human transcript only), LLC annual meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 no-error-named ▶ 03:22:41 transcript
    “Okay, so we have a motion on the floor and a second. We've had quite a bit of time for discussion. So, at this time, I want to see a show of hands for all those that are, actually, if we could maybe mention the motion was originally to not recognize [Wolf Lake and Minneapolis] as member [congregations] of the LLC, is that correct? Okay, so if we get a show of hands that are in favor of that. … Okay, let's show hands for those that are opposed. Okay, so the motion stands. So that's the end of the agenda that we have.”
    The chair's closing puts the removal to a vote with no doctrinal ground stated.
  • Peter Lever, Roaring Fork Valley, 2022-10-08 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:32:46
    “DIFFERENT SPIRIT THIS ONE SPIRIT AND THIS DIFFERENT SPIRIT THE RESULT OF IT AS LIKE I SAID JUST HAPPENED THIS RECENT HERESY IS A SEPARATION OF THE GOD'S ELECT AND THE UNGODLY BECAUSE THERE'S ONLY ONE FAITH ONE HOPE ONE BAPTISM ONE GOD”
    The 2022 'heresy' is explained as a different spirit separating elect from ungodly; no doctrinal error named. Segment is machine-capitalized.
  • Unidentified speaker, RLLC delegate report and congregation discussion, 2022-10-23 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:16:06 transcript
    “In the end of that discussion there was a near unanimous vote to remove them … And not only them, but those who have been in spiritual sympathy with the spirit, the wrong spirit that has persisted there,”
    The removal is reported as a call away from 'the wrong spirit'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Thomas Prophet, Ishpeming, 2023-02-12 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:15:55
    “The Holy Spirit dwells in God's kingdom, and when the doctrine is not a sound doctrine, it is not the voice of the good shepherd, and the sheep do not follow after one that has a wrong spirit. … Even recently we have witnessed where there are those who have departed from God's kingdom and they were spoken to many times, preached to many times, … but did not endure this sound doctrine”
    Pairs 'not a sound doctrine' with 'a wrong spirit' but specifies no doctrine; the departed are said to have rejected 'sound doctrine' generically.
  • Peter Lever, Spokane, 2023-04-02 spirit-says ▶ 00:47:27
    “And even now as the battle continues, God has cleared and spoken the error in His kingdom. He has cleared it. There's not any question now on where God's kingdom is. If one believes that the Holy Spirit has spoken from the beginning of time, … through this past warfare and battle, that's all we need to do is trust and believe. We don't have to understand.”
    The 2022 outcome is 'God has spoken'; believers need not understand it. No doctrinal error named.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2023-04-16 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:31:29
    “The danger of continuing in fellowship with those of a different spirit that are in heresy. Even if we have had very close friends … But now we find that they go to a different church. They don't gather with us. They don't confess the same faith. It's important that we find new friends.”
    Applies Titus 3:10 to those 'of a different spirit'; the heresy is identified by spirit and attendance, no doctrine named.
  • David Anderson, Cokato (Spring Services), 2023-05-07 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:28:23
    “You know, and oftentimes, we couldn't put a finger on what was different. … But it was the Spirit that was different. … Maybe it wasn't something that was so black and white. … Maybe it wasn't a point of doctrine that we could understand or put a finger on. … But it was a different spirit.”
    Says plainly, after the removals, that the difference was not a point of doctrine anyone could identify but 'a different spirit'. No error named.
  • Peter Hill, Ishpeming, 2023-06-04 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:39:36
    “even a year ago there was those different churches that we are now separate from and the reason that … We are now separate, you could say, as God separated them, separated that different spirit. It's not the same spirit. It's not the same faith. It's not in agreement with God's kingdom.”
    Gives 'that different spirit' as the reason for the 2022 separation; no doctrinal error named.
  • Allen Pirness, Rockford, 2023-08-08 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:21:23
    “We're not able to even always discern what it was that made it difficult to hear. … We have even marveled over the last few years leading up to this time of the separation that there, when someone would speak with a different spirit, that sometimes the words could be correct … but they were coming from a different place.”
    Concedes the words 'could be correct' and the trouble could not be discerned; judgment rests on spirit. No error named.
  • Allen Pirness, Rockford, 2024-01-01 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:32:40
    “That we can't quickly put our finger on what it is that they're teaching different, but we know that something feels a little bit different to us.”
    A 'slightly different teaching' recognized by feeling, not named.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2024-02-19 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:12:46
    “And I suppose as many times they could not put a finger on that, what is wrong? Because often what is wrong is what is lacking in what is said.”
    What is wrong is 'what is lacking', so nothing said can be pointed to.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Glendale, 2025-01-05 different-spirit-ground ▶ 00:18:37
    “separated because of the wrong spirit. Some of us have children that have left. It is hard to imagine. It is hard to believe these words of God that we need to separate from them. But so it is. … But when the question is that we should sit down and discuss, discuss doctrine, … I was told that we need to sit down, open the Bible and discuss doctrine. These are such difficult matters when the heart is not yearning to hear the truth and believe the truth.”
    Separation grounded on 'the wrong spirit'; a request to open the Bible and discuss doctrine is treated as a symptom. No error named.
  • Keith Kariniemi, Rockford, 2025-06-22 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:11:36
    “And we hear about how when there's a foreign voice, our spirit's so quick to identify that. … We don't necessarily, we can't put our finger on it, we can't explain. There's no sort of ability, yeah, to explain what's different or that sort of thing, but the Spirit knows. And it's because the voice is different.”
    States there is 'no ability to explain what's different'; the Spirit knows. No doctrinal error named.
  • Peter Lever, Spokane, 2025-08-11 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:19:30
    “it answers in our heart like something doesn't sound right. I don't know what it is. I can't put my finger on it, but it doesn't sound right.”
    The spirit of error recognized without being identified.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2025-08-17 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:22:02
    “But there was a different tone. There was something that perhaps we couldn't quite put our finger on but didn't sound or didn't seem right. That was the Holy Spirit recognizing that.”
    Looking back on the 'heresy': a 'different tone' no one could name.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2025-10-26 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:15:53
    “There were many times we believers were left unsettled after the services. We couldn't put a finger on what was wrong. And often it was what was left out of the sermon that we heard.”
    Looking back: what was wrong could not be named; it was 'what was left out'.
  • Chad Simonson, Flathead Valley, 2026-02-01 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:20:51
    “Even during this last heresy, we knew when something was off. … Our spirit simply didn't say amen. … We would many times leave wondering and pondering, what did they mean?”
    The 'heresy' was known because 'something was off' and the spirit did not say amen; hearers did not know what was meant. No error named.
  • Dave Edwards, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 01:12:27 transcript
    “that they didn't feel that there was the same spirit, the same understanding, … the heresy happened unfortunately uh there was a wrong understanding and a wrong spirit and that was revealed in god's time and in god's time he cleansed his kingdom of that wrong understanding and so to go back and try to revisit about those matters it just it brings so much sorrow to us … do you feel that there was a heresy? And if not, um, why, uh, that's, that's what God's spirit has revealed.”
    The heresy is 'what God's spirit has revealed'; revisiting the matters is refused. No doctrinal error named.
  • Brent (surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 cannot-name-it ▶ 01:39:03 transcript
    “I see that one message, but then I hear another and I can't quite put my finger on it, but … But I hear that, a different voice in this discussion, which is disturbing or unsettling, rather.”
    Board member hears 'a different voice' he cannot identify; no doctrinal error named.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2026-03-21 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:19:33
    “How do you know if somebody does not have the same spirit with you? … You can put your finger on it. You don't know. You're just uncomfortable. Why is God's Spirit uncomfortable or comfortable? That's a mystery to us because we don't understand. But it is God's Spirit.”
    Spirit-difference is known by discomfort that is 'a mystery'; 'You can put your finger on it' is almost certainly 'You can't'. No error named.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2026-03-21 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:20:03
    “How do you know if somebody does not have the same spirit with you? You [can't] put your finger on it. You don't know. You're just uncomfortable.”
    The machine transcript reads 'can'; the recording has 'can't'.
  • Paul Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:02:57 transcript
    “Because we all know when we're that divided, it is a matter of conscience, it's a matter of offense, it's a matter of differences, a matter of different spirits. And as Arvin said, … Those things are corrected by the individual repentance.”
    Answers the request for a stated doctrine with 'different spirits' cured by individual repentance; no error named.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:14:37 transcript
    “And the reason was that we are no longer in the same spirit. The separation came long before the 2022 meeting, and it was a formality that stated that those congregations are no longer in the same spirit. … I'm not part of the LLC. And I'm afraid, Briar, that Central California is in the same path because you're of a different spirit.”
    States the 2022 reason was 'no longer in the same spirit' and applies the same to Coastal California; 'Central California' and 'I'm not part of the LLC' are machine-text oddities. No error named.
  • Justin Anderson, LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03 different-spirit-ground ▶ 01:58:54 transcript
    “Who has the Holy Spirit? Who doesn't? And it seems that with the apparent difference in spirit and understanding that maybe it's God's time to [clear this] kingdom of [wrong] understandings and [support others] saying that [there are] two different spirits”
    Supports the Coastal California motion on 'two different spirits'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Meeting chair ('Ray' per the human transcript; Part 1 names Ray Waaraniemi of Rockford as chair), LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 02:10:53 transcript
    “Many scripture portions, many portions of Luther's writings, these were not the reason why … weren't seconds to those motions but I think as has been alluded to here there's a long history of these discussions and differences and we feel that these things … have resulted in heresy. We believe that the Holy Spirit has revealed this to the living congregation of God. When there's differences of spirit, … Well, the Spirit has revealed these matters to us.”
    Chair's closing: Scripture and Luther quotations were 'not the reason'; the heresy is what 'the Holy Spirit has revealed'. No doctrinal error named.
  • Greg Jacobson, Flathead Valley, 2026-08-23 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:36:01
    “We don't always have a specific thing that we can put our finger on that says this is what's wrong, but we're left with a feeling that something's not right.”
    A feeling, not a named error, as the signal.
  • Stephen Warwaruk, Outlook, 2026-09-20 revealed-to-congregation ▶ 00:27:27
    “I remember the instruction that when you go to serve, just go and speak about how you believe. … if there would be an error in your faith, that it would be revealed to the congregation and they could correct you.”
    Error in a minister's faith is to be 'revealed to the congregation'; no reference to testing by Scripture. No error named.
  • Eric Mattila, Outlook, 2026-10-03 cannot-name-it ▶ 00:28:03
    “And yet when the children of God heard that foreign voice, even though we weren't always exactly able to pinpoint it, It brought trouble and it brought restlessness.”
    October 2026: the 'foreign voice' could not be pinpointed.
Binding, Matthew 18, and removing ministers 79 statements: 7 sermons by 6 ministers, 61 statements at 12 meetings, 11 documents (2018–2026) ↑ top
  • Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide speakers' and boards' meeting, Monticello, 2018-06-14 unrest-ground ▶ 02:25:58 transcript
    “I don't believe that there is evidence of clear wrong doctrine. For me it's enough to know that there is unrest around the service of one of the ministers.”
    Removal ground stated as 'unrest' expressly without 'clear wrong doctrine'; the book tests teachers by Scripture (p. 177).
  • Roger W. Alajoki, Wolf Lake letter to the Cokato board, 2018-09-26 disinvite document (PDF)
    “We are disappointed in your preference not to answer our congregation's request in writing. … In our first visit, you mentioned both the robe of righteousness and withholding of forgiveness as reasons, when I inquired why your decision was made. But no details as what, if any, differences that exist were given.”
    Cokato gave topics but no details and declined to put its doctrinal concern in writing.
  • Briar Siljander, Letter to the Detroit congregation before its discussion of Phil Alajoki's Youth Days service, 2018-09-30 disinvite document (PDF)
    “The following Sunday, I was informed that Paul Honkala had spoken again with Jim Franti and that the board should meet again to discuss Phil – and whether or not he should still be invited to come serve at Detroit Youth Days. We met this past Wednesday evening. Paul Honkala stated that he had spoken with Jim Franti and Jim had recommended that we disinvite Phil. The majority of our board ultimately thought that this would be appropriate until such time as the issues between the Cokato board and Phil were resolved.”
    Contemporaneous letter: the LLC chairman's recommendation to disinvite, as relayed by a Detroit board member (second-hand; Frantti denied it in Jan. 2019).
  • Briar Siljander, Letter to the Detroit congregation, 2018-09-30 minister-removed-no-error document (PDF)
    “No one on the board described any concern about how Phil believes or what he preaches. No one else on the board has called Phil. No one has spoken with him. No one knows the reasons that the Cokato board, through one of its members, told Phil he was not invited to speak there. Yet, now we are prepared to tell him that he is not welcome to come to Detroit to preach God's Word because we are told there is a "cloud" over him.”
    Disinvitation proposed with no stated error in belief or preaching; letter asks that doctrinal differences 'be articulated and then discussed'.
  • Briar Siljander (reporting Phil Alajoki's account), Letter to the Detroit congregation, 2018-09-30 disinvite document (PDF)
    “Phil told me that George Koivukangas showed up unannounced at his workplace to tell him that the Cokato board had sent him to tell him he was no longer invited to speak there. Phil said he asked George what Cokato's concerns were and was told that he was associating with false preachers and teaching false doctrine. Phil told me he asked George to discuss Cokato's concerns, but George spoke only briefly with him – 20-30 minutes – before leaving.”
    How the first disinvitation was delivered; no Scripture or sermon cited.
  • Unidentified speaker (Minneapolis member), Minneapolis congregation meeting on John Lehtola, 2018-09-30 unrest-ground ▶ 03:52:45 transcript
    “As far as, you know, being a minister and with all the questions that keep coming up over decades, for the life of me, I can't figure out why John hasn't asked to be relieved”
    Pressure to step down on 'questions that keep coming up', not a named error; the 28 Oct 2018 removal meeting is not held.
  • Jim Frantti (self-introduced at [00:45:32]), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 disinvite ▶ 00:58:52 transcript
    “I received an email that had been sent not to me but to somebody else and then I received a copy of it that I had given advice to the Detroit congregation and board that they should not call our brother Phil Alajoki to serve there. I haven't met with the Detroit congregation or board in years and I've never given them that advice. … And I've never told any congregation board who to call or who not to call.”
    Frantti's denial of the Detroit report; it cuts against the 2018-09-30 letter and must be shown with it.
  • Don Lahti (Brainerd), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 refused-minister ▶ 01:07:15 transcript
    “I'll touch upon the question that came up about Brainerd not calling Darwin there. For many months, at least three or four months before he was scheduled to come, questions came up from the congregation … They have heard comments from other congregations where the spirit evidently did not answer. We struggled with it on the board. I'm not on the board, but I attend the board meetings. And each time, each meeting we said, we just don't have a good reason. … Not to call him.”
    Brainerd did not call Darwin Lake while admitting 'we just don't have a good reason'.
  • Dave Keranen (Menahga), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 unrest-ground ▶ 03:13:30 transcript
    “Here in [Menahga], our brother, dear brother Eugene was, we've had our concerns with him and we had visited with him. He hasn't, based on visits and actions, he hadn't been free in [Menahga] or with our board and speakers and he had requested to no longer to be relieved of his speaking duties … Well, I don't know. I don't know what the question is. And I think that's why we're here today. We're trying. It seems like maybe there's some questions around the forgiveness question.”
    Eugene Kumpula's stepping down explained by 'concerns' and not being 'free'; the speaker says 'I don't know what the question is'. The recording is unclear here.
  • Roger Alajoki (Wolf Lake), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 disinvite ▶ 04:09:42 transcript
    “My brother in particular, in the [Cokato] situation, did not go there to speak. But the disinvitation happened prior. I have stated in both publicly and in letters to [Cokato] that I felt that their actions were wrong. They were incorrect. … I have stated to you, dear brothers, before, both in [Cokato] and in Brainerd and Detroit by extension, that what you have done was not right. It was and is, as happened before, dividing of the body of Christ”
    Wolf Lake names Cokato, Brainerd and Detroit as having refused its minister before he spoke;
  • Mark Skoog (Menahga), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 refused-minister ▶ 06:21:43 transcript
    “When we decided [Menahga] was not going to use Darwin and Phil until it was resolved, our scheduler, which is Larry, and your scheduler, which is Joe, they worked together.”
    Menahga stopped using both Wolf Lake ministers 'until it was resolved'.
  • Unidentified speaker (answering 'Roger'), Menahga annual joint board meeting, 2019-04-27 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 04:24:59 transcript
    “but if you say that unless you can identify something in somebody's sermon, that's not necessarily the case. Sometimes it may be evident and sometimes it may not.”
    Defends disinviting without identifying anything in the sermons; the book says teachers are evaluated by Scripture (p. 177).
  • Rockford LLC board chairman (board report), Rockford congregation meeting on Craig Kumpula, 2019-05-19 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 00:40:42 transcript
    “Due to these questions hovering in our congregation, [the board had requested] that Craig not serve outside of Rockford until the congregation can have more discussion on this. Craig agreed to respect this request. He also stated that he did not agree that it was the right decision. … Beyond asking Craig to not serve outside of Rockford until the congregation can visit further, we do not have an official recommendation from the board.”
    Restriction imposed on 'questions hovering', with no board finding.
  • Jeremy Glynn (Rockford LLC board chairman), Rockford congregation meeting on Craig Kumpula, 2019-05-19 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 03:24:30 transcript
    “Last year it was concerned that Craig was serving at a confirmation camp. Parents were concerned. There was questions from sister congregations where he has been scheduled. … I can't sit here and say that it's only because we're discussing him. I would say that we're discussing him because of those concerns. I specifically, as I said, can't say that there is exact same … So this is maybe a long-winded way of saying that my concern with Craig, with [his wife], is, I can't specifically say it is doctrinal, but I can say that it troubles me how they will defend and join with those … That's my concern.”
    Chairman's stated concern is association ('defend and join with those'), expressly 'not doctrinal'.
  • Jeremy Glynn (Rockford LLC board chairman), Rockford congregation meeting on Craig Kumpula, 2019-05-19 amen-test ▶ 03:28:54 transcript
    “They spoke of that letter as exactly how they believed. At the same time, they said that Huddy's presentation also joined with them. And I thought, how can you say amen to both? I don't know. … See how that's possible. To me it looks like, it feels like, serving two masters.”
    Concern is whom one says 'amen' to (the Raisanen-Skoog letter vs. a workshop presentation); 'Huddy's' probably mis-transcribed.
  • Craig Kumpula, Rockford congregation meeting, 2019-05-19 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 05:10:59 transcript
    “The congregation, I don't want to be the cause of mistrust, confusion. So it would seem good that I would take that rest. But the matters that are troubling God's kingdom are not resolved here tonight, it's clear.”
    Accepts a 'rest' after a 5h52m meeting that identified no doctrinal error; one speaker called it 'a morphing of Craig's understanding of forgiveness' [05:01:41].
  • Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 00:22:47 transcript
    “I think what started a series of meetings was there was a sermon kept by our brother Darwin in Outlook. It raised some concern among believers. It seemed like it caused some divisions. Some spoke very favorably of it and some felt very troubled by it. … The LLC board and staff had discussed it and thought that if it is causing division, maybe it is best that we not keep it on the archives where it is aired for all of the public and the world to hear. … Not because we had any questions or doubts about how he believes or anything like that. Simply, we didn't feel that it was good for us to keep it there if it was causing concern.”
    Darwin Lake's sermon pulled from the archive for 'causing concern', with no doubt about his belief stated.
  • Kent Simonson, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 disinvite ▶ 00:52:54 transcript
    “I ask this question, why are our ministers not accepted to preach in other congregations? Where have they gone wrong the preaching of doctrine? Has it been in discord with the Scriptures? … If there is no issue with the doctrine that they preach, why is this the case [that they are disinvited]? There needs to be before steps are taken, it would be said perhaps that the people have been troubled. Our doctrine is based on clear scriptures.”
    Wolf Lake's question: name the doctrinal error; the book's test is Scripture (p. 177).
  • Lori Alajoki, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 01:08:24 transcript
    “We tell them what is wrong with them. We don't tell them that there is something wrong with you, but I don't know what it is. You are causing clouds of confusion. We tell them what the matter is.”
    Caretaking should name the fault; 'clouds of confusion' is no charge.
  • Ken Raisanen, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 disinvite ▶ 02:16:53 transcript
    “That is disinviting believing ministers without cause, which is a great sin. It is a sin against God. It is sin against the kingdom of Zion. … This idea of disinviting believing ministers, pressuring ministers off of speaking for unexplained reasons is sin. … It has now been a year-and-a-half since Phil [Alajoki] from this congregation was disinvited from Cokato, and they have still not figured out why [it was done].”
    Eighteen months after Cokato's action the reason was still unexplained.
  • Becky Lake, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 refused-minister ▶ 02:22:21 transcript
    “That is what we need to hear. Why are the ministers disinvited? They're not going to Menahga. We had shared ministers with Menahga for years and years. They're uninvited from Menahga. They're off the schedule there, also.”
    Menahga, which had shared ministers with Wolf Lake for years, took both off its schedule.
  • Esa Vilkama, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 disinvite ▶ 02:59:11 transcript
    “They have preached the gospel. So, I would say unless I am shown otherwise, I think that those disinvitations of our ministers were wrong. That is one reason for the broken love. Often I hear these terms like confusion, cloud, can't put a finger on it.”
    A translator of the book calls the disinvitations wrong 'unless I am shown otherwise'; grounds heard were 'confusion, cloud'.
  • Warren Raisanen, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 03:56:27 transcript
    “There are ministers that have been taken down that there is not good agreement that they should be [resting]. That is a big, big difference. As far as the disinviting of these ministers. I do believe without telling these brothers what is wrong with him -- we have to think about how anxious would it make you?”
    Ministers taken down and disinvited 'without telling these brothers what is wrong'.
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 04:48:40 transcript
    “I feel like this cloud that is also over Phil and Darwin, is the cloud that has been over the good part of your board. It has arisen because of these meetings and the way those meetings have gone. … the cloud that has developed around your board -- the majority of it -- is the cloud that is over Phil and Darwin, in my mind. … I would say that the cloud is this -- this adversarial kind of attitude and approach in these discussions.”
    The 'cloud' over the two ministers defined as their board's 'adversarial attitude' in meetings, not any teaching.
  • Sam Roiko, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 disinvite ▶ 05:23:00 transcript
    “I wanted to hear what the concerns that you Wolf Lake brothers and sisters have. Disinviting, as it has been called, is one of them. I'm not sure, as Jon Bloomquist mentioned, if it is the issue or just a symptom of the issue.”
    LLC board member treats disinviting as possibly 'a symptom', not answering the doctrinal question.
  • Will Randall, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 refused-minister ▶ 05:51:45 transcript
    “So, our chairman called Eric Jurmu and asked what was his thought on it? … What was the LLC's stance on inviting or disinviting Darwin to Gillette? Eric Jurmu stated that the LLC did not have a position on that. … One of our brothers on the board called a speaker in Cokato and asked him what his thoughts were. His stated that he would be VERY AFRAID of having one of these brothers speak in our congregation.”
    How a refusal spread: a Cokato speaker's fear, with the LLC taking 'no position'.
  • Dave Edwards, Rockford LLC, 2020-08-14 binding-individual ▶ 00:20:55
    “There is another key and it is the key of binding. One that has been entrusted into the congregation of God. Not as an individual. … we put that person into the care of the congregation. … And until that person acknowledges that, we carry that person in love.”
    Binding is the congregation's key over a person; he confesses he once wrongly withheld greeting from a brother on his own.
  • Scott Simonson, Longview LLC, sermon on John 8:1-11, 2020-10-04 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 00:29:42
    “every believer, even those who, and those who have been born again, that live of the gospel, they not only walk in continual forgiveness, but they walk in continual repentance.”
    His only archive use of 'continual forgiveness', paired with 'continual repentance'; he preached again 2021-05-02. No record ties his removal to it. He was later removed from preaching: his last sermon in the LLC archive is 2 May 2021 at Longview, and the Seattle and Longview archives continue with hundreds of sermons by others after that date.
  • Unidentified speaker (Glendale member), Glendale congregation meeting on Eric Lahti, 2020-10-17 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 01:23:10 transcript
    “When a person is accused of something and told they need to repent, naturally they're going to ask, repent from what? And today, in every case, ministers being pressured to step down or taken down, they've not been told what they are to repent from that I'm aware of.”
    Member's summary: no removed minister was told what to repent of.
  • Unidentified speaker (Glendale board member), Glendale congregation meeting on Eric Lahti, 2020-10-17 unrest-ground ▶ 02:10:25 transcript
    “We had a meeting back in February and then after that we met as a board and asked Eric to take a rest. … I've never heard or seen this discussion turn to personal soul care for Eric. … That's much different when we're talking about a servant of the word if there's confusion being spread and trouble of the sheep in God's kingdom. That's been the discussion that I've had.”
    Eric Lahti asked to rest; the board's stated ground is 'confusion being spread', not soul care or a named error.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford LLC, sermon on Matt. 18:15-18, 2021-08-31 binding-individual ▶ 00:35:17
    “this individual claims to be a child of God, but yet lives otherwise, that we can't continue to hold such a one as a child of God. … we can easily, in our own impatience, in our own understanding, begin to take matters into our own hands and begin to, as if, bind as an individual. … It is the church that binds. It is the congregation. It is not any one of us as an individual. It's a very serious and sobering step that God's children would take in the light of the Holy Spirit. And we want to be very careful.”
    Binding described as the congregation's act toward one individual after the Matt. 18 steps; ten months later delegates removed two congregations by vote.
  • Robert Haapala, Outlook LLC, 2021-10-31 binding-individual ▶ 00:46:25
    “Jesus' words teach us then how it is the congregation of God that can … bind a person. Not us as individuals, but the spirit that teaches within the congregation. But it is a kingdom of forgiveness.”
    Matt. 18 steps end with the congregation binding 'a person'.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix annual meeting (participant-prepared transcript; no audio), 2022-01 amen-test typed transcript (PDF)
    “And our dear sister Cheryl [Simonson] and others who were not directly involved spoke. We said amen. I thought for sure that now Brett will see, he will step down and take care of his [matters], whatever they may be. But again, he resisted any attempts for help.”
    Expected the minister to step down because the congregation 'said amen'; The typed text has 'manners'; 'matters' is the idiom meant.
  • Mary Hillukka, Phoenix annual meeting (participant-prepared transcript; no audio), 2022-01 minister-removed-no-error typed transcript (PDF)
    “Our congregation had a discussion about sending ministers to Minneapolis [Wolf Lake?]. At a later time, we discussed sending ministers to Minneapolis. I felt that the congregation clearly spoke. Brett was not in unity with those decisions. So, that to me is very, very concerning that we have a speaker brother who is not in unity with the congregation on a very important matter like that.”
    Ground for removal: not in unity with the decision not to send ministers.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix annual meeting (participant-prepared transcript; no audio), 2022-01 minister-removed-no-error typed transcript (PDF)
    “Maybe we could say that the concerns started, from my understanding, after a meeting that took place in Monticello. It was acknowledged that there were two spirits and two sides at that meeting. I don't believe that Brett [Rintamaki] was in agreement with it. It was noticed that a change happened with him after that meeting. He has not felt free with the board members. He stopped coming to board meetings. … It was felt that he was not on the same page and not in the same unity. … We visited the MBMAC letter that was sent from the Minnesota congregations. We visited Warren [Raisanen] and Eric's [Skoog] letter. We visited Wolf Lake having Bible class with heretics. The list went on and on. We had a completely different understanding of everything that we discussed.”
    Stated issue: disagreement that there were 'two spirits', loss of 'freedom', different views of the dispute; no Scripture or sermon cited.
  • Timo Sutinen (with the meeting chairman), Phoenix annual meeting (participant-prepared transcript; no audio), 2022-01 minister-removed-no-error typed transcript (PDF)
    “I make the motion to have the vote. The vote [motion] is to remove Brett Rintamaki as a pastor. … The motion was put forward and then seconded by Nate [Skoog?], by a show of hands to remove Brett as a speaker. Those in favor, raise your hand. Those opposed. The motion carries.”
    Removal by show of hands though the agenda said 'by ballot'.
  • Keith Hillukka, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 unrest-ground ▶ 00:21:30 transcript
    “Over the past couple of years, congregation members have reached out to the board voicing concerns surrounding our preacher brother Brett. … The board has felt a change with Brett which is a lack of freedom with board members and [the lack of] attending board meetings. … At one of our board meetings in unity we decided that we would not schedule Brett to serve until we could meet as a congregation.”
    The stated issue: 'concerns', 'a lack of freedom' and missed board meetings; no sermon or doctrine named.
  • Neil Roberts, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 00:40:38 transcript
    “I think that we should have had this meeting before we took anyone off of the schedule. It is a big deal when we pull someone down from speaking. You would think that we would cross our T's and dot our I's before we make a decision that is going to influence someone's faith life.”
    Objection to removal from the schedule before any congregation meeting.
  • Bruce Wuollet, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 00:59:43 transcript
    “It seems to be recurring in sermons. The doctrine is close, but there are things that are left out. There are thoughts that are not completed. I wrote it off – maybe it is nervousness. … It is specifically around serving Minneapolis and Wolf Lake. … [Attendance at] board meetings are not a requirement. It is not a litmus test.”
    Most specific sermon criticism offered: 'the doctrine is close' but things 'left out' (wording in a typed transcript only; audio check needed); concern 'specifically around serving Minneapolis and Wolf Lake'.
  • Ryan Koivisto, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 01:16:04 transcript
    “Brett has not been a part of those discussions, other than the one that we talked about, where we discussed sending speakers to Minneapolis and Wolf Lake. That, I guess, has probably been my concern. There has been mention of the lack of freedom. … I think it is important that all of the speakers and board members that the congregation has entrusted with these duties that we all believe in the same way. … Like Eric [Mattila] mentioned, I have not heard how Brett understands these matters and how he believes on these matters.”
    The concern is tied to the decision on sending speakers to Minneapolis and Wolf Lake; the speaker has not heard Brett's belief.
  • Steve Kariniemi, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 01:19:22 transcript
    “According to the confessional writings of the Lutheran Church, the prophetic writings of the Old and the New Testament are the Only Rule and Norm by which all teaching and teachers are to be tried and evaluated. … I asked them a simple question: What would you want me to do if you said something in your sermon that concerned me? Every one of them said, come and talk to me. This is a very natural and correct way. And it is in accordance with the Church Law of Christ.”
    Member cites the same rule as the book (p. 177) and Matt. 18.
  • Mark Young, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 amen-test ▶ 01:37:10 transcript
    “I asked him if he is with us or with those [people] in Minneapolis. He asked, what is going on up in Minneapolis? I didn't know what to say. I think that everyone here knows what is going on in Minneapolis. I was offended by him not being open about these matters.”
    The visit's question was side-taking, not doctrine; Brett later said Mark 'did not have concerns with my sermons' [04:31:04].
  • John Redman, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 01:59:08 transcript
    “One, if the preacher is to be removed, the preached doctrine would be incorrect. That would be [number] one. Secondly, the life that they live would be contrary to God's word or living in sin. As a congregation we must say, okay, are these the two reasons for removing a minister or is there a third or fourth [reason]? … If these are the two reasons, what is the incorrect doctrine that is being preached?”
    A member states the two scriptural grounds and asks which applies; no answer naming a doctrine followed.
  • Lauri Nevala, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 02:14:30 transcript
    “They might speak – we can't find fault in the written word of God. Perhaps even doctrinally, the words which are spoken are the same. Why is it so that the letter kills? That's what it ends up being when someone – I have heard sermons on the radio that were spoken by unbelieving people. … They spoke doctrinally correct. But there wasn't even a possibility for them with the spirit to feed my undying soul.”
    Concedes the words may be doctrinally the same; the ground is 'spirit'.
  • Keith Hillukka, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 amen-test ▶ 02:19:57 transcript
    “In these battles the congregation here in Phoenix has taken some action in regards to some of these events in Minneapolis and Wolf Lake. … We have sent a letter. We have decided that we will not send speakers [there]. Here is a question: are you in unity with the congregation on these matters? Or do you feel differently?”
    The test put to the minister: unity with the board's decision not to send speakers to Minneapolis and Wolf Lake.
  • Brett Rintamaki, Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 minister-removed-no-error ▶ 04:31:04 transcript
    “When Mark came to speak to me, he said he did not have concerns with my sermons. … He then asked if I was in the other group? And my answer was, I wasn't aware that there was a heresy. I'm aware that there are many misunderstandings going on right now. … I guess for me personally, there are two spirits, the Spirit of God and the Spirit of the devil. I think it is a serious matter. I'm not ignoring the fact that there are battles in God's kingdom. I have not been a part of the meetings or events that took place there in Minnesota. … I do not want to base my actions on secondhand information, hearsay and rumors.”
    Brett's own statement: no sermon concern raised; he would not declare a heresy on hearsay; his 'two spirits' are God's and the devil's.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC board visit to the Wolf Lake congregation (typed transcript), 2022-05-13 binding-individual document (PDF)
    “Sometimes, we have been asked this question, what must the Wolf Lake congregation repent of? And my answer has been nothing. A congregation doesn't repent. Faith is personal. We can only take care of our own matters. Repentance doesn't happen as a group. But it happens personally, as we all, I think, know and have experienced in our lives. Each person has to choose his or her own path, and each must believe for him or herself.”
    Seven weeks before the delegates removed Wolf Lake as a congregation, the LLC chairman said a congregation cannot repent and faith is personal.
  • Unidentified speaker (Wolf Lake member; typed transcript), LLC board visit to the Wolf Lake congregation (typed transcript), 2022-05-13 disinvite document (PDF)
    “really got a really happened when our speakers were first disinvited from other congregations, and with no enlightenment, to our congregation as to why our speakers were no longer welcome.”
    Wolf Lake still had no explanation of the disinvitations in May 2022.
  • Unidentified speaker (the same opening address Jim Frantti gave at Wolf Lake the day before), LLC board visit to the Minneapolis congregation, 2022-05-14 binding-individual ▶ 00:15:30 transcript
    “A congregation doesn't repent. Faith is personal. And we must each take care of our own matters. Repentance is an individual matter. … And so it's a personal but not a congregational matter to care for our own undying souls and our own faith. But it does feel like without repentance this kind of division that we have been experiencing could sadly become a formal separation.”
    Same statement at Minneapolis: repentance is 'not a congregational matter'; the congregation was removed as a body on 2 July 2022.
  • Unidentified speaker (context indicates an LLC board representative), LLC board visit to the Minneapolis congregation, 2022-05-14 binding-individual ▶ 02:40:55 transcript
    “I can't say what your sins are. I can say what mine are and what I need to take care of. But that's why repentance is a personal matter. I can't say I'm going to repent on behalf of the LLC board. I have to just take heed unto myself.”
    The LLC side says it cannot name anyone's sins and that repentance is personal; no Matt. 18 step toward any individual preceded the July vote.
  • Trent Simonson, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-removed ▶ 00:35:11 transcript
    “These two spirits here. We can talk and discuss and whatever, and I don't see this getting there. Maybe in some ways, and maybe I'm wrong in this, but it feels like the [Church Law] of Christ is coming into play [here. It is the] final act of love …”
    Calls removing congregations the Matt. 18 'final act of love'; the clause that follows is unclear in the recording and is omitted.
  • Daniel Kumpula, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-removed ▶ 01:04:04 transcript
    “no individual is being pushed from God's kingdom. But the spirit is, there is this foreign spirit that's being pushed out of God's kingdom. And if you feel that push, … Out of God's kingdom. You're hanging on to that spirit that is being pushed from God's kingdom.”
    Denies any individual is bound while whole congregations are removed; the object is 'a spirit'.
  • Timo Hotari, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 binding-individual ▶ 01:19:48 transcript
    “My spirit has connected. It's also been them that have been asking me, what do I feel? My opinions, how I see it, how I understand it. My spirit hasn't connected with that. Faith is so personal.”
    'Faith is so personal' said in support of the corporate removal; test stated as whether 'my spirit connected'.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-removed ▶ 01:37:23 transcript
    “if we have congregations that are not in unity, and we're openly acknowledging that they're not in unity, it also feels right that at this time we should come to some agreement about what we do about that as well. Because how do we travel in unity when we openly acknowledge that there are congregations that are not in unity with us”
    Frames the question as what to do about congregations, not about any member.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 be-sure-of-reason ▶ 01:39:01 transcript
    “Those individuals may not understand, they might not feel or know exactly what the differences are, but know that there is a difference and all that's required is a humble heart and forgiveness of those sins. And if we have to, through what's been [referenced as the Church Law of] Christ [and] that final [step, take] action. Know that all it takes is simple repentance to be restored.”
    Those to be bound need not 'know exactly what the differences are'; the book requires the congregation to 'be sure of the reason' (p. 141).
  • Peter Ojala, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 be-sure-of-reason ▶ 01:43:17 transcript
    “And if not, then after that, thou shalt cut it down. I don't know if I have much more to add on this, brothers and sisters, but it's my prayer that we recognize [this applies to this sort of] situation at this meeting, [and] that we don't take any formal votes”
    Cited the fig-tree parable (Luke 13) and asked that no formal vote be taken.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, new business, 2022-07-02 congregation-removed ▶ 02:03:57 transcript
    “We didn't, of course, on the annual meeting agenda put this topic or any kind of action item, but it's a meeting of the delegates, and the bylaws authorize the delegates to take whatever actions … And of course they have the freedom to make motions and vote on motions and could freely make a decision today even regarding these matters under discussion. I'm not encouraging or discouraging that, but simply saying that there is freedom for the delegates to address these matters.”
    Chairman tells delegates they may vote on the un-noticed matter; the removal followed by show of hands.
  • Paul Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 be-sure-of-reason ▶ 02:21:27 transcript
    “Ask for gospel, repent of your condition, and God will give the understanding or you won't even have the questions. … God will clarify matters for you if you humble yourself to repent, not requiring understanding, no conditions, just take care of your matter and belief.”
    Repentance asked without stating the sin; a translator of the book, which says the keys concern 'actual sins' (p. 141).
  • Mitch Loukusa, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-removed ▶ 02:28:25 transcript
    “I guess I would at this time make the motion that we formally recognize … Wolf Lake and Minneapolis do not travel together with North American Zion. I'm not super familiar with the bylaws and what exactly that process would be, but that we formally remove the Wolf Lake and Minneapolis congregations. So that concludes my motion.”
    Motion to remove two whole congregations; no individual named, no Matt. 18 step described.
  • Joan Parks, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 binding-individual ▶ 02:36:08 transcript
    “One cannot be pushed out of God's kingdom. It is not possible. The kingdom of God resides within us. It goes from heart to heart. Faith is personal. It is a gift from God, a gift that no man can take from us.”
    Minneapolis member: faith is personal, so a vote cannot remove it.
  • Mitchell Johnson, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 be-sure-of-reason ▶ 02:40:12 transcript
    “Seriously, consider the effects of voting that through with really no reason. So I make a motion before excommunicating Wolf Lake and Minneapolis that they be judged with the Holy Word of God before committing that action.”
    Wolf Lake asked that the ban first be tested by Scripture, which is what the book requires (pp. 141, 177); the motion was not taken up.
  • Bryce Ojalehto, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 be-sure-of-reason ▶ 02:42:00 transcript
    “And I don't know what the difference is between each individual, but it seems that the divide is evident and clear. And the call to repent and flee both Wolf Lake and Minneapolis congregations has been repeated many, many times. … But when God's children tell any of us that we need to repent, we know that even if we don't understand, it would be good that we be obedient to that.”
    Supports the vote while saying he does not know the difference 'between each individual'.
  • Emily Parks, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 binding-individual ▶ 02:55:00 transcript
    “there are people that seem eager to rid the problem and to take a vote … On our individual faith, at the end of the day, that's what it is. That's my faith. That's my family's faith. That's other individual people's faith. That's what that is. I can say confidently that the members of Minneapolis do not wish to separate.”
    Objection that a delegate vote on a congregation is a vote on individual faith.
  • Ben Grangroth (meeting moderator), LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 congregation-removed ▶ 03:22:41 transcript
    “Okay, so we have a motion on the floor and a second. We've had quite a bit of time for discussion. So, at this time, I want to see a show of hands for all those that are, actually, if we could maybe mention the motion was originally to not recognize [Wolf Lake and Minneapolis] as member [congregations] of the LLC, is that correct? Okay, so if we get a show of hands that are in favor of that. … Okay, let's show hands for those that are opposed. Okay, so the motion stands.”
    Vote by show of hands; no count spoken.
  • Briar Siljander, Letter to the LLC board and member congregations after the 2022 annual meeting, 2022-08-03 minister-removed-no-error document (PDF)
    “No one at the meeting stated he believed Darwin Lake or Phil Alajoki preached incorrectly – only that there was a cloud over them. … No one stated that the Wolf Lake congregation believed incorrectly or that its preachers preached incorrect doctrine. Indeed, Jim Frantti affirmed that he believed the same way about birth control as Darwin Lake”
    Participant letter summarizing the Dec. 2019 meeting; consistent with the transcript rows above.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, LLC lesson on Matt. 18:15, 2024-09-16 binding-individual ▶ 00:09:41
    “Go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone. … We pray that in doing this first step of the church law of Christ, we would gain our brother or sister. Matters would be cared for with the blood of Christ. Jesus teaches us not to leave it there if the one offender doesn't take care of matters. We will not cover that here, but there is a second and third step”
    Church Law of Christ taught as steps toward one offender ('between thee and him alone'), matching the book's order (pp. 140-141).
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga LLC, sermon on Matt. 18:15-22, 2025-08-10 congregation-removed ▶ 00:44:36
    “It is just like when God's kingdom decided to officially remove … the Minneapolis and the Wolf Lake congregations from the association. … It did not remove anyone's faith. … The faith was gone already. … The spirit of God had left. … and a different spirit had entered in. … We cannot take away the faith of anyone, but we can acknowledge, for instance, after the third … step of the church law that that one is no longer believing”
    Applies the third step of Matt. 18 to the 2022 removal of two congregations; the book's order runs toward 'one of its members' (p. 141).
  • Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 00:55:57 transcript
    “I don't know you, Phil, but when you said how you believe it, my heart didn't say amen, because many in this world believe that way, or proclaim to believe that way, that Christ is their Savior, and it's in the Bible.”
    A confession of faith in Christ judged insufficient because 'my heart didn't say amen'.
  • Dave Edwards, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 01:15:39 transcript
    “I guess to be very straightforward, do you feel that there was a heresy? And if not, um, why, uh, that's, that's what God's spirit has revealed.”
    The direct question put to the congregation chairman: do you agree there was a heresy.
  • Wyatt Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 01:26:32 transcript
    “if we've been pretty removed from the heresy and we don't know the details and someone we trust and a brother that says, yes, this heresy happened and those individuals are no longer believing. All we can do is... If that's the case, then we can just say, amen, I believe you, brother, that you are believing.”
    Admits not knowing the details and accepting the verdict on trust; the book says the congregation must 'be sure of the reason' (p. 141).
  • Lauri Nevala (Phoenix), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 01:43:37 transcript
    “that's the question and it's a question that a number asked in different ways and where are you how do you believe do you believe as we do or do you believe”
    Test restated as 'do you believe as we do'.
  • Jeremy Keranen (Colorado), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 01:52:45 transcript
    “On that, you've evaded the direct questions that have been asked. Like Shannon just said, through the Spirit, it reveals that I don't believe the same as you do.”
    Verdict 'through the Spirit' rather than by Scripture.
  • Arvin Pirness (per the typed transcript), LLC annual meeting, new business on Coastal California, 2026-07-03 binding-individual ▶ 00:41:16 transcript
    “But yet, as God's children, we remember all those who have become troubled in these matters that the way to God's kingdom and the return to prodigal ones is through individual repentance.”
    Says return is 'through individual repentance' minutes before delegates moved to begin expelling a congregation.
  • Ryan Huotari (per the typed transcript), LLC annual meeting, new business on Coastal California, 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 00:42:24 transcript
    “So I'm glad that Briar was able to come here and share his personal testimony. And it's apparent from what he shared that my spirit does not agree with his spirit. And this is something that the Southwest congregations and also Phoenix … that battled for some time here. And we did want to bring that here to discuss whether or not Coastal California should remain as part of an LLC member congregation.”
    The test stated is whether 'my spirit agrees with his spirit'; no doctrinal error named.
  • Jared Huhta (self-identified on the recording), LLC annual meeting, new business on Coastal California, 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 00:44:43 transcript
    “He was invited to attend our last Southwest Area Board meeting, and he did attend remotely. And his testimony was not that of a believer. … He showed us clearly that he was not a believer. And I believe Briar has done us the same favor today. I would do him the favor, if he's still here, to let him know that he is not a believer. He is not traveling with us. I think his testimony, what he read, doesn't answer to any of our spirits, those of us that are believing.”
    Judgment of unbelief rests on whether a testimony 'answers to our spirits'; the book says teachers and teachings are tested by Scripture (p. 177).
  • Wyatt Kesti, LLC annual meeting, new business on Coastal California, 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 00:49:18 transcript
    “during our spring board meeting, fortunately, the call for repentance was extended to Phil, but he did not adhere to that message. He did not accept that call back into God's kingdom”
    Ground stated as not accepting a call to repent; no sin or error identified.
  • Briar Siljander, LLC annual meeting, new business, 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 00:57:56 transcript
    “there's an open question here, repent of what? It seems the standard from that meeting, and I encourage you all to listen to it, the standard of that meeting was, do you agree that the heresy was correct? Do you agree that … The vote of the delegates at that meeting was correct and the Holy Spirit. And if you don't, you are an unbeliever.”
    The accused side's description of the March 2026 Southwest meeting's test: agreement with the 2022 vote.
  • Paul Waaraniemi (per the typed transcript), LLC annual meeting, new business, 2026-07-03 congregation-removed ▶ 01:02:57 transcript
    “it is a matter of conscience, it's a matter of offense, it's a matter of differences, a matter of different spirits. And as Arvin said, … Those things are corrected by the individual repentance. I was a delegate at the meeting in 2022. I went to that meeting not aware that that was actually coming up … the delegates from the LLC congregations overwhelmingly … voted on that motion to remove Wolf Lake and Minneapolis from LLC membership. But the division had actually occurred before that.”
    Says correction is 'individual repentance' while defending a vote that removed congregations without notice.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga LLC, sermon on Rev. 3:1-6, 2026-08-09 congregation-removed ▶ 00:52:43
    “We have seen this play out, unfortunately and sadly, in recent years. How a whole congregation or almost the whole congregation can go astray in some way or another. … And that happened as well in the 1970s, and I dare say in any previous heresy.”
    Post-2022 framing: a 'whole congregation' goes astray; justifies corporate treatment.
Judging hearts 48 statements: 10 sermons by 9 ministers, 38 statements at 7 meetings, 0 documents (2018–2026) ↑ top
  • Lauri Nevala, Monticello, 2018-09-02 declared-unbeliever ▶ 00:23:01
    “If the spirit is different, we don't believe the same way.”
    The spirit test stated as doctrine by the minister later identified as the 'devil quoted scriptures' speaker.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2019-06-09 amen-test ▶ 00:18:09
    “how comforting it is when my spirit says amen to what is being spoken and how sad it is if there is another voice that speaks when my spirit does not say amen … I know I've told that story about being in Finland when I heard a bishop speak. And he said something and I told my wife, that couldn't be a believer. I asked and they said, no, no, no, that's a bishop. I said, okay. My spirit did not say amen to what was spoken.”
    A stranger's standing judged on the spot by the preacher's spirit not saying amen.
  • Amy McEleney, Wolf Lake LLC meeting with the LLC board, 2019-12-07 never-spoke ▶ 04:15:17 transcript
    “I had four people who came up to me at the camp, telling me, I am so sorry about your sister … and brother-in-law … "They are not believing correctly anymore." [I asked], "have you talked to them?" None of those four people -- actually one of them did. Three of those people had not talked to them.”
    Testimony that members were being pronounced 'not believing correctly' by people who had not spoken with them.
  • Amy McEleney, Wolf Lake LLC meeting with the LLC board, 2019-12-07 never-spoke ▶ 04:19:01 transcript
    “He himself has never talked to anyone in Wolf Lake. I said, let's call right now. We can call Darwin. We can call Phil. I have their numbers. Let's call them right now. He told me, no.”
    A minister warning against Wolf Lake had never spoken to anyone there and declined to call.
  • Mark Haataja, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 amen-test ▶ 01:13:56 transcript
    “The spirit answers. That is how I believe. If we are all of the same mind and the same spirit and we discuss a matter and we say Amen, what more is there to discuss on that matter?”
    States the amen test as the way doctrinal questions are settled.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2021-08-31 declared-unbeliever ▶ 00:45:11
    “an individual reveals in such a clear way that they are not believing that it feels like there isn't even God's peace on our lips anymore at the end of such a conversation. … You sense, you understand that we don't believe the same way. It's good to share that. It's good to be open and say that, you know, it feels like we don't believe the same way.”
    Instructs believers to tell a person 'we don't believe the same way' on the basis of how a conversation feels; also says God knows the hearts.
  • Steve Kariniemi, Phoenix congregational meeting about minister Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 counter-voice ▶ 01:23:28 transcript
    “We hear talk about two different spirits. If there are two different spirits, I don't look around this room and see a bunch of unbelievers and consider myself as a believer. And if anyone does, they have put themselves in the place of judgment.”
    An LLC member objecting to the two-spirits verdict as judging; agrees with the book's p. 156 position.
  • Darren Forstie, Phoenix congregational meeting about minister Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 amen-test ▶ 01:46:42 transcript
    “myself and a few others have expressed concern about Brett. They do not know where Brett stands. We know where the other ministers stand. … I say amen and I know where those brothers stand. My concern with Brett – I have not heard where he stands publicly.”
    Ministers are sorted by whether the listener can 'say amen'; concern about Brett rests on not having heard him declare a position.
  • Lauri Nevala, Phoenix congregational meeting about minister Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 heart-judged ▶ 03:46:00 transcript
    “I also had a coworker who could quote scriptures from any place in the Bible you asked him to. … But he's not believing, either. Quoting the scriptures – he quoted much of it to me, when we spoke of the Bible. But knowing scriptures and quoting scriptures didn't bring him to God's Kingdom. He hadn't been able to humble his heart.”
    Same argument Nevala used of Phil at the 2026 Southwest meeting: scriptural answers do not show faith. Text from the typed transcript.
  • Ryan Koivisto, Phoenix congregational meeting about minister Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 counter-voice ▶ 03:52:08 transcript
    “just whether Brett serves us as a speaker. I don't think that's us looking into his heart and saying he's not a believer.”
    Board member distinguishes removing a speaker from judging his heart.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC board meeting with the Minneapolis congregation, 2022-05-14 amen-test ▶ 02:18:28 transcript
    “When I repent them, we can't tell you, only God knows the hearts. God can touch any heart, but we, brothers and sisters, can't any longer. … But it doesn't coexist with the spirit that doesn't answer. And that's what we wrestle with. None of us are able, of our own wisdom or strength, to be able to serve or to tell. It either answers or it doesn't.”
    Concedes 'only God knows the hearts' and then makes 'it either answers or it doesn't' the operative test. Opening words likely mis-transcribed.
  • Mike Jurmu, LLC Annual Meeting, 2 July 2022 (removal of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake), 2022-07-02 amen-test ▶ 00:09:46 transcript
    “As a consequence of the fact that we feel that you don't believe the same as we do. … I think it's time because it's clear that we don't believe the same. The letters that have come from Minneapolis, these last three letters that have come, I personally did not feel the love or the unity of the Holy Spirit in those letters. … They didn't answer to my spirit.”
    First speech after Gary Lehtola's objection: the ground for not recognizing the congregations is 'we feel' and 'they didn't answer to my spirit'.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC Annual Meeting, 2 July 2022 (removal of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake), 2022-07-02 heart-judged ▶ 00:22:09 transcript
    “The separation has taken place and it hasn't been believers that has pushed anyone away. It's been those that have, through sin, separated themselves from God, which is the only thing that separates us from God and from God's kingdom. … although I don't know many of the brothers here or some of the sisters on the other side,”
    Attributes the division to the removed members' sin while saying he does not know many of them.
  • Mark Haataja, LLC Annual Meeting, 2 July 2022 (removal of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake), 2022-07-02 declared-unbeliever ▶ 00:29:26 transcript
    “there has been not only acknowledgement from our congregation, but there has been acknowledgement from, I know some in Wolf Lake as well, that we are not, we don't believe the same. We speak of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit does not divide. … some, as many have visited personally, they [have acknowledged] that they don't believe the [same way], but yet there's others that [I have] visited with previously [who are] in those congregations. And we face that question, do we [greet] or don't we [greet]?”
    Notes that some judged 'don't believe the same' had not been visited at all.
  • Jared Juusola, LLC Annual Meeting, 2 July 2022 (removal of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake), 2022-07-02 heart-judged ▶ 02:47:03 transcript
    “A year and a half ago, believers left Minneapolis. It is not a believing congregation. … And when you choose to go somewhere else, you've lost your faith. There's no question.”
    Declares a whole congregation unbelieving; loss of faith inferred from where people attend.
  • Swen Sorvala, Ishpeming, 2023-10-15 heart-judged ▶ 00:07:25
    “And we know that those that have gone into heresy are no longer believing. And it is sorrowful when we … think about it, and it's knowing that their end, or as we even said last night, an expected end is not of the same place as a child of God. It isn't heaven.”
    States as known fact the unbelief and eternal end of those 'gone into heresy'.
  • Dave Edwards, Monticello, 2024-02-03 heart-judged ▶ 00:09:56
    “Or perhaps they were believing and through the deceit of the enemy of souls they were lost in their faith. I think each one of us experienced this during this most recent heresy. With great sorrow those that were once believing no longer believed or had the desire to believe.”
    Same speaker who at the 2026 Southwest meeting relied on others' reports about Phil.
  • Martin Pylvainen, Prescott Valley, 2024-03-24 heart-judged ▶ 00:35:10
    “We perhaps in those times of struggle wondered who and what was happening with many of our friends. And we wondered what was in their hearts. For perhaps they spoke one way and lived another. … Or perhaps they even spoke in the same way we did, and it seemed as if they understood matters correctly. But yet, when the time came, as Jesus had told them, that their hearts had become full of sin. … and the fruits of faith were no longer there.”
    Says of the removed members that even when they spoke the same way, their hearts 'had become full of sin'.
  • David Ojala, Longview, 2024-11-03 amen-test ▶ 00:20:03
    “and you hear the Holy Spirit, and your heart says amen to this message, that is your duty. That if your heart did not say amen, that you would approach one and to speak with one.”
    Teaches the amen test as a listener's duty, though here paired with going to speak with the person.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2025-08-10 heart-judged ▶ 00:44:26
    “Faith already left that heart before this action took place. … It is just like when God's kingdom decided to officially remove … the Minneapolis and the Wolf Lake congregations from the association. … It did not remove anyone's faith. … The faith was gone already. … The spirit of God had left. … and a different spirit had entered in.”
    Preaching on Matthew 18: asserts as fact the inner state of two congregations' members before the 2022 vote.
  • Chad Simonson, Flathead Valley, 2026-02-01 amen-test ▶ 00:20:51
    “Even during this last heresy, we knew when something was off. … Our spirit simply didn't say amen. … We would many times leave wondering and pondering, what did they mean?”
    The heresy was recognized by the spirit not saying amen, even when the hearers could not say what was wrong.
  • Shannon Simonson, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 no-ground-given ▶ 00:37:37 transcript
    “When people are of the same faith, of the same unity, these meetings are easy. And if I was to be open, and I will be, that, [Phil], when your name came up, an uneasiness came to me.”
    Chair opens the Phil Siljander discussion with a feeling ('an uneasiness') rather than a stated error. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Keith Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 no-ground-given ▶ 00:42:49 transcript
    “[The discussion] we should have right now would center around how does each of us believe and not all the details. … And I don't know that these procedural matters are so important at this point. But rather, do we see, each of us, do we see ourselves in alignment with those who have left in heresy?”
    After Phil read the minutes' charge ('non-communication and spiritual heresy') and asked for particulars, Kesti declines the details. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 00:55:57 transcript
    “I don't know you, Phil, but when you said how you believe it, my heart didn't say amen, because many in this world believe that way, or proclaim to believe that way, that Christ is their Savior, and it's in the Bible.”
    Admits he does not know Phil; the test applied to Phil's confession of faith is whether the listener's heart 'said amen'. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Dave Edwards, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 never-spoke ▶ 01:11:58 transcript
    “because i know those brothers they believe the same as i or at least my faith my spirit aligns with theirs and when they would tell me or they would report back of the sorrowing side … that I didn't feel I, being weak like the other brothers here have expressed, felt that I could all of a sudden have great understanding and knowledge to be able to come speak with you. And so I trust that.”
    Relies on other brothers' reports; says he himself did not feel able to come speak with Phil. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 declared-unbeliever ▶ 01:20:38 transcript
    “Or even if you didn't go with the heresy, did you simply lose your faith? … And those of us that are here can hear it when you speak that … You are suffering from this blindness of one that's on the outside of God's kingdom. So if you can humble your heart to believe that sin of unbelief forgiven and gather back with us as believers, you can believe that mother of all sin, unbelief forgiven in Jesus' name and blood.”
    First explicit verdict of the meeting: Phil is 'on the outside of God's kingdom', known by how he sounds ('can hear it when you speak'). Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Wyatt Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 01:26:32 transcript
    “if we've been pretty removed from the heresy and we don't know the details and someone we trust and a brother that says, yes, this heresy happened and those individuals are no longer believing. All we can do is... If that's the case, then we can just say, amen, I believe you, brother, that you are believing.”
    States the required posture toward the heresy finding: accept it on a trusted brother's word and 'say amen' without knowing the details. Surname from the 2026 annual meeting ('Wyatt Kesti, Utah').
  • Steve Johnson, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 never-spoke ▶ 01:30:41 transcript
    “And I myself had not personally discussed … Faith matters with Phil and [his wife]. But I have heard firsthand from those that have.”
    Admits no direct discussion of faith with Phil before offering a judgment based on what others reported. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Justin (surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 amen-test ▶ 01:37:33 transcript
    “I have this prayer every time that when Phil responds that my heart would rejoice. Unfortunately, it sinks once again and it's very carnal in response.”
    Phil's answers are weighed by whether the listener's heart 'rejoices' or 'sinks'. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Lauri Nevala, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 heart-judged ▶ 01:42:09 transcript
    “I think many here have found that the responses that you've given are, there's nothing, we could say there's nothing wrong with your responses. We've always known that it's good to discuss, it's good to believe in the Lord Jesus. These things are good things. But like, … I think it was even in the presentation that even the devil quoted scriptures to Jesus to try to get him to do things that were contrary to God's will. And I think that's where we are left here at this point, where we wonder that … to the good words that you speak, where do they come from? And what is their purpose?”
    Concedes nothing is wrong with Phil's answers, then treats correct words as possibly diabolical and asks about their hidden source. The speaker introduces himself at [01:40:05].
  • Shannon Simonson, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 heart-judged ▶ 01:46:29 transcript
    “for myself, I know we don't judge. We don't take somebody out of faith. The only way somebody loses [faith or] goes another way. … or finds another way, is [through] unforgiving sin. I feel right now, I feel your speeches are the same as the last heresy. And you're standing outside the temple doors.”
    Says 'we don't judge' and in the same breath places Phil 'outside the temple doors' on the basis of a feeling. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Shannon Simonson, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 declared-unbeliever ▶ 01:48:55 transcript
    “And for myself, I can say that, Phil, you and I, we don't believe the same. It's not the same. It's the same discussions that I've heard for 10 plus years. The same discussions that go round and round and reason and whatever else. It's true darkness.”
    Verdict stated as personal perception; no doctrine or scripture named as the ground. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Jeremy Keranen (Colorado), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 never-spoke ▶ 01:52:17 transcript
    “I would say, Phil, I don't know you personally and haven't visited with you, but as I've sat here today, I've heard many, many loving calls for you to repent and return to God's kingdom through the spirit of this meeting and your responses. I don't feel that you've … On that, you've evaded the direct questions that have been asked. Like Shannon just said, through the Spirit, it reveals that I don't believe the same as you do.”
    Says he has never met or visited Phil, then declares through 'the Spirit' that they do not believe the same.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 declared-unbeliever ▶ 01:58:38 transcript
    “as long as Phil, you do not feel that you are in unbelief from what you've said. You don't believe. You've said your faith has not changed. Then you ask to hear the gospel, but … Those of us that are here are telling you that your faith has changed. It's no longer the faith that you shared with us from years ago as brothers have related. Your faith has changed. And the humility that's required is to repent from unbelief itself. If you don't believe that you're in unbelief and God doesn't choose to open your eyes, then there's … No amount of discussion that's going to change anything.”
    Overrides Phil's own confession ('my faith hasn't changed', [01:56:13]) with the group's verdict; no change in doctrine is identified. The speaker introduced himself at [00:29:27].
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 never-spoke ▶ 02:01:35 transcript
    “You said that, well, we've heard all these things from other people, but you haven't personally had these discussions. Well, that's because you haven't been around. We're having these discussions with you right now.”
    Phil's objection that the accusers had not spoken with him is answered by blaming his absence. Speaker per the independent transcript of the meeting.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 declared-unbeliever ▶ 02:02:04 transcript
    “I can tell you that for myself, you and I do not believe the same. I feel that you are in unbelief. And that's all we can do is tell you directly that that's the case.”
    Closing verdict, grounded in 'I feel'.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2026-03-17 heart-judged ▶ 00:13:26
    “I was at a memorial a few days ago, and the deceased and the family were no longer believing. They went into that heresy of 1973.”
    Pronounces a deceased person and family unbelieving on the basis of the 1973 division.
  • Arvin Pirness, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 00:40:18 transcript
    “You heard them and you failed to second the motions that were brought forward because they didn't answer. … It's a really interesting thing how those who have found a different way are so offended by such a statement that it doesn't answer. They want to yet see a proof that isn't there.”
    Explains the delegates' silence on Coastal California's motions by 'they didn't answer' and dismisses the request for a stated ground as wanting 'a proof that isn't there'.
  • Ryan Huotari, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 00:42:24 transcript
    “So I'm glad that Briar was able to come here and share his personal testimony. And it's apparent from what he shared that my spirit does not agree with his spirit.”
    Immediate response to Briar Siljander's presentation: spirit-disagreement, no point of doctrine named.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 declared-unbeliever ▶ 00:44:43 transcript
    “He was invited to attend our last Southwest Area Board meeting, and he did attend remotely. And his testimony was not that of a believer. … He showed us clearly that he was not a believer. And I believe Briar has done us the same favor today. I would do him the favor, if he's still here, to let him know that he is not a believer. He is not traveling with us. I think his testimony, what he read, doesn't answer to any of our spirits, those of us that are believing.”
    Pronounces both Phil and Briar Siljander unbelievers before the annual meeting; the stated test is that the testimony 'doesn't answer to any of our spirits'.
  • Wyatt Kesti, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 heart-judged ▶ 00:49:18 transcript
    “during our spring board meeting, fortunately, the call for repentance was extended to Phil, but he did not adhere to that message. He did not accept that call back into God's kingdom … I did not feel the peace of God in your speech. I felt like that was a speech conducted by the … reasoning and ideas of man without allowing the Holy Spirit to guide your speech.”
    Judges Phil's and Briar's standing by what the speaker felt in their speech.
  • Briar Siljander, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 no-ground-given ▶ 00:55:51 transcript
    “I think I also heard that I'm not a believer. And I guess I would like to understand a believer in what exactly? I have professed that I believe according to the constitution of this organization. And it's easy to fling around and say, well, my spirit didn't answer. Or maybe my tone was too hard. Or maybe too insistent.”
    The 'unbeliever of what?' question (rendered 'a believer in what exactly?'). No delegate answered it; the next speakers restated the verdict.
  • Paul Waaraniemi (Pelkie delegate), LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 never-spoke ▶ 01:02:06 transcript
    “I don't know Briar. I don't know where he lives. I don't know if he represents … I know he's a lawyer, I've heard. Is he representing Minneapolis? Is he representing Wolf Lake? Is he even representing Coastal California? I don't know his membership status anywhere. … those members though had strayed they were that's just a formality whether they belong to the LLC but as Briar said the LLC [isn't] God's kingdom but they had left God's kingdom”
    Says he knows nothing of Briar, then affirms the removed congregations 'had left God's kingdom'. Not named in either transcript.
  • Steve Collette, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 01:07:08 transcript
    “we've heard Briar's … lengthy [dissertation] it does not answer the spirit of how i feel is the spirit of god … we've heard many say that, and I agree, that Briar and that congregation is no longer believing like we do.”
    'Does not answer the spirit' is the sole ground offered; then proposes a motion to expel.
  • Aaron Huhta, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 no-ground-given ▶ 01:09:19 transcript
    “I don't think we should approach this from a spiritual matter. If he's aligned with the Minneapolis and Wolf Lake congregations, … And he perceives some sort of division remaining in God's kingdom. And I would say that's a good sign that you're not part of it. Because I'm not involved in any of these discussions. … it's very telling that Briar is not in the right place and we don't have to try to argue and go back and forth with him and try to prove that because I think that's what he wants.”
    Says outright that the delegates need not prove the verdict; perceiving division is itself the evidence.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 declared-unbeliever ▶ 01:14:37 transcript
    “And the reason was that we are no longer in the same spirit. The separation came long before the 2022 meeting, and it was a formality that stated that those congregations are no longer in the same spirit. … And I'm afraid, Briar, that [Coastal California] is in the same path because you're of a different spirit.”
    Extends the 'different spirit' verdict from the 2022 removals to Briar and Coastal California.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 declared-unbeliever ▶ 01:23:48 transcript
    “They no longer walk with us. Phil has not been participating in our meetings up until this last one. And at that meeting, he made it very clear that he didn't [believe] with us. And Briar is here, made it very clear that he doesn't [believe] with us. So I'm not really sure what their goal is.”
    Restates the verdict while amending the expulsion motion.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Annual Meeting, 3 July 2026 (new business: Coastal California), 2026-07-03 amen-test ▶ 02:35:09 transcript
    “you heard at the end of many speeches today, many people ask for the gospel. … They felt their sinfulness and they needed encouragement to believe, to hold on to that faith they had been given. We've been silent in that regard. And that tells us … That we don't believe the same way.”
    After the meeting: Briar's not asking for the gospel is taken as the sign of unbelief. Briar's interjection ('That I don't believe my sins are forgiven?') sits between the two clauses.
Christ and the written Word 90 statements: 59 sermons by 39 ministers, 31 statements at 11 meetings, 0 documents (2017–2026) ↑ top
  • Walter Lampi, Ishpeming, 2017-04-23 never-too-much ▶ 00:15:38
    “I don't think personally myself, the brothers and sisters, that we can ever speak too much about God's kingdom and what it means and what it is.”
    Mirror image: one can never speak too much about the kingdom (not Christ).
  • Daniel Parks, Menahga, 2017-04-30 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:33:07
    “Just as Jesus appeared after his resurrection only to his own, likewise we confess that Jesus is only found here in his kingdom. There's no salvation outside of his kingdom. One must find his kingdom, find that gracious God and that forgiveness of sins which brings faith into the heart.”
    'Jesus is only found here in his kingdom.'
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2017-05-25 too-much-christ ▶ 00:19:57
    “Christ in me, I in Christ. So the whole faith for them is my connection with Christ. And it is interesting that even in the times of heresy in Finland, the rebukes have been made that you speak too much of God's congregation or God's kingdom. I've heard it by my own ears. That we should more speak of Christ. That that should be the focus of our faith, Christ. And we say, yes, but. Yes, but. And what's the but? Where is Christ? He is in his congregation.”
    Says the demand to 'speak more of Christ' is a heresy-time rebuke; answers 'yes, but' - Christ is in his congregation.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2017-05-28 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:23:31
    “And that's why it is not enough that someone believes that God exists. That's not enough. But that is enough if someone believes that God speaks through people. That pleases God.”
    What suffices is believing 'that God speaks through people' (the congregation).
  • Peter Kuopus, Ishpeming, 2017-09-10 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:12:12
    “There are many people in the world who believe that there is a God. But they are not one of God's children. For they are not a part of His Kingdom. They are not believing according to God's Word when God's Word even teaches us that there is one kingdom, one faith, one doctrine.”
    Those outside 'His Kingdom' are not God's children regardless of belief.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2017-12-10 too-much-christ ▶ 00:13:32
    “God's children are often criticized for this. That we speak too much of this kingdom of God. and not enough of its king. But when we examine the Holy Scriptures, we see that, as I just mentioned, that is what Jesus spoke of himself.”
    Acknowledges the 'too much kingdom, not enough King' criticism and defends the emphasis.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2018-04-01 christ-alone ▶ 00:26:57
    “So it is not enough that we simply believe in God, is it? But there must be something else. There must be faith. Faith that Jesus has indeed died for us.”
    Same 'not enough' opener, but the 'something else' is faith that Jesus died for us.
  • Eric Jurmu, Rockford, 2018-04-01 christ-alone ▶ 00:30:39
    “For those that rely on their own righteousness, it is not enough. But when we rely on the merit work of Christ, this is enough.”
    Christ's merit 'is enough'.
  • Tommi Kinnunen, Cokato, 2018-04-22 never-too-much ▶ 00:33:25
    “can we in God's kingdom preach too much grace, too much love, too much mercy? And I would ask you that question also, brothers and sisters, that can we preach too much of that?”
    Reports the question from a speakers' meeting whether grace can be preached 'too much'.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 2018-06-14 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:25:14 transcript
    “I've sometimes heard in the recent times that, and it's true, God's Word is the highest authority in God's people. So is God's Word higher or more important than the Holy Spirit? I would say no. … God's Word and Spirit are equal to Christ. The Holy Spirit is only found in God's Kingdom. And there is no other way to be acceptable to God than through His Spirit.”
    Pushes back on 'God's Word is the highest authority'; the Spirit is only in God's kingdom.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Phoenix, 2018-10-14 christ-alone ▶ 00:18:24
    “they came into the congregations and they say that, no, no, no, no, it's good that you believe in Jesus Christ, but you have to follow the law of Moses too. It's not enough that you believe, only believe.”
    Condemns adding requirements to 'only believe' - a year before his 'only head, Christ' warning (Outlook, 2019-11-09).
  • Eric Lahti, Glendale, 2018-10-21 too-much-christ ▶ 00:30:29
    “It is important to know and to remember that it is not only the Word of God, it is not only Christ, but it is also the Holy Spirit that we are taught. God speaks through His Spirit today.”
    'Not only Christ' but also the Spirit, speaking through brothers and sisters.
  • Roger Alajoki (Wolf Lake), Menahga spiritual joint board meeting, 2019-01-12 never-too-much ▶ 04:00:13 transcript
    “If we believe we are justified by faith alone, but we answer, but, that's another gospel. And we need to be careful with that. In times past, then, there have been those that say that, for example, The speakers at Wolf Lake have spoken perhaps too much of grace. It's not possible to speak too much of grace.”
    Participant rejects 'too much grace' charge against Wolf Lake; 'faith alone, but' is 'another gospel'.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (evening), 2019-04-13 too-much-christ ▶ 02:00:24 transcript
    “The comments have been made at times that all we have to do is believe. I wish my faith was that strong that I could just believe. But when sin comes on my heart and conscience, I find it difficult to believe. I find it difficult to walk in faith. I need to put that away.”
    Treats 'all we have to do is believe' as a problematic comment; adds putting sin away.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (evening), 2019-04-13 too-much-christ ▶ 02:02:06 transcript
    “So, reading the Bible alone, without the Holy Spirit revealing it, opening that word, really, doesn't understand how much is going on. … And we also, we need the revelation of the Holy Spirit to understand what the Bible, what God's word says unto us.”
    Scripture reading 'alone' is insufficient without the Spirit's revelation; said while warning that 'even satan' quoted Scripture.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (afternoon), 2019-04-13 christ-alone ▶ 02:06:32 transcript
    “I've heard more often than I think I should have that faith is not that simple. That it's not a matter of just believing. But it is. At least in human history, it's pretty simple.”
    Board-workshop participant objects to hearing that faith is 'not a matter of just believing'.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (evening), 2019-04-13 too-much-christ ▶ 02:40:14 transcript
    “With regard to the sermons that have caused concern, not only with the Wolf Lake brothers, but with others, it seems that there's been a focus on Christ and the written … of the Holy Spirit, the congregation, and the endeavor. They're all important. Christ, salvation through Christ, the grace of Christ is most important. Justification by faith. We are saved by grace through faith. Those are the most important things. … we heard so preciously of the Holy Spirit and the work of the Holy Spirit. If that is missing, there is much missing.”
    Unlabeled LLC board-workshop speaker uses the same 'focus on Christ and the written [Word]' formula eight months before Keith Waaraniemi; audio gap mid-sentence.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (afternoon), 2019-04-13 too-much-christ ▶ 03:47:49 transcript
    “A brother was telling me about a discussion he had where they were talking about reading scripture and he lamented to the other that he hasn't read a lot and he doesn't understand the doctrine so well. And that, but he believes according to the teaching of the congregation. And the reply was a shocking, well that's not enough. And so I thought when I heard that, Is it coming to that that reading scripture is becoming a work amongst many in this world, or most of all?”
    Treats an emphasis on reading Scripture as a 'work'; 'believing according to the teaching of the congregation' is presented as what should suffice.
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC, 2019-07-05 too-much-christ ▶ 00:18:16
    “those who criticize God's children for this, that we speak too much about the kingdom of God and the congregation of God rather than about Jesus. We see, however, that in the Old Testament, God's children also spoke of this congregation of God.”
    Acknowledges and rejects the criticism that LLC preaching is about the kingdom rather than Jesus (LLC Summer Services).
  • Eric Mattila, Alaska, 2019-08-18 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:17:27
    “This is the only place on this earth where this message can truly be preached and truly be believed. There is no other place on earth, there is no other group of people in this world that can forgive man his sins.”
    'No other group of people in this world' can forgive sins.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 too-much-christ ▶ 01:15:48 transcript
    “And the only other concern that has been brought up is that I speak too much about the importance of the Scriptures and the Holy Bible and that my instruction is we need to turn to the Holy Bible because it's the highest authority in all matters of doctrine and life.”
    A Colorado speaker (addressed as 'Randy' at [01:19:02]) reports being criticized for speaking 'too much' about the Bible's authority.
  • Brian Johnson, Elk River, 2019-09-29 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:14:21
    “When you understand and you see and you believe in Christ, you can see and believe in the congregation. They're one. They're inseparable. And when you understand and see, behold the congregation of God and believe in it, you believe and you see Christ. … but if we lose sight if we lose sight of the mother congregation we lose sight of Christ”
    Believing in Christ and believing in the congregation made one and the same.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Phoenix, 2019-10-13 christ-alone ▶ 00:18:38
    “Has started to say that this freedom that you have received by faith is not enough. But you have to keep also All those demands and instructions of the law of God. And it was against what Paul has preached to them.”
    'Faith is not enough' presented as the Galatian error.
  • Unidentified speaker, Elk River congregation, 2019-10-19 christ-alone ▶ 00:27:37 transcript
    “But we must remember that our object of faith is not the congregation. We don't believe in the congregation. We believe that there is a congregation that exists. But our object of faith is Christ.”
    Presenter at an LLC congregation discussion: the object of faith is Christ, not the congregation.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2019-10-20 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:29:05
    “If there should be one listening today who wonders, about the Holy Spirit only being found in His kingdom. Consider the thoughts of Luther when he said that anyone who is to find Christ must first find the church.”
    Anticipates a listener who doubts the Spirit is only in 'His kingdom'; cites Luther.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Outlook, 2019-11-09 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:23:43
    “Sometimes we hear this teaching that it's only head, Christ. I need only Christ. But what we do if we have only head? … And it's wrong teaching if somebody says that, okay, I can be saved, that I have only like a straight connection to Christ in heaven. I don't need any congregation or this body. It's not biblical teachings.”
    Calls 'I need only Christ' a wrong, unbiblical teaching (presentation on the Holy Spirit in the congregation).
  • Bruce Johnson, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 christ-alone ▶ 00:38:12 transcript
    “I personally feel that these MBMAC [Midwestern boards] meetings and some of these others, like the Monticello meeting, there was not the love of Christ spoken in those speeches. There were comments there made that the Wolf Lake brothers speak too much of Christ. In my mind, it is all about Christ. Christ is our Savior. It is only [by] him that we are going to be saved.”
    Wolf Lake board member reports that LLC-side meetings said Wolf Lake speaks 'too much of Christ'; answers that salvation is by Christ only.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 never-too-much ▶ 02:52:12 transcript
    “We can never preach too much about Christ. But also at the same time in living Christianity, sermons have included the address where we can find Christ, the body of Christ, God's holy congregation. We can never separate one from another. Personally, I feel about this congregation that around me some have lost the view of this beauty or value of the congregation.”
    Affirms one can never preach too much about Christ, then adds that sermons must also give the 'address' (the congregation).
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 too-much-christ ▶ 03:28:08 transcript
    “I've been asked a few times, have I said that you can speak too much about Christ? I do not remember my exact words. But I do know what intention I have had. When I have spoken of brothers that have preached. And I would even be direct enough to say that some of the speeches of the Wolf Lake brother's sermons have raised this question in my mind.”
    Asked whether he said one can speak too much about Christ; does not deny it, says Wolf Lake sermons raised the question.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 too-much-christ ▶ 03:28:55 transcript
    “There tends to be a focus on Christ and the written Word but an avoidance of speaking of the Holy Spirit, the congregation and the endeavor. The Holy Spirit is the teacher in the congregation. The Holy Spirit is the key to understanding Scripture. That has been a concern that I have had.”
    Names a 'focus on Christ and the written Word' as his concern with Wolf Lake preaching.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 too-much-christ ▶ 03:29:26 transcript
    “When the matters are right in the congregation, there is no conflict between the Word, the congregation and the Holy Spirit. They are inseparable. It is disturbing to me that in this time, I hear voices that seem to want to separate them from each other -- the word from the congregation, for example.”
    Frames preaching the Word without the congregation as separating what is inseparable.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 03:29:59 transcript
    “We can find lots of people in this community or in these surroundings communities that speak very warmly of Christ and of God's Word. But if you don't have the congregation, you don't have the Word. If you don't have the Word, you don't have the congregation.”
    Speaking warmly of Christ and the Word is insufficient without 'the congregation'.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 too-much-christ ▶ 03:30:45 transcript
    “Also, in our time we have heard some sermons where it seems like what Harri referred to that speak of the general [gospel] or the word or [that the] sermon is the gospel, which it is. But there is an avoidance or almost skirting around and directly preaching the core message of the Gospel, the forgiveness of sins, absolution from the pulpit.”
    Second 'avoidance' charge: sermons that present the Word itself as gospel rather than pulpit absolution.
  • Loren Hillukka, Elk River, 2019-12-08 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:12:41
    “We may think this is easy to do, that it's easy to believe that Christ came here, lived here on this earth, and died on that cross. This matter also many others in the world believe. But this will of God goes deeper than just acknowledging that his son came here.”
    Believing Christ died on the cross is what 'many others in the world believe'.
  • Randall Haapala, Monticello, 2020-01-19 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:27:51
    “How is that spirit born in us? By and through believing our sins forgiven. But many in this world believe that Jesus died for their sins. And they are zealous and they will post whatever they want on these social medias how righteous they are.”
    'Many in this world believe that Jesus died for their sins' treated as zeal without knowledge.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, LLC, 2020-07-05 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:30:50
    “We believe our sins forgiven. It's not enough that we believe that God exists. It's not enough that I believe that Jesus once died or was born and lived here as a historical person. … That's not enough. The Bible says even devils believe that and tremble.”
    Historical belief vs. believing one's sins forgiven; listed for completeness.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2020-07-08 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:20:12
    “It is not enough, as we heard during summer services, that we believe in God, that He exists. Like the brother said, we have a lot of company. Even the devils believe that. But as one dear Finnish brother who has long since gone to his rest used to say, we have to believe God.”
    Believing God exists vs. believing God; orthodox, listed for completeness.
  • Walter Lampi, LLC, 2020-07-16 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:07:01
    “Only the Holy Spirit can call, gather, and enlighten, and only in God's kingdom. There may be other reasons that one could give, but the power to forgive sins hasn't been given to every faith, only one. It is only in the fellowship of God's children, We have the keys of the kingdom. One must be led to the kingdom in order to receive forgiveness.”
    The Spirit's work and the keys are 'only in God's kingdom' (LLC evening devotion).
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2020-08-09 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:14:50
    “To know God, to know the Lord Jesus, one must find the kingdom of heaven. But is it enough to know that there is the [Laestadian] church right there? When the cars go by, they know that that's the [Laestadian] church. That's not enough.”
    Knowing Jesus requires finding 'the kingdom of heaven'; knowing of the Laestadian church is not enough.
  • Unidentified speaker, Glendale congregation meeting, 2020-10-17 too-much-christ ▶ 03:27:40 transcript
    “I think Franz is the one that brought up that people are elevating the written word above the congregation or some version of that. The word of God is equal to God himself.”
    Reports the charge that people 'elevate the written word above the congregation'.
  • Ray Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2020-10-18 too-much-christ ▶ 00:44:13
    “And the children of God were criticized that they speak too much of the kingdom of God, of this one living kingdom of God. And that heresy had that thought that it should be a more Christ-centered message. But we know that when we speak of God's kingdom, we speak of the Lord of life himself. Because Jesus dwells in his kingdom.”
    Labels the call for a 'more Christ-centered message' a mark of the 1960s Finnish heresy.
  • Curtis Simonson, Cokato, 2020-11-22 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:28:55
    “They teach us here in the kingdom of God. That's the only place where you can hear God's spirit here in this world. There's not another place. You can read God's word in your car or in some other building, some other church. It is still God's word. They can read the Holy Scriptures. But God's Spirit is only here in God's kingdom.”
    Scripture read elsewhere is still God's word, but the Spirit is only here.
  • Randy Hillukka, Menahga, 2020-11-26 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:36:28
    “We find this Holy Spirit only in God's kingdom. And this Spirit leads and guides you and I, dear brother and sister.”
    Plain statement.
  • Josh Byman, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 too-much-christ ▶ 02:08:56 transcript
    “There is much talk about God; there is much talk about Jesus Christ; [but] there is very little talk about the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the third part of God that dwells within us and within God's congregation here today.”
    Menahga-side speaker says Wolf Lake talks much of God and Christ, too little of the Holy Spirit.
  • Mitch Johnson, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 never-too-much ▶ 02:10:16 transcript
    “I have heard rumors that Wolf Lake speaks too much about Christ and not enough about the congregation or the spirit. I don't know if this is an answer to your question. In John 16 verse 13 are the words of Jesus. … He shall glorify me [Christ]: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.”
    Wolf Lake board member confirms the rumor that Wolf Lake 'speaks too much about Christ' and answers that the Spirit glorifies Christ.
  • Nick Ylitalo, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 too-much-christ ▶ 02:47:43 transcript
    “This friend even shared sermons with me from Finland where they did not preach the gospel. There was an emphasis on just believing. Of course, we are saved by faith and believing. But I feel like where the emphasis question comes in.”
    Objects to an 'emphasis on just believing' in sermons; wants the preached gospel emphasized.
  • Scott Hillstrom, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 spirit-only-here ▶ 03:11:39 transcript
    “In the world there are a lot of people who believe in Jesus and they want to get to heaven. I said to continue to search for God's Kingdom. Turn to God's Kingdom. That is where the spirit is. It is the only place. It is the only place where the forgiveness of sins is found.”
    People who 'believe in Jesus' are told to keep searching for the kingdom, the only place of forgiveness.
  • Swen Sorvala, Phoenix, 2021-05-16 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:17:40
    “There are those that may even speak the same message in those non-living churches of this world, but the power is not in those words that they speak, for the Holy Spirit is only within one kingdom here on this earth. It doesn't only mean of just Phoenix congregation, but of whole God's kingdom, which spans the continents of this world”
    Chair of the 14 Mar 2026 Southwest Area Meeting: the same words preached elsewhere have no power.
  • Curtis Simonson, Cokato, 2021-05-16 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:36:57
    “I think most of the world believes that Jesus came in the flesh. I think most people believe that he died on the cross. I think most people believed he rose victorious on Easter morning. But do most people believe that that this is the kingdom of God here in our midst this morning? I say not. But what do you believe?”
    The distinguishing belief is that 'this is the kingdom of God here in our midst'.
  • Darwin Lake, Wolf Lake, 2021-05-23 christ-alone ▶ 00:28:06
    “the requirement of other things other than faith in Christ alone is the law. … There is no merit in doing. The merit is in believing.”
    Wolf Lake (then LLC) minister whose preaching was under discussion.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Ishpeming, 2022-01-01 too-much-christ ▶ 00:41:10
    “We have been accused every now and then that you speak too much of the congregation and too little of Jesus. I don't recognize that accusation. Every text brings us to Jesus. And when we come to Jesus, where do we enter? We come to the congregation. Because the head and the body belong together.”
    Rejects the 'too little of Jesus' accusation; coming to Jesus means entering the congregation.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC meeting with Minneapolis congregation, 2022-05-14 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 03:11:41 transcript
    “And this gospel is preached only from the kingdom of God. That it isn't in this way that I can believe that Christ is my Savior wherever, and it doesn't matter what church I go to, but that there is one kingdom of God, one congregation of God. As Luther says, if you wish to find Christ here on earth, you must find his congregation”
    Justification is 'one with the doctrine of the congregation'; believing Christ 'wherever' is rejected.
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2022-05-22 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:33:51
    “That Holy Spirit only resides in the one living mutual congregation of God here upon this earth. Even coming here this morning, we would have driven by many other churches or denominations of this world. But isn't it so sad that there is not the life of the Spirit?”
    Other churches driven past on the way to services lack 'the life of the Spirit'.
  • Daniel Jurmu, Roaring Fork Valley, 2022-06-12 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:17:39
    “That it is not enough for any one of us for any man to only believe in God and to believe in Jesus. For this man, Nicodemus believed in that and Jesus did not find him acceptable to heaven. And in the world around us, we can see and even read and how many in this world believe in God.”
    'Not enough ... to believe in God and to believe in Jesus.'
  • Marvin Wittenberg, LLC, 2022-06-30 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:10:53
    “This is, dear brothers and sisters, what separates God's kingdom from all other faiths in this world. There's only one place where the Holy Spirit dwells, and it's here in God's kingdom.”
    LLC Summer Services 2022.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2022-11-06 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:08:16
    “It is not enough if someone believes that Jesus was born and lived here in this world. Even the devils believe that and tremble, says the Bible. So that kind of faith where we just accept like historical facts, it is not saving faith.”
    Historical belief vs. saving faith; orthodox in itself, listed for completeness.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Phoenix, 2023-01-22 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:24:04
    “There have been some who have left God's house and they have searched for peace in other spiritualities and have not found it. Because only one place does the Holy Spirit dwell.”
    Those who left cannot find peace elsewhere because the Spirit is only here.
  • Stanley Ylioja, Outlook, 2023-02-06 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:11:39
    “Isn't that what distinguishes God's children from those that are not part of this living faith in God's kingdom here upon this earth? That that Holy Ghost only resides, that Holy Spirit only resides with God's own children here upon this earth.”
    Spirit as the distinguishing mark of 'this living faith'.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Monticello, 2023-03-11 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:42:02
    “It is not enough that we believe that Jesus once lived, died, even resurrected from death and rose into heaven. That's not enough. That's a fact. But even the devil does not deny that fact. The Bible says that he believes and trembles. What we believe, we have to believe that there is the kingdom of God lowered into this earth. And it is a group of people. Group of lacking, sinful people.”
    Believing Christ's death and resurrection 'is not enough'; one must believe in the kingdom of God as 'a group of people' (funeral sermon).
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2023-04-02 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:26:50
    “And so we can trust even today that God's Holy Spirit dwells only here in God's kingdom.”
    Plain statement.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2023-06-04 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:10:28
    “Many people in this world say that they believe in God. And they also can say that they believe in Jesus. They talk about the Holy Spirit. But God's word teaches us that the Holy Spirit only resides in the kingdom of God here on earth. There are not many kingdoms of God on earth. There is one.”
    Believing in God and Jesus does not give the Spirit, which 'only resides' in the one kingdom.
  • Timo Lopponen, LLC, 2023-07-09 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:18:20
    “The Holy Spirit dwells in only one kingdom. Even during the time of the apostles and Jesus, there was much spirituality. But we can read in the Bible that only one part had the gift of the Holy Spirit, and it was those who followed Jesus Christ, the apostles and them.”
    Visiting minister at LLC Summer Services (bilingual Swedish/English).
  • Jim Frantti, Ishpeming, 2023-08-27 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:11:12
    “And it is here in God's kingdom, as we sing in that one song in our songbook, that the Spirit dwells. God's Spirit doesn't dwell in many different places. Just as Jesus once said that you shall not say the kingdom of God is here or lo, it is there. But God's Spirit dwells only amongst his children.”
    'God's Spirit doesn't dwell in many different places.'
  • Glenn Wisuri, Phoenix, 2023-10-29 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:19:26
    “Christians of the world believe that there is a God. They believe that there is a Christ. But yet they stumble at that third portion of the Godhead, the triune, the third portion of the three-headed God, the Holy Spirit or the Holy Ghost. Therein comes to us the forgiveness of sins.”
    World's Christians believe in Christ but 'stumble' at the Holy Spirit, i.e., the power to forgive sins given to 'his own'. ('three-headed God' is as transcribed.)
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis MLLC, 2024-01-07 never-too-much ▶ 00:24:08
    “Is it possible to speak too much about Christ? Sometimes we've heard that statement that too much is spoken about Christ. Well, how is it possible when Christ is the author and the finisher of our faith?”
    Minneapolis (removed from LLC in 2022) speaker confirms the statement circulated and rejects it.
  • Hannu Janhunen, Glendale, 2024-02-04 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:10:53
    “And that unity of the Holy Spirit is only experienced there where the children of God are gathered together. It is nowhere there in the world outside of God's kingdom.”
    Unity of the Spirit 'nowhere ... outside of God's kingdom'.
  • Russell Roiko, LLC, 2024-03-17 never-too-much ▶ 00:24:21
    “Have you heard it too much, dear brothers and sisters? Has too much gospel been preached? That was one of those heresies back when, and they said, yeah, you preach too much gospel, it leads to a kind of Christianity where they don't worry about falling into sin. As if.”
    Calls 'you preach too much gospel' a heresy-era charge.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Williston, 2024-03-31 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:22:01
    “And the world also says that I believe and therefore I will be saved. I'm saved. But isn't it important that we know what we believe? It's not enough to believe that God created all things. It's not enough to believe that Jesus was born into this world. He suffered and died and rose again. One must have the Holy Spirit. One must be a member of that body of Christ. Because there is only one body, one spirit, one God, one faith, one baptism, one holy mutual congregation here upon this earth. There is not many.”
    Immediately after 'That's all that's required ... is that we believe', adds that one must be a member of the one congregation.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC, 2024-04-15 christ-alone ▶ 00:04:37
    “It is because through faith, a person owns the righteousness of Christ, which is the only righteousness acceptable to God. … because it is only Christ's righteousness that is perfect and acceptable, and one can only own that by faith.”
    Classic 'Christ's righteousness owned by faith' (LLC devotion).
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2024-05-19 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:15:10
    “The world cannot see it. They cannot feel it. They do not have it. If they are not of us, if they do not believe, they cannot have the Holy Spirit. So the Holy Spirit only belongs and leads and guides and directs and teaches the children of God who are in the kingdom of God”
    'If they are not of us ... they cannot have the Holy Spirit.'
  • Michael Ylioja, Outlook, 2024-05-26 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:35:47
    “for one on the outside of God's kingdom, it's not enough to recognize that God is there, that Jesus was also, or they cannot believe on God and Jesus only. We must believe in the triune God.”
    'Cannot believe on God and Jesus only'; the third article is identified with the kingdom.
  • Keith Kariniemi, Rockford, 2025-06-22 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:18:23
    “God's Holy Spirit is only found in this congregation, Mother, and we need to trust the Spirit. … It is because this Spirit of truth, the Holy Spirit, is only found in this one place, that the congregation mother is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.”
    Spirit 'only found in this congregation, Mother'.
  • Nathan Muhonen, LLC, 2025-07-04 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:08:24
    “The world believes in God. God who created all things. And the Christian people who believe in Christ believe in Christ. But they do not have the Holy Spirit that connects and unites us in the bonds of Christ.”
    Christians who 'believe in Christ' lack the Spirit that 'unites us' (LLC Summer Services).
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2025-11-18 too-much-christ ▶ 00:07:20
    “how oftentimes when there are people who want to criticize our Christianity, maybe from heresy or from other denominations, they claim that we believe in the congregation. and not God. They say, we believe in God, but you believe in the congregation. … And I think one reason is that they don't know it. They don't have the congregation.”
    Dismisses the 'you believe in the congregation' critique as ignorance by those who 'don't have the congregation'.
  • Petri Hotari, Toronto, 2026-01-11 christ-alone ▶ 00:29:15
    “That it is only through Christ and his merit work that we have salvation. There is no other salvation for us. There is no other road that leads to heaven than through the forgiveness of all sins. We have nothing to bring”
    Plain Christ-alone.
  • George Koivukangas, Rockford, 2026-02-15 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:38:22
    “This is no small matter. The living Holy Spirit is only found here in God's kingdom.”
    Plain statement.
  • Swen Sorvala (attribution from context), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 too-much-christ ▶ 00:11:14 transcript
    “And the devil said unto them, For it is written. And so even the devil had used God's word to try to sway Jesus. So there's many examples that in this world will use God's word, but the Holy Spirit is the one that opens.”
    Opening presentation sets up the 'devil quoted Scripture' frame later applied to Phil. Presenter identified as Swen Sorvala from the meeting context.
  • Jared Huhta, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:32:22 transcript
    “So I guess one of the questions that I had was for Phil is, do you believe along with us, and do you believe that this faith that the brothers here share is the one true saving faith. And I guess if not, if you find yourself outside of this kingdom or that you don't believe the same, then I would be the first to welcome you back or to offer that repentance to you that you can believe along with us.”
    Opens the questioning: the test is whether 'this faith that the brothers here share is the one true saving faith'. The speaker introduces himself at [00:29:27].
  • Phil Siljander, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 christ-alone ▶ 00:33:19 transcript
    “So are you asking how I believe? My faith has not changed. I believe the same way. through faith in Jesus Christ that I have that hope of heaven. And that has not changed.”
    Phil Siljander's confession that the meeting then weighs.
  • Keith Kesti, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:43:18 transcript
    “But rather, do we see, each of us, do we see ourselves in alignment with those who have left in heresy? That there's more than one way to be saved? That why is there only one kingdom on earth?”
    Sets 'only one kingdom' as the question rather than procedural matters.
  • Mikko Pasanen, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:50:27 transcript
    “[I heard your] question of your faith by this way that you said that you believe like you have believed before that you have that hope of heaven. Hope of heaven is a thing that I would say that most people on this earth have. They hope that they can [get] to heaven it doesn't really confess your faith”
    Dismisses 'hope of heaven through faith in Jesus Christ' as what 'most people on this earth have'. Speaker identified as Mikko Pasanen by the next speaker's 'before Mikko spoke' [00:55:57].
  • Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:55:57 transcript
    “I don't know you, Phil, but when you said how you believe it, my heart didn't say amen, because many in this world believe that way, or proclaim to believe that way, that Christ is their Savior, and it's in the Bible. But There was a question asked, is that do you believe that this is God's kingdom here, the one saving grace, the one kingdom? And I didn't get the feeling that you believe that because you didn't answer it.”
    'Christ is their Savior' confession rejected because 'many in this world believe that way'. Self-identified 'Scott from the Black Hills' [00:55:29]; no surname given.
  • Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:56:57 transcript
    “through visiting with friends that went in the heresy, and listening to that doubt from Satan, it almost took my faith that there was references in the Bible to what you have to do to be saved, and it was believe in Christ, that he's your savior. And I almost went that way, and many in the world would believe the same. But for whatever reason, God saved me. … But my encouragement to you, and God willing, is that there is one kingdom, and it's here.”
    Calls the Bible's 'believe in Christ ... to be saved' a 'doubt from Satan' that almost took his faith.
  • Scott (Black Hills; surname not given), Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:57:56 transcript
    “There is one single kingdom on this earth, and it is small, and it's hard for humans to accept that, but you must believe that to be saved, just the way I believe.”
    Salvation conditioned on believing in 'one single kingdom ... just the way I believe'.
  • Lauri Nevala, Southwest Area Meeting, Phoenix, 2026-03-14 too-much-christ ▶ 01:42:09 transcript
    “I think many here have found that the responses that you've given are, there's nothing, we could say there's nothing wrong with your responses. We've always known that it's good to discuss, it's good to believe in the Lord Jesus. These things are good things. But like, I think it was even in the presentation that even the devil quoted scriptures to Jesus to try to get him to do things that were contrary to God's will. And I think that's where we are left here at this point, where we wonder that to the good words that you speak, where do they come from? And what is their purpose?”
    Concedes nothing is wrong with Phil's answers, then likens them to the devil quoting Scripture. The speaker introduces himself at [01:40:05].
  • Martin Pylvainen, Elk River, 2026-03-16 christ-alone ▶ 00:28:44
    “The living word, the living gospel is preached through the Holy Spirit in God's congregation. Our salvation is based on faith, and that contains only Christ.”
    Echoes the book, p. 97: faith 'contains only one thing: Christ'.
  • Carey Simonson, Saskatoon, 2026-05-10 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:38:51
    “It is not enough to believe in the Father. It is not enough to believe in the Father and the Son, but also in the power of the Holy Spirit. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, they three together make these gates that face out from God's kingdom. And these gates are opened from the inside out.”
    Believing in Father and Son is not enough; the 'gates' of the kingdom open only from inside.
  • Keith Moll, Prescott Valley, 2026-05-17 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:12:12
    “And many in the world believe in God. … And many also believe in the Son of God, Jesus, was here on earth. … But it is difficult for them to know or understand the Holy Spirit.”
    Bilingual sermon by a Southwest Area Meeting participant: belief in God and Jesus is common; the Spirit is what the world lacks.
  • Benjamin Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2026-07-26 not-enough-to-believe ▶ 00:38:39
    “It is not enough to believe that he came and that he died for the sins of the entire world. But we must, by faith, personally own that message in our own hearts.”
    Personal appropriation of Christ's death; consistent with the book's 'owning Christ' (pp. 97-99), listed for completeness.
  • Keith Kariniemi, Cokato, 2026-10-07 spirit-only-here ▶ 00:04:52
    “So we know, understand, and believe that God's Holy Spirit is only found in one place, and that's here in God's kingdom.”
    Most recent instance in the corpus (Oct 2026).
The robe of righteousness 90 statements: 65 sermons by 40 ministers, 13 statements at 6 meetings, 12 documents (2015–2026) ↑ top
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2015-02-06 attack-sinless ▶ 00:33:13
    “We have that white robe of the Lord Jesus Christ's righteousness. That perfect robe of righteousness. But when we wear that robe, because of our sinfulness, not because of Christ, but because of us, that robe that we wear becomes stained. Sometimes there has been this kind of understanding that once a person has put on that white robe, they no longer have to worry about anything. That that white robe can't become stained. But we know... that because of our sinfulness, the white robe becomes stained.”
    Earliest sermon in the sweep: teaches the believer's robe becomes stained and dismisses the 'can't become stained' understanding; predates the 2016 MBMAC dispute.
  • Robert Haapala, Outlook, 2015-03-15 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:24:27
    “That the robe of righteousness that even a believer wears is spotless because of the merit work of our Lord and Savior.”
    States the believer's robe is spotless because of Christ's merit.
  • Darwin Lake, Phoenix, 2016-03-27 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:53:08
    “Because God only sees a perfect white robe on his believers, the children that believe. There aren't spots and speckles of sin or stains on the robe when we believe. The blood of Jesus has washed it away.”
    Wolf Lake minister preaching at Phoenix Winter Services: God sees no spots or stains on the believer's robe.
  • Russell Roiko, LLC, 2016-07-02 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:15:39
    “So the Father looks on you, dear brothers and sisters, through the merits of his Son. And what does he see? He sees no sin. Even though you feel yourself to be so sinful. Even though you feel yourself to be failing, tempted and tried. God looks upon you through the merits of his Son and sees no sin. You are holy and righteous.”
    LLC minister's standard 'God sees no sin' formulation; he repeats it in 2021, 2022, 2025 and 2026 sermons.
  • Eric Jurmu, Rockford, 2016-11-06 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:14:25
    “We are, as God's children, we are sinners and righteous at the same time. And it's such an interesting and difficult thing to comprehend that how can it be that we are corrupt but also righteous? It is because of the merit work of Christ.”
    Simul iustus et peccator in an LLC sermon.
  • Al Lake, Rockford (MBMAC), 2016-11-19 cannot-be-stained typed transcript (PDF)
    “You have a clean garment, a robe of righteousness that is pure, when you believe. Everybody here ... talking about the sin-stained garment, they always came back and said that it's clean when you believe.”
    MBMAC 19 Nov 2016 speech notes; Ray Waaraniemi replies that 'it is also on the journey, too, that we endeavor to put sin away'.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2016-11-20 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:42:00
    “How we can be, as children of God, both righteous and sinners at the same time. How is that possible? It is possible because God does not view us as we are.”
    LLC chairman-era minister teaching simul iustus: God does not view believers as they are.
  • Ray Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2016-11-20 stained ▶ 00:44:27
    “that robe of righteousness prepared by our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, that he has clothed you in, that can become stained on you the journey as we travel can be washed again and again in the blood of the Lamb.”
    Preached the day after the 19 Nov 2016 MBMAC exchange with Al Lake; says the robe Christ clothed you in 'can become stained'. 'on you the journey' is likely 'on the journey'.
  • Kevin Ruonavaara, Glendale, 2017-04-13 attack-sinless ▶ 00:42:22
    “One does not receive this robe of righteousness and then never have to worry about anything. There have even been those doctrines in this world, heresies that have left by the wayside.”
    Links a once-robed-always-safe reading of the robe to past heresies.
  • Peter Lever, Longview, 2017-04-16 stained ▶ 00:33:30
    “We know and believe that we wear this robe of righteousness, which is put on each child of God, each believer. But I could ask you, is that robe always pure white? Does that robe... become stained in your daily lives? Does that robe need to be washed?”
    Asks the congregation whether the robe becomes stained and needs washing; moments earlier affirmed simul iustus.
  • Joseph Lehtola, Rockford, 2017-08-27 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:37:59
    “that robe was perfected through the merit works of Jesus. And so there's no blemishes on that robe. So when God looks down on us, and we're covered with this robe of righteousness, then God does not see our sinful portion, but he sees us through the merit works of Jesus”
    No blemishes on the robe; God does not see the believer's sinful portion.
  • Carey Simonson, Toronto, 2018-01-06 removed ▶ 00:25:19
    “They stripped him of his raiment. His raiment could be a picture of the robe of righteousness. ... So when we fall into sin, it doesn't mean we have lost the robe of righteousness. But if we fall into sin and do not believe that sin forgiven, and how do we believe sin forgiven?”
    Robe lost through unforgiven sin, not by falling into sin as such; Good Samaritan picture.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2018-02-04 stained ▶ 00:36:03
    “And how do we appear perfect before God? It is when our heart has been cleansed, when those stains have been washed from our robes.”
    Perfection before God conditioned on stains being washed from the robe.
  • Kevin Ruonavaara, Longview, 2018-02-04 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:36:50
    “God then sees us through the merit work of Jesus. And we own that perfect robe of righteousness that cannot be taken, but it is given as a gift by God.”
    Robe 'cannot be taken'; contrast his 2021 sermon where it is 'stripped away'.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC ministers' camp, 2018-04-14 both ▶ 00:23:27 transcript
    “First of all, I believe that Christ's righteousness is perfect. It cannot ever be blemished or diminished by our sins. His work was perfect and he finished it all for us. ... But sin stains my conscience. And the scriptures give examples of caring for sin. One is the washing of robes, one is the washing of feet ... did that mean their sins tarnished the righteousness of Christ and all that? No, of course it doesn't mean that.”
    Ministers' camp presentation (speaker attributed by file title; voices not separated): Christ's robe cannot be blemished; what is stained is the conscience.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2018-05-06 removed ▶ 00:48:36
    “But there is a warning in God's Word that we can lose this precious faith. When we lose this precious faith, we lose the robe of righteousness. Let us not err to think that once I have this robe, it will always be there for me. Because sin separates man from God. God will not continue to robe one with the robe of righteousness if he or she lives in sin.”
    Says 'we have heard about the robe of righteousness of late'; God will not continue to robe one who lives in sin.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis, 2018-05-31 both ▶ 00:16:45 transcript
    “This next issue is the question of the robe of righteousness. Can the believer's robe ever be stained? Christ's righteousness is perfect and is not blemished by our sins. But sin stains the conscience.”
    Reads out the ministers'-camp position ('Jim has listed several of them here'); voices not separated.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis, 2018-05-31 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:36:58 transcript
    “Christ Jesus is the robe of righteousness. He is perfect. He is sinless. He is blameless. Christ Jesus cannot commit sin. It's impossible. So if the robe of righteousness is Christ Jesus, it's impossible for the robe of righteousness to become stained. Literally impossible. But this is a picture, this is a metaphor, and it has been used that our robes become stained. ... What then becomes stained? Our conscience becomes stained. Our feet become dusty and dirty.”
    Voices are not separated on the recording. The speaker also says 'this is how Finland believes'.
  • Roger Plough, Alaska, 2018-09-09 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:23:45
    “And as corrupt as we are, through His merits, when we believe, God sees no sin. It's something that our minds can even perhaps struggle. But we know that we carry these two portions. We are sin corrupt and full of sin, but through the merits of Christ, we are sinless. We are acceptable to God.”
    LLC minister: through Christ's merits 'we are sinless'; same teaching Wolf Lake was faulted for.
  • Eric Jurmu, Outlook, 2018-11-10 removed ▶ 00:31:36
    “This young man had lost his robe. All the children born into this world are born with that kind of robe. That garment of Christ. The robe of righteousness, we often say. But because of sin, there are many whose robes become stained to the point where they no longer wear this robe of righteousness, but rather a filthy garment, even as the Old Testament prophets wore.”
    Robe stained by sin to the point of being lost; from the LLC's then-president.
  • Andrew Forstie, Rockford, 2018-11-18 attack-sinless ▶ 00:27:23
    “I have heard this type of question in our day, that does God see my sin? And my response has been this, that that's a fruitless question. If we begin to question what God can see and what God can't see, we begin to question God Himself.”
    Calls 'does God see my sin' a fruitless question; seven weeks later says there is 'no wrinkle or stain' in the garment.
  • Wolf Lake congregation (board and speakers), Wolf Lake, 2018-11-20 cannot-be-stained document (PDF)
    “We believe that the Robe of Righteousness is the righteousness of Christ, perfect without blemish, gifted to us by faith when we believe. It is not stained by our sins and failures, but covers them. By faith, being owners of this garment of salvation, we are righteous before God without sin. ... Some have said we as believers stain this robe of righteousness, others suggest that we also wear another robe that we stain and clean. We believe neither is correct.”
    Wolf Lake 'Confession of faith', item 2; rejects both the stained-robe and the two-robe explanations. Re-sent 2019-04-03 as 'Current concerns on Zion'.
  • Wayne Kallio, Outlook, 2018-12-02 both ▶ 00:21:54
    “Purity is the white robes of Christ himself who suffered and died for us. Purity is when we have those robes of ours which become soiled and stained from sin and iniquity and doubts and temptations. And when we have those washed in the blood of the Lamb, then they are pure too.”
    Two-robe framing: Christ's white robes versus 'those robes of ours' that get stained.
  • Andrew Forstie, Glendale, 2019-01-05 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:39:42
    “His righteousness is put upon us. And we then are dressed in the righteousness of Christ. There is no wrinkle or stain in that garment of righteousness as it comes from the grace of God.”
    No stain in the garment of righteousness.
  • Bruce Johnson (Wolf Lake), Menahga, 2019-01-12 attack-sinless ▶ 00:25:26 transcript
    “The robe of righteousness, now I don't profess that I have knowledge of it, but if it is the robe of Christ, it cannot be stained, and in our meetings it has been stated. When Roger said that he believes the robe of righteousness is Christ and it cannot be stained, he was told it can be stained. You [Menahga] board members, you were in this meeting here when it was brought up by a speaker that there is a group of people out there that believe that the robe cannot be stained there in a wrong doctrine. Even that's never been corrected.”
    Reports that Wolf Lake's 'cannot be stained' confession was answered 'it can be stained' and called wrong doctrine.
  • Kevin Moll, Elk River, 2019-01-20 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:05:36
    “and he will look and he will see no sin and we will be righteous before him”
    At the judgment God 'will see no sin' (unpunctuated transcript); ten months later says the robe is gone if the Spirit is taken away.
  • Tommi Kinnunen, Monticello, 2019-02-01 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:32:23
    “This is what God says of us when he looks at us through his Son, our Lord and Savior, Jesus. He sees no sin. Even though we feel sinful, we feel faulty and lacking.”
    'He sees no sin' preached at Monticello during the dispute.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-03-10 stained ▶ 00:26:02
    “or it comes upon one slowly, when they leave unforgiven sin on their conscience, when that robe becomes stained and does not get washed in the blood of the Lamb.”
    Falling from faith pictured as the robe becoming stained and unwashed.
  • Unidentified speaker, Menahga, 2019-04-27 cannot-be-stained ▶ 01:39:26 transcript
    “We can defile the righteousness of Christ. That's not accurate. I've never heard that in the years that I've been believing. When we talk about defiling our garments, we're using a word picture in a different sense. We're not talking about defiling the righteousness of Christ. ... If I believe that when I fall into sin, now I've stained or marred Christ's righteousness, then I need a new Christ.”
    Denies anyone taught that Christ's righteousness is stained; frames 'defiling our garments' as a different word picture.
  • Unidentified speaker, Menahga, 2019-04-27 cannot-be-stained ▶ 02:09:05 transcript
    “In that we felt and still feel that the robe of righteousness is perfect. This is Christ's merit work that is given to us by faith. That it covers our sinfulness. And a certain brother there then did make it very clear, John. I want to refresh your memory where he said that we stain the robe of righteousness of Christ. It was very clear. Later, another brother in a sermon in another location made it very clear as well. That we by our sinfulness stained the righteousness, the robe of righteousness ... a Finnish brother did preach on this matter at the summer services in Howard Lake ... where he said that the rope of righteousness is Christ's righteousness and it is impossible for us to stain it.”
    Recounts the origin: LLC brothers said believers stain Christ's robe; a Finnish minister later preached it cannot be stained. 'rope' = robe.
  • Unidentified speaker, Menahga, 2019-04-27 both ▶ 03:32:17 transcript
    “there seems to be a confusion around Christ's robe of righteousness and our own righteousness. And I don't think anybody, to my knowledge, has ever stated that we could possibly stay in Christ's robe, that his robe is spotless. ... I'm assuming that would mean that our robes get stained with sin, and they do need to get cleansed.”
    Two-robe reading: Christ's robe spotless, 'our robes' get stained. 'stay in' = stain.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford, 2019-05-19 attack-sinless ▶ 01:58:01 transcript
    “Some have said that our conscience cannot be tarnished, wounded, dirty, etc. because God looks at us through Christ. He sees us as sinless, as the mere works of Christ. Who has ever said that? Again, we heard through our dear brother how the endeavor is to endeavor to keep faith in a pure conscience. I've heard with my own ears someone said that all we need is faith.”
    Objects to 'He sees us as sinless' teaching as a source of anxiety. 'mere works' = merit works.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford, 2019-05-19 attack-sinless ▶ 02:08:12 transcript
    “And one of them about the robe is pure. And we just sang how the robe is pure. They've been in three meetings with boards about how the robe gets stained. And they were actually told that they were in non-doctrine because they believed that the robe is pure.”
    Reports Wolf Lake was told it was in wrong doctrine for believing the robe is pure. 'non-doctrine' likely 'wrong doctrine'.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford, 2019-05-19 cannot-be-stained ▶ 02:27:38 transcript
    “when Brother Eric said in this church, he's not a theologian. If the robe is Christ, it cannot be stained. If the road is our conscience, it can be steeped. I said, Amen.”
    Recalls an LLC minister ('Brother Eric') saying the robe-as-Christ cannot be stained but the conscience can. 'road ... steeped' = robe ... stained.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford, 2019-05-19 cannot-be-stained ▶ 03:05:53 transcript
    “That a believer is simultaneously righteous and a sinner. How does that work? That's another mystery, right? ... Because when Christ looks upon a person with a view, Christ sees no sin.”
    Defends continual forgiveness via simul iustus: Christ sees no sin.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-06-30 both ▶ 00:26:24
    “The righteousness of Christ is so perfect, we can't do anything. We can't add, we can't take. It's the righteousness of God Himself. But these robes that God has given unto us when we receive the gift of living faith, mine has been tarnished and stained again and again by my failings, my faults, and my sins. And the only way my robe of righteousness has been preserved to this day is believing the gospel message of our Lord and Savior Jesus.”
    Christ's righteousness perfect, yet 'my robe of righteousness' tarnished and stained again and again.
  • Eric Mattila, Alaska, 2019-06-30 attack-sinless ▶ 00:43:47
    “Over a hundred years ago now, there was this understanding that when you heard that Gospel once, that you did not need to hear it again. That all you needed to do was believe. That once you were given that robe of righteousness, it was so pure and so holy that it could never become stained or defiled. Those people that had this understanding are no longer in God's kingdom. But they all departed in heresy.”
    Ties 'the robe could never become stained' to a heresy whose adherents left.
  • Tomm Stewart, Seattle, 2019-08-04 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:24:19
    “Which means that before God, he sees you as clean and righteous because your sins are forgiven. We ourselves become sin-stained, but that which Christ has given us, it can't be stained. It's clean because it's washed with his blood.”
    Same Sunday as the Alaska 'so stained' sermon: what Christ has given 'can't be stained'.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-08-04 removed ▶ 00:26:29
    “For we know that stains do come upon our robe. We know that we sin each and every day. We are imperfect human beings. We fall into sin. And if we do not continually put away those sins, eventually that robe which we own will become so stained it will no longer be an acceptable wedding garment.”
    Stains accumulate until the robe is no longer an acceptable wedding garment.
  • Eric Mattila, Rockford, 2019-08-09 attack-sinless ▶ 00:38:04
    “It is a good matter when we can hear when we have fallen into sin that we don't begin to have this kind of understanding that God does not see our sin. Or that through our own strength we can believe that sin away. Or it seems like this is more a matter of the hardening of conscience than freedom of faith.”
    Warns against the understanding 'that God does not see our sin' as hardening of conscience.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-08-25 attack-sinless ▶ 00:33:04
    “This matter of the robe of righteousness... that we have heard of in recent times, how this robe can never be stained. I must say that for myself, I don't know if I would have enough faith in my heart to try to walk without putting away sin, without cleansing that robe in the blood of the Lamb. ... You know, there was a heresy many years back. And I believe that this was one of the points that they made, those that departed.”
    Identifies 'this robe can never be stained' as a point of an earlier heresy.
  • Phillip Huhta, Glendale, 2019-09-15 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:16:21
    “the robe of Christ that is without blemish and without spot. God does this dressing. And then he sees us who are so sinful, simultaneously righteous and sinful, we travel. But God sees us through the merits of his son.”
    Robe without spot; simul iustus.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-09-15 removed ▶ 00:30:53
    “that raiment off him, or that covering cloak that each believer owns, each child of God owns, that robe of righteousness was taken from this man. It says, and they wounded him. What are those wounds? Aren't they those sin wounds that befall each and every one of us?”
    Good Samaritan: the robe taken from the one who went down toward Jericho.
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2019-11-03 removed ▶ 00:33:03
    “been given this festive robe that is the righteousness of Christ that adorns us. But it is possible to lose this. It is possible that it would become soiled.”
    The robe that is Christ's righteousness can be lost and soiled.
  • Kevin Moll, Elk River, 2019-11-24 removed ▶ 00:39:42
    “if God takes away this Holy Spirit then we no longer have this robe of righteousness that covers us that we will be as those on the left side here that we will be there exposed to all those sins”
    Robe removed when the Spirit is taken away because of a defiled conscience (unpunctuated transcript).
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Wolf Lake, 2019-12-07 cannot-be-stained ▶ 02:41:25 transcript
    “I thought that if my heart is right, I understand that no one can corrupt the robe of righteousness that Jesus made, [which is] his righteousness. I would not want to make a big problem [or issue] out of it. We wash ... I remember when I was a child, they called them traveling clothes. It simply means this, when we fall, we take care of matters and put sin away.”
    SRK pastor at the LLC-Wolf Lake meeting: no one can corrupt Christ's robe; the washed garments are 'traveling clothes'. Also said he had heard the same question in Finland.
  • Bruce Johnson, Wolf Lake, 2019-12-07 attack-sinless ▶ 05:04:48 transcript
    “But then Don Lahti brought up that there is a group of people that believe that the robe of righteousness cannot be stained. They are in a wrong doctrine. You could have corrected him. He was wrong.”
    Reports an LLC speaker (Don Lahti) calling the 'cannot be stained' belief wrong doctrine at the Menahga joint meeting, uncorrected.
  • Ronald Honga, Phoenix, 2020-03-15 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:41:56
    “We have on a robe of righteousness that can't be taken from us.”
    Robe cannot be taken from the believer.
  • Curtis Simonson, Cokato, 2020-05-17 removed ▶ 00:28:20
    “We know others that have one day traveled here with us under that covenant of good conscience with God, but their robes have been defiled by sin and they've lost the gift of faith.”
    Robes defiled by sin, faith lost.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2020-08-05 removed ▶ 00:23:02
    “It is for those who believe and those who live of the gospel that will own that robe of righteousness. That robe of righteousness will be removed from one who does not live according to God's Word, does not live of the Gospel”
    Robe 'will be removed' from one who does not live according to God's Word.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2020-09-20 both ▶ 00:40:26
    “There's been a lot of discussion concerning garments the robe of righteousness, and so on. But here we see the words of Jesus that there were a few that have not defiled their garments, which would tell us that some, because of sin and unbelief, became defiled. You know, the important thing is not the terminology ... There has never been a question that the robe that Jesus has given would be defiled. But because of sin and unbelief, we can become defiled and lose this most precious gift of living faith.”
    Six weeks after 'will be removed': the robe Jesus gave is never defiled, but 'we' become defiled and lose faith.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2020-11-05 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:28:29
    “And somehow or another, these topics have become mixed up. We understand that when God sees us in his Son, that we are righteous. We have been given that robe of righteousness. That when God sees us through his Son, we are righteous. That all believers are righteous before God. But nevertheless, when we use examples of robes or as it speaks here of sin, that topic, even though it is relevant to the doctrine of God's kingdom, nevertheless, it doesn't explain to us what to do with sin that attaches and makes the journey slow”
    Concedes all believers are righteous before God; says the robe picture does not address sin that attaches.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Phoenix, 2021-01-31 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:39:23
    “I have considered, brother and sister, the matter that is spoken of nowadays that we own the garment of Christ, the robe of righteousness, and it is so that we do. Jesus' work is pure and holy, but we do not want to confuse that with taking care of matters ... The question is not of whether Jesus' work was perfect or not. But God's word teaches us to care for the conscience.”
    Concedes the robe is pure; shifts the issue to care of conscience.
  • Mikko Pasanen, Phoenix, 2021-03-07 attack-sinless ▶ 00:17:56
    “Even now, today, we have heard that we cannot defile our garment. We cannot make our robe dirty. We cannot have, in other ways, that we cannot have sin that gathers in our conscience. But rather that God has sent Jesus to forgive our sins. And if we have heard, if we have believed, we are good to go. How come then Jesus here tells this angel, Laodicea, that I know thy works. You are lukewarm.”
    Treats 'we cannot make our robe dirty' as Laodicean lukewarmness.
  • Robert Haapala, Outlook, 2021-03-28 removed ▶ 00:33:45
    “But we know that we cannot travel this earth carrying and living in sin, for it will take us away from this precious kingdom. This garment can be removed.”
    'This garment can be removed'; in 2015 he called the believer's robe spotless.
  • Randy Hillukka, Menahga, 2021-08-01 both ▶ 00:34:26
    “And when we picture this, even this robe of righteousness, and we think of the Lord Jesus, His robe is never blemished. It is always pure and white. But yet as this letter writer speaks about our conscience, how it needs to be washed with the pure water, it is us who fail. It is us who carry this dirty laundry.”
    Christ's robe never blemished; the conscience is what is washed.
  • Tommi Kinnunen, Cokato, 2021-08-23 both ▶ 00:30:29
    “discussed quite frequently the last few years here in Christianity, here in North America, of the robe of righteousness, that we cannot make the righteous... the robe of Christ, we cannot make it dirty or filthy or dusty or make it black or blemished. But that is, of course, that is true. We cannot because the work of Jesus was complete. It was perfect. ... That is the dust that attaches to us on our robes as we travel on this way toward heaven.”
    Affirms the disputed claim as 'of course true', then speaks of dust on 'our robes'.
  • Kevin Ruonavaara, Longview, 2021-08-29 removed ▶ 00:24:38
    “suddenly found himself stripped of his raiment or his clothing. We could say that that garment of righteousness had been stripped away through unforgiven sin and unbelief, and he had lost that precious robe of righteousness.”
    Robe stripped away through unforgiven sin; in 2018 he said it 'cannot be taken'.
  • Michael Kuopus, Ishpeming, 2021-10-17 stained ▶ 00:43:20
    “And there that robe will no longer ever be stained like it is stained here. But we will be free from all sin.”
    Robe 'is stained here'; only in heaven will it no longer be stained.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Cokato, 2021-11-13 stained ▶ 00:27:37
    “Our white robe gets stained with sin. But how, what a blessed matter it is that we can put away those sins. And our robe again gets washed.”
    White robe stained with sin, washed again.
  • John Lehtola, Wolf Lake, 2022-01-08 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:50:27
    “But it is sinful at the same time. A paradox. Pure and sinful at the same time. Just like we are righteous and sinners at the same time. So likewise, the congregation is pure and sinful at the same time.”
    Simul iustus applied to believer and congregation, quoting Valde Palola's 2012 SRK yearbook.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 cannot-be-stained quoted from the book
    “A pardoned sinner is simultaneously righteous [and a] sinner (simul iustus et peccator).”
    Printed p. 5 (Theology - What Is It?). 'anda' is an OCR run-together of 'and a'.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 cannot-be-stained quoted from the book
    “A believing person is simultaneously righteous and sinful (simul iustus et peccator). Being righteous means being acceptable to God, pure and per[-]fect, whereas being sinful means being unacceptable to God, defiled and corrupt. Purity and perfection are provided by Christ”
    Printed p. 39.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 cannot-be-stained quoted from the book
    “Luther expressed the same by stating that a Christian is simultaneously righteous and a sinner (simul iustus et peccator). The human is at once com[-]pletely sinful and completely righteous (Refutation of Latomus).”
    Printed p. 45 (Original Sin and Its Fruits); pairs 1 John 1:8 with 1 John 3:9.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 cannot-be-stained quoted from the book
    “Because the Christian owns Christ in faith, God sees in [p. 99] him or her only the righteousness of Christ and no sin. For this reason, the Christian is not an object of God's wrath, but rather God looks upon him or her lovingly, no longer wrathful.”
    Printed pp. 98-99 (By Faith Alone). The book's clearest 'God sees no sin' statement.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 cannot-be-stained quoted from the book
    “A Christian remains completely sinful, but simultane[-]ously he or she is completely righteous in Christ. ... The righ[-]teousness that a Christian owns by faith is entirely Christ's righteousness. It is never governed by the Christian ... Owning Christ does not remove the Christians sinfulness. The Christian continues to be completely sinful.”
    Printed p. 99 (Owning Christ): alien righteousness; nothing of the Christian's own in the robe.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 cannot-be-stained quoted from the book
    “A person's faith is always weak and imperfect, but for the sake of Christ God counts it as perfect righteousness. A Christian is simultaneously righteous and sinful, holy and defiled, God's enemy and a child of God.”
    Printed p. 121 (Repentance and Justification); next paragraph: 'in this life it is impossible to live such that one would remain without blemish'.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 cannot-be-stained quoted from the book
    “Jesus' followers are servants, whose duty is to dress the penitent sinner in the pure robe of righteousness (Luke 15:22).”
    Printed p. 115. The book's only use of 'robe of righteousness' as doctrine; the robe is put on at repentance.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 removed quoted from the book
    “On the other hand, the battle in a Christian is real. Falling under the power of sin and losing faith is a real possibility.”
    Printed p. 105. Loss is loss of faith, not a stained robe; the robe is never said to be stained or removed by sin.
  • SRK/LLC doctrinal book (ed. Ari-Pekka Palola), LLC, 2022-02-01 removed quoted from the book
    “Faith is preserved in a good and unharmed conscience, but a neglected conscience and living a sinful life cause faith to become shipwrecked (1 Tim. 1:5,19). Caring for faith also includes the grace privilege of confession. ... We are believers both before and after confession”
    Printed p. 129 (Life in Faith). What sin harms is the conscience; 'believers both before and after confession'.
  • John Stewart, Longview, 2022-03-06 both ▶ 00:19:54
    “our travel garment gets kind of stained. It doesn't mean that the robe of Christ is stained. His is never stained, but you know what? Our everyday journey, we get tainted on the way. It doesn't mean we've given up faith or gone in and out of God's kingdom, but the conscience bothers.”
    Two-garment framing: travel garment stained, Christ's robe never stained.
  • Benjamin Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2022-06-26 removed ▶ 00:34:01
    “and do not care for sin as it attaches on this journey. That garment is defiled or removed. And then when that call to the wedding comes, we would find ourselves in the place of this man”
    Wedding garment 'defiled or removed' when sin is not cared for.
  • Darwin Lake, Wolf Lake, 2022-07-31 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:48:20
    “You'll have joy that your sins are forgiven. My friend Jesus Christ has paid the price. I am sinless before God because of full payment with the blood of Jesus and his death when my sins went to the cross.”
    Weeks after the LLC removal: 'I am sinless before God'.
  • Nealen Jurmu, Rockford, 2022-10-30 stained ▶ 00:27:00
    “And even this robe has been discussed in the last years of how does it get dirty. This robe does become stained. Sin attaches on the way and on the journey to each and every one of us.”
    After the 2022 removals: 'This robe does become stained.'
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2023-03-05 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:35:46
    “We heard in the recent spiritual battles much about the robe of righteousness And we know that that which God prepared for us through His Son is the robe of righteousness. And it cannot be defiled. But we know, and Scripture teaches, that we often fall short, fall into sin”
    Robe 'cannot be defiled'; contrast his 2018, 2020 and 2025 'removed' statements.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2023-07-23 both ▶ 00:14:35
    “Take care of sin. Fear sin. Fear those things that can blemish this robe of righteousness. But we can when we care for our matters. We can when we ask for the gospel, the forgiveness of sins. And when we believe that our sins are forgiven, when we hear that audible proclamation of the gospel, we are made white again. Before God, we are sinless and acceptable to him.”
    Sin can blemish the robe; after absolution 'we are sinless'.
  • Ross Fredrickson, Prescott Valley, 2024-02-18 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:33:48
    “These robes that God has given us cover our nakedness. These robes that God gives us make us acceptable to Him. When He looks at us through those robes of His Son, He sees no sin.”
    'He sees no sin' through the robes.
  • Andrew Hotari, Cokato, 2024-04-21 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:44:21
    “And when He sees His Son, He sees no sin. ... God sees no sin in us.”
    'God sees no sin in us' at Cokato, 2024.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis, 2024-06-12 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:35:10
    “So Jesus himself has prepared this [robe of] righteousness and that will always remain pure. It is nothing that we can do. It's kind of outside us. It's Jesus who has prepared it. We can't even touch that, but that's what we have. We own it by faith. So when God looks at us, Sinful people, he sees no sin because he looks at us through the righteousness of his son. And he sees innocent people even when they are sinners.”
    MLLC Bible class after the 2022 removal; the robe 'will always remain pure'. 'rope'/'carbon' = robe/garment (mistranscription).
  • Ward Plough, Longview, 2024-06-24 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:24:42
    “God does not see our sin corruption, but rather he sees that pure white robe which was washed in the blood of his dear son, who died on the cross and was victorious over death.”
    God does not see the believer's sin corruption.
  • Eric Mattila, Menahga, 2024-11-02 removed ▶ 00:07:40
    “If we consider this in a spiritual sense, one that leaves this precious kingdom, they cannot take that robe of righteousness with them, that it will be lost.”
    Robe lost on leaving the kingdom.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2024-12-25 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:23:47
    “Endeavor to put sin away. When we do this, we are sinless before God. He does not see all of our sin because it is paid for in the merits of Jesus.”
    'Sinless before God', conditioned on endeavoring to put sin away.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Prescott Valley, 2025-12-06 removed ▶ 00:24:38
    “That robe of righteousness is the robe that Jesus has prepared for us. There was controversy over this robe of righteousness in the most recent heresy. And it seemed that some of them did not understand that this robe of righteousness can be removed from us because of sin and disobedience.”
    Calls the Wolf Lake/Minneapolis dispute 'the most recent heresy' and faults them for not understanding the robe 'can be removed'.
  • James Jurmu, Monticello, 2026-04-05 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:16:33
    “by His grace, He sees no sin. He sees no sin in you or me when we are clothed in that robe of righteousness because of the works of His only begotten Son”
    'He sees no sin in you or me' in the robe, 2026.
  • Phil Alajoki, Wolf Lake, 2026-05-02 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:39:53
    “And that the Lord God, our dear Heavenly Father, doesn't see your sins. Your great and mighty sins are covered by the merit works of His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. You are robed with that perfect righteousness that is acceptable to our dear Heavenly Father.”
    Wolf Lake 2026: God doesn't see your sins; robed with perfect righteousness.
  • Russell Roiko, Rockford, 2026-07-26 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:21:30
    “He looks upon you through the merit works of his son. And what does he see? He sees no sin. Sins are forgiven in Jesus' name and blood.”
    Same 'sees no sin' wording as 2016, still preached in 2026.
  • Samuel Roiko, Elk River, 2026-07-26 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:24:20
    “But as sinners, we are, as the Latin teaching of Luther's time was, simul [iustus et peccator], that is simultaneously justified and sinful.”
    Simul iustus preached in 2026 by the minister who in 2019 said the robe can be lost and soiled. 'pecador' = peccator.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2026-08-09 attack-sinless ▶ 00:24:23
    “In the Finnish Bible, it says, blessed are they that wash their robes. That wash their robes. There were those who said that these robes ... These garments can never be defiled. And Jesus here very clearly says, Blessed are they that wash their robes”
    Still refuting 'these garments can never be defiled' in 2026.
  • Phil Alajoki, Wolf Lake, 2026-09-06 cannot-be-stained ▶ 00:16:15
    “that were simultaneously righteous and sinful at the same time. It doesn't, it's not logical. It doesn't make sense that at this very moment, I'm a sinner, but I'm righteous before God.”
    Simul iustus preached at Wolf Lake.
  • Minneapolis MLLC (congregation statement), Minneapolis, 2026-10-11 cannot-be-stained ▶ source
    “This is the grace cloak of Christ's perfection, His merit, that covers our sin and wretchedness ... Because this is a picture of Christ's perfection, and nothing of our own, we cannot add anything to it, nor remove anything from it, by our works or by our sin.”
    MLLC 'Confessions of Faith' 5.3 on mllchurch.org (fetched 2026-10-11): nothing removed from the robe by our sin.
What the congregation is 86 statements: 52 sermons by 43 ministers, 30 statements at 13 meetings, 4 documents (2000–2026) ↑ top
  • Laestadian Lutheran Church, LLC Constitution, Section V, 2000-07-01 bible-highest-authority document (PDF)
    “Said Corporation holds that the Holy Word of God is the highest authority and only measure according to which all doctrines and teachings in said Corporation are to be examined and judged.”
    Constitution §V; transcribed from the scanned PDF. No public URL found.
  • Richard Nevala, Ishpeming, 2017-01-01 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:37:07
    “really true that there's only in [Laestadian]ism where you're saved? Is it really the only church? I remember his answer because it answered to my spirit. He said, I don't know. I don't know if there's believers elsewhere.”
    Approves a pastor's answer 'I don't know if there's believers elsewhere' – contrast the same speaker 2017-12-10 ('you must belong').
  • Daniel Parks, Menahga, 2017-04-30 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:33:07
    “Just as Jesus appeared after his resurrection only to his own, likewise we confess that Jesus is only found here in his kingdom. There's no salvation outside of his kingdom.”
    'Jesus is only found here'; no salvation outside.
  • Carey Simonson, Outlook, 2017-09-24 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:28:30
    “And that if at any times you have questions about the work of the LLC, the LLC is us. We are God's kingdom … here on earth and here in our organization in North America”
    Equates the LLC with 'us' and 'us' with God's kingdom 'here in our organization in North America'.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2017-12-10 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:33:34
    “My dad belongs to a saving faith, the only true living faith. To make it to heaven, you must belong to that faith.”
    'You must belong to that faith' to reach heaven (reporting his father's witness approvingly).
  • Laestadian Lutheran Church, Monticello, MN, 2018-04-08 bible-highest-authority document (PDF)
    “the Holy Word of God is the highest authority and only measure according to which all doctrines and teachings in said Corporation are to be examined and judged.”
    Second copy of §V (OCR, p. 2 of 13) confirming the wording.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis congregation meeting, 2018-05-06 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:24:52 transcript
    “A person becomes part of this community by believing and is then one member of Christ's body. There is no salvation outside of God's congregation.”
    No salvation outside God's congregation (tied to believing, not to an organization).
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2018-07-01 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:25:26
    “This is not a party. This is not an association of people for some general cause. This is God's congregation. This is a piece of kingdom of God. This is one congregation which forms one piece of the unity of God's kingdom.”
    Said while explaining the annual meeting and board; the local congregation 'is a piece of kingdom of God'.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis congregation meeting, 2018-09-30 invisible-congregation ▶ 03:15:31 transcript
    “The kingdom of God is the mother. Luther explains in a large catechism, the mother, in this sense, is the one that gives us birth, it feeds us, it nourishes us, and also cares for us. … The mother is the invisible congregation, not the local gathered congregation here in Minneapolis or Rockford or Monticello or wherever.”
    The 'mother' is the invisible congregation, not any local gathering.
  • Adrian Pirness, Rockford, 2019-08-10 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:19:32
    “We know also that God's spirit has a home here on earth. It is his congregation, his kingdom here on earth. … It is the same Spirit. And it is the Spirit that teaches us as individual believers in the same way as it teaches in God's kingdom.”
    Spirit's 'home' is the congregation; the individual's Spirit cannot teach differently than the group.
  • Unidentified speaker, Colorado congregation meeting, 2019-08-25 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 01:55:59 transcript
    “I know this is where I want to be. I know this is where God's kingdom is. I know this is where the Holy Spirit resides and resounds in our visits and our discussions.”
    The local congregation is 'where God's kingdom is'.
  • Unidentified speaker, Elk River Holy Spirit discussion, 2019-10-19 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:29:51 transcript
    “As Luther says in the Christmas sermon, that it is a group of people. It's not stick or stone or rock, so it's not a physical building, but it's a group of believers who are assembled together who believe upon Christ. So, the invisible congregation, the kingdom of God is … Unerring. But that doesn't mean that the visible assembled congregation would be unerring. Any physical assembled body can err”
    Invisible congregation unerring; the visible assembled body can err.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2019-10-20 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:29:05
    “about the Holy Spirit only being found in His kingdom. Consider the thoughts of Luther when he said that anyone who is to find Christ must first find the church.”
    Uses the Church Postil line quoted at book p. 158 to argue the Spirit is found only in 'His kingdom'.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2019-11-03 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:37:36
    “They do not have the power. Because they do not have the Holy Spirit. Only in the house of God is that power. So precious is God's house. God's kingdom.”
    Others 'do not have the Holy Spirit'; the power is 'only in the house of God'.
  • Ray Waaraniemi, LLC Summer Services, 2020-07-04 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:24:12
    “In North American Zion, the address for this living faith is under the [Laestadian] Lutheran Church. And we believe that the administration of God's house in our land is under this organization.”
    Locates 'this living faith' and 'the administration of God's house' under the LLC corporation by name.
  • Walter Lampi, LLC Summer Services, 2020-07-16 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:07:01
    “Only the Holy Spirit can call, gather, and enlighten, and only in God's kingdom. There may be other reasons that one could give, but the power to forgive sins hasn't been given to every faith, only one.”
    Power to forgive sins given to 'only one' faith.
  • Steven Haataja, Menahga, 2020-12-06 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:27:30
    “How this kingdom, as we mentioned, is not an earthly kingdom, but is a spiritual kingdom. … But he says that this church is not made of wood or stone. It's not a building. But it is a communion or a fellowship of believers that dwell together in unity guided by God's Holy Spirit.”
    Paraphrases Luther: the church is not wood or stone but a fellowship of believers.
  • Samuel Roiko, LLC Phoenix Winter Services, 2021-03-20 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:14:00
    “The congregation of God is both visible and invisible. … This does not signify two different or distinct communities or groups where the visible congregation would be a subset of the invisible.”
    Denies the visible congregation is a subset of the invisible; book p. 155 counts the departed and all children in the hidden congregation.
  • Nick Ylitalo, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 02:16:15 transcript
    “Now the congregations in God's kingdom are no longer comfortable sending speakers to Wolf Lake. We see how the division has seemingly widened between God's kingdom and Wolf Lake, and other areas.”
    'God's kingdom' on one side, the Wolf Lake congregation on the other, 15 months before the vote.
  • Scott Hillstrom, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 no-faith-outside ▶ 03:12:02 transcript
    “That is where the spirit is. It is the only place. It is the only place where the forgiveness of sins is found. … It is in God's kingdom where the spirit is. … It is in the congregation where the spirit is found. It is the only place where the forgiveness of sins is found.”
    Forgiveness found in 'the only place', the congregation.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, Longview, 2021-05-23 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:21:29
    “How is it that it's come to have this name of [Laestadian] Lutheran? And the brothers went on to explain that that's the current name that God has given or allowed. But throughout time, God's congregation, God's kingdom has been known under different names.”
    The organization's name presented as 'the current name that God has given' to His kingdom.
  • Bryce Ojalehto, Alaska, 2021-06-14 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:13:20
    “And we can always remind them they can look on the LLC website for things and let them know that we believe that the Holy Spirit is in God's kingdom here.”
    Seekers are pointed to the LLC website as the place to find the Spirit's kingdom.
  • Donald Lahti, LLC Summer Services, 2021-07-02 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:30:25
    “The kingdom of God has an address. And in order to find God's kingdom, one needs to find the address.”
    Kingdom as a findable address; said at the 2021 LLC Summer Services.
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC Summer Services, 2021-07-03 bible-highest-authority ▶ 00:18:08
    “The Church is not above the Word, but subject to it and one with it. As Paul says, a great mystery, it too is an article of faith.”
    LLC Summer Services 2021: the Church is 'not above the Word, but subject to it'.
  • John Stewart, LLC annual meeting 2021 (Zoom), 2021-07-03 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 02:08:34 transcript
    “And I think it's important in that regard to realize that this is not a top-down organization, God's Kingdom. It's a congregational decision and it's an organization that's congregational driven. It's not run by the LLC office people. It's not run by the LLC board.”
    God's kingdom described as 'an organization' with a governance structure; self-introduced at 01:08:48.
  • Randall Herrala, Rockford, 2021-08-08 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:08:30
    “unable to conduct the business in an official sense of a living congregation or a member congregation. And then we realized a time had come where those congregations would cease and end. … They would no longer be identified in this way as a member congregation of our central organization.”
    Treats 'living congregation' and 'member congregation of our central organization' as the same category.
  • Samuel Roiko, Williston, 2021-10-10 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:41:05
    “We remembered last evening how God's kingdom has an address. There is a location where God's kingdom is. … It wasn't on every mountaintop and with every group of people.”
    'God's kingdom has an address' – a locatable place; contrast Luther: the church is not bound to this place or that.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2022-01-04 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:43:26
    “but we remember that invisible congregation that's already in glory. They were weak, they were poor, but through the power of the gospel, they gained the victory.”
    'Invisible congregation' used only for the departed in glory.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix congregational meeting, 2022-01-08 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:17:20 transcript
    “many have lost their sight of the kingdom of god they are unable to say where god's kingdom is and some have even felt … that those who have risen against God's kingdom in rebellion, that that is the kingdom of God. What a sorrowful manner it is when we lose our vision, when we no longer are able to understand in what group God's Holy Spirit dwells,”
    Knowing 'in what group' the Spirit dwells is the test.
  • Glenn Wisuri, Glendale, 2022-01-10 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:33:09
    “The Holy Spirit has instructed that to preach not in these congregations of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake. It has been many years that this visit and discussion have been. And some stumble.”
    Pre-vote (Jan 2022): the Holy Spirit 'has instructed' not to preach in the two congregations.
  • Bryan Simonson, Spokane, 2022-01-23 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:08:34
    “And there is a difference, we could say, a slight difference between the outward congregation or the church, the living kingdom, … Or invisible congregation. And the living or the invisible kingdom of God.”
    Distinguishes the outward congregation from the invisible kingdom, though only 'a slight difference'.
  • Ross Hillukka, Elk River, 2022-02-20 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:20:07
    “the boundaries of God's congregation, though they are clear when we believe by faith and when matters are well. They are not tied to any sort of geography, any sort of … lines, geographical lines, but yet it runs from heart to heart of God's congregation.”
    Boundaries of the congregation not tied to geography; run 'from heart to heart' (book p. 156).
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC board member workshop, 2022-04-30 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:40:31 transcript
    “But I do know there are some present who are not in unity and who continue this battle against the kingdom of God. And it's a very dangerous place that many of you have found yourself outside of God's kingdom and that it is a call for repentance. God's kingdom and his purity is not divided.”
    Board workshop two months before the vote: dissenters already 'outside of God's kingdom'.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 01:20:11 transcript
    “I think what we're being asked to choose is to trust that we are in God's kingdom. That the [Laestadian] Lutheran Churches in North America and sister organizations throughout the world are God's kingdom. … And as God's kingdom, they're guided by His Holy Spirit.”
    The LLC and sister organizations 'are God's kingdom'.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 invisible-congregation ▶ 02:14:55 transcript
    “No LLC decision that we'll decide. We could decide nothing. The LLC board doesn't control God's kingdom. God controls and guides His kingdom.”
    Fairness: 'The LLC board doesn't control God's kingdom'.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 no-faith-outside ▶ 03:01:54 transcript
    “We've also heard how the Holy Spirit only brings people together. It only unites God's children. And this is how I believe as well. So then when it doesn't unite, where does that put it? It does not unite those of a different spirit.”
    Disunity taken as proof the other side has 'a different spirit'.
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2022-05-22 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:33:51
    “That Holy Spirit only resides in the one living mutual congregation of God here upon this earth. Even coming here this morning, we would have driven by many other churches or denominations of this world. … the keys of God's kingdom is only here.”
    Spirit and keys 'only here', contrasted with the churches driven past on the way to services.
  • James Moll, Prescott Valley, 2022-06-12 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:12:44
    “So one of you said, well, where can I find God's kingdom? Say, go to such and such an address in such and such a town, and that's where God's children gather. Not this building, but where children gather. … But it's a known location. It's not some nebulous pray to God sort of thing”
    Kingdom is 'a known location' in 'such and such a town', while disclaiming the building itself.
  • Gary Lehtola, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 bible-highest-authority ▶ 00:07:12 transcript
    “And so the [LLC] Constitution says that member congregations confess [living] faith [which is founded on] the [Holy] Word of God, [in] which Jesus Christ is the chief cornerstone. And they also hold the Word of God as the highest authority, and all instructions and teachings of the said corporation … These are based upon the authority of the Holy Scriptures. So I would recommend here that we don't talk about dividing, because that's contrary to Scripture.”
    Cites Constitution §V on the Word as highest authority before the removal vote.
  • Mike Jurmu, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:12:28 transcript
    “People in Minneapolis and [Wolf] Lake have been lovingly called, reminded, rebuked, and you haven't listened. And so, the push that you feel is the fact that your spirit doesn't answer to God's kingdom.”
    'God's kingdom' is the body doing the pushing.
  • Mitch Loukusa, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:16:10 transcript
    “the borders of God's kingdom run from heart to heart. … It is, well, it's impossible to push someone out of God's kingdom. God takes care of his own and wouldn't allow that to happen.”
    Fairness: a delegate for removal says borders run heart to heart and no one can be pushed out.
  • Jared Huhta, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:22:09 transcript
    “The talk of excommunication and the separation of everything else is simply formality of what's already occurred. The separation has taken place and it hasn't been believers that has pushed anyone away. It's been those that have, through sin, separated themselves from God”
    Removal vote described as 'formality' of a separation from God already accomplished.
  • Trent Simonson, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:34:40 transcript
    “The separation, I think, has already happened. There's two spirits. God's kingdom consists of one spirit.”
    Separation 'already happened'; name appears only in the human transcript.
  • Paul Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:46:19 transcript
    “But if there's not unity of spirit, the groups can't stay together. There's one kingdom, one spirit,”
    Groups without 'unity of spirit' cannot stay together.
  • Daniel Kumpula, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ceased-by-vote ▶ 01:04:04 transcript
    “no individual is being pushed from God's kingdom. But the spirit is, there is this foreign spirit that's being pushed out of God's kingdom. And if you feel that push, … Out of God's kingdom. You're hanging on to that spirit that is being pushed from God's kingdom.”
    Those who feel pushed out are said to hold a 'foreign spirit'.
  • Hannu Janhunen, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 ceased-by-vote ▶ 01:29:08 transcript
    “It is such a decision here, through the understanding and guidance of the Holy Spirit, that we formalize this. It does not change anything. That separation has already happened. … Kingdom of God is not some kind of social club where we just socialize and agree to [belong].”
    Vote 'does not change anything'; separation already happened; Holy Spirit guides the decision.
  • Andrew Skoog, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 word-not-above-congregation ▶ 01:47:31 transcript
    “All I want to do is get to heaven and believe with the [rest] of Zion. The document is there just as a guideline. If you don't have the Holy Spirit, you have to lean on these things.”
    The governing document is 'just as a guideline'; relying on it is for those without the Spirit.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 invisible-congregation ▶ 01:50:12 transcript
    “That's the only thing that really matters, that I have spiritual unity with God's kingdom. If I don't have spiritual unity, … That official designation means nothing. If I die with that false spirit, I'm lost. Being technically called a [Laestadian],”
    Fairness: the official designation 'means nothing' without the Spirit.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 word-not-above-congregation ▶ 01:59:52 transcript
    “And we've heard speaking [their] speeches that seem to separate the word of God from the congregation and place the word above the congregation in some way. But our understanding is that the word and the congregation are inseparable.”
    Chairman objects to placing the Word 'above the congregation'; Constitution §V makes the Word the 'only measure' of the Corporation's teaching.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 02:05:11 transcript
    “Is God's kingdom here today? Is God's kingdom present here in this gathering? Is the Holy Spirit here? … But if you answer the question that God's kingdom, is it here today? Is the Holy Spirit speaking? And if your answer is no, then to me it's clear that we are not part of the same fellowship.”
    The delegates' gathering identified with God's kingdom; denying it means not being in the fellowship.
  • Jon Bloomquist, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 02:16:00 transcript
    “Do you believe that God's kingdom is here, that God's spirit is here, that the body of Christ is here? He has spoken.”
    The body of Christ located 'here' in the meeting; 'He has spoken' = the removal is God's voice.
  • Jared Juusola, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 no-faith-outside ▶ 02:48:34 transcript
    “There's been no denying to those in Minneapolis and Wolf Lake. There's been no denying. God's Word is freely, freely preached. And when you choose to go somewhere else, you've lost your faith. There's no question.”
    Attending another congregation equals losing faith.
  • Ward Plough, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 03:20:05 transcript
    “The church buildings of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake, to me, it's just a building. God's kingdom is here, it's present.”
    Removed congregations' buildings are 'just a building'; God's kingdom is 'here'.
  • Dean Simonson, Outlook, 2022-07-10 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:21:37
    “And came to such a decision that two congregations were, it was decided that they would no longer travel with the rest of Zion.”
    Eight days after the vote: delegates 'decided' the two congregations no longer travel with Zion.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga, 2022-07-14 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:20:21
    “to remove two congregations who do not any longer journey in unity of doctrine or spirit with other congregations is not an act that creates a division, but it simply acknowledges … that which we have all come to realize as an unfortunate fact.”
    Twelve days after the vote: removal 'simply acknowledges' a spiritual division.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2022-07-17 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:36:33
    “At our recent annual meeting, or the LLC annual meeting, at Summer Services, there was a decision made there to acknowledge that congregations of Minneapolis and Wolf Lake are not traveling the same path as … the children of God. The mind of man would say that they were thrown out of God's kingdom.”
    Vote framed as acknowledging the congregations are not on the path of 'the children of God'.
  • Stephen Warwaruk, Outlook, 2022-10-03 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:06:53
    “we visited about the recent heresy and that decision that was made at the annual meeting to separate Wolf Lake and Minneapolis congregations from the … the [Laestadian] Lutheran Church. … So it was clear that that decision simply acknowledged the separation that had already occurred.”
    Calls it 'the recent heresy'; the vote 'simply acknowledged' a separation.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford delegate report, 2022-10-23 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:08:48 transcript
    “there was a motion to formally recognize the difference that both Lake and Minneapolis do not travel together with North American design, and that we formally remove them as a member of congregations. … the vast majority supported the motion.”
    Delegate's report of the motion.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford delegate report, 2022-10-23 ceased-by-vote ▶ 01:09:30 transcript
    “Nobody kicks anybody out of God's kingdom. The discussion here was acknowledging that we had a heresy. It was final and formal at the LLC summer services. … And we have never greeted heretics. We do not greet heretics.”
    The vote made the heresy 'final and formal'.
  • Michael Ylioja, Williston, 2022-11-06 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:22:59
    “There was two congregations there in Minnesota that those other congregations felt that speakers could not be sent. … or God had revealed in his time how a different spirit was there and dwelt there and it was an act of love and rebuke to not send preachers.”
    Withholding preachers from two congregations described as God-revealed 'love and rebuke'.
  • Brian Johnson, Elk River, 2022-11-12 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:30:52
    “We don't greet those who are of a different spirit. … We can no longer greet them.”
    Youth services, four months after the vote: no greeting for those 'of a different spirit'.
  • Travis Ruonavaara, Roaring Fork Valley, 2022-11-14 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:24:19
    “We recently visited here in our congregation about the outcome of the LLC annual meeting, … and there are those who do not desire to endeavor and believe as God's kingdom has exhorted and has taught. Even though it is tragic of those who have fallen in the way of heresy, yet it has brought some finality”
    The annual-meeting outcome 'brought some finality' to those 'fallen in the way of heresy'.
  • Brian Johnson, Alaska, 2023-02-13 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:05:47
    “Recently there was a letter put out and it was stated in that letter that the LLC is not the kingdom of God. … Which is true, but the LLC is part of the kingdom of God. … It is yours and my organization to help us arrange for services, publications, music.”
    Concedes the LLC is not the kingdom but calls the corporation 'part of the kingdom of God'.
  • Stanley Ylioja, Outlook, 2023-04-23 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:16:51
    “Or we even question that decision that was made last summer there at that annual meeting when God even revealed to those delegates there to even make that decision that separated those two congregations from the rest of God's living kingdom.”
    The vote 'separated those two congregations from the rest of God's living kingdom'; questioning it is a temptation.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2023-06-04 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:10:28
    “But God's word teaches us that the Holy Spirit only resides in the kingdom of God here on earth. … There are not many kingdoms of God on earth. There is one. And that is where the Holy Spirit resides.”
    Those who 'say that they believe in God' and Jesus do not have the Spirit, which resides only in the one kingdom.
  • Jason Parks, Saskatoon, 2023-07-03 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:10:08
    “The delegates even made that motion and voted to remove those two congregations from our member organization. … that heresy that has openly been declared and discussed”
    Removal 'from our member organization' recalled together with 'that heresy that has openly been declared'.
  • Randall Herrala, LLC Summer Services, 2023-07-08 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:10:21
    “It is not an earthly kingdom. It's not an earthly organization. It is a spiritual one. The kingdom of God, the kingdom of heaven. But yet, we know that it is on this earth.”
    LLC Summer Services sermon: the kingdom is 'not an earthly organization'.
  • Tomm Stewart, Seattle, 2023-08-20 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:52:25
    “The correct way to believe is that which is revealed through the Holy Spirit in God's living congregation and nowhere else. … when you believe simply that this is God's congregation, when you believe simply that there is no other place where I or anyone else can find salvation, … but in this small and precious flock”
    Salvation found 'nowhere else' than 'this' congregation; believing 'this is God's congregation' made part of right faith.
  • Allen Pirness, Rockford, 2023-10-22 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:26:00
    “God's kingdom is not a building. God isn't held here in temples that are built by men, but he is a spirit who, even as Jesus taught that woman at the well, that he must be worshipped in spirit and in truth.”
    Kingdom 'not a building'.
  • Stephen Warwaruk, Outlook, 2023-11-19 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:32:41
    “since that decision was made at the annual meeting to remove those two congregations from our midst, have we not experienced the unity of faith and love?”
    Unity of faith dated from the removal vote.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2023-12-31 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:08:52
    “that there are so many other good people in the world, that why are we the only church or the only congregation that has the true and living Holy Spirit and are on the way to heaven?”
    States the premise as accepted: 'we' are 'the only church' with the Spirit; then answers why.
  • Petri Hotari, Menahga, 2024-03-30 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:17:00
    “Because we need to be in the care of the congregation of God. Because that's where Christ is. Christ has an address. And that address is God's kingdom.”
    Christ 'has an address'; being away from 'the care of the congregation' called a dangerous place.
  • Veli-Matti Heikkinen, Cokato, 2024-04-08 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:28:01
    “The borders of God's kingdom go from heart to heart.”
    The book's formula (p. 156) preached from an LLC pulpit.
  • Andrew Hotari, Cokato, 2024-04-21 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:31:32
    “And there with us stands that invisible congregation. … The former saints, those who have laid their staff in faith.”
    'Invisible congregation' = the departed saints.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2024-05-19 no-faith-outside ▶ 00:15:10
    “If they are not of us, if they do not believe, they cannot have the Holy Spirit. So the Holy Spirit only belongs and leads and guides and directs and teaches the children of God who are in the kingdom of God and who are believing … And you won't find this outside of God's kingdom.”
    'Not of us' equated with not believing and not having the Spirit.
  • John Stewart, Seattle, 2024-05-20 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:54:16
    “We don't even have our own building. It's not the building. It's the presence of the Holy Spirit in God's kingdom. It's not in a bunch of scattered different religions and doctrines as Luther described. It's the same doctrine.”
    Kingdom is the Spirit's presence, not a building; but 'not in scattered different religions'.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC services, 2024-06-26 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:04:50
    “Martin Luther wrote about God's kingdom, that it is not a building or some other inanimate object, but rather it is the throng of God's children.”
    Frantti citing Luther: the kingdom is the throng of God's children, not a building.
  • Ronald Honga, Menahga, 2024-08-11 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:44:28
    “Because we know that during these battles we have heard this said. That there in Finland they have the Holy Spirit, but not the LLC and the members here.”
    Reports critics' claim; frames the dispute as whether 'the LLC' has the Holy Spirit.
  • Carey Simonson, Saskatoon, 2024-10-06 ceased-by-vote ▶ 00:25:27
    “In the same way there at that annual meeting, the Spirit instructed, … that we must sever ourselves from this false spirit, that this spirit must be removed from the congregation. And at that time, these congregations, as we recall, Wolf Lake and Minneapolis, were removed from the LLC. This then was an open heresy in our midst. … I think we can safely say that this was the work of the Spirit. This was the work of God.”
    The delegates' removal vote presented as the Spirit's instruction and 'the work of God', likened to separating from Korah.
  • Benjamin Waaraniemi, Monticello, 2025-01-05 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:13:46
    “We remember how Paul wrote that this house is made of living stones. It is not a building or a place or an organization, but it is that gathering of his children.”
    God's house 'is not a building or a place or an organization'.
  • Peter Lever, LLC services, 2025-11-10 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:04:16
    “What is God's kingdom? It's a place where people live. Is it a real building? Certainly the buildings we attend services in are real, but God's kingdom is not confined to a certain or fixed building.”
    Kingdom 'not confined to a certain or fixed building'.
  • Kevin Ruonavaara, Spokane, 2026-01-04 kingdom-is-this-organization ▶ 00:07:34
    “I remember the old believers would often say that God's house or his kingdom, the Lord Jesus has an address also. … That baby Jesus, his address is in the kingdom of God. There where God's children are.”
    Repeats the 'address' teaching; the enemy 'would like to hide that address'.
  • Briar Siljander, LLC annual meeting 2026, 2026-07-03 bible-highest-authority ▶ 00:12:59 transcript
    “The first is that the kingdom of God is not the LLC and it's not a physical kingdom. God's kingdom is not an earthly physical organization. It's not bound to a legal entity or a physical building or an earthly organization.”
    Briar Siljander's own floor speech citing the Constitution (the speaker identifies himself in the typed transcript).
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2026-07-05 invisible-congregation ▶ 00:20:39
    “It is not tied to a physical building or a physical place. So we don't have to try to build something grand or beautiful because those things appeal to our human flesh.”
    Kingdom not tied to a building or place.
  • Laestadian Lutheran Church, llchurch.org, 2026-10-11 bible-highest-authority ▶ source
    “We believe that God's Word is Christian faith's highest authority and thus Christian faith's guiding principles and doctrine must be examined and evaluated in the light of God's Word.”
    Public statement of the same principle; heading 'GOD'S WORD IS CHRISTIAN FAITH'S HIGHEST AUTHORITY'.
  • Laestadian Lutheran Church, llchurch.org, 2026-10-11 bible-highest-authority ▶ source
    “According to these principles, the Holy Bible is the highest authority in questions regarding faith and life and man is made righteous alone by faith, alone by grace, alone by the merits of Christ.”
    Public 'How We Believe' page.
Culture treated as doctrine 99 statements: 77 sermons by 44 ministers, 11 statements at 7 meetings, 9 documents (2011–2026) ↑ top
  • SRK Board, Finland (SRK), 2011-10-01 conscience-free document (PDF)
    “Problems arose which needed to be discussed together. Such problems were, for example, our attitude toward television and birth control. ... In addition to these phenomena, the following began to appear: the diminishment of the conscience of the individual, injurious speech, and withholding forgiveness. ... We regret the errors in doctrine and the abuses that occurred.”
    SRK's official 2011 regret for the caretaking era names the television question and 'the diminishment of the conscience of the individual' among its errors.
  • Phillip Huhta, Phoenix, 2015-01-25 sin-declared ▶ 00:41:51
    “For the young people, when your parents instruct you to go to services, when they teach you, that movies and makeup and such like are sin. That is love.”
    Movies and makeup taught to children as sin.
  • Craig Kumpula, Rockford, 2015-02-08 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:26:23
    “participate in some of the activities that the world has to offer in the area of sports. But it is good to heed unto the wisdom that has been revealed in God's kingdom on this matter. Sports themselves as physical activity are good.”
    Sports abstention is 'wisdom that has been revealed in God's kingdom'.
  • Stanley Ylioja, Outlook, 2015-03-01 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:22:13
    “And we can even think of that example of many years ago when God so openly revealed to his children how that having a television in the house was not the thing for a believer to have. And so his children were obedient to that voice that spoke in the congregation.”
    Television decision described as God openly revealing to his children.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, Outlook, 2015-04-05 sin-declared ▶ 00:20:15
    “You believers, you don't go there to the movies. You believers, you avoid partaking of alcohol. You believers, you avoid having a television in your home. It's not a work that we do or from this list of rules. But isn't it this way that we endeavor to keep faith and a clean conscience? And these things the Spirit reveals to be sin. The Bible doesn't tell us. We've used this example many times, but it's so clear. The Bible doesn't tell us about television. But God, through His Spirit, through the Holy Spirit in Zion, has revealed this.”
    Television (and movies, alcohol) are things 'the Spirit reveals to be sin' though 'the Bible doesn't tell us'; denies these are rules.
  • David Ojala, Phoenix, 2015-10-11 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:10:57
    “Whether it be large families or whether it be the worldly appearance, makeup, and earrings, and even getting more prevalent in this world are tattoos and the markings and piercings that this world has become so fond of, that which the Holy Spirit has taught are not fitting for a child of God.”
    Makeup, earrings, tattoos and piercings: 'the Holy Spirit has taught' they are not fitting.
  • Jari Warwaruk, Outlook, 2016-01-03 test-of-faith ▶ 00:22:39
    “And at least I have heard those stories of those families and individuals that didn't want to be obedient to that voice of the congregation. And instead they chose to bring this television into their home. And sad to say that those... Those families and individuals have lost this precious gift of faith.”
    Bringing a television home against 'the voice of the congregation' linked to losing faith.
  • Donald Lahti, Menahga, 2016-05-15 test-of-faith ▶ 00:27:29
    “They say, we need to update Christianity, make it more modern. We need to revisit the decisions of those old men that have made these decisions years ago. Let's take, for example, a matter of television, where they, already in the 50s and 60s,”
    Wanting to revisit the television decision is 'traveling on the outer edges where the devil is there tempting them'.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2016-06-26 test-of-faith ▶ 00:14:44
    “This mutual acquaintance, they were confessing faith, yet the wife wore earrings. When I went into that house, I knew they were confessing faith. I greeted the husband. And the words wouldn't come out to greet the wife.”
    Earrings on a woman confessing faith led him to withhold the believers' greeting from her.
  • Mikko Pasanen, Phoenix, 2016-08-21 test-of-faith ▶ 00:24:53
    “And for you, dear sisters, if you have that cross that you have to carry about wearing makeup, and if brother or sister approaches you, be open-minded. They are only approaching you because they have love against your undying soul. They want you to stay a believer And this, the Bible does not teach anywhere that we should live like this world does.”
    Makeup is an occasion for brethren to 'approach' a sister for her soul's sake.
  • Rory Sorvala, Phoenix, 2016-09-04 conscience-free ▶ 00:19:22
    “We recently learned that it is not sufficient for us to simply say that I don't watch television and so on. Our faith is not a kingdom of do's and don'ts, but rather it is a kingdom of freedom from sin, freedom of believing that my sins are forgiven”
    Fairness: faith is not 'do's and don'ts'; still assumes the believer does not watch television.
  • Richard Nevala, Ishpeming, 2017-01-01 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:27:45
    “the decisions that were made back in the 60s about television, I agreed with them. I still agree with that. ... But I have a computer. I have a telephone. Everything that was ever on that television I can find way worse. Was there ever a decision made in God's kingdom that, oh, it's okay now that we can have television in our homes? No. There was never a discussion on that. Yeah, we still don't bring them in that box and attach it to an antennae.”
    The 1960s decision stands because it was never reversed by a later decision, even though phones carry worse content.
  • Wayne Kallio, Outlook, 2017-03-19 test-of-faith ▶ 00:37:07
    “I can take a social drink and I don't have to listen to the people in church who says that you should never drink alcohol. There's nothing wrong with it if I don't get drunk. That's a perversion of your mind and your thought. That is where, again, you are putting yourself before God's word and God's kingdoms.”
    Claiming a social drink is permissible is 'putting yourself before God's word and God's kingdom'.
  • Jouko Haapsaari, Rockford, 2017-08-20 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:43:28
    “Believing ladies even today. Don't wear earrings. ... Why do we use rings and necklaces. But not earrings. And I had a little electronic Bible and I made a search of earrings. ... The Bible mentions earrings before this, but not after concerning believers. Maybe that was a day when God's congregation decided, okay, we're done with this. We do not want to use earrings anymore. So no wonder if we don't remember or know when the decision was made.”
    Admits the earrings-but-not-rings line has no known origin; speculates the congregation decided it at the golden calf.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, Seattle, 2017-12-10 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:23:27
    “When the local teams do well, there can be this temptation even to gather and to watch these games. But even this isn't in harmony, in unity with the understanding with God's kingdom. That instruction has been that we would avoid these things for conscience sake. Temptations to dress like this world and so forth. There's not this big list that we see on the wall that you can do this and you can't do that.”
    Even gathering to watch games is 'not in harmony' with the kingdom's understanding.
  • Glenn Wisuri, Phoenix, 2018-01-14 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:18:07
    “And so then the kingdom of God taught that television is not furniture for a believing home. And it took care of all those temptations. And now each of us carries along with us the capability to view whatever we want.”
    'The kingdom of God taught' the television rule.
  • Walter Lampi, Rockford, 2018-03-18 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:36:34
    “the kingdom of God at that time warned that this is not a thing for the believing. And so their warning was there. I don't think that that was a demand of the law of moses but it was the far-seeing eyes of the holy spirit that could see what damage would be done in the christian home and so it it was viewed in our home as as personal liberty My stepfather felt that that was his right”
    Television in the 1970s: 'personal liberty' claims versus the 'far-seeing eyes of the holy spirit'.
  • James Jurmu, Monticello, 2018-04-22 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:21:00
    “the class was going through a period of time where they were learning to dance and they were dancing. And the believing children of God, though they were very young, confessed their faith and they said that they would not wish to partake with that curriculum and that they would be excused from that period, that they would not need to dance and soil their conscience.”
    School dance curriculum: children asking to be excused is praised as confessing faith.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-06 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:21:26 transcript
    “And to say that the decisions that were made in God's kingdom in the late 50s or early 60s about television would not be a good thing to bring to your home, I think are still a good admonition.”
    Afternoon session reply defending the television decision as 'still a good admonition'. Earlier in the turn: 'the dangers of [worldly] music, the dangers of television'.
  • John Lehtola, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-06 conscience-free ▶ 01:16:15 transcript
    “There was a column in the recent Voice of Zion on the back page. It was in the February issue, [written] by Harri Vähäjylkkä. He clearly states that everything is not black and white for all believers. There are gray areas. ... There were believers gathered together in the commons area at one apartment [building]. It was the time of elections. Some believers were watching the election results. Another believer came in and shut off the television. He said, believers do not watch television. It was black and white [for him].”
    Cites an SRK writer's Voice of Zion column that 'there are gray areas' against the black-and-white television rule. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-06 conscience-free ▶ 02:09:24 transcript
    “So I am not or have never undone the so-called television decision. I'm just illustrating a point that now today with our cell phones and our computers we have the television right at our fingertips and it's even much more and much worse than television ever was. ... And this is something that I didn't come up with. I have heard it multiple times in America and in Finland.”
    Defends his television remarks as content-based watchfulness heard 'in America and in Finland'; header has no speaker names.
  • James Jurmu, Monticello, 2018-05-27 conscience-free ▶ 00:20:52
    “So playing sports isn't sin. Trying to do your best and trying to win isn't sin. And so I dare say that we will not get to heaven by not playing sports on the organized teams at the school.”
    Fairness: denies school sports are sin or salvific; then explains why believers still do not join ('Sports ... has become a god').
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-31 conscience-free ▶ 02:32:55 transcript
    “I came here 13 years ago and I felt that I came to the jail. I live in Christian Freedom in Finland. It means that there was nobody watching ... And for people, when they say here that, yeah, we live in freedom, maybe you don't know what the freedom is. And it's different. There's many things that have been different here.”
    Finnish-raised member contrasts 'Christian freedom in Finland' with being watched in the LLC; direct witness that SRK practice differs. Not a letter; a meeting speech.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 2018-06-14 test-of-faith ▶ 02:34:49 transcript
    “And I've heard over the course of some years that of course television is not in the Bible and so forth, but if we start to put in God's kingdom where us as board members or speakers begin to question these decisions that were guided by the Holy Spirit, And if we have these discussions, and another one I think of is Halloween. ... If we begin to question and say that, well, I can... I can do this and it's not going to harm my faith life. There's other believers that know that this happens, but this is, I would say, very simply grieving the Holy Spirit.”
    A board member or speaker questioning the television or Halloween decisions is 'grieving the Holy Spirit' (Eph 4:30 was the text under discussion).
  • Unidentified speaker, Minnesota-wide meeting, 2018-06-14 test-of-faith ▶ 02:40:54 transcript
    “Have you spoke to others in the congregation what's on your heart about some of these other matters of television? Or have you told them that, oh I can, have you ever said, oh I can watch TV and ... Maybe there's some of these other things that we have, that the Spirit has instructed in the congregation that we are questioning, but yet on all points of other doctrine we might be right.”
    Watching TV treated as a test separate from doctrine: one may be 'right' on doctrine yet be questioning what 'the Spirit has instructed'.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2018-07-01 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:18:49
    “signs of the times were seen in ways like television, music, professional sports, many, many of those types of topics which for so many years had been seen as not a good place for the believer to ... one of the brothers from Finland who was here around those years, Einari [Lepistö]. And he writes in there how one of the things that was affecting here in North America that wasn't really at that time in Finland was television. ... but he visited many homes where there were televisions there openly used. And there were those who would preach that it was, I guess, allowable And it can be used in those terms such as freedom of a Christian.”
    Cites Einari Lepistö that television was a North American issue 'not really at that time in Finland'; 'freedom of a Christian' arguments are tied to the 1970s heresy.
  • Stanley Ylioja, Outlook, 2018-08-05 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:37:12
    “if we don't understand the instruction of God's kingdom, but yet how important it is that we would listen to that instruction and to that voice that speaks in God's kingdom. For instance, we think of many years ago when televisions were brought out and the Spirit revealed to God's kingdom that this was not something that the believer would want to have in their homes ... when we had discussions around Halloween and how we take part in that festival of the world, that how God instructed us that it would be appropriate that we would not go trick-or-treating”
    Obedience is required even when the believer does not understand the instruction; television and Halloween named as Spirit-revealed instructions.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2018-09-23 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:20:34
    “But we must differentiate between that which the Spirit has taught. We know things like television and worldly music. or celebrating of Halloween, little things like this, that those are not merely traditions of man, but the Spirit has taught the congregation of God that these things are not good and are not right.”
    Distinguishes 'traditions of man' (Finnish as sacred language) from television, worldly music and Halloween, which 'the Spirit has taught' are wrong.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-09-30 test-of-faith ▶ 02:12:30 transcript
    “It seems like John's views have raised concern. Comments like the television decision is obsolete. ... Wouldn't we rather speak of the beauty of that decision, the blessing of that decision that has helped us so much and try to preserve that, a sense of that decision even in the midst of changing technology. Another similar example is the matter of Halloween. It feels like there's been dissension about that from John over the years.”
    The minister's remarks on the television decision and Halloween are listed among the concerns about him in a congregation meeting.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-09-30 conscience-free ▶ 03:18:18 transcript
    “TV, I explained myself already. I'm not saying that we undo the This was a decision back in the 1960s but I'm saying in all reality we have the TV on our phones and on our computers and it's right there in our own homes and with us every step of our way. So it comes down to personal watching. Watching what buttons we click and what web pages we go to and so on and so forth. That's all I was trying to say. I'm not saying every believer now go out and buy a television and bring it into your home. Absolutely not.”
    Reply: the 1960s decision is not undone, but with TV on every phone the matter 'comes down to personal watching'. Speaker not labeled in header.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2018-10-14 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:15:41
    “the things that the children of God wish to keep away from, things like television and things like dancing and movies and all these things, that the Spirit has spoken in the churches.”
    Television, dancing and movies: 'the Spirit has spoken in the churches' (Rev 2-3 language).
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2018-10-14 sin-declared ▶ 00:20:07
    “It's a very secular holiday and at its core is anti-God and his word and his kingdom, speaking about spirits and devils and those such things. it would be good that we would not partake of it at all to avoid the appearance of evil. ... On the other hand, nevertheless, there are dangers on the other side that we would begin to watch so closely over our friends and family and place them in such a position that it could be impossible to come back from.”
    Grounds Halloween abstention in 1 Thess 5:22, then warns against over-watching others. A rare scriptural framing plus a caution against legalism.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2019-02-03 sin-declared ▶ 00:32:31
    “I asked you here today that how many of you want to do sin after church? You want to go and watch the Super Bowl? I think the Super Bowl is today, I'm not even sure, but there's a big football game coming up. Is that what your desire is to do? Pray to God if you have that temptation to take it away”
    Watching the Super Bowl equated with doing sin.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-07-07 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:19:15
    “Good in how right the instruction in God's kingdom has been. With matters as small as, for example, that believers would not want to participate in school sports or competitive sports. Because we know that these matters can lead to pride.”
    School and competitive sports are an 'instruction in God's kingdom'.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2019-07-14 test-of-faith ▶ 00:32:10
    “Painting. Fingernails just a little bit and slight makeup to beautify oneself. Oh, vanity of vanities, saith the preacher. That's the flesh. And then came that day and she was greeting and she says, I am a believer. ... And then came that day when she came and she had earrings on and she said, I'm still believing. And that mother said to me that how confusing is this to the children and youth in God's kingdom.”
    A woman wearing earrings while saying 'I'm still believing' is presented as confusing and as the path of losing faith.
  • Terry Ruonavaara, Roaring Fork Valley, 2019-08-11 test-of-faith ▶ 00:25:04
    “Questions in this way that where in the Bible does it say anything about television being sin? Does it not feel that there is a foreign voice that we would not want to follow? That we would rather hearken to what God's Word and the Spirit says and reminds us.”
    Asking where the Bible calls television sin is itself 'a foreign voice'.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-09-22 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:32:27
    “As believers, we have always abstained from alcohol. But those on the outside cannot understand this matter. We know the Bible speaks much about drunkenness and how a drunkard or one who is drunken will not inherit the kingdom.”
    Total abstinence presented as the believers' constant practice; scripture cited is on drunkenness.
  • Unidentified speaker, Elk River, 2019-10-19 conscience-free ▶ 00:30:51 transcript
    “One month ago in the [Päivämies], there was a little article which [Ari-Pekka Palola] wrote, and he talked about the television question. And he said the decision was made back in the early 1960s. But he said then came the question of, in 1978, whether AV audiovisual equipment and television could be used by teachers, believing teachers, in the classroom. ... And the decision that was made is that a believing teacher cannot and should not use television as a teaching tool in any form or fashion in the classroom. Hundreds of believing teachers were there and they left that meeting dumbfounded. ... it said that we cannot make any fast and firm rule that the Holy Spirit will guide us.”
    Cites a Sept 2019 Paivamies article (author's name garbled; likely Ari-Pekka Palola) to show an assembled congregation can err: the 1978 SRK teachers' TV ruling versus 'no fast and firm rule'.
  • David Anderson, Alaska, 2019-10-31 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:08:22
    “And we could say even that putting on a costume wouldn't necessarily be sin, would it? Or maybe going around from house to house to get treats that... Would this be so bad? But what is important when we think of these matters? Isn't it that matter of obedience? That the Holy Spirit has taught that it is not good for a believer to partake.”
    Concedes costumes and trick-or-treating are not sin in themselves; the operative principle is obedience to what 'the Holy Spirit has taught'.
  • Ray Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2019-10-31 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:11:43
    “And so from that time, I think the children of God in this country for the most part quit partaking in Halloween. And I think it was somewhat of a controversial issue ... it feels like it was the wisdom of the Spirit that moved in the congregation of God ... decided that it doesn't have a place in the Christian home. ... But it seemed good to the believers then and to the Holy Spirit to make that kind of decision.”
    Admits the Halloween decision was controversial and 'some of that lingering', but credits it and the 1950s-60s television decision to the Spirit (Acts 15:28 wording).
  • James Jurmu, Monticello, 2019-11-17 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:32:54
    “That she has never understood how wearing earrings would steal her faith. But she would not want to wear earrings because she wants to keep her faith. ... Do not pierce your ears and wear those things. Why? Will we get to heaven by not wearing earrings? No, but we'll be able to keep faith, childlike faith, by listening to how God's Spirit teaches us to avoid the ways of this world.”
    Earrings: not salvific, but abstaining is how one keeps faith by obeying 'how God's Spirit teaches'.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2020-05-10 sin-declared ▶ 00:34:09
    “Justifications for sin. Quoting scriptures. There are some even that defend sin in this way that, well, it doesn't speak in the Bible about that. You know, be it the dangers of the internet, television, movies, whatever.”
    Pointing out that the Bible is silent on television or movies is 'defending sin'.
  • George Koivukangas, Cokato, 2020-11-08 sin-declared ▶ 00:38:00
    “Maybe with the young maiden's little makeup or dyed hair or finger polish. That's not so bad. You know, when you look at the sin in the unbelieving world, and there's many, many, many, many, many examples that one could say that, and yet, sin is sin.”
    Light makeup, dyed hair and nail polish: 'sin is sin'.
  • Eric Mattila, Phoenix, 2021-02-21 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:30:28
    “You will not find television or trick-or-treating in the cover of this Bible. But yet God still guides and he still teaches and he still instructs his children. I have recently heard this sort of a saying, that these instructions and teaching are man-made sins. ... that I cannot watch television or have a social drink or go trick-or-treating. That is nothing but decisions of men. Dear brothers and sisters, do not confuse the Holy Spirit with decisions of men. Do not begin to speak evil against the Holy Spirit.”
    Calling the television, social-drinking and Halloween instructions 'man-made sins' is framed as speaking evil against the Holy Spirit; continues with the sin of blaspheming.
  • Mark Skoog, Menahga, 2021-03-26 test-of-faith ▶ 03:14:42 transcript
    “One, I understand that there are several who are participating in Halloween from Wolf Lake. Is that true? Do any of you guys know, is it true or not? ... Like the Halloween deal. I have heard that it is fairly widely participated in by members from Wolf Lake. That's why I figured that this is the place to ask.”
    Halloween participation by Wolf Lake members is put on the table as a concern in a joint board meeting about that congregation's standing.
  • Dave Keranen, Menahga, 2021-03-26 kingdom-revealed ▶ 03:37:01 transcript
    “We can think of many examples in this world where God's Kingdom through the Holy Spirit reveals these understandings to us, whether participating in sports or going to a rodeo, some of these worldly pleasures of the world. ... It is difficult for me to explain to my children why we don't go trick or treating. I simply trust that God's Kingdom through the Holy Spirit has said that it is not a place for a child of God. It is not an activity that we want to participate in.”
    Board-meeting speech: sports, rodeos and trick-or-treating are understandings 'God's Kingdom through the Holy Spirit reveals'; he cannot explain them to his children except by trust.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, Longview, 2021-05-23 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:17:39
    “One example that can come up is this matter of Halloween, the celebration of Halloween. We don't find that word, Halloween, anywhere here in God's holy word. But as believers, as we've been able to look back on that matter, that decision, we say that God guided through his spirit, the Holy Spirit guiding God's congregation. ... And it was revealed there that this wouldn't be a celebration that we would, as believers, continue to participate in.”
    Answers the 'show me in God's Word' question by treating the congregational Halloween decision as a revelation of the Spirit.
  • Stephen Warwaruk, Saskatoon, 2021-06-07 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:15:55
    “I played hockey in the community or organized sports as we call them. ... But I do know that after starting, I learned that playing hockey in the community was something that God's kingdom warned against. ... I remember to this day those, and it would usually be sisters in faith around my age, speaking to me, about that activity. And I believe that those rebukes left a mark. They pricked my conscience.”
    Community hockey was 'something God's kingdom warned against'; peers rebuked him for it.
  • Peter Lever, LLC (Summer Services), 2021-07-02 sin-declared ▶ 00:28:14
    “Sin wasn't preached as sin. Excuses were made. Many things that had been revealed through the Spirit to God's children was not preached as sin or seen or understood as sin. ... A little bit drink of wine before dinner, a little bit of television was okay. That for many years has been revealed in God's kingdom, those things that we want to avoid those things, that they're sin.”
    Television and a glass of wine are things 'revealed in God's kingdom' to be sin; tolerating them is a mark of the 1970s heresy.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga, 2021-07-25 test-of-faith ▶ 00:28:43
    “In the last heresy, the heresy of 1973, There were a number of fruits of a false spirit that were prevalent at that time. It was leniency, greeting heretics, watching and owning televisions, Marriage with unbelievers. Obsession with sports.”
    Owning a television and 'obsession with sports' listed as 'fruits of a false spirit'.
  • Rory Sorvala, Phoenix, 2021-08-22 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:26:50
    “We have in times past talked about the dangers of television and worldly activities such as bowling and whatnot. And we could go on and on about how it is important that we would incline our ears to the teaching of the Holy Spirit.”
    Bowling named among 'worldly activities' warned against.
  • Peter Lever, Spokane, 2021-10-10 sin-declared ▶ 00:16:09
    “Just because movies and television and these types of things weren't there then. It's been revealed through the Holy Spirit in the congregation that those are sin. That they're wrong. So it doesn't speak specifically to that in the Bible. So it doesn't change.”
    Movies and television are sin by revelation 'in the congregation', not by Scripture.
  • Pentti Rentola, Christ Is the Same, p. 201, 2022-01-01 conscience-free quoted from the book
    “We can use our God-given gifts for our own and others' enjoyment in many different ways and enjoy the many things that enrich life. One person gladly becomes refreshed with good music, either listening to or playing music. Another enjoys exercise and nature. ... Drawing the line between good and unsuitable hobbies is sometimes difficult. Even believers may have conflicting opinions about what is [suitable].”
    The book's Culture chapter allows that believers may disagree about hobbies; it names no sport, holiday or adornment as sin.
  • Pentti Rentola, Christ Is the Same, p. 200, 2022-01-01 conscience-free quoted from the book
    “Everyone can appreciate and respect their own culture. A believer, [however], is willing to give up characteristics and customs of his or her own [culture] that are contrary to faith and a good conscience. We may ponder what things belong to culture and what things are part of God's salvation plan.”
    Invites the reader to separate culture from the plan of salvation; the LLC sermons above fold the two together.
  • Pentti Rentola, Christ Is the Same, p. 202, 2022-01-01 sin-declared quoted from the book
    “The cultural offerings of our time are largely centered around [entertainment]. They feed a persons lusts and desires via the senses and open the way for destructive temptations. Entertainment culture distorts, among other things, sexuality which is seen or heard in dress, speech, music, movies and literature.”
    The book's strongest culture warning: entertainment culture as a conveyor of lust; still framed by content and Rom 12:2, not by a named prohibition.
  • Seppo Sarkiniemi, Christ Is the Same, p. 180, 2022-01-01 conscience-free quoted from the book
    “Fundamentalist influences have also been visible in the difficulty of [distinguishing] between culture and doctrine. Cultural issues may then give rise to doctrines that slowly begin to be demanded as [prerequisites] for salvation. ... In these matters, the [Christian] makes choices guided by living faith so that he or she can live with a good conscience.”
    The book itself names the failure mode this page documents: cultural issues becoming doctrines 'demanded as [prerequisites] for salvation'.
  • Hanna Ottman, Christ Is the Same, p. 103, 2022-01-01 conscience-free quoted from the book
    “Demanding certain works or the avoidance of certain works can lead to an outwardly pious life, but it does not bring faith and salvation. ... Even in daily life love teaches more precisely than any demand or any rules. This does not mean that Christians would not discuss among [themselves] nor desire to contemplate in different life situations what is agreeable to God.”
    'Avoidance of certain works' demanded of believers yields outward piety only; discussion is allowed but not demand.
  • Pekka Tervo, Christ Is the Same, p. 131, 2022-01-01 kingdom-revealed quoted from the book
    “Our rational minds battle against the will of God, but faith enables the understanding that in the instruction and advice of the congregation is heard the voice of God and Holy Spirit, a voice which it pays to obey. When a person obeys God, God's blessings follow.”
    The book's nearest support for the LLC position: the congregation's 'instruction and advice' carries God's voice; but p. 128-129 binds conscience to 'God's Word and the instructions of the Holy Spirit based on God's Word'.
  • Aimo Helén, Christ Is the Same, p. 185, 2022-01-01 conscience-free quoted from the book
    “A fallen one may consider permissible something that God has forbidden, or forbidden that which God has allowed (Rom. 14:1). The Bible is the only guide from which we can learn to know God's will.”
    States the Bible is the only guide to God's will and warns against forbidding what God has allowed.
  • Aimo Helén, Christ Is the Same, p. 190, 2022-01-01 conscience-free quoted from the book
    “A Christian is no longer a slave of sin but rather free and independent of all demands placed on him or her. This freedom is the basis of Lutheran ethics.”
    Lutheran ethics defined by freedom from demands.
  • Stephen Warwaruk, Outlook, 2022-03-07 test-of-faith ▶ 00:07:26
    “When we have made a decision as a congregation, or there's been instruction in the congregation, and I think of things like the instruction that we wouldn't have televisions in our home. We want to be obedient to that instruction and not question that. Is that truly true? the instruction that God has for us? Or is that just something that man has brought forward? And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die”
    Questioning whether the television instruction is from God or man is likened to the serpent's question in Eden.
  • Bryce Ojalehto, Alaska, 2022-05-29 test-of-faith ▶ 00:18:31
    “perhaps worldly music if they're bothered by worldly music you know I can understand why they would not listen but it does not bother my conscience so I will ignore that message to avoid those things and go my own way that's not the condition a child of God wants to find himself in but we want to be obedient to the voice of the Holy Spirit even if we do not”
    Explicitly rejects the individual-conscience standard for worldly music: obedience is owed even if one's conscience is untroubled.
  • Martin Wuollet, Longview, 2022-09-11 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:28:23
    “That's how we learn these age-old instructions to flee from sin. I don't know how many sermons I've heard in my life that speak of the dangers of worldly life. Makeup, music, movies, on and on and on and on the list goes. All those things.”
    Acknowledges the frequency of the makeup-music-movies list in LLC preaching.
  • Curtis Simonson, Cokato, 2022-10-09 conscience-free ▶ 00:16:17
    “But faith is different than do's and don'ts. Are you, dear brothers and sisters, are you boys and girls, are you believers because you don't have a television? Or are you believers because you have a large family?”
    Fairness: having no television is not what makes one a believer.
  • Bryce Ojalehto, Phoenix, 2022-10-23 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:09:26
    “whether it's things of our temporal lives, maybe avoidance of television or avoidance of school sports or makeup or who knows what the thing may be that. a particular individual may not be able to understand, ... But I don't think it is necessary that we would always understand the ins and outs of everything, but that we would want to have that childlike trust in God's guiding hand here, and that we would want to obey and believe that voice of the Holy Spirit.”
    Television, school sports and makeup are decisions 'the Holy Spirit speaks on' to be obeyed without understanding.
  • Martin Wuollet, Menahga, 2022-10-29 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:30:13
    “God's children have been given this kind of instruction years and years ago to flee from worldly music. To not listen to worldly music. ... And so God has instructed that we would not listen to worldly music. And none of us would look at that as bad instruction.”
    Worldly music: 'God has instructed'.
  • Eric Jurmu, Phoenix, 2022-12-03 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:16:20
    “I'm one of those believers. I'm one of those that don't watch TV, and I'm one of those that don't go to dances, and I'm one of those who doesn't play on the sports team, and I'm one of those young ladies who doesn't wear makeup and earrings.”
    Confessing faith at school is defined by the list of abstentions. Same passage is the YouTube clip 4QNmXLofmNg.
  • Jason Parks, Saskatoon, 2023-03-05 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:24:49
    “some of those matters that in themselves are not sin but we have been taught and I believe the Holy Spirit has clearly revealed that those things would not be those that a child of God would partake in ... attending professional sporting events, and how in God's kingdom we have taught and we have been taught that those places are not for a child of God. ... Certainly there is no harm to observe a hockey game and indeed many of us participate and play hockey one with another”
    Professional sporting events: 'not sin' in themselves, yet 'the Holy Spirit has clearly revealed' believers do not attend.
  • Martin Wuollet, Rockford, 2023-06-18 test-of-faith ▶ 00:11:29
    “It shows up in their hair, maybe with some of their hair length for guys, maybe, or their dress attitude. Maybe with some of the women you see makeup sneaking in. And these are fruits of sin that have settled in the heart. And it's a place for us to open the conversation”
    Hair length, dress and makeup are 'fruits of sin' that trigger the church-law process described next.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2023-07-16 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:22:07
    “Television first came out. There was much discussion in God's kingdom about this new invention. And the Spirit of God revealed that this device was not appropriate for a believing home.”
    Television decision as a revelation of the Spirit.
  • Greg Jacobson, Flathead Valley, 2023-08-20 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:53:34
    “There are certain things in God's kingdom where instruction has been very specific. And we know that, for example, when the television came out, that God's instruction to God's kingdom was that it was wrong. That there was much in it that fed the flesh. And hardly anything, if at all, that fed the spirit. And there were times, even when I was growing up, where the instruction, although it is not wrong and it is not a sin,”
    Television 'was wrong' by God's instruction; sentence trails into a concession that some instruction concerned things that are 'not a sin'.
  • James Moll, Prescott Valley, 2023-11-01 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:06:36
    “years ago we had a congregation discussion meeting in Phoenix and our congregation was discussing celebrating Halloween. ... And we were having this discussion, and there's some brothers that come from Finland, some speaker brothers, And we were describing to him what happens on this night in our country and how people celebrate it and how it's an excuse for evil spirits and evil doing and so on. They were shocked. And at that time we decided this is not the way we want to celebrate this evening.”
    Recalls the Phoenix congregation meeting that decided against Halloween; visiting SRK speakers had to have the custom explained to them.
  • Gary Hoikka, Cokato, 2023-11-01 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:09:15
    “And you know, we have to marvel and thank our Heavenly Father that through His Holy Spirit, the guidance that He has given those dear elders, many who are no longer here, to see that This Halloween is no holiday for a child of God.”
    Answering a young believer's question 'why don't we celebrate Halloween'; the elders' decision is credited to the Holy Spirit.
  • Stanley Ylioja, Outlook, 2023-11-01 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:15:43
    “And we know how God, through His Spirit, even directed the believers many years ago, even when I was a young person, which is many years ago already, but how we had those discussions in our congregation and how God even revealed to us How about Halloween and maybe some of the dangers in taking part in those activities in certain instances.”
    Halloween abstention is something 'God even revealed to us' through congregational discussion.
  • Kevin Moll, Elk River, 2024-02-18 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:25:22
    “glory of those sports figures and those events would be tempting for us to to watch to pay attention to and how God's kingdom has instructed that we would we would avoid those areas that that can lead us away”
    Watching sports: 'God's kingdom has instructed' avoidance.
  • Dave Edwards, Prescott Valley, 2024-09-22 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:19:08
    “the Holy Spirit has led God's kingdom to instruct us that for example like we shouldn't go to the movie theater we should refrain from alcohol or we should refrain from drugs because they alter our mind there's a reason we shouldn't partake of the worldly lifestyles”
    Movie theaters and alcohol: 'the Holy Spirit has led God's kingdom to instruct'.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, Seattle, 2024-09-22 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:27:43
    “In times past, we participated in this holiday, dressed up and went out trick-or-treating, and with our mind we could say, well, where's the harm in that? ... That it's a pagan holiday. It's not a holiday of faith. ... It's not a holiday of God's children. And so the Spirit has revealed to God's children through the discussions. It didn't just come down as a thundering voice from heaven.”
    Halloween used as the model case of 'instruction from God's kingdom' that the believer must not set aside; preceded by a warning that a divided heart ends in faith being 'extinguished'.
  • Paul Honkala, LLC (Minneapolis area), 2024-10-29 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:05:52
    “And we know that even in God's kingdom, we've even heard those kinds of instructions, even that how we would even live even in this time with even that kind of a holiday, that we don't really go out trick-or-treating for candy and that kind of stuff, but rather just maybe events at church that we attend and we do those things. ... It means that we don't even attend those same kind of events that the unbelieving people attend. We don't attend, we can say we don't attend concerts and football games and any of those kind of things.”
    Reads 2 Cor 6:14 ('unequally yoked') as meaning believers do not attend concerts or football games; Halloween abstention is 'instruction' heard in God's kingdom.
  • David Ojala, Longview, 2024-11-03 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:14:16
    “And they want to beautify themselves with all manner of makeup and earrings and hair colorings and all this kind of worldly beautification that we as believers know and have been taught through the Holy Spirit is not for a believer.”
    Makeup, earrings and hair coloring: 'taught through the Holy Spirit'.
  • Loren Keplinger, Flathead Valley, 2024-11-03 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:29:16
    “around this most recent holiday, Halloween, where we see the world embracing the spirit of darkness, how it has become ever more important in the world around us and how we are thankful yet today that God has given us this understanding that it is not appropriate for believers to celebrate this holiday.”
    Halloween abstention described as an understanding 'God has given us'.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, Seattle, 2024-11-10 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:14:49
    “[Laestadian] believers appear to live by rules. You don't go to movies. You don't watch television. Sports. Don't partake of organized sports. These things. ... Children of God, we don't live this way on our endeavor, trying to keep these rules perfectly. They're not rules. But God's children have visited over the years and throughout the centuries, each of our own time.”
    Denies the practices are rules while listing the same practices as settled by congregational visiting.
  • James Jurmu, Rockford, 2025-01-19 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:31:34
    “If you are very gifted at sports and if you are in high school, your fellow students and the coaches would love that you would be on the sports teams of the school. And through the Holy Spirit, God's kingdom has always taught that we would avoid those places of competition that would draw our hearts away from God.”
    School teams: 'God's kingdom has always taught' avoidance.
  • Bryce Ojalehto, Glendale, 2025-02-09 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:12:48
    “I'd heard talk of man-made sins or things that people thought perhaps that the believers had made up and thought, you know, things such as television or social drinking, makeup. lots of those kinds of things, or attending movies and such, that these were just man-made sins, that God does not mind if we do these things. These things, if they don't bother your conscience, they're fine with you. But we know that that's not true, that if the Holy Spirit speaks about these things, that we can trust that that is the guidance of the Holy Spirit.”
    Rejects the 'man-made sins' and 'if it doesn't bother your conscience' positions heard during the 2019-2022 split.
  • Nathan Muhonen, Rockford, 2025-06-22 sin-declared ▶ 00:17:21
    “We don't want to be there in the sporting arenas or in front of the televisions, the movies, or consuming of drugs and alcohol. All those things that are sin, and we know they're sin. Our conscience tells us that they're sin. These are the dark, dark places of this world.”
    Sporting arenas, television and movies are 'sin, and we know they're sin'.
  • Olli Vanska, Seattle, 2025-07-24 test-of-faith ▶ 00:10:26
    “And for this reason, often we see that one, for example, woman, they leave the kingdom of God, immediately they want to use makeup or earrings to show that they are not believing anymore. And this way, we know that they are not in the same faith.”
    Makeup or earrings read as the outward sign that a woman is no longer believing.
  • Roger Plough, Spokane, 2025-07-27 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:19:18
    “Back, I'm not even sure exactly when, around the 50s, I think, the issue of television was discussed and decided that the television was not a good instrument for the home of a believer. ... When I was younger, I participated in trick-or-treating. But then when it was discussed and decided that maybe that wasn't such a great or a good practice to continue, that then God's children wished to refrain from that activity. ... and other things that have been discussed and God's kingdom has come to a decision or an understanding. Perhaps it's difficult for us to understand ourselves and wonder that is this really what God intends?”
    Television and Halloween decisions offered as examples right after the Saul text ('God's mercy is not necessarily infinite' for the rebellious).
  • Jason Parks, Saskatoon, 2025-08-03 conscience-free ▶ 00:35:38
    “Who of us could say that it would be a sin to have a television in your house or to watch the television? ... But isn't it this way, dear brother and sister, that I don't think any of us could say it is sin to have a television. But maybe if I said it in this way about this matter, that what if you were to come visit my house? And what if there we had a television? How would you feel, dear brother and sister? I think I know how you would feel. It would bother you.”
    Says outright that no one could call a television sin, yet a television in a believer's home would 'bother' the brethren; keeps the practice as a matter of offense.
  • Steven Laiho, Williston, 2025-08-10 test-of-faith ▶ 00:45:22
    “those things that we've been instructed and taught are not for a believer, and we become bold enough to show them, even to others, maybe a little at a time, That boldness, that is where that questioning comes at. Did God really say this? Is the instruction that you have received truth? Or is something as small and as petty as wearing earrings? Are you going to tell me that that's something that's going to bring one unto eternal death?”
    The objection 'will earrings bring eternal death?' is cast as the serpent's 'Did God really say'.
  • Steven Laiho, Williston, 2025-10-19 test-of-faith ▶ 00:29:49
    “So you're wearing earrings. Well, I mean, there's many sisters even in Ecuador, Togo, those different cultures. We start with those hypothetical questions and it's like, well, how can you say that just because I want to put some adornment on that I'm not believing correctly? How can you say that I'm corrupt in such a way? ... And we would not want to offend even a brother or sister in this way that if by me exercising my freedoms in my life causes you to struggle”
    Earrings handled under 'we know them by their fruits' and Rom 14 offense; acknowledges other cultures differ.
  • Kevin Ruonavaara, Flathead Valley, 2026-02-08 conscience-free ▶ 00:29:01
    “To the young ladies, it was perhaps those temptations of makeup and so on. To the young boys and men, it was perhaps sports. To all of the young, it was perhaps those gray areas of music that we're How far can we push that line before it becomes sin? And as workers at that camp, at least for myself, I often feel at a loss to answer these questions. What happened then is that as time went on, it was revealed the importance of keeping faith in a tender, sensitive conscience.”
    Camp worker admits he cannot answer where makeup, sports or music become sin; answer is a tender conscience.
  • Jeremy Simonson, Outlook, 2026-02-15 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:26:25
    “And God, through the Holy Spirit, led and guided that discussion there for us. How we realize that It is cultural, even in Ecuador, but also in North America that women would wear makeup and earrings. ... That these items are also a temptation for believers in North America.”
    Mission-trip discussion in Quito on makeup and earrings; calls them cultural yet a temptation the Spirit guided against.
  • Jari Warwaruk, LLC (Winter Services), 2026-02-21 sin-declared ▶ 00:18:09
    “And we knew that the music of this world was sin. And we knew and understood that to bring a television into our guy's pad or into our homes was sin and contrary to the teachings of the Holy Spirit.”
    Worldly music and a television in the home called sin outright.
  • Ramin Shulda, Longview, 2026-03-22 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:27:49
    “And that even though you won't find the direct words that thou shall not wear makeup or thou shall not dye thy hair, that it has been opened by and through the Holy Spirit that we would refrain and endeavor as children of God not to do these things.”
    Makeup and hair dye: no scripture, but 'opened by and through the Holy Spirit'.
  • Daren Hendrickson, LLC (Summer Services presentation 'Rebuke Is Love'), 2026-07-04 test-of-faith ▶ 00:03:12
    “So what do you do if your believing friend is swearing? What if you're in a car of other believers where music of this world is playing? What if you hear that your believing friend is wearing makeup? What if your believing friend has stopped attending services?”
    Makeup and worldly music listed with swearing and skipping services as occasions for rebuke.
  • Tapani Kinnunen, Rockford, 2026-07-12 sin-declared ▶ 00:32:56
    “And the enemy of the souls brings a vision in front of us. ... When a person in this world puts a makeup on. ... That they would be prettier than a person that's created by God. But dear brothers and sisters, it is not so. We are all created by God as a picture of God.”
    Finnish visiting speaker frames makeup as the enemy's vision against God's creation; does not say 'sin' or cite a decision.
  • Curtis Simonson, Cokato, 2026-09-27 sin-declared ▶ 00:26:28
    “You probably shouldn't have a television in your home week. And he was a little surprised at that, but he asked me why. And I said, well, it's a sin to watch things on television.”
    Childhood anecdote told approvingly: he told a kindergarten friend it is 'a sin to watch things on television'. 'week' is a transcription artifact.
  • Ramin Shulda, Longview, 2026-09-27 conscience-free ▶ 00:33:10
    “no minister had told me that I couldn't play baseball. No board member told me that I couldn't play baseball. No congregation member told me that I couldn't play baseball.”
    Says his decision to quit high-school baseball after repentance came from conscience, not from anyone's instruction.
  • Ramin Shulda, Longview, 2026-09-27 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:34:29
    “But it's this Christian freedom that we have, dear brothers and sisters, that when the devil comes and whispers in our ear that we're a kingdom of rules and we have strict parents, how can it be that I just can't wear a little bit of makeup and I wouldn't want to put just a little bit of fingernail polish on?”
    'Christian freedom' is invoked against the question 'why can't I wear a little makeup', which is attributed to the devil.
  • Ramin Shulda, Longview, 2026-09-27 kingdom-revealed ▶ 00:36:30
    “But even though it isn't said in the Bible that we wouldn't participate with those activities of Halloween, We can take comfort, dear brothers and sisters, that when Jesus, before he left, he said, when he left this earth, he said, I must go so he will come. And that comforter will teach us in all things.”
    Concedes the Bible is silent on Halloween; grounds abstention in the Comforter teaching 'all things'.
Finland and the culture questions 41 statements: 15 sermons by 13 ministers, 13 statements at 10 meetings, 13 documents (2011–2026) ↑ top
  • SRK Board of Directors, Finland (SRK), 2011-10 srk-statement document (PDF)
    “Problems arose which needed to be discussed together. Such problems were, for example, our attitude toward television and birth control. … In addition to these phenomena, the following began to appear: the diminishment of the conscience of the individual, injurious speech, and withholding forgiveness. Humiliation of another person is never right, neither is physical, mental, or spiritual violence. We regret the errors in doctrine and the abuses that occurred.”
    The SRK's own board names its 'attitude toward television and birth control' as the problems of the caretaking era and regrets the 'diminishment of the conscience of the individual' and 'spiritual violence'; the same items the LLC still treats as revealed by the kingdom.
  • SRK Board of Directors, Finland (SRK), 2011-10 srk-statement document (PDF)
    “A community is formed of individuals; so also is the community of believers. We believe that the Holy Spirit gathers the congregation of God. When individual Christians err, the fault is not that of the congregation. Therefore, the correction of matters starts with the endeavoring individual's own desire to journey with a good conscience before God and people.”
    The SRK locates correction in the individual's conscience before God, not in collective decisions; contrast with LLC meetings where questioning a television or Halloween decision is 'grieving the Holy Spirit'.
  • Valde Palola, Finland (SRK), 2012-01-01 srk-not-doctrine document (PDF)
    “According to Luther, there may be questions in life where we need to have patience and long-suffering for each other. There are always sin, errors, impurity and wretchedness in the life of a Christian. In this, love can as if looks at issues between the fingers and withstand upsets. … According to Luther, there should be patience and forgiveness in questions of life. In doctrinal matters, there can be no give-or-take (must be absolute) in the congregation.”
    The later SRK chairman draws Luther's line between 'questions of life' (patience, forbearance) and doctrine (absolute); the LLC collapses that line by treating life questions as Spirit-revealed and tests of faith.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2016-01-24 finland-differs ▶ 00:32:14
    “Here in this country, we're approaching the Super Bowl, and cultures being different. There in Finland, when I was there, there was the World Junior Championship hockey. I felt bad one night when they told me that there were only so few there because there's the hockey game on. We're not far from those temptations here either”
    An LLC board member reports that in Finland believers skipped services to follow the World Junior hockey championship, something he can only call a temptation; it shows SRK members following organized sports.
  • Unidentified speaker, Rockford (RLLC-LLC discussion), 2018-01-21 unity-claim ▶ 00:51:52 transcript
    “I heard that in Finland, for example, people are accepting birth control now for a couple of years for Christ. I've only lived here for four years, but I don't believe that the way of believing in Finland has changed in the last four years.”
    A Finnish-born member denies rumors that Finland now accepts birth control; shows such rumors were circulating in LLC congregations by 2018. Machine transcript, garbled in places.
  • Jaakko Kaltakari, LLC Winter Services, 2018-02-22 unity-claim ▶ 00:09:24
    “Here, you dear travel friends believe the same way as we do in Finland. Se on mahdollista vain Jumalan pyhän hengen työn kautta. It is possible only by the work of God's Holy Spirit.”
    SRK visitor's unity claim, 2018.
  • John Lehtola, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-06 srk-not-doctrine ▶ 01:15:14 transcript
    “A big issue back in the 1990s was whether every issue is either black or white for believers or are there such things as gray areas? There was a column in the recent Voice of Zion on the back page. It was in the February issue, [written] by Harri Vähäjylkkä. He clearly states that everything is not black and white for all believers. There are gray areas. … Another believer came in and shut off the television. He said, believers do not watch television. It was black and white”
    An SRK-sent minister's Voice of Zion column (Feb 2018) conceding 'gray areas', used against the black-and-white television rule; the column itself is not in the corpus. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-31 finland-differs ▶ 00:39:55 transcript
    “Birth control. As the new pastor in Phoenix said, that a mother with health problems and issues doesn't have to throw herself in front of a train. Another Finnish brother who recently was here said that a mother when she's caring for her health is not birth control.”
    Second-hand report of a Finnish (SRK) minister's teaching that a mother caring for her health 'is not birth control'; the same speaker repeats it on 30 Sep 2018 [00:56:12]. Machine transcript.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (MLLC), 2018-05-31 finland-differs ▶ 02:32:55 transcript
    “I came here 13 years ago and I felt that I came to the jail. I live in Christian Freedom in Finland. It means that there was nobody watching … And for people, when they say here that, yeah, we live in freedom, maybe you don't know what the freedom is. And it's different. There's many things that have been different here.”
    A Finnish-raised member describes LLC life as 'jail' compared with 'Christian freedom in Finland' where 'nobody was watching'; machine transcript, speaker not named on tape.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2018-07-01 finland-differs ▶ 00:19:26
    “one of the brothers from Finland who was here around those years, Einari [Lepistö]. And he writes in there how one of the things that was affecting here in North America that wasn't really at that time in Finland was television. And it seemed like a… an easy decision for those in Finland at that time, that it wasn't something that a believer took to their home, but he visited many homes where there were televisions there openly used.”
    In the 1970s Finland's line on television was, per Lepistö, firmer than North America's; the television rule was not an American invention.
  • Eero Nuolioja (as recorded in the LLC Board synopsis), LLC Board (Monticello), 2018-10-27 unity-claim document (PDF)
    “Eero Nuolioja relayed greetings from the SRK Board and staff, Opisto boards, and also from the LLC congregations he served on his month-long mission trip. He expressed thankfulness for the unity of faith and commented that they believe the same in Finland as we do here.”
    A visiting SRK minister's unity claim recorded in LLC board minutes, 2018.
  • Jim Frantti, Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 unity-claim ▶ 00:59:45 transcript
    “So this kind of question or decision is not unique to North America. And sometimes we hear that in Finland everything is different than here. It hasn't been my experience at all. They believe the same there, they face the same struggles there.”
    The LLC chairman answers the 'Finland is different' complaint at the Jan 2019 joint boards meeting; attribution rests on the human transcript's labels (quote falls in his 1:19-1:35 turn). Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Jon Bloomquist, Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 unity-claim ▶ 01:34:16 transcript
    “I think in American Christianity we believe the same way that they believe in Finnish Christianity, the same way that SRK in the book presents that.”
    An LLC director ties the unity claim to the SRK book itself, the book whose p. 180 warns against making culture into doctrine. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Kimmo Puolitaival, Longview, 2019-07-16 unity-claim ▶ 00:01:55
    “I have felt so that the Holy Spirit's the same faith and the same doctrine is here as it is in Finland.”
    SRK visitor claims 'the same doctrine', the word the LLC avoids for these practices.
  • Unidentified speaker, Elk River, 2019-10-19 srk-not-doctrine ▶ 00:31:45 transcript
    “the decision that was made is that a believing teacher cannot and should not use television as a teaching tool in any form or fashion in the classroom. Hundreds of believing teachers were there and they left that meeting dumbfounded. … it said that we cannot make any fast and firm rule that the Holy Spirit will guide us. Case by case. So I have heard believers say that that decision, official decision that was made was an error.”
    Paivamies (Sept 2019) presents the 1978 SRK television-in-classroom decision as a case where an assembled body erred and says no fast rule can be made.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Outlook, 2019-11-09 srk-not-doctrine ▶ 00:06:38
    “And this Marco asked me, Harry, how do you believe you live at church? How is your faith? What was my answer? For example, we don't watch TV. That's all, like, nice, nice, nice faith. We don't watch TV, that's all. Oh, your faith is you don't watch TV. Is there anything else, like any God or...”
    An SRK minister mocks his boyhood answer that faith is 'we don't watch TV'; Finnish believers keep the practice, but he treats defining faith by it as empty. Cuts both ways.
  • John Lehtola, Wolf Lake, 2019-12-07 srk-statement ▶ 01:54:18 transcript
    “The rejection of birth control and abortion arises on the part of everyone as a personal matter on the basis of faith. In Christianity, as elsewhere, there are mothers who have lost their health. The ill, whether they be physically or psychologically ill, need medical help and rest. … This signifies, as needed, a time of fasting and prayer according to the Word of God and not birth control. The believers have taken a stand on this matter in a large speakers and elders meeting in Finland in the 1970s.”
    SRK teaching as published: rejection of birth control is 'a personal matter on the basis of faith', with room for health; the same article also cites a 1970s speakers' meeting stand, so it cuts both ways. Human-labelled transcript.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Wolf Lake, 2019-12-07 unity-claim ▶ 02:43:15 transcript
    “We had about 20 ministers. They were all Finnish ministers. There was no connection to North America. When I was asked, are the sermons more merciful [of grace] in Finland than here? Are the sermons here more law-minded? My experience is this that, no. I have found the same faith and spirit.”
    An SRK minister denies at the Dec 2019 meeting that Finnish sermons are more gracious; human-labelled transcript.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC Annual Meeting 2020, 2020-07 unity-claim document (PDF)
    “We have felt the guidance of God's spirit which has preserved the unity of love and spirit and faith. This same unity exists with the boards of our sister organizations in Finland and Sweden, We work together in virtually every area of work we have and feel like we function more like one board in different locations.”
    The LLC chairman's official claim that the LLC and SRK boards 'function more like one board in different locations'.
  • SRK Board of Directors, Finland (SRK), 2020-11-11 unity-claim document (PDF)
    “The SRK and its Board of Directors have full confidence in the operations of the LLC. We feel that we have mutual faith and the ensuing fellowship of the Holy Spirit.”
    The SRK board's public endorsement of the LLC during the division; the claim of 'mutual faith' the page can set against the SRK's own 2011 statement and book.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Rockford, 2021-01-05 srk-accepts ▶ 00:18:53
    “because in Finland then, as probably now, sports is a big temptation. … he was a good hockey player and he had received the grace of repentance and I gathered he was still playing hockey on some level and he was also a student of theology … finally, his wife told him that one of these things has to go. That you can't have all three.”
    A Finnish believer and theology student kept playing hockey after repentance; he gave it up because of marriage, not a congregational decision. Waaraniemi still frames sports as temptation.
  • Seppo Sarkiniemi (chapter 'Fundamentalism'), Finland (SRK publication, sold by the LLC), 2022-01-01 srk-not-doctrine quoted from the book
    “Fundamentalist influences have also been visible in the difficulty of [distinguishing] between culture and doctrine. Cultural issues may then give rise to doctrines that slowly begin to be demanded as prereguisites for salvation.”
    The SRK book names the making of cultural issues into doctrine as a fundamentalist error; 'prereguisites' and the hyphenated 'distin- guishing' are OCR artefacts of the LLC edition.
  • Seppo Sarkiniemi (chapter 'Fundamentalism'), Finland (SRK publication, sold by the LLC), 2022-01-01 srk-not-doctrine quoted from the book
    “protects against both doctrinal errors as well as the extension of biblical norms to the realm of the secular regiment, to which political and cultural issues inherently belong. In these matters, the [Christian] makes choices guided by living faith so that he or she can live with a good conscience.”
    Cultural issues are assigned to the secular regiment where the individual Christian chooses by faith and conscience; the opposite of a congregational decision binding on all. 'Chris- tian' is hyphenated across a line in the OCR.
  • Pentti Rentola, Finland (SRK publication, sold by the LLC), 2022-01-01 srk-not-doctrine quoted from the book
    “The relationship between faith and culture has been much discussed. Re- ligion has not ceased to exist, but rather it remains a major cultural and societal influence. Faith is not culture, although practicing religion may include cultural characteristics.”
    The SRK book's premise that faith and culture are distinct; 'Re- ligion' is a line-break hyphen in the OCR.
  • Pentti Rentola, Finland (SRK publication, sold by the LLC), 2022-01-01 srk-not-doctrine quoted from the book
    “One person gladly becomes refreshed with good music, either listening to or playing music. Another enjoys exercise and nature. … We are different, and our interests vary. Drawing the line between good and unsuitable hobbies is sometimes difficult. Even believers may have conflicting opinions about what is [suitable].”
    The SRK book leaves music and hobbies to differing opinions among believers; no list of forbidden pastimes anywhere in the book. 'suit- able' is hyphenated in the OCR.
  • Pentti Rentola, Finland (SRK publication, sold by the LLC), 2022-01-01 srk-statement quoted from the book
    “The cultural offerings of our time are largely centered around entertain- ment. They feed a persons lusts and desires via the senses and open the way for destructive temptations. Entertainment culture distorts, among other things, sexuality which is seen or heard in dress, speech, music, movies and literature.”
    The closest the SRK book comes to the LLC list; it warns about entertainment content but names no practice as sin or as revealed by the congregation.
  • Unidentified speaker, LLC board-member workshop, 2022-04-30 unity-claim ▶ 00:38:25 transcript
    “We have experienced there also such a complete unity of faith and spirit. We meet frequently with, for example, those who serve in SRK in Finland, and we have always together marveled at the unity of understanding and faith and spirit between us. And that can't come from the flesh.”
    'Complete unity of faith and spirit' with the SRK claimed two months before the 2022 expulsions; machine transcript, speaker not named.
  • Unidentified speaker, Minneapolis (LLC-MLLC meeting), 2022-05-14 unity-claim ▶ 02:36:07 transcript
    “We have been told, for example, that the teaching in North America is law-minded and in Finland it's grace. I haven't experienced that. I've made many trips to Finland. I met regularly with brothers there. And the sermons I hear there and the sermons I hear here, they're the sermons of faith.”
    The 'law here, grace in Finland' complaint rejected by an LLC board member weeks before the expulsion vote; machine transcript, speaker not named.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC Summer Services, 2022-07-01 unity-claim ▶ 00:07:38
    “Because we have always felt such great unity of faith and spirit with our fellow travelers there in Finland. And it has given to us also great comfort and encouragement when we can experience that unity and oneness in faith.”
    LLC chairman's unity claim the day before the 2022 Annual Meeting expulsions.
  • Tuula Mattila, LLC Annual Meeting 2022, 2022-07-02 finland-differs ▶ 00:50:16 transcript
    “So I moved here from Finland about eight years ago. And pretty soon after we moved here, I started noticing something around in sermons. … Speakers didn't quite say I was used to hear or how that game was supposed to go. And they were really humble and small changes, but often they were towards our own endeavor or our own words or … Or maybe sometimes law-minded or some kind of demand of our own that how we keep our faith.”
    A member raised in Finland tells the 2022 Annual Meeting that LLC sermons differ from Finnish ones toward 'our own endeavor' and 'law-minded' demands; speaker attribution from the attributed transcript.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Oulu (SRK-LLC-SFC joint meeting), 2022-09-30 unity-claim document (PDF)
    “In various discussions with the LLC, a connection and common understanding that is created by the same faith and the Holy Spirit have been felt. There has been no doubt that we believe exactly the same way. In Finland and Sweden, the understanding has remained that the congregation of God is also present among believers in North America.”
    The strongest written unity claim: the sister organizations say they 'believe exactly the same way'; the same meeting took the LLC's account of the 2022 expulsions.
  • Harri Vähäjylkkä, Oulu (SRK-LLC-SFC joint meeting), 2022-09-30 unity-claim document (PDF)
    “In the discussion it was brought out that the view of some is that in North America, in LLC congregations, the law is preached to the believers, while in Finland grace is preached. The meeting representatives did not agree with this observation.”
    The 'law here, grace in Finland' complaint was put to the sister organizations in 2022 and formally rejected; the page's evidence is that the difference shows in practice (TV, sports, Halloween) rather than in sermon wording.
  • Peter Hill (reading the LLC Board synopsis of 21 Jan 2023, reporting Valde Palola), Ishpeming, 2023-02-19 unity-claim ▶ 00:47:08
    “SRK Chairman Valde … kept the opening speech where he spoke to the heresy in North America and how SRK, SFC, and LLC have visited frequently in recent years and have been of one faith and understanding. In North America, congregations continue to visit locally and acknowledge that years of division has ended in heresy.”
    The SRK chairman's Jan 2023 speakers'-meeting claim that SRK, SFC and LLC are 'of one faith and understanding', relayed through LLC board minutes.
  • Lauri Nevala, Phoenix, 2023-10-09 unity-claim ▶ 00:13:17
    “God's kingdom is the same here as it is in Finland. That we believe the same way, the same spirit is there, is here.”
    LLC board member's unity claim after a trip to Finland.
  • James Moll, Prescott Valley, 2023-11-01 finland-differs ▶ 00:06:36
    “years ago we had a congregation discussion meeting in Phoenix and our congregation was discussing celebrating Halloween. … And we were having this discussion, and there's some brothers that come from Finland, some speaker brothers, And we were describing to him what happens on this night in our country and how people celebrate it … They were shocked. And at that time we decided this is not the way we want to celebrate this evening.”
    The Halloween line is a Phoenix congregational decision made after Finnish speaker brothers had to have the custom explained to them; Halloween is not an SRK question at all.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2024-07-02 unity-claim ▶ 00:23:17
    “But now, so many years later, when I listen to that, I recognize how even today we have that same kind of unity of faith with the brothers from Finland. And it hasn't changed.”
    LLC board member: unity of faith with Finland 'hasn't changed' since the 1970s.
  • Jorma Vuorma, Monticello, 2025-03-30 srk-accepts ▶ 00:18:33
    “As the U.S. had recently won the World Cup. And Finland was not able to compete. But it did not affect us a lot. … Ja olen seurannut sen verran itsekin urheilua. And as I followed sports. … And I don't know if the players trained at the game last night. That they'd be in good shape for the married singles game last night. But we won't concentrate on that.”
    An SRK minister says in Finnish that he himself has followed sports ('olen seurannut sen verran itsekin urheilua') and jokes about the congregation's married-vs-singles hockey game; no hint that following sport is sin. Interpreted sermon.
  • Ilmari Korhonen, Williston, 2025-07-23 unity-claim ▶ 00:02:50
    “We have rejoiced in a fraternal congregation between LLC and SRK. We have always felt that we have the same Father in the heaven, the same understanding of faith, and the same destination, the eternal life in the glory.”
    SRK board greeting 2025: 'the same understanding of faith'.
  • James Jurmu, LLC Summer Services, 2026-07-02 unity-claim ▶ 00:05:35
    “The work of this LLC continues in the world where we live together with cooperation from the children of God there in Finland and in Sweden and we thank the Heavenly Father for that unity of faith and understanding and that love that he has given to us when we are able to serve so closely together even on a weekly basis there at the office.”
    The current LLC chairman's 2026 claim of 'unity of faith and understanding' with the SRK.
  • Tapani Kinnunen (SRK board; interpreted by Jouko Haapsaari), LLC Annual Meeting 2026, 2026-07-03 unity-claim ▶ 01:46:30 transcript
    “Others explained unto us how they believed. and they asked do we understand in the same way? Do we believe in these basic questions in the same way? And always when we had a discussion, we noticed, yes, we believe the same way. … That between us there is the [love of the] children of God. And we believe in the same way.”
    The SRK representative's unity claim at the 2026 Annual Meeting, limited to 'these basic questions'.
  • Jussi Rentola, Spokane, 2026-07-12 unity-claim ▶ 00:09:19
    “That a common understanding of faith is present in Finland and here in North America. There is one faith and one spirit.”
    SRK visitor's 2026 unity claim; the audio_url carries a '2027' typo in the archive.
Reading Scripture and quotations treated as a fault 21 statements: 0 sermons by 0 ministers, 21 statements at 12 meetings, 0 documents (2018–2022) ↑ top

First, the statements in which speakers on the LLC side faulted the reading of prepared statements, quotations or Scripture, or granted that what was read was accurate and set it aside for want of the Spirit. Then, kept separate: the LLC side’s own reading of prepared texts, and the answers of those faulted. Passages from archive recordings are not on this site and are not linked.

  • unidentified speaker, Rockford LLC (RLLC) congregation discussion, 2018-01-21 selective quotation ▶ 00:05:58 transcript
    “One thing when I kind of hear like partial quotes … There can be full quotes from the heart of something, a document or a sermon or something that Luther wrote. I don't know if that's the nature of me or what, but I do get a little, I suppose, cautious about that.”
    Opening the discussion; a caution about partial quotations from documents, sermons and Luther. The speaker names no one.
  • unidentified speaker (he sets the time for the discussion, as a moderator would), LLC ministers camp, April 2018 (Tom Huhta session), 2018-04-15 quotations discouraged ▶ 00:23:51 transcript
    “But in the interest of time, we only have about an hour of time. I'd ask that we avoid long speeches. … Let's try to avoid... We all agree with those quotes. And speak what you feel, like you did in the end of your speech, Tom.”
    Said right after Tom Huhta's speech. A second recording of the session (archive only, not on this site) has a fuller wording at [00:42:46]: “The quotes, the long quotes, we all agree with them when they're taken from dear brother's sermons.”
  • Keith Waaraniemi, MLLC / RLLC meeting at the LLC office, 2018-04-24 asking for Scripture as the fault ▶ 04:03:52 transcript
    “And John has said that he feels that what he's quoting is how he believes. And I believe that. And so, the stuff that is continuously quoted, I have to believe that that's where John's concerns lie. … John has answered, well, feelings don't mean anything to me. Show me a scripture where I'm wrong. But, brothers and sisters, the Spirit of God works in God's children. … And we can't dismiss it just because someone says that if you can't prove it with Scripture, then I won't listen to it.”
    Called as “Keith” at [03:55:57]; John Lehtola was not present. Interpretation: the request to be shown an error from Scripture is put forward as the fault. Asked for particulars, he said there were other things “I don't need to get into” [04:12:19].
  • John Lehtola, reporting what had been said of him, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-06 criticism reported by its target ▶ 01:15:44 transcript
    “In others, my sermons are too academic. I use notes. I use quotes of others.”
    The criticism as its target reported it; the critics' own words are not on this tape.
  • Janelle Lehtola (Minneapolis), reporting criticism of John Lehtola, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-06 criticism reported by its target ▶ 01:25:36 transcript
    “John was admonished for studying for sermons, prepping for sermons, researching for sermons, using note cards or outlines, using the easier language of the different translations for the Bible class, even though he was on the committee for exploring a new Bible translation.”
    A second-hand report of earlier criticism; the critics' own words are not on this tape.
  • unidentified minister, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-31 prepared speeches or statements ▶ 02:25:13 transcript
    “Those brothers didn't bring their own wisdom there. They didn't bring their own research and prepared speeches and thorough Bible knowledge. They simply brought their hearts and they listened to that word and they confirmed with the spirit that was in them”
    Describing his first ministers' camp. The same meeting had opened with Russ Roiko presenting Jim Frantti's prepared camp presentation (see below).
  • Don Lahti (Brainerd), Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 accurate but without the Spirit ▶ 01:06:15 transcript
    “When I heard Al Lake speak, I have to agree with what Tommi and others have mentioned. I was confused. It seems like the spirit did not come clear. I'm not disagreeing with a lot of the quotations that you read from scripture. They are factual. But my question arises from the fact that why doesn't something answer to the spirit?”
    Called by the chair at [01:01:46]; speaking to Al Lake of Wolf Lake. The Scripture readings are conceded to be “factual” and set aside.
  • the moderator (by role: he calls the next speakers), LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (afternoon), 2019-04-13 documents not to be read ▶ 01:17:58 transcript
    “So I think this idea of sending documents out and whatever, I think it's a very, very dangerous road to go down. … And some of the stuff I've received, I actually haven't even read it … because I looked at the first page and I already knew. The Spirit told me that there's no reason to read this.”
    On the documents circulated before the workshop; he says he did not read some of them. The workshop recording has no row anchors, so the link opens the audio.
  • Don Lahti, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello (evening), 2019-04-13 accurate but without the Spirit ▶ 01:47:33 transcript
    “The words that are spoken we cannot disagree with. They have quoted scripture, but so did the devil quote scripture. … And I say there is a false spirit that is trying to work its way into God's kingdom.”
    His turn runs from [01:44:37] to [01:58:40]: he served on the AALC and LLC boards and says his carpool must leave after the next speech, and that next speaker says “like Don mentioned, our carpool is ready to leave” [02:04:33]. Also listed under The Word and the congregation.
  • unidentified speaker, Elk River congregation discussion on the Holy Spirit, 2019-10-19 quotations discouraged ▶ 00:50:30 transcript
    “I think Brother John, when you're reading quotes from this mother [brother] or that brother, we want to be careful of that and not giving credit to them.”
    “John” is John Lehtola by inference: earlier in the discussion he had quoted Luther and SRK sources. No one said which quotation was false.
  • unidentified speaker, Elk River congregation discussion on the Holy Spirit, 2019-10-19 selective quotation ▶ 01:07:02 transcript
    “We certainly can't take man's word and pass that on as understanding. Men, individual men, err. We all err. … These articles that are quoted, I don't know the full context, quoting such a small portion of an article, what is the full context?”
    Same discussion, said of the sources quoted earlier; the speaker does not say what the context would change.
  • Nick Ylitalo (Menahga), Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 2021-11-20 prepared speeches or statements ▶ 02:15:00 transcript
    “We have God's written word. But without the Spirit speaking and opening it, it's a dead word. … The whole world has the written scriptures, and they can form their defenses to how they believe from the scriptures, which is why there's probably hundreds of denominations. And so it seems when some of you come to teach God's kingdom, you have your defenses prepared ahead of time, oftentimes. And we hear them, but we don't hear the comforter there.”
    Self-introduced at [02:08:10]. He goes on to ask how long “these other voices” may speak in the kingdom [02:16:30].
  • Loren Ylioja (Dunblane), Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 2021-11-20 selective quotation ▶ 03:54:03 transcript
    “What John Lehtola was saying, I guess I would call it cherry-picking a certain portion out of a sermon to find that which feeds what I would like to hear. … So I don't think it's fair to take small and certain portions or even single sermons To justify one's actions or beliefs.”
    Self-introduced at [03:50:07]. Earlier the same day the LLC side read from the continent-wide meeting synopsis and from Juhani Uljas (see below).
  • Keith Hillukka (Phoenix board chairman), Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 prepared speeches or statements ▶ 00:23:33 transcript
    “I also just want to encourage you to speak from the heart. I know at times we read a lot of prepared statements and whatnot, and I think we're going to have a lot of … this evening, so it'd be good if we could just keep it to what's on our heart and mind. As it says in Matthew 10, 19, and 20. But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak, for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.”
    Opening the meeting about the speaker Brett Rintamaki. Interpretation: Matthew 10:19–20 is Jesus' word to disciples brought before governors and kings.
  • Sheryl Simonson (Phoenix), Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 accurate but without the Spirit ▶ 02:51:47 transcript
    “But there was just no revelation and no life. Most of it is just reading scripture. Well, you can't say that that's wrong because every word in the Bible is true. So if somebody just keeps reading scripture and reading scripture, you can't say that the sermon was faulty. But there just was no life.”
    On Brett Rintamaki's sermons. Nothing in them is named as wrong; the complaint is that they were mostly Scripture. Also listed under The Word and the congregation.
  • Molly Raisanen (Phoenix), Phoenix congregation meeting about Brett Rintamaki, 2022-01-08 Bible verses as proof ▶ 03:34:42 transcript
    “Regarding the Bible verses that are brought up here, I kind of am looking at those as the Bible sort of being weaponized. … And so I get worried when they bring up all these Bible verses because I think they're just, it's like, well, here it says this, here it says this, here it says this. So this proves our point. … I don't think God or Jesus would want us to bring up all these verses and use their words to prove points.”
    Same meeting; greeted as “Molly” just before her turn [03:34:15]. Interpretation: aimed at the verses read by those speaking for Brett Rintamaki.
  • Jim Moll (Prescott Valley), LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 accurate but without the Spirit ▶ 00:40:45 transcript
    “For example, you accurately quote God's word, but so does the enemy of souls. And the quotation of God's words, which are accurate, the understanding has been lost. Without the Holy Spirit, your brother, there's darkness.”
    Addressed to “my brother” in Minneapolis [00:40:20]; the accuracy of the quotations is conceded. Also listed under The Word and the congregation.
  • Timo Hotari (Toronto delegate), LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 accurate but without the Spirit ▶ 01:17:53 transcript
    “Listening to his speaking [turns], quoted Bible portions. I've had many friends in the world that were of different denominations that have quoted the Bible much better than I have. … One side is humble and is begging for grace. The other side is quoting the Bible and wanting to be a part of a group. … No finger pointing. No reciting. Bible portions as a defense.”
    Before the vote. Also listed under The Word and the congregation (with the wording of another transcript at [01:18:52]).
  • Andrew Skoog (Rockford), LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 accurate but without the Spirit ▶ 01:47:04 transcript
    “I can't resonate with some of these, some of the comments that come about, even what Gary has said about the Constitution. All I want to do is get to heaven and believe with the rest of Zion. The document is there just as a guideline. If you don't have the Holy Spirit, you have to lean on these things.”
    On the LLC Constitution, after another speaker (“Gary”) had cited it: the written document is what one leans on without the Spirit.
  • the moderator, LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 prepared speeches or statements ▶ 03:04:07 transcript
    “If you have some prepared statements, maybe you can email them in. But for the interest of time, I just want to limit this to the delegates, if there's any more comments from the delegates.”
    Procedural, said during Ann Parks's turn; she went on, and her answer is below.
  • unidentified speaker, Rockford delegate report, 2022-10-23 Bible verses as proof ▶ 01:09:58 transcript
    “We can go round and round and round and read scripture and talk about how we forgive, who we should forgive. We're tired. We've gone over this for many, many years.”
    After the removals. He goes on: “My spirit does not say amen” [01:10:27].
Counterpoint: the LLC side read prepared texts itself (not counted)
  • Jim Frantti (presiding; inferred from the recording), asking LLC board member Keith Waaraniemi to read, LLC ministers' camp, Stony Lake (Friday session), 2016-04-15 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 00:35:06 transcript
    “I'm just going to ask our brother Keith to read from a summary he prepared for last Friday's meeting. … this part of this introduction tonight with a few additional comments that I didn't mention at April 8th.”
    Keith (named on the tape) reads his written account of the Wolf Lake meetings, to about [00:49:14], and further sections of the same text on Saturday morning and at 4:00 p.m. Saturday morning is part 3 and the 4:00 p.m. session part 5 of the posted camp transcript.
  • unidentified speaker, guidance to ministers on the rites, LLC ministers' camp, Stony Lake (Saturday 1:00 p.m. session), 2018-04-14 LLC side reads a prepared text archive recording, not on this site [00:06:19]
    “it's either reading those sermons or keeping an extemporaneous sermon. Either option is acceptable. … There's a lot of good in reading those sermons in the Sacred Acts manuals”
    Reading a written sermon at the rites is “acceptable.” Archive recording, not on this site.
  • Russ Roiko (addressed as “Russ” at [00:25:43]), Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-05-31 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 00:09:21 transcript
    “So what I've been asked to attempt to do, dear brothers and sisters, is to use this presentation that our dear brother Jim Frantti kept at minister's camp … So Jim titled his presentation, Current Work and Conditions in Zion.”
    The meeting at which a minister later said the camp brothers brought no “prepared speeches” (above) opened with a prepared presentation, relayed.
  • Keith Waaraniemi (LLC board), Menahga joint boards meeting, 2019-01-12 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 00:29:49 transcript
    “I was going to read in a book here because I don't know how to remember things and speak them into mic, but like confession is not needed since absolution proclaimed and the original conversion is sufficient for a lifetime.”
    Speaking of Al Lake; identified from the human transcript of the meeting. Al Lake answered by reading 1 John 2:12 [00:30:16]; Don Lahti's “factual” remark (above) came about half an hour later.
  • the Minneapolis board chairman, Minneapolis meeting with the LLC board, 2019-11-24 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 00:32:38 transcript
    “So I'm gonna read this introduction that we read at our last congregation meeting. I also read it with the … LLC brothers whom we met Friday evening.”
    The board's written introduction. The board majority had contacted the LLC for help without a congregation vote [00:36:59], [00:38:50].
  • the Minneapolis board's report, read by “Mike” (first name only on the tape), Minneapolis annual meeting, 2020-03-08 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 01:04:38 transcript
    “Nine of the 11 board members were in agreement with it. So I'll read it. It's kind of long, but I'll try to move right along.”
    The report spoke of “a different voice, a dividing voice” [01:06:06] (point 7). Members called it one-sided; one asked what the different voice was.
  • Paul Pylvainen (Minneapolis), Minneapolis annual meeting, 2020-03-08 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 01:40:47 transcript
    “The other board members that participated in that report, they wrote, I believe, what was in their hearts. And we heard in our opening sermon today that we would speak what's in our hearts.”
    Called by the chair at [01:39:49]. A written report, read aloud, defended as speaking from the heart. Roland Keranen (Minneapolis) answered: “We don't need divisive letters like this that we just read” [01:51:26].
  • the meeting's presenter, Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 2021-11-20 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 00:30:20 transcript
    “Juhani Uljas explains in the book, The Treasure Hid in a Field, how God's congregation is the community of people whom the Holy Spirit has sanctified. And I'll read from that portion of the book … But that was what I had prepared”
    The day's presentation on John 15, read in part from a book and from prepared text (to [01:04:31]); the same meeting heard the “cherry-picking” charge against John Lehtola (above).
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 2021-11-20 LLC side reads a prepared text ▶ 02:30:12 transcript
    “And so I've tried to gather some thoughts together from things that have been said recently and discussions, and I'll try not to spend too much time on that, but I will try. The continent-wide meeting synopsis has these kinds of statements in it … There is a concern that a different understanding on the doctrine of the congregation exists in our midst.”
    Called by the chair at [02:23:21]. He reads the written synopsis of the May 2021 continent-wide meeting, the only doctrinal list on the tape.
Answers on the record (not counted)
  • John Lehtola, Minneapolis Congregation Meeting, 2018-09-30 answer ▶ 01:05:19 transcript
    “And what did I say? I read two statements on continual forgiveness. Well, the first one wasn't even, didn't even use the term continual forgiveness. It was continual grace.”
    On his speaking turn at the April 2018 ministers' camp; the second statement, he says, was from the SRK's Summer Services.
  • Warren Raisanen (Phoenix), LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 answer ▶ 00:59:05 transcript
    “the reaction in the Monticello speeches, I was dumbfounded at the amount of reactions … that condemned it, but for the most part, said nothing specific about it. … I am reading from a transcript.”
    On the written confession of faith he co-wrote with Eric Skoog (timeline, April 2, 2019) and the April 2019 workshop's response; he then reads the workshop speaker's words back from a transcript.
  • Roland Keranen (Minneapolis), LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 answer ▶ 02:07:43 transcript
    “And there are those that have made very clear statements, just friends and associates, have said that, I put my trust in the LLC. And well, don't we want to go to Scripture? Well, no, I don't need that because I've been told that. We had a discussion in my former local congregation where it was emphasized that we don't need to read the Scriptures.”
    His account of what he had heard; he does not name those who said it. Speaker as named in the meeting's typed transcript.
  • Priscilla Ylitalo (Brainerd), LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 answer ▶ 02:12:33 transcript
    “In Alaska I was told, oh, you, oh, you can't read the Bible, you got to have the Holy Spirit to … read the Bible. I said, what? When we were, when we were younger, when the heresy went, we were all admonished to take your Bibles, open them up. It was a joy to read the Bible.”
    Self-introduced at [02:10:41]. Capitals and punctuation added to an unpunctuated machine-transcript row; the words are unchanged.
  • Lori Alajoki (Wolf Lake), LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 answer ▶ 03:00:31 transcript
    “Did you say that if a person hears the sermon and finds that they have to go read the scripture, that they're not trusting the spirit, that there might be maybe fault with the listener? Or what did you say?”
    Called by the chair at [02:59:56]; a question to an earlier speaker from Finland. His answer [03:01:01] does not take up reading.
  • Peter Ojala (Seattle), LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 answer ▶ 01:41:51 transcript
    “Fellow believers, in a way, rebuking other believers from reading from the Bible. In some ways, I understand it. In other ways, I don't. And I just wanted to share this.”
    He then reads Luke 13:6–9, the barren fig tree.
  • Ann Parks (Minneapolis), LLC annual meeting, 2022-07-02 answer ▶ 03:04:27 transcript
    “But regarding the two spirits, Jesus was tempted by the devil in the wilderness … If we don't use the word to defend our faith, what do we use? If it is truly the highest authority as our bylaws construct our Constitution even state, why wouldn't we use it to defend what we believe is true?”
    Answering the moderator's “prepared statements” remark, made during her turn; the chair then says “Okay, Anne, if we could just wrap it up” [03:05:09].
Other statements 19 statements: 5 sermons by 5 ministers, 8 statements at 8 meetings, 5 documents (2017–2026) ↑ top
  • John Lehtola, Phoenix, 2017-04-13 communion is not absolution; Christ's presence brings continual forgiveness ▶ 00:43:33
    “And we don't have this understanding that, that, uh, if we have sin on our conscience, that, uh, that when we come to communion, then through participating in the Lord's holy supper, then we receive absolution, that those sins that bother us are then removed. No, we want to, uh, if we need to find relief and comfort for our troubled soul, we want to talk to another brother and sister in faith and then hear that oral proclamation of the gospel, of the forgiveness of sins. But yet, there is the real presence of Christ in the elements. And where Christ is and where he is present, there is continual forgiveness of sins. Not in the sense of absolution, but where Christ is present, there is the continual forgiveness of sins.”
    Lehtola expressly denies the position later complained of at Rockford 2019 ('they go to the communion table and receive their sins forgiven'); he keeps absolution oral and separate.
  • LLC, LLC Annual Meeting Minutes 2018, 2018-10-02 dates the 2015 annual meeting document (PDF)
    “The current dues rate was established by the July 4, 2015, LLC Annual Meeting”
    Fixes the 2015 LLC Annual Meeting at Outlook Summer Services on Saturday, July 4, 2015, the session during which Darwin Lake's sermon was kept.
  • Scott Simonson, LLC Board Members' Workshop, Monticello, 2019-04-13 disinviting ministers without consulting the congregation; putting words in mouths ▶ 02:02:25 transcript
    “if we as ministers and board members are troubled with another believer, would we not consult the congregation before going to say that you're not welcome? ... Another thing that troubles many is the putting of thoughts ... and words into people's mouths that they don't think and they don't say they don't believe. ... To say something that somebody doesn't believe. To say that they believe something they don't. It seems that simple to me.”
    Speaker introduced by the moderator as Scott Simonson [01:56:40]; objects to disinviting ministers without the congregation and to mischaracterizing beliefs.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC board meeting with the Wolf Lake congregation, 2019-12-07 LLC removed the 2015 Outlook sermon from the archive ▶ 00:22:47 transcript
    “I think what started a series of meetings was there was a sermon kept by our brother Darwin in Outlook. It raised some concern among believers. It seemed like it caused some divisions. Some spoke very favorably of it and some felt very troubled by it. The LLC board and staff had discussed it and thought that if it is causing division, maybe it is best that we not keep it on the archives where it is aired for all of the public and the world to hear.”
    The LLC chairman confirms the sermon was pulled from the public archive by board and staff decision; explains why no copy exists on llc-archive-sermons.
  • Scott Simonson, Longview, 2020-10-04 preaches continual forgiveness with continual repentance ▶ 00:29:42
    “every believer, even those who, and those who have been born again, that live of the gospel, they not only walk in continual forgiveness, but they walk in continual repentance.”
    His last archive sermons are 2 May 2021. No record states the reason; this is his one 'continual forgiveness' sermon. He was later removed from preaching: his last sermon in the LLC archive is 2 May 2021 at Longview, and the Seattle and Longview archives continue with hundreds of sermons by others after that date.
  • Steven Kallinen, Monticello, 2020-11-23 'show me in the Bible where I am wrong' called not a heart of faith ▶ 00:23:43
    “That they would place the highest authority on the written word. But how can man even understand the written word if he doesn't have the keys of the kingdom of heaven? To open that word. And reference to demands of some in our time who say, show me in the Bible where I am wrong. That's not a heart of faith.”
    Same sermon as the absolution complaint; treats asking to be shown error from Scripture as unbelief, against the book's rule of examining doctrine by the Word.
  • Neil Waaraniemi, Menahga and Wolf Lake boards meeting, 2021-03-26 dates the sermon to the annual-meeting session ▶ 03:02:13 transcript
    “it was not the LLC board whose ears were pricked during that sermon because they were in the annual meeting at the time.”
    Places the sermon during the 2015 LLC Annual Meeting, which the LLC's 2018 minutes date to July 4, 2015 (Outlook, Saskatchewan).
  • LLC (synopsis of the May 7-8, 2021 continent-wide meeting), Synopsis of LLC Meeting May 7-8, 2021, 2021-05-14 'different understanding on the doctrine of the congregation' as the stated concern document (PDF)
    “There is a concern that a different understanding on the doctrine of the congregation exists in our midst.”
    The LLC's written summary of the 2021 meeting lists the concern but states no teaching of Minneapolis or Wolf Lake contrary to the Word.
  • Jim Frantti, Ministers' teleconference, 2021-11-04 names the doctrine of the congregation as a cause; Word is highest authority typed transcript (PDF)
    “It seems like one matter is the doctrine of the congregation. We will have a chance to hear the very good presentation that our brother Matti Taskila prepared. ... Of course, it is important. God's Word is our highest authority. God's Word is the light that shows the pathway to heaven. God's Word is our foundation.”
    Names 'the doctrine of the congregation' as an underlying matter without defining it, while affirming the book's rule that God's Word is the highest authority.
  • Keith Waaraniemi, Midwest boards meeting (MBMAC), 2021-11-20 defines the doctrine of the congregation; Word is highest authority ▶ 02:34:49 transcript
    “Then the doctrine of the congregation. The Holy Spirit is the third person in the Godhead. It governs the congregation. We have discussed it in recent years. Some feel like we are emphasizing the spirit without the word. There have been phrases like, spirit, spirit, spirit. It is like – that is all we speak about is the spirit. Of course, the spirit reveals what is in God's Word. It cannot be otherwise. We cannot separate and decide ourselves that this is the spirit, if it is not according to God's Word. God's Word is the highest authority.”
    An LLC minister's own definition concedes the book's rule: the Spirit cannot be claimed against God's Word; the Word is the highest authority. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.
  • Marvin Wittenberg, LLC meeting with Minneapolis, 2022-05-14 same doctrine, different spirit ▶ 02:16:46 transcript
    “Many things are the same, the same doctrine in many ways. But there's a different spirit. There's only one holy spirit.”
    Speaker says he is from 'a faraway congregation' and grew up in a divided house; a later speaker [03:03:54] attributes this personal account to 'Marv'; the only LLC-board Marv is Marv Wittenberg of Seattle.
  • Tomm Stewart, Spokane, 2022-06-12 admits 1980s 'wrong spirit' charge was false ▶ 00:18:31
    “We've made mistakes. We can look at the history of Christianity. And we can see how sometimes we've gotten goofed up and we really haven't done the truth or known the truth. We thought we did, but we didn't. Many of you have heard of something called the Kosolainen spirit. Do you remember hearing of that back in the 80s? Well, we thought it was real. It wasn't.”
    An LLC minister, from the pulpit, says the 1980s 'spirit' people were bound over never existed; 'Kosolainen' refers to kosolaisuus, a 1970s-80s movement in Finland.
  • Tomm Stewart, Spokane, 2022-06-12 admits wrongful binding over a nonexistent spirit ▶ 00:19:29
    “many people believed that this wrong spirit was true and that certain people were possessed by it well we made a mistake it wasn't true it never existed yet many people thought it did and followed the teachings of those who pushed it it was wrong ... There were even certain people that were bound. Do you remember that? And they were bound wrongly because we thought it was the truth and it wasn't. We can make mistakes. The Holy Spirit will never make a mistake. And if we goof up, the Holy Spirit will ultimately correct us. God's word is truth. The Holy Spirit can never err. I can and have, you can and have,”
    Three weeks before the 2 July 2022 expulsion vote, an LLC minister concedes people were 'bound wrongly' on a spirit charge and that the congregation's people can err.
  • Jim Frantti, LLC Annual Meeting, Rockford, 2022-07-02 defines the 'doctrine of the congregation' issue as Word-above-congregation ▶ 01:59:22 transcript
    “There somehow seems to be a wrong understanding from some of these, of the doctrine of the congregation. And we've heard speaking our speeches that seem to separate the word of God from the congregation and place the word above the congregation in some way. But our understanding is that the word and the congregation are inseparable.”
    The clearest LLC statement of what 'the doctrine of the congregation' means in the dispute: placing the Word above the congregation is the error.
  • SRK-LLC-SFC meeting article, SRK-LLC-SFC Meeting Article (English), 30 Sept 2022, 2022-09-30 'different understanding of the doctrine of the congregation' repeated, undefined document (PDF)
    “At that meeting, there was concern expressed that a different understanding of the doctrine of the congregation existed in the midst of the ... believers of North America. It was also openly acknowledged on both sides that there were two groups within North American Zion and that we cannot continue as a divided flock.”
    The joint SRK-LLC account repeats the phrase as the doctrinal concern without stating its content.
  • LLC Board of Directors, The Voice of Zion / llchurch.org, 'Spiritual Division in North American Zion Led to Heresy', 2023-01-01 lists 'the relationship between God's Word and God's congregation' among points discussed; discord dated to 2015 Summer Services ▶ source
    “Discord surfaced soon after the 2015 LLC Summer Services. In the years that followed, some alleged that the teaching of our Laestadian Lutheran Church (LLC) was wrong on a number of points of doctrine. ... Among points of doctrine discussed were justification, the office of the Holy Spirit, the relationship between the written and spoken Word of God, the relationship between God’s Word and God’s congregation, the essence and role of the congregation, the forgiveness of sins, confession, and the role of the congregation’s servants.”
    The LLC's own article dates the discord to the 2015 Summer Services (the Darwin Lake sermon) and lists topics, never a doctrinal finding.
  • Richard Nevala, Rockford, 2024-04-23 requiring heard absolution for peace is 'works' (agrees with the book p.87) ▶ 00:15:25
    “there were demands for certain kinds of forgiveness. And the only time that they're allowed to feel at peace was when they had heard from some believer that their sins were forgiven in Jesus' name and blood. And then that brings us down a road where at the end of our days, we're distressed and worried and will someone be there at the last moment at our bedside to preach the forgiveness of sins, otherwise we won't make it to heaven. It's works. It can be turned into works.”
    An LLC minister calls confining peace to heard absolution 'works', the same point the book makes (p.87) and the opposite of the 2020 Kallinen complaint.
  • Arvin Pirness, Letter to the CCLLC Board and Delegate, 2026-06-26 'doctrine of the congregation' named as the ground, undefined document (PDF)
    “The LLC Constitution teaches that the Kingdom of God is one and indivisible and that there is one saving faith, one baptism, and one Holy Christian Church. The understanding of the doctrine of the congregation was not acceptable to those who were deceived in the 2022 schism.”
    The only doctrinal area the 2026 letters name; the letter never states what the unacceptable 'understanding' was.
  • Ray Waaraniemi, LLC Annual Meeting, Rockford, 2026-07-03 Scripture and Luther set aside; Spirit-revelation as the ground ▶ 02:10:21 transcript
    “when your motions didn't receive a second, it didn't mean that everything you said and quoted was not believed and understood. [There were] many scripture portions, many portions of Luther's writings; these were not reasons why there weren't seconds to those motions. I think, as has been alluded to here, there's a long history of these discussions and differences, and we feel that these things have resulted in heresy. We believe that the Holy Spirit has revealed this to the living congregation of God.”
    The typed transcript names the chair as Ray Waaraniemi. Scripture 'not the reason'; the Spirit revealed heresy. Wording from a typed transcript of the meeting.

Spot a mistake in a quotation, a date or a name? Suggest a correction, or send a recording or document for the record.

Report a correction